Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Antropolítica (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/50104 |
Resumo: | The so called Rural Studies are networks of social scientists between academic sectors, social mouvements and NGOs in Brazil. This network make researchs about rural-urban transformations in Brazilian society: conflicts about land, water, agro-food systems, family farmer policies, indigenous peoples, quilombolas etc. Although its great advancements, there is a gap in Rural Studies: the elites and the rulling class. This article discuss about this part of the brazilian rural society – farmers, agrobussinessman, cattle breeders. At first, make critics about the concept of “latifundiários”. This word is linked to debates inside the Brazilian Communist Party in 1950s-1960s. Because its root the concept of “latifúndio” fits better in political fights and loses his analytical capacity. The second part shows ambiguities in the theme of the social change and rural society in classical views of the brazilian sociology (1930-1960). After this, shows the newest generations of Rural Studies after 1970s and their themes: the “wicked alliance” between great land owners and capitalist modernization; the political representations of the agribusiness and rulling rural class and ethnographical studies in the area of the old “engenhos“, the sugar cane zone at Brazilian northeast. At the last section the article purposes one anaytical term – richs of the countryside – to construct ways to guide a new research agenda. At this point its possible to overcome the ambiguities and gaps about the rural elites and rulling class in Rural Studies. Key-words:Elites, rulling class, Rural Studies, richs of the countryside |
id |
UFF-18_fc46fcd7b9967313422ea21f23392b17 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/50104 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-18 |
network_name_str |
Antropolítica (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do BrasilElitesClasses dominantesEstudos ruraisRicos do campoThe so called Rural Studies are networks of social scientists between academic sectors, social mouvements and NGOs in Brazil. This network make researchs about rural-urban transformations in Brazilian society: conflicts about land, water, agro-food systems, family farmer policies, indigenous peoples, quilombolas etc. Although its great advancements, there is a gap in Rural Studies: the elites and the rulling class. This article discuss about this part of the brazilian rural society – farmers, agrobussinessman, cattle breeders. At first, make critics about the concept of “latifundiários”. This word is linked to debates inside the Brazilian Communist Party in 1950s-1960s. Because its root the concept of “latifúndio” fits better in political fights and loses his analytical capacity. The second part shows ambiguities in the theme of the social change and rural society in classical views of the brazilian sociology (1930-1960). After this, shows the newest generations of Rural Studies after 1970s and their themes: the “wicked alliance” between great land owners and capitalist modernization; the political representations of the agribusiness and rulling rural class and ethnographical studies in the area of the old “engenhos“, the sugar cane zone at Brazilian northeast. At the last section the article purposes one anaytical term – richs of the countryside – to construct ways to guide a new research agenda. At this point its possible to overcome the ambiguities and gaps about the rural elites and rulling class in Rural Studies. Key-words:Elites, rulling class, Rural Studies, richs of the countrysideOs Estudos Rurais são uma rede de cientistas sociais e de áreas afins que pesquisam temas no mundo rural brasileiro: da concentração da terra e recursos hídricos, conflitos entre populações locais e projetos de impactos socioambientais até políticas públicas voltadas para o meio rural. Os Estudos Rurais têm espaço em congressos nacionais e internacionais, além de parcerias e intercâmbios entre departamentos de universidades, ONGs e movimentos sociais. Neste artigo, proponho um debate sobre uma zona difusa dentro dessa consolidação de pesquisas dos Estudos Rurais: o tema das elites e classes dominantes e a construção de agendas de pesquisa acerca dos latifundiários, ruralistas, estancieiros, empresários rurais, pecuaristas, usineiros dentre outros. Para tanto, utilizo o seguinte roteiro: primeiro faço uma revisão dos debates acerca do termo “latifúndio” em teses clássicas do mundo rural; depois analiso a forma como os clássicos das ciências sociais no Brasil (1930-1960) abordaram a elite e o mundo rural. Aqui, também, a revisão é direcionada para as novas gerações de clássicos dos Estudos Rurais (de 1970 até o início do século XXI) e seus temas: pesquisas sobre a “perversa aliança” entre a grande propriedade e a modernização capitalista rural; temas dos setores patronais ruralistas do agronegócio e, por fim, etnografias feitas na zona da mata canavieira nordestina que alcançou o mundo das elites rurais. Revisando essas gerações de clássicos, proponho construir a categoria “ricos do campo” para firmar uma agenda de pesquisa atualizada sobre elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense2021-12-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/5010410.22409/antropolitica2021.i53.a50104Antropolítica - Revista Contemporânea de Antropologia; n. 53 (2021): SET/OUT/NOV/DEZ2179-73311414-737810.22409/antropolitica2021.5353reponame:Antropolítica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/50104/30513https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/50104/30514Copyright (c) 2021 Valdênio Freitas Meneses (UFCG)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMeneses, Valdênio Freitas2021-12-02T19:05:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/50104Revistahttp://www.revistas.uff.br/index.php/antropoliticaPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/oaiperiodicos@proppi.uff.br||antropoliticauff@gmail.com||lauragraziela@gmail.com2179-73312179-7331opendoar:2021-12-02T19:05:49Antropolítica (Online) - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil |
title |
Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil |
spellingShingle |
Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil Meneses, Valdênio Freitas Elites Classes dominantes Estudos rurais Ricos do campo |
title_short |
Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil |
title_full |
Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil |
title_fullStr |
Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil |
title_sort |
Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil |
author |
Meneses, Valdênio Freitas |
author_facet |
Meneses, Valdênio Freitas |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Meneses, Valdênio Freitas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Elites Classes dominantes Estudos rurais Ricos do campo |
topic |
Elites Classes dominantes Estudos rurais Ricos do campo |
description |
The so called Rural Studies are networks of social scientists between academic sectors, social mouvements and NGOs in Brazil. This network make researchs about rural-urban transformations in Brazilian society: conflicts about land, water, agro-food systems, family farmer policies, indigenous peoples, quilombolas etc. Although its great advancements, there is a gap in Rural Studies: the elites and the rulling class. This article discuss about this part of the brazilian rural society – farmers, agrobussinessman, cattle breeders. At first, make critics about the concept of “latifundiários”. This word is linked to debates inside the Brazilian Communist Party in 1950s-1960s. Because its root the concept of “latifúndio” fits better in political fights and loses his analytical capacity. The second part shows ambiguities in the theme of the social change and rural society in classical views of the brazilian sociology (1930-1960). After this, shows the newest generations of Rural Studies after 1970s and their themes: the “wicked alliance” between great land owners and capitalist modernization; the political representations of the agribusiness and rulling rural class and ethnographical studies in the area of the old “engenhos“, the sugar cane zone at Brazilian northeast. At the last section the article purposes one anaytical term – richs of the countryside – to construct ways to guide a new research agenda. At this point its possible to overcome the ambiguities and gaps about the rural elites and rulling class in Rural Studies. Key-words:Elites, rulling class, Rural Studies, richs of the countryside |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/50104 10.22409/antropolitica2021.i53.a50104 |
url |
https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/50104 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22409/antropolitica2021.i53.a50104 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/50104/30513 https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/50104/30514 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Valdênio Freitas Meneses (UFCG) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Valdênio Freitas Meneses (UFCG) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Antropolítica - Revista Contemporânea de Antropologia; n. 53 (2021): SET/OUT/NOV/DEZ 2179-7331 1414-7378 10.22409/antropolitica2021.5353 reponame:Antropolítica (Online) instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Antropolítica (Online) |
collection |
Antropolítica (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Antropolítica (Online) - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
periodicos@proppi.uff.br||antropoliticauff@gmail.com||lauragraziela@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797068793082544128 |