Avaliação de métodos de colheita no femento florestal em relevo acidentado
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/7658 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to evaluate, technically and economically, three harvesting methods used in forest development in rugged regions in the southern State of Espírito Santo, the data were collected from three rural properties located in the municipalities of Jerônimo Monteiro, São José do Footwear and Mimoso do Sul. The methods evaluated were non-outsourced harvesting and transportation on their own, partially outsourced own harvest and outsourced transportation and fully outsourced harvest and outsourced transportation. It was carried out a study of times and movements, calculation of productivity, operational efficiency, besides the costs of production of each method, as well as the identification of the profile of the workers. For the analysis of the obtained data, the descriptive statistic was used and the results referring to the operational phases were compared by the Student t test at the 5% probability level. The profile of the workers was composed of males, with an average age of 37 years, and a low level of schooling was evidenced. According to the study of times and movements the tipping activity is the one that demands more operational time of the activity cycles, followed by the processing. The operational efficiency of all methods was over 70%. The productivity obtained was higher for the outsourced method when compared to the other two methods evaluated in this study. The highest operating cost for cutting, extracting and stacking activity was found in the method itself. Therefore, it was concluded that there was a technical difference in the execution time of the activities and in the costs of the three evaluated methods, indicating that the partially outsourced method is the best option to be adopted. |
id |
UFES_30b79e171a9db750ed535f2268a12d7a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufes.br:10/7658 |
network_acronym_str |
UFES |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) |
repository_id_str |
2108 |
spelling |
Chichorro, José FranklimMinette, Luciano JoséSantos, Leandro Soares dosSchettino, StanleyFiedler, Nilton Cesar2018-08-01T22:35:46Z2018-08-012018-08-01T22:35:46Z2017-07-18The objective of this study was to evaluate, technically and economically, three harvesting methods used in forest development in rugged regions in the southern State of Espírito Santo, the data were collected from three rural properties located in the municipalities of Jerônimo Monteiro, São José do Footwear and Mimoso do Sul. The methods evaluated were non-outsourced harvesting and transportation on their own, partially outsourced own harvest and outsourced transportation and fully outsourced harvest and outsourced transportation. It was carried out a study of times and movements, calculation of productivity, operational efficiency, besides the costs of production of each method, as well as the identification of the profile of the workers. For the analysis of the obtained data, the descriptive statistic was used and the results referring to the operational phases were compared by the Student t test at the 5% probability level. The profile of the workers was composed of males, with an average age of 37 years, and a low level of schooling was evidenced. According to the study of times and movements the tipping activity is the one that demands more operational time of the activity cycles, followed by the processing. The operational efficiency of all methods was over 70%. The productivity obtained was higher for the outsourced method when compared to the other two methods evaluated in this study. The highest operating cost for cutting, extracting and stacking activity was found in the method itself. Therefore, it was concluded that there was a technical difference in the execution time of the activities and in the costs of the three evaluated methods, indicating that the partially outsourced method is the best option to be adopted.Objetivou-se neste estudo, avaliar técnica e economicamente três métodos de colheita utilizados no fomento florestal, em regiões de relevo acidentado no sul do Estado do Espírito Santo, os dados foram coletados em três propriedades rurais localizadas nos municípios de Jerônimo Monteiro, São José do Calçado e Mimoso do Sul. Os métodos avaliados foram, não terceirizado colheita e transporte por conta própria, parcialmente terceirizado colheita própria e transporte terceirizado e totalmente terceirizado colheita e transporte terceirizado. Foi realizado estudo de tempos e movimentos, cálculo da produtividade, eficiência operacional, além dos custos de produção de cada método, como também a identificação do perfil dos trabalhadores. Para análise dos dados obtidos, foi utilizada a estatística descritiva e os resultados referentes às fases operacionais foram comparados pelo teste t de Student ao nível de 5% de probabilidade. O perfil dos trabalhadores foi constituído pelo gênero masculino, com média de idade de 37 anos, e foi evidenciado baixo grau de escolaridade. De acordo com o estudo de tempos e movimentos a atividade de tombamento é a que demanda mais tempo operacional dos ciclos de atividades, seguido do processamento. A eficiência operacional de todos os métodos foi superior a 70%. A produtividade obtida foi maior para o método terceirizado se comparado com os outros dois métodos avaliados nesse estudo. O maior custo operacional para atividade de corte, extração e empilhamento, foi encontrado no método próprio. Com isso, concluiu-se que houve diferença técnica, no tempo de execução das atividades e nos custos dos três métodos avaliados, indicando que o método parcialmente terceirizado é a melhor opção a ser adotada.TextSANTOS, Leandro Soares. Avaliação de métodos de colheita no fomento florestal em relevo acidentado. 2017. 49 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Florestais) – Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Jerônimo Monteiro, 2017.http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/7658porUniversidade Federal do Espírito SantoMestrado em Ciências FlorestaisPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências FlorestaisUFESBRCentro de Ciências Agrárias e EngenhariasForest managementForest cuttingForestry extractionForestry techniques and operationsTécnicas e operações florestaisColheita florestalExtração FlorestalManejo florestalCorte florestalMadeira - TransporteRecursos Florestais e Engenharia Florestal630Avaliação de métodos de colheita no femento florestal em relevo acidentadoEvaluation of harvesting methods in the forest development In rough reliefinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)instname:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)instacron:UFESORIGINALLeandroSoaresdosSantos-2017-trabalho.pdfapplication/pdf1284695http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/6c206552-2f1b-46c7-8218-ea0867a9be51/downloada1c6cedf9fab2bb6ef5979edcef11298MD5110/76582024-06-21 15:46:33.624oai:repositorio.ufes.br:10/7658http://repositorio.ufes.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ufes.br/oai/requestopendoar:21082024-07-11T14:41:52.960880Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação de métodos de colheita no femento florestal em relevo acidentado |
dc.title.alternative.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of harvesting methods in the forest development In rough relief |
title |
Avaliação de métodos de colheita no femento florestal em relevo acidentado |
spellingShingle |
Avaliação de métodos de colheita no femento florestal em relevo acidentado Santos, Leandro Soares dos Forest management Forest cutting Forestry extraction Forestry techniques and operations Técnicas e operações florestais Colheita florestal Extração Florestal Manejo florestal Corte florestal Madeira - Transporte Recursos Florestais e Engenharia Florestal 630 |
title_short |
Avaliação de métodos de colheita no femento florestal em relevo acidentado |
title_full |
Avaliação de métodos de colheita no femento florestal em relevo acidentado |
title_fullStr |
Avaliação de métodos de colheita no femento florestal em relevo acidentado |
title_full_unstemmed |
Avaliação de métodos de colheita no femento florestal em relevo acidentado |
title_sort |
Avaliação de métodos de colheita no femento florestal em relevo acidentado |
author |
Santos, Leandro Soares dos |
author_facet |
Santos, Leandro Soares dos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Chichorro, José Franklim |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Minette, Luciano José |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Leandro Soares dos |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Schettino, Stanley |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Fiedler, Nilton Cesar |
contributor_str_mv |
Chichorro, José Franklim Minette, Luciano José Schettino, Stanley Fiedler, Nilton Cesar |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Forest management Forest cutting Forestry extraction Forestry techniques and operations |
topic |
Forest management Forest cutting Forestry extraction Forestry techniques and operations Técnicas e operações florestais Colheita florestal Extração Florestal Manejo florestal Corte florestal Madeira - Transporte Recursos Florestais e Engenharia Florestal 630 |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Técnicas e operações florestais Colheita florestal Extração Florestal Manejo florestal Corte florestal Madeira - Transporte |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
Recursos Florestais e Engenharia Florestal |
dc.subject.udc.none.fl_str_mv |
630 |
description |
The objective of this study was to evaluate, technically and economically, three harvesting methods used in forest development in rugged regions in the southern State of Espírito Santo, the data were collected from three rural properties located in the municipalities of Jerônimo Monteiro, São José do Footwear and Mimoso do Sul. The methods evaluated were non-outsourced harvesting and transportation on their own, partially outsourced own harvest and outsourced transportation and fully outsourced harvest and outsourced transportation. It was carried out a study of times and movements, calculation of productivity, operational efficiency, besides the costs of production of each method, as well as the identification of the profile of the workers. For the analysis of the obtained data, the descriptive statistic was used and the results referring to the operational phases were compared by the Student t test at the 5% probability level. The profile of the workers was composed of males, with an average age of 37 years, and a low level of schooling was evidenced. According to the study of times and movements the tipping activity is the one that demands more operational time of the activity cycles, followed by the processing. The operational efficiency of all methods was over 70%. The productivity obtained was higher for the outsourced method when compared to the other two methods evaluated in this study. The highest operating cost for cutting, extracting and stacking activity was found in the method itself. Therefore, it was concluded that there was a technical difference in the execution time of the activities and in the costs of the three evaluated methods, indicating that the partially outsourced method is the best option to be adopted. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-18 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-01T22:35:46Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-01 2018-08-01T22:35:46Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
SANTOS, Leandro Soares. Avaliação de métodos de colheita no fomento florestal em relevo acidentado. 2017. 49 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Florestais) – Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Jerônimo Monteiro, 2017. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/7658 |
identifier_str_mv |
SANTOS, Leandro Soares. Avaliação de métodos de colheita no fomento florestal em relevo acidentado. 2017. 49 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Florestais) – Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Jerônimo Monteiro, 2017. |
url |
http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/7658 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
Text |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo Mestrado em Ciências Florestais |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Florestais |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFES |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Ciências Agrárias e Engenharias |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo Mestrado em Ciências Florestais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) instname:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) instacron:UFES |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) |
instacron_str |
UFES |
institution |
UFES |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/6c206552-2f1b-46c7-8218-ea0867a9be51/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
a1c6cedf9fab2bb6ef5979edcef11298 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1813022633683320832 |