Poderes instrutórios do juiz no processo de conhecimento
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/2677 |
Resumo: | Evidence law constitutes a procedural institute of great relevance, since it is designated to demonstrate the judge about the procedural truth which will serve as a basis for his sureness. Considering that the contemporary procedural law has been developing in order to give process the task of not only applying the material rights, but also applying the constitutional axiological load, the role of the judge in this intent has been very important, since it has been given to him – the judge – powers until then non-existent on procedural law – since this procedural law was always destined to solve private relations –, to give an answer to what doctrine has been calling “procedural publicization”. The probational field has been through great impact because of this paradigm change, and the judge, when it concerns to gather the proofs, started to have an active role when confronted to the eventual obstacles in the search of the truth. It is this probative initiative that will be subject to analysis, in its main meanings, with a different view of the contemporary position of the Brazilian doctrine. The main goal is to make jurists start to understand the judge’s finding of facts power in another way, in order to heat up the debates over the subject. The methodology applied, as a scientific method, was the deductive-dialectic one and, as an approach method, the descriptive historicexploratory of a quantum-qualitative bibliographical-documental method (context analysis). The research was developed basically by means of theoretical and literary revision argumentation, of national and foreign written works, since, as it was already mentioned, in the Brazilian judiciary system, when it concerns to the evidence field, it is constituted by the junction of the civil and common law systems. The results gathered were, by means of a critical analysis of the doctrine about the subject, the establishment of new solutions to the most intriguing questions. The conclusion of the studies was to demystify the limits imposed nowadays to the judge’s active role and to demonstrate that his finding of facts powers are very wide and many times decisive to an adequate jurisdictional use, in the new constitutional forms. |
id |
UFES_e10431285acd898da4c5a28fe7538360 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufes.br:10/2677 |
network_acronym_str |
UFES |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) |
repository_id_str |
2108 |
spelling |
Jorge, Flávio CheimXavier, Trícia NavarroSchneider, EdgarPinho, Humberto Dalla Bernardina de2016-08-29T11:13:07Z2016-07-112016-08-29T11:13:07Z2008-07-01Evidence law constitutes a procedural institute of great relevance, since it is designated to demonstrate the judge about the procedural truth which will serve as a basis for his sureness. Considering that the contemporary procedural law has been developing in order to give process the task of not only applying the material rights, but also applying the constitutional axiological load, the role of the judge in this intent has been very important, since it has been given to him – the judge – powers until then non-existent on procedural law – since this procedural law was always destined to solve private relations –, to give an answer to what doctrine has been calling “procedural publicization”. The probational field has been through great impact because of this paradigm change, and the judge, when it concerns to gather the proofs, started to have an active role when confronted to the eventual obstacles in the search of the truth. It is this probative initiative that will be subject to analysis, in its main meanings, with a different view of the contemporary position of the Brazilian doctrine. The main goal is to make jurists start to understand the judge’s finding of facts power in another way, in order to heat up the debates over the subject. The methodology applied, as a scientific method, was the deductive-dialectic one and, as an approach method, the descriptive historicexploratory of a quantum-qualitative bibliographical-documental method (context analysis). The research was developed basically by means of theoretical and literary revision argumentation, of national and foreign written works, since, as it was already mentioned, in the Brazilian judiciary system, when it concerns to the evidence field, it is constituted by the junction of the civil and common law systems. The results gathered were, by means of a critical analysis of the doctrine about the subject, the establishment of new solutions to the most intriguing questions. The conclusion of the studies was to demystify the limits imposed nowadays to the judge’s active role and to demonstrate that his finding of facts powers are very wide and many times decisive to an adequate jurisdictional use, in the new constitutional forms.O direito probatório constitui um instituto processual de grande relevância, pois destina-se a demonstrar ao magistrado a verdade processual que servirá de base para a sua convicção. Considerando que o direito processual contemporâneo vem evoluindo para conferir ao processo a tarefa não só de realização do direito material, mas também de aplicação da carga axiológica constitucional, o papel do juiz nesse intento passou a ter grande importância, tendo-lhe sido conferidos poderes até então não existentes no âmbito do processo civil - já que destinado a resolver relações privadas - , para atender ao que a doutrina denomina de publicização do processo. O campo probatório sofreu forte impacto dessa mudança de paradigma, sendo que o juiz, em tema de prova, passou a ter uma conduta ativa frente aos eventuais obstáculos à busca da verdade. É essa iniciativa probatória o objeto deste estudo, em suas pricnipais acepções, com uma visão distinta do posicionamento atual da doutrina brasileira. Objetiva fazer com que os juristas passem a enxergar o poder instrutório do juiz sob outro ângulao, a fim de aquecer os debates em torno da matéria. O método científico empregado o o dedutivo-dialético, e o método de abordagem o histórico e exploratóriio descritivo de base quanto-qualitativa documental bibliográfico (análise de contexto externo). A pesquisa foi desenvolvida basicamente por meio de argumentação teórica e revisão literária de obras nacionais e estrangeiras, já que o sistema jurídico brasileiro, no que pertine às provas, é constituído pela junção de vertentes pertencentes à civil law e à common law. O resultado obtido foi, por meio de uma análise crítica da doutrina sobre o assunto, o estabelecimento de novas soluções para as questões mais intrigantes. A conclusão do estudo desmistifica os atuais limites impostos à conduta ativa do juiz e demonstra que seus poderes instrutórios são amplíssimos e muitas vezes decisivos para a adequada prestação jurisdicional, nos atuais moldes constitucionais.TextXAVIER, Trícia Navarro. Poderes instrutórios do juiz no processo de conhecimento. 2008. 173 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito Processual) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito Processual, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, 2012.http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/2677porUniversidade Federal do Espírito SantoMestrado em Direito ProcessualPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Direito ProcessualUFESBRCentro de Ciências Jurídicas e EconômicasEvidencePowerJudgeJuizProva (Direito).Poderes (Direito).Juízes.Direito Processual Civil340Poderes instrutórios do juiz no processo de conhecimentoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)instname:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)instacron:UFESORIGINALtese_2580_Dissertação Tricia Navarro.pdfapplication/pdf868318http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/936b3d73-fed6-44cc-bcf1-4ced14f419c7/download7ea21f142d0126bd2e9d652ead9f2473MD5110/26772024-07-02 21:30:43.737oai:repositorio.ufes.br:10/2677http://repositorio.ufes.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ufes.br/oai/requestopendoar:21082024-07-11T14:40:36.954586Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Poderes instrutórios do juiz no processo de conhecimento |
title |
Poderes instrutórios do juiz no processo de conhecimento |
spellingShingle |
Poderes instrutórios do juiz no processo de conhecimento Xavier, Trícia Navarro Evidence Power Judge Juiz Direito Processual Civil Prova (Direito). Poderes (Direito). Juízes. 340 |
title_short |
Poderes instrutórios do juiz no processo de conhecimento |
title_full |
Poderes instrutórios do juiz no processo de conhecimento |
title_fullStr |
Poderes instrutórios do juiz no processo de conhecimento |
title_full_unstemmed |
Poderes instrutórios do juiz no processo de conhecimento |
title_sort |
Poderes instrutórios do juiz no processo de conhecimento |
author |
Xavier, Trícia Navarro |
author_facet |
Xavier, Trícia Navarro |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Jorge, Flávio Cheim |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Xavier, Trícia Navarro |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Schneider, Edgar |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Pinho, Humberto Dalla Bernardina de |
contributor_str_mv |
Jorge, Flávio Cheim Schneider, Edgar Pinho, Humberto Dalla Bernardina de |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Evidence Power Judge |
topic |
Evidence Power Judge Juiz Direito Processual Civil Prova (Direito). Poderes (Direito). Juízes. 340 |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Juiz |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
Direito Processual Civil |
dc.subject.br-rjbn.none.fl_str_mv |
Prova (Direito). Poderes (Direito). Juízes. |
dc.subject.udc.none.fl_str_mv |
340 |
description |
Evidence law constitutes a procedural institute of great relevance, since it is designated to demonstrate the judge about the procedural truth which will serve as a basis for his sureness. Considering that the contemporary procedural law has been developing in order to give process the task of not only applying the material rights, but also applying the constitutional axiological load, the role of the judge in this intent has been very important, since it has been given to him – the judge – powers until then non-existent on procedural law – since this procedural law was always destined to solve private relations –, to give an answer to what doctrine has been calling “procedural publicization”. The probational field has been through great impact because of this paradigm change, and the judge, when it concerns to gather the proofs, started to have an active role when confronted to the eventual obstacles in the search of the truth. It is this probative initiative that will be subject to analysis, in its main meanings, with a different view of the contemporary position of the Brazilian doctrine. The main goal is to make jurists start to understand the judge’s finding of facts power in another way, in order to heat up the debates over the subject. The methodology applied, as a scientific method, was the deductive-dialectic one and, as an approach method, the descriptive historicexploratory of a quantum-qualitative bibliographical-documental method (context analysis). The research was developed basically by means of theoretical and literary revision argumentation, of national and foreign written works, since, as it was already mentioned, in the Brazilian judiciary system, when it concerns to the evidence field, it is constituted by the junction of the civil and common law systems. The results gathered were, by means of a critical analysis of the doctrine about the subject, the establishment of new solutions to the most intriguing questions. The conclusion of the studies was to demystify the limits imposed nowadays to the judge’s active role and to demonstrate that his finding of facts powers are very wide and many times decisive to an adequate jurisdictional use, in the new constitutional forms. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2008-07-01 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-29T11:13:07Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2016-07-11 2016-08-29T11:13:07Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
XAVIER, Trícia Navarro. Poderes instrutórios do juiz no processo de conhecimento. 2008. 173 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito Processual) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito Processual, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, 2012. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/2677 |
identifier_str_mv |
XAVIER, Trícia Navarro. Poderes instrutórios do juiz no processo de conhecimento. 2008. 173 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito Processual) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito Processual, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, 2012. |
url |
http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/2677 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
Text |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo Mestrado em Direito Processual |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito Processual |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFES |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Ciências Jurídicas e Econômicas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo Mestrado em Direito Processual |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) instname:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) instacron:UFES |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) |
instacron_str |
UFES |
institution |
UFES |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/936b3d73-fed6-44cc-bcf1-4ced14f419c7/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
7ea21f142d0126bd2e9d652ead9f2473 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1813022630370869248 |