A 'fase de saneamento e organização' no processo de estrutura cooperativo-democrática

• Autor(a) principal: Sant'Anna, Igor Pinheiro de
• Data de Publicação: 2015
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/8863
• topic: Civil Procedure; Cooperation; Coparticipation; Evaluative Formalism; Democratic process; Substantial contradictory; Democracy; Judicial dialogue; Shared sanitation; Organization of procedure; Preliminary hearing; Controversial points; Righteous Decision; Reasonable duration of the process; Formalismo-valorativo; Modelo Democrático de Processo; Contraditório substancial; Democracia; Diálogo judicial; Saneamento Compartilhado; Organização do processo; Audiência preliminar; Pontos controvertidos; Decisão justa; Razoável duração do processo; Processo Civil; Comparticipação; Direito Processual Civil; Processo civil; Contraditório (Direito); Cooperação; 340

This research aim to analyze the judicial sanitation phase of the process and its organization as a mechanism to enforce parties to participate on court’s decisions. Nowadays, the judicial system experiences the theoretical framework of formalism and evaluative, where the process itself is the methodological pole of the procedural science, strengthening it as a stage with three different actors. It is assumed that a democratic model of procedures is required to ensure the effective participation of the parties along the formation of the court’s decision. Moreover, the research dismembers the three main activities developed during the sanitation phase of the process: the conciliation attempt proclaimed by the judge; the correction of procedural defects added by the decisions regarding any other issues related to procedural disputes; and, at last, the organization of the probative instruction phase, with the proper fixing of the disputed issues. At the end, the research will conclude if the sanitation part of the process is the best moment to develop the judicial dialogue; and if it is possible to reach a fair decision in a reasonable time with the judicial dialog with the effective participation of the parties.