AVALIAÇÃO DA PERCEPÇÃO DA QUALIDADE DO AMBIENTE INTERNO POR TRABALHADORES DE ESCRITÓRIOS DURANTE A PANDEMIA

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ghidetti, Bianca Valadares
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/15356
Resumo: The COVID-19 pandemic forced office workers to carry out their work activities remotely from their homes for an extended period of time. Faced with this unexpected situation, emerged the need to know the characteristics of this new work environment and discover the level of users satisfaction with factors related to the quality of the internal environment. In order to do that, the research aimed to recognize the intensity of the main factors influence for the institutional environment and the residential work environment, in the context before the pandemic and current to the pandemic, according to the workers perception. The research methodology was divided into three stages: (1) definition of the object of study, selection and analysis of the building; (2) perception survey through the application of questionnaires; and (3) data analysis and elaboration of results. In the acoustic comfort, the noise sources that stood out in both environments for interfering with the ability to concentrate were: conversation and human activity. The thermal environment of JFES was perceived by most respondents as slightly cold and the residential environment predominantly ranged from neutral to very hot. In the air quality parameter, most respondents reported not feeling uncomfortable in both environments. The parameter of visual comfort showed high votes of satisfaction for the items view, natural light and general lighting for both environments. The last parameter analyzed was the layout and the satisfaction levels that presented the best evaluation were: finishes for two environments, interaction and furniture for JFES and visual privacy for the home office. In the result of the average ranking, the two environments had high ratings, with the average general perception higher for the residential environment. In the institutional environment, the variable that presented the most significant correlation with general satisfaction was: natural light. In the residential environment it was: individual space. No significant statistically correlation was found between the satisfaction and the individuals age group, but it was established between gender and satisfaction with the view/landscape and between occupation of the environment and sound privacy in the residential environment.
id UFES_da6fe9648d4858b8e6a0d4127e670596
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufes.br:10/15356
network_acronym_str UFES
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
repository_id_str 2108
spelling 139Rodrigues, Edna Aparecida Nicohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0905-1723http://lattes.cnpq.br/2506902397204906Ghidetti, Bianca Valadareshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1443-9618http://lattes.cnpq.br/7858506438360436Laranja, Andréa Coelhohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6729-0653http://lattes.cnpq.br/5555191350817421Pagel, Erica Coelhohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4484-1963http://lattes.cnpq.br/27305864631513392024-05-30T00:50:23Z2024-05-30T00:50:23Z2021-12-17The COVID-19 pandemic forced office workers to carry out their work activities remotely from their homes for an extended period of time. Faced with this unexpected situation, emerged the need to know the characteristics of this new work environment and discover the level of users satisfaction with factors related to the quality of the internal environment. In order to do that, the research aimed to recognize the intensity of the main factors influence for the institutional environment and the residential work environment, in the context before the pandemic and current to the pandemic, according to the workers perception. The research methodology was divided into three stages: (1) definition of the object of study, selection and analysis of the building; (2) perception survey through the application of questionnaires; and (3) data analysis and elaboration of results. In the acoustic comfort, the noise sources that stood out in both environments for interfering with the ability to concentrate were: conversation and human activity. The thermal environment of JFES was perceived by most respondents as slightly cold and the residential environment predominantly ranged from neutral to very hot. In the air quality parameter, most respondents reported not feeling uncomfortable in both environments. The parameter of visual comfort showed high votes of satisfaction for the items view, natural light and general lighting for both environments. The last parameter analyzed was the layout and the satisfaction levels that presented the best evaluation were: finishes for two environments, interaction and furniture for JFES and visual privacy for the home office. In the result of the average ranking, the two environments had high ratings, with the average general perception higher for the residential environment. In the institutional environment, the variable that presented the most significant correlation with general satisfaction was: natural light. In the residential environment it was: individual space. No significant statistically correlation was found between the satisfaction and the individuals age group, but it was established between gender and satisfaction with the view/landscape and between occupation of the environment and sound privacy in the residential environment.A pandemia por COVID-19 forçou funcionários de escritórios a realizarem suas atividades de trabalho remotamente a partir de suas residências durante um longo período. Diante dessa situação inesperada, surgiu a necessidade de conhecer as características desse novo ambiente de trabalho e descobrir o nível de satisfação dos usuários com fatores relacionados à qualidade do ambiente interno. Para isso, a pesquisa teve como objetivo principal reconhecer a influência dos principais fatores para o ambiente institucional e para o ambiente residencial de trabalho, nos contextos anterior e atual à pandemia, por meio da percepção dos funcionários. A metodologia de pesquisa foi dividida em três etapas: (1) definição do objeto de estudo, seleção e levantamento da edificação; (2) realização da pesquisa de percepção por meio da aplicação de questionários; e (3) análise de dados e elaboração dos resultados. Sobre o conforto acústico, as fontes de ruído que se destacaram em ambos os ambientes por interferirem na capacidade de concentração foram: a conversa e a atividade humana. A sensação térmica da JFES foi percebida pela maior parte dos respondentes como levemente fria e do ambiente residencial variou, predominantemente, numa escala de neutra a muito quente. No parâmetro da qualidade do ar, a maior parte dos respondentes informaram não sentir incômodos em ambos os ambientes. O parâmetro de conforto visual apresentou elevados votos de satisfação para os itens vista, luz natural e iluminação geral para os dois ambientes. O último parâmetro analisado foi o layout e os níveis de satisfação que apresentaram a melhor avaliação foram: acabamentos para dois ambientes, interação e mobiliário para a JFES e privacidade visual para a residência. No resultado do ranking médio, os dois ambientes tiveram elevadas avaliações, sendo a percepção geral mais positiva no ambiente residencial. No ambiente institucional, a variável que apresentou correlação mais significativa com a satisfação geral foi: luz natural. No ambiente residencial foi: espaço individual. Não foi encontrada correlação estatística significativa entre a satisfação e a faixa etária do indivíduo, porém foi estabelecida entre gênero e a satisfação com a vista/paisagem e entre a ocupação do ambiente e a privacidade sonora no ambiente residencial.Texthttp://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/15356porUniversidade Federal do Espírito SantoMestrado em Arquitetura e UrbanismoPrograma de Pós- Graduação em Arquitetura e UrbanismoUFESBRCentro de Artessubject.br-rjbnArquitetura e UrbanismoQualidade do ambiente internoIEQpandemiaescritóriohome officeAVALIAÇÃO DA PERCEPÇÃO DA QUALIDADE DO AMBIENTE INTERNO POR TRABALHADORES DE ESCRITÓRIOS DURANTE A PANDEMIAtitle.alternativeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)instname:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)instacron:UFESORIGINALBiancaValadaresGhidetti-2021-dissertacao.pdfapplication/pdf4866177http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/15b4374d-c3cb-4346-ac3a-c2a87a151f28/download2b0938e3f41534c24abf2df77060445eMD5110/153562024-09-16 10:26:10.509oai:repositorio.ufes.br:10/15356http://repositorio.ufes.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ufes.br/oai/requestopendoar:21082024-10-15T18:01:06.904269Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv AVALIAÇÃO DA PERCEPÇÃO DA QUALIDADE DO AMBIENTE INTERNO POR TRABALHADORES DE ESCRITÓRIOS DURANTE A PANDEMIA
dc.title.alternative.none.fl_str_mv title.alternative
title AVALIAÇÃO DA PERCEPÇÃO DA QUALIDADE DO AMBIENTE INTERNO POR TRABALHADORES DE ESCRITÓRIOS DURANTE A PANDEMIA
spellingShingle AVALIAÇÃO DA PERCEPÇÃO DA QUALIDADE DO AMBIENTE INTERNO POR TRABALHADORES DE ESCRITÓRIOS DURANTE A PANDEMIA
Ghidetti, Bianca Valadares
Arquitetura e Urbanismo
Qualidade do ambiente interno
IEQ
pandemia
escritório
home office
subject.br-rjbn
title_short AVALIAÇÃO DA PERCEPÇÃO DA QUALIDADE DO AMBIENTE INTERNO POR TRABALHADORES DE ESCRITÓRIOS DURANTE A PANDEMIA
title_full AVALIAÇÃO DA PERCEPÇÃO DA QUALIDADE DO AMBIENTE INTERNO POR TRABALHADORES DE ESCRITÓRIOS DURANTE A PANDEMIA
title_fullStr AVALIAÇÃO DA PERCEPÇÃO DA QUALIDADE DO AMBIENTE INTERNO POR TRABALHADORES DE ESCRITÓRIOS DURANTE A PANDEMIA
title_full_unstemmed AVALIAÇÃO DA PERCEPÇÃO DA QUALIDADE DO AMBIENTE INTERNO POR TRABALHADORES DE ESCRITÓRIOS DURANTE A PANDEMIA
title_sort AVALIAÇÃO DA PERCEPÇÃO DA QUALIDADE DO AMBIENTE INTERNO POR TRABALHADORES DE ESCRITÓRIOS DURANTE A PANDEMIA
author Ghidetti, Bianca Valadares
author_facet Ghidetti, Bianca Valadares
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorID.none.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1443-9618
dc.contributor.authorLattes.none.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7858506438360436
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Edna Aparecida Nico
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0905-1723
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2506902397204906
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ghidetti, Bianca Valadares
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Laranja, Andréa Coelho
dc.contributor.referee1ID.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6729-0653
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5555191350817421
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Pagel, Erica Coelho
dc.contributor.referee2ID.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4484-1963
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2730586463151339
contributor_str_mv Rodrigues, Edna Aparecida Nico
Laranja, Andréa Coelho
Pagel, Erica Coelho
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv Arquitetura e Urbanismo
topic Arquitetura e Urbanismo
Qualidade do ambiente interno
IEQ
pandemia
escritório
home office
subject.br-rjbn
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Qualidade do ambiente interno
IEQ
pandemia
escritório
home office
dc.subject.br-rjbn.none.fl_str_mv subject.br-rjbn
description The COVID-19 pandemic forced office workers to carry out their work activities remotely from their homes for an extended period of time. Faced with this unexpected situation, emerged the need to know the characteristics of this new work environment and discover the level of users satisfaction with factors related to the quality of the internal environment. In order to do that, the research aimed to recognize the intensity of the main factors influence for the institutional environment and the residential work environment, in the context before the pandemic and current to the pandemic, according to the workers perception. The research methodology was divided into three stages: (1) definition of the object of study, selection and analysis of the building; (2) perception survey through the application of questionnaires; and (3) data analysis and elaboration of results. In the acoustic comfort, the noise sources that stood out in both environments for interfering with the ability to concentrate were: conversation and human activity. The thermal environment of JFES was perceived by most respondents as slightly cold and the residential environment predominantly ranged from neutral to very hot. In the air quality parameter, most respondents reported not feeling uncomfortable in both environments. The parameter of visual comfort showed high votes of satisfaction for the items view, natural light and general lighting for both environments. The last parameter analyzed was the layout and the satisfaction levels that presented the best evaluation were: finishes for two environments, interaction and furniture for JFES and visual privacy for the home office. In the result of the average ranking, the two environments had high ratings, with the average general perception higher for the residential environment. In the institutional environment, the variable that presented the most significant correlation with general satisfaction was: natural light. In the residential environment it was: individual space. No significant statistically correlation was found between the satisfaction and the individuals age group, but it was established between gender and satisfaction with the view/landscape and between occupation of the environment and sound privacy in the residential environment.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021-12-17
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2024-05-30T00:50:23Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2024-05-30T00:50:23Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/15356
url http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/15356
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv Text
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
Mestrado em Arquitetura e Urbanismo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós- Graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFES
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Centro de Artes
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
Mestrado em Arquitetura e Urbanismo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
instname:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
instacron:UFES
instname_str Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
instacron_str UFES
institution UFES
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/15b4374d-c3cb-4346-ac3a-c2a87a151f28/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 2b0938e3f41534c24abf2df77060445e
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1813022568745009152