Framings and misinformation about COVID-19 vaccine on YouTube: scrambles between science and denial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brotas, Antonio
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Rocha Costa, Marcia Cristina, Massarani, Luisa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Mídia.e.Cotidiano
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uff.br/midiaecotidiano/article/view/50954
Resumo: This study analyzes framing and its relationship with misinformation in 50 videos from Brazilian influencers about COVID-19 vaccines posted on YouTube in 2020, selected from the engagement, considering views, comments and likes. As a theoretical-methodological path, the idea of frames is adopted as “interpretatives packages” that produce meanings and have resonance in culture. The results show that the frames 'Risk and Scientific Uncertainty' and 'Public Policy and Political Strategy', although subordinated to the dominant frame 'New Technological Development', were the most triggered in the occurrence of informational disorder in the narratives of doctors, religious, YouTubers and communication professionals. The misinformation present in anti-vaccine discourses also occurs in narratives that defend science and the vaccine, highlighting the tensions and/or ambiguities that can occur in the media framework. The 'New Technological Development' frame was predominant in the sample and in the fight against misinformation, highlighting the narratives of researchers and science disseminators, which demonstrate the importance of scientific dissemination.
id UFF-19_c6fdb989498af8d2f850b4d5d1ee47ff
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/50954
network_acronym_str UFF-19
network_name_str Mídia.e.Cotidiano
repository_id_str
spelling Framings and misinformation about COVID-19 vaccine on YouTube: scrambles between science and denialEncuadres y desinformación sobre la vacuna COVID-19 en YouTube: revueltas entre ciencia y negaciónEnquadramentos e desinformação sobre vacina contra COVID-19 no Youtube: embaralhamentos entre ciência e negacionismodesinformación; vacuna contra COVID-19; encuadresmisinformation; vaccine against COVID-19; framingdesinformação; vacina contrra COVID-19; enquadramentoThis study analyzes framing and its relationship with misinformation in 50 videos from Brazilian influencers about COVID-19 vaccines posted on YouTube in 2020, selected from the engagement, considering views, comments and likes. As a theoretical-methodological path, the idea of frames is adopted as “interpretatives packages” that produce meanings and have resonance in culture. The results show that the frames 'Risk and Scientific Uncertainty' and 'Public Policy and Political Strategy', although subordinated to the dominant frame 'New Technological Development', were the most triggered in the occurrence of informational disorder in the narratives of doctors, religious, YouTubers and communication professionals. The misinformation present in anti-vaccine discourses also occurs in narratives that defend science and the vaccine, highlighting the tensions and/or ambiguities that can occur in the media framework. The 'New Technological Development' frame was predominant in the sample and in the fight against misinformation, highlighting the narratives of researchers and science disseminators, which demonstrate the importance of scientific dissemination.Este estudio analiza los encuadres y su relación con la desinformación en 50 videos de influencers brasileños sobre las vacunas COVID-19 publicados en YouTube en 2020, seleccionados del compromiso, considerando las visualizaciones, los comentarios y los ‘me gusta’.Como camino teórico-metodológico, se adopta la ideia de los encuades como “paquetes interpretativos”que producen significados y tienen resonancia en la cultura. Los resultados muestran que los encuadres 'Riesgo e Incertidumbre Científicos' y 'Política Pública y Estrategia Política', aunque subordinados al marco dominante 'Nuevo Desarrollo Tecnológico', fueron los más desencadenados en la ocurrencia de desorden informacional en las narrativas de médicos, religiosos, youtubers y professionales de la comunicación. La desinformación presente en los discursos antivacunas también se da en narrativas que defienden la ciencia y la vacuna, destacando las tensiones y/o ambiguedades que puden darse en el encuadre mediático. El encuadre del 'Nuevo Desarrollo Tecnológico' predominó en la muestra y en la lucha contra la desinformación, destacando las narrativas de investigadores y divulgadores de la ciencia, que demuestran la importancia de la divulgación científica.Este estudo analisa os enquadramentos (framing) e sua relação com a desinformação sobre vacinas contra a COVID-19 em 50 vídeos postados no YouTube em 2020, em canais de influenciadores brasileiros, selecionados a partir do engajamento, considerando visualizações, comentários e likes. Como caminho teórico-metodológico, adota-se a ideia de quadros (frames) como “pacotes interpretativos” que produzem sentidos e têm ressonância na cultura. Os resultados apontam que os quadros “risco e incerteza científica” e “política pública e estratégia política”, apesar de subordinados ao frame dominante “novo desenvolvimento tecnológico”, foram os mais associados à ocorrência da desordem informacional em narrativas de médicos, religiosos, youtubers e profissionais da comunicação. A desinformação presente nos discursos antivacina também ocorre em narrativas que defendem a ciência e a vacina, evidenciando as tensões e/ou ambiguidades que podem ocorrer no enquadramento midiático. O frame “novo desenvolvimento tecnológico” foi predominante na amostra e no enfrentamento à desinformação, destacando-se narrativas de pesquisadores e divulgadores da ciência, que demonstram a importância da divulgação científica.ABEC2021-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/midiaecotidiano/article/view/5095410.22409/rmc.v15i3.50954Revista Mídia e Cotidiano; v. 15 n. 3 (2021): A informação e o mal: disputas éticas, políticas e epistemológicas da Comunicação em tempos extremos; 73-1002178-602X10.22409/rmc.v15i3reponame:Mídia.e.Cotidianoinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/midiaecotidiano/article/view/50954/30060Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Mídia e Cotidianoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrotas, AntonioRocha Costa, Marcia CristinaMassarani, Luisa 2021-10-08T14:13:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/50954Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/midiaecotidiano/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/midiaecotidiano/oaimidiaecotidiano.ega@id.uff.br||revistamidiaecotidiano@gmail.com2178-602X2178-602Xopendoar:2021-10-08T14:13:51Mídia.e.Cotidiano - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Framings and misinformation about COVID-19 vaccine on YouTube: scrambles between science and denial
Encuadres y desinformación sobre la vacuna COVID-19 en YouTube: revueltas entre ciencia y negación
Enquadramentos e desinformação sobre vacina contra COVID-19 no Youtube: embaralhamentos entre ciência e negacionismo
title Framings and misinformation about COVID-19 vaccine on YouTube: scrambles between science and denial
spellingShingle Framings and misinformation about COVID-19 vaccine on YouTube: scrambles between science and denial
Brotas, Antonio
desinformación; vacuna contra COVID-19; encuadres
misinformation; vaccine against COVID-19; framing
desinformação; vacina contrra COVID-19; enquadramento
title_short Framings and misinformation about COVID-19 vaccine on YouTube: scrambles between science and denial
title_full Framings and misinformation about COVID-19 vaccine on YouTube: scrambles between science and denial
title_fullStr Framings and misinformation about COVID-19 vaccine on YouTube: scrambles between science and denial
title_full_unstemmed Framings and misinformation about COVID-19 vaccine on YouTube: scrambles between science and denial
title_sort Framings and misinformation about COVID-19 vaccine on YouTube: scrambles between science and denial
author Brotas, Antonio
author_facet Brotas, Antonio
Rocha Costa, Marcia Cristina
Massarani, Luisa
author_role author
author2 Rocha Costa, Marcia Cristina
Massarani, Luisa
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brotas, Antonio
Rocha Costa, Marcia Cristina
Massarani, Luisa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv desinformación; vacuna contra COVID-19; encuadres
misinformation; vaccine against COVID-19; framing
desinformação; vacina contrra COVID-19; enquadramento
topic desinformación; vacuna contra COVID-19; encuadres
misinformation; vaccine against COVID-19; framing
desinformação; vacina contrra COVID-19; enquadramento
description This study analyzes framing and its relationship with misinformation in 50 videos from Brazilian influencers about COVID-19 vaccines posted on YouTube in 2020, selected from the engagement, considering views, comments and likes. As a theoretical-methodological path, the idea of frames is adopted as “interpretatives packages” that produce meanings and have resonance in culture. The results show that the frames 'Risk and Scientific Uncertainty' and 'Public Policy and Political Strategy', although subordinated to the dominant frame 'New Technological Development', were the most triggered in the occurrence of informational disorder in the narratives of doctors, religious, YouTubers and communication professionals. The misinformation present in anti-vaccine discourses also occurs in narratives that defend science and the vaccine, highlighting the tensions and/or ambiguities that can occur in the media framework. The 'New Technological Development' frame was predominant in the sample and in the fight against misinformation, highlighting the narratives of researchers and science disseminators, which demonstrate the importance of scientific dissemination.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/midiaecotidiano/article/view/50954
10.22409/rmc.v15i3.50954
url https://periodicos.uff.br/midiaecotidiano/article/view/50954
identifier_str_mv 10.22409/rmc.v15i3.50954
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/midiaecotidiano/article/view/50954/30060
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Mídia e Cotidiano
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Mídia e Cotidiano
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABEC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABEC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Mídia e Cotidiano; v. 15 n. 3 (2021): A informação e o mal: disputas éticas, políticas e epistemológicas da Comunicação em tempos extremos; 73-100
2178-602X
10.22409/rmc.v15i3
reponame:Mídia.e.Cotidiano
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Mídia.e.Cotidiano
collection Mídia.e.Cotidiano
repository.name.fl_str_mv Mídia.e.Cotidiano - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv midiaecotidiano.ega@id.uff.br||revistamidiaecotidiano@gmail.com
_version_ 1797053446565658624

Registros relacionados