REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ARCHAIC: JOÃO CABRAL DE MELO NETO AND CLARICE LISPECTOR
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Gragoatá |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33360 |
Resumo: | Dealing with two authors like João Cabral and Clarice Lispector is at least challenging. Mixing poetry and short story in a comparative analysis requires a double effort: firstly, it is necessary at the interpretation not to reduce the poetic into the merely analytic and, secondly, not to lose the poetic concision of the short story. This article has nevertheless a central axis: to reflect on the image of the “egg” present in both authors, highlighting differences and reconciliations which enable to think, from the literary point of view, a comprehension of the archaic that is precisely manifested in everyday life. |
id |
UFF-6_5bc7c72b6c94992bf69e8d0a37314935 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33360 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-6 |
network_name_str |
Gragoatá |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ARCHAIC: JOÃO CABRAL DE MELO NETO AND CLARICE LISPECTORREPRESENTAÇÕES DO ARCAICO: JOÃO CABRAL DE MELO NETO E CLARICE LISPECTORJoão CabralClarice LispectoreggarchaicJoão CabralClarice LispectorovoDealing with two authors like João Cabral and Clarice Lispector is at least challenging. Mixing poetry and short story in a comparative analysis requires a double effort: firstly, it is necessary at the interpretation not to reduce the poetic into the merely analytic and, secondly, not to lose the poetic concision of the short story. This article has nevertheless a central axis: to reflect on the image of the “egg” present in both authors, highlighting differences and reconciliations which enable to think, from the literary point of view, a comprehension of the archaic that is precisely manifested in everyday life.Tratar de dois autores como João Cabral e Clarice Lispector é, no mínimo, desafiador. Misturar poesia e conto em uma análise comparativa exige um esforço duplo: primeiro, ao interpretá-lo, não reduzir o poético ao meramente analítico e, segundo, não perder, do conto, sua concisão poética. O presente artigo tem, não obstante, um eixo central: refletir sobre a imagem do “ovo” presente nos dois autores, evidenciando divergências e conciliações que permitam pensar, do ponto de vista literário, uma compreensão do arcaico que se manifesta, precisamente, no cotidiano.Universidade Federal Fluminense2015-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/3336010.22409/gragoata.v20i39.33360Gragoatá; Vol. 20 No. 39 (2015): Literature StudiesGragoatá; v. 20 n. 39 (2015): Estudos de Literatura2358-41141413-907310.22409/gragoata.v20i39reponame:Gragoatáinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33360/19347Copyright (c) 2015 Gragoatáinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGrupillo, ArthurBezerra, Cicero Cunha2019-08-23T11:06:19Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33360Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoataPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/oai||revistagragoata@gmail.com2358-41141413-9073opendoar:2019-08-23T11:06:19Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ARCHAIC: JOÃO CABRAL DE MELO NETO AND CLARICE LISPECTOR REPRESENTAÇÕES DO ARCAICO: JOÃO CABRAL DE MELO NETO E CLARICE LISPECTOR |
title |
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ARCHAIC: JOÃO CABRAL DE MELO NETO AND CLARICE LISPECTOR |
spellingShingle |
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ARCHAIC: JOÃO CABRAL DE MELO NETO AND CLARICE LISPECTOR Grupillo, Arthur João Cabral Clarice Lispector egg archaic João Cabral Clarice Lispector ovo |
title_short |
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ARCHAIC: JOÃO CABRAL DE MELO NETO AND CLARICE LISPECTOR |
title_full |
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ARCHAIC: JOÃO CABRAL DE MELO NETO AND CLARICE LISPECTOR |
title_fullStr |
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ARCHAIC: JOÃO CABRAL DE MELO NETO AND CLARICE LISPECTOR |
title_full_unstemmed |
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ARCHAIC: JOÃO CABRAL DE MELO NETO AND CLARICE LISPECTOR |
title_sort |
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ARCHAIC: JOÃO CABRAL DE MELO NETO AND CLARICE LISPECTOR |
author |
Grupillo, Arthur |
author_facet |
Grupillo, Arthur Bezerra, Cicero Cunha |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bezerra, Cicero Cunha |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Grupillo, Arthur Bezerra, Cicero Cunha |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
João Cabral Clarice Lispector egg archaic João Cabral Clarice Lispector ovo |
topic |
João Cabral Clarice Lispector egg archaic João Cabral Clarice Lispector ovo |
description |
Dealing with two authors like João Cabral and Clarice Lispector is at least challenging. Mixing poetry and short story in a comparative analysis requires a double effort: firstly, it is necessary at the interpretation not to reduce the poetic into the merely analytic and, secondly, not to lose the poetic concision of the short story. This article has nevertheless a central axis: to reflect on the image of the “egg” present in both authors, highlighting differences and reconciliations which enable to think, from the literary point of view, a comprehension of the archaic that is precisely manifested in everyday life. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33360 10.22409/gragoata.v20i39.33360 |
url |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33360 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22409/gragoata.v20i39.33360 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33360/19347 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Gragoatá info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Gragoatá |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Gragoatá; Vol. 20 No. 39 (2015): Literature Studies Gragoatá; v. 20 n. 39 (2015): Estudos de Literatura 2358-4114 1413-9073 10.22409/gragoata.v20i39 reponame:Gragoatá instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Gragoatá |
collection |
Gragoatá |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistagragoata@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799705501453254656 |