The status of criticism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Gragoatá |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33070 |
Resumo: | The text belongs to a debate in literary criticism on the question of method. As a matter of fact, the author does not consider himself as a defensor of a definite method. This means that the dividing line in current literary approach does not concern the question of method. What does not imply that there is a common denominator in today theoretical and critical approach to literature. That is the reason why the text below is characterized by its contraposition to the so-called desconstructionist critique, more specifically against Jacques Derrida’s approach. |
id |
UFF-6_33d03e6ccf3d4c7c0448b2da8e35c3d7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33070 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-6 |
network_name_str |
Gragoatá |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The status of criticismO estatuto da críticaDeconstructionismDerridareferentialitydifférancemetaphorindeterminationundecidibilityDesconstrucionismoDerridareferencialidadedifférancemetáforaindeterminaçãoindecidibilidadeThe text belongs to a debate in literary criticism on the question of method. As a matter of fact, the author does not consider himself as a defensor of a definite method. This means that the dividing line in current literary approach does not concern the question of method. What does not imply that there is a common denominator in today theoretical and critical approach to literature. That is the reason why the text below is characterized by its contraposition to the so-called desconstructionist critique, more specifically against Jacques Derrida’s approach.O texto faz parte de um debate sobre a posição da crítica literária quanto à questão do método. De fato, contudo, o autor, não se julga defensor de algum método em critica literária, o que vale dizer, o divisor básico hoje em dia na abordagem literária não concerne ao ataque ou à defesa do método. Nem por isso, entretanto, há algum denominador comum na abordagem teórico-crítica. Isso aqui se mostra pela contraposição à chamada crítica desconstrucionista, mais especificamente contra conceitos-chaves da abordagem de Jacques Derrida.Universidade Federal Fluminense2010-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/3307010.22409/gragoata.v15i29.33070Gragoatá; Vol. 15 No. 29 (2010): Methodological approachesGragoatá; v. 15 n. 29 (2010): Abordagens metodológicas2358-41141413-907310.22409/gragoata.v15i29reponame:Gragoatáinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33070/19057Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatáinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Luiz Costa2019-08-23T10:58:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33070Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoataPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/oai||revistagragoata@gmail.com2358-41141413-9073opendoar:2019-08-23T10:58:49Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The status of criticism O estatuto da crítica |
title |
The status of criticism |
spellingShingle |
The status of criticism Lima, Luiz Costa Deconstructionism Derrida referentiality différance metaphor indetermination undecidibility Desconstrucionismo Derrida referencialidade différance metáfora indeterminação indecidibilidade |
title_short |
The status of criticism |
title_full |
The status of criticism |
title_fullStr |
The status of criticism |
title_full_unstemmed |
The status of criticism |
title_sort |
The status of criticism |
author |
Lima, Luiz Costa |
author_facet |
Lima, Luiz Costa |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Luiz Costa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Deconstructionism Derrida referentiality différance metaphor indetermination undecidibility Desconstrucionismo Derrida referencialidade différance metáfora indeterminação indecidibilidade |
topic |
Deconstructionism Derrida referentiality différance metaphor indetermination undecidibility Desconstrucionismo Derrida referencialidade différance metáfora indeterminação indecidibilidade |
description |
The text belongs to a debate in literary criticism on the question of method. As a matter of fact, the author does not consider himself as a defensor of a definite method. This means that the dividing line in current literary approach does not concern the question of method. What does not imply that there is a common denominator in today theoretical and critical approach to literature. That is the reason why the text below is characterized by its contraposition to the so-called desconstructionist critique, more specifically against Jacques Derrida’s approach. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33070 10.22409/gragoata.v15i29.33070 |
url |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33070 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22409/gragoata.v15i29.33070 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33070/19057 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatá info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatá |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Gragoatá; Vol. 15 No. 29 (2010): Methodological approaches Gragoatá; v. 15 n. 29 (2010): Abordagens metodológicas 2358-4114 1413-9073 10.22409/gragoata.v15i29 reponame:Gragoatá instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Gragoatá |
collection |
Gragoatá |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistagragoata@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799705500205449217 |