Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Meneses, Valdênio Freitas
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Antropolítica (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/50104
Resumo: The so called Rural Studies are networks of social scientists between academic sectors, social mouvements and NGOs in Brazil. This network make researchs about rural-urban transformations in Brazilian society: conflicts about land, water, agro-food systems, family farmer policies, indigenous peoples, quilombolas etc. Although its great advancements, there is a gap in Rural Studies: the elites and the rulling class. This article discuss about this part of the brazilian rural society – farmers, agrobussinessman, cattle breeders. At first, make critics about the concept of “latifundiários”. This word is linked to debates inside the Brazilian Communist Party in 1950s-1960s. Because its root the concept of “latifúndio” fits better in political fights and loses his analytical capacity. The second part shows ambiguities in the theme of the social change and rural society in classical views of the brazilian sociology (1930-1960). After this, shows the newest generations of Rural Studies after 1970s and their themes: the “wicked alliance” between great land owners and capitalist modernization; the political representations of the agribusiness and rulling rural class and ethnographical studies in the area of the old “engenhos“, the sugar cane zone at Brazilian northeast. At the last section the article purposes one anaytical term – richs of the countryside –  to construct ways to guide a new research agenda. At this point its possible to overcome the ambiguities and gaps about the rural elites and rulling class in Rural Studies.   Key-words:Elites, rulling class, Rural Studies, richs of the countryside
id UFF-18_fc46fcd7b9967313422ea21f23392b17
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/50104
network_acronym_str UFF-18
network_name_str Antropolítica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do BrasilElitesClasses dominantesEstudos ruraisRicos do campoThe so called Rural Studies are networks of social scientists between academic sectors, social mouvements and NGOs in Brazil. This network make researchs about rural-urban transformations in Brazilian society: conflicts about land, water, agro-food systems, family farmer policies, indigenous peoples, quilombolas etc. Although its great advancements, there is a gap in Rural Studies: the elites and the rulling class. This article discuss about this part of the brazilian rural society – farmers, agrobussinessman, cattle breeders. At first, make critics about the concept of “latifundiários”. This word is linked to debates inside the Brazilian Communist Party in 1950s-1960s. Because its root the concept of “latifúndio” fits better in political fights and loses his analytical capacity. The second part shows ambiguities in the theme of the social change and rural society in classical views of the brazilian sociology (1930-1960). After this, shows the newest generations of Rural Studies after 1970s and their themes: the “wicked alliance” between great land owners and capitalist modernization; the political representations of the agribusiness and rulling rural class and ethnographical studies in the area of the old “engenhos“, the sugar cane zone at Brazilian northeast. At the last section the article purposes one anaytical term – richs of the countryside –  to construct ways to guide a new research agenda. At this point its possible to overcome the ambiguities and gaps about the rural elites and rulling class in Rural Studies.   Key-words:Elites, rulling class, Rural Studies, richs of the countrysideOs Estudos Rurais são uma rede de cientistas sociais e de áreas afins que pesquisam temas no mundo rural brasileiro: da concentração da terra e recursos hídricos, conflitos entre populações locais e projetos de impactos socioambientais até políticas públicas voltadas para o meio rural. Os Estudos Rurais têm espaço em congressos nacionais e internacionais, além de parcerias e intercâmbios entre departamentos de universidades, ONGs e movimentos sociais. Neste artigo, proponho um debate sobre uma zona difusa dentro dessa consolidação de pesquisas dos Estudos Rurais: o tema das elites e classes dominantes e a construção de agendas de pesquisa acerca dos latifundiários, ruralistas, estancieiros, empresários rurais, pecuaristas, usineiros dentre outros. Para tanto, utilizo o seguinte roteiro: primeiro faço uma revisão dos debates acerca do termo “latifúndio” em teses clássicas do mundo rural; depois analiso a forma como os clássicos das ciências sociais no Brasil (1930-1960) abordaram a elite e o mundo rural. Aqui, também, a revisão é direcionada para as novas gerações de clássicos dos Estudos Rurais (de 1970 até o início do século XXI) e seus temas: pesquisas sobre a “perversa aliança” entre a grande propriedade e a modernização capitalista rural; temas dos setores patronais ruralistas do agronegócio e, por fim, etnografias feitas na zona da mata canavieira nordestina que alcançou o mundo das elites rurais. Revisando essas gerações de clássicos, proponho construir a categoria “ricos do campo” para firmar uma agenda de pesquisa atualizada sobre elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense2021-12-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/5010410.22409/antropolitica2021.i53.a50104Antropolítica - Revista Contemporânea de Antropologia; n. 53 (2021): SET/OUT/NOV/DEZ2179-73311414-737810.22409/antropolitica2021.5353reponame:Antropolítica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/50104/30513https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/50104/30514Copyright (c) 2021 Valdênio Freitas Meneses (UFCG)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMeneses, Valdênio Freitas2021-12-02T19:05:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/50104Revistahttp://www.revistas.uff.br/index.php/antropoliticaPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/oaiperiodicos@proppi.uff.br||antropoliticauff@gmail.com||lauragraziela@gmail.com2179-73312179-7331opendoar:2021-12-02T19:05:49Antropolítica (Online) - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil
title Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil
spellingShingle Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil
Meneses, Valdênio Freitas
Elites
Classes dominantes
Estudos rurais
Ricos do campo
title_short Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil
title_full Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil
title_fullStr Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil
title_full_unstemmed Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil
title_sort Olhai para “os ricos do campo”: o lugar das elites e classes dominantes nos Estudos Rurais do Brasil
author Meneses, Valdênio Freitas
author_facet Meneses, Valdênio Freitas
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Meneses, Valdênio Freitas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Elites
Classes dominantes
Estudos rurais
Ricos do campo
topic Elites
Classes dominantes
Estudos rurais
Ricos do campo
description The so called Rural Studies are networks of social scientists between academic sectors, social mouvements and NGOs in Brazil. This network make researchs about rural-urban transformations in Brazilian society: conflicts about land, water, agro-food systems, family farmer policies, indigenous peoples, quilombolas etc. Although its great advancements, there is a gap in Rural Studies: the elites and the rulling class. This article discuss about this part of the brazilian rural society – farmers, agrobussinessman, cattle breeders. At first, make critics about the concept of “latifundiários”. This word is linked to debates inside the Brazilian Communist Party in 1950s-1960s. Because its root the concept of “latifúndio” fits better in political fights and loses his analytical capacity. The second part shows ambiguities in the theme of the social change and rural society in classical views of the brazilian sociology (1930-1960). After this, shows the newest generations of Rural Studies after 1970s and their themes: the “wicked alliance” between great land owners and capitalist modernization; the political representations of the agribusiness and rulling rural class and ethnographical studies in the area of the old “engenhos“, the sugar cane zone at Brazilian northeast. At the last section the article purposes one anaytical term – richs of the countryside –  to construct ways to guide a new research agenda. At this point its possible to overcome the ambiguities and gaps about the rural elites and rulling class in Rural Studies.   Key-words:Elites, rulling class, Rural Studies, richs of the countryside
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/50104
10.22409/antropolitica2021.i53.a50104
url https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/50104
identifier_str_mv 10.22409/antropolitica2021.i53.a50104
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/50104/30513
https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/50104/30514
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Valdênio Freitas Meneses (UFCG)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Valdênio Freitas Meneses (UFCG)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Antropolítica - Revista Contemporânea de Antropologia; n. 53 (2021): SET/OUT/NOV/DEZ
2179-7331
1414-7378
10.22409/antropolitica2021.5353
reponame:Antropolítica (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Antropolítica (Online)
collection Antropolítica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Antropolítica (Online) - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv periodicos@proppi.uff.br||antropoliticauff@gmail.com||lauragraziela@gmail.com
_version_ 1797068793082544128