The monstrous science in 'Frankenstein': aspects of the posthuman
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Gragoatá |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33606 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work is to investigate the ways in which the discoveries and the scientific thought in the end of the 18th century and beginning of the 19th century (the period known as the Second Scientific Revolution) influenced the writing of Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein (1818), as well as to analyze how this work presents aspects which contribute to the study of the posthuman. Frankenstein was written during a period of profound revolutions in philosophical and scientific thought that informed several elements present in the novel: the social theories of William Godwin and Mary Wollstonecraft, Erasmus Darwin’s hypotheses about the origin of life, Luigi Galvani’s experiments with electricity, among others. On the other hand, in a contemporary perspective, Frankenstein is a work that inaugurates many aspects that would be read through the prism of the posthuman. When describing the possible (and terrible) consequences of the connection between the human sphere and those of the animal and of the technological, the novel problematizes the privileged position of man in nature. Considering the physical and biological features of the monster, Frankenstein’s wish in overcoming the limits of nature, and the complex relation between both characters regarding the binomial desire/freedom, the novel can be read as one of the greatest representatives of the concept of posthumanity in literature. ---DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.2018n47a1173 |
id |
UFF-6_5eeeda54df590c98df87b26ee2981a18 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33606 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-6 |
network_name_str |
Gragoatá |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The monstrous science in 'Frankenstein': aspects of the posthumanA ciência monstruosa em 'Frankenstein': aspectos do pós-humanoFrankensteinscienceposthuman.Frankensteinciênciapós-humano.The objective of this work is to investigate the ways in which the discoveries and the scientific thought in the end of the 18th century and beginning of the 19th century (the period known as the Second Scientific Revolution) influenced the writing of Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein (1818), as well as to analyze how this work presents aspects which contribute to the study of the posthuman. Frankenstein was written during a period of profound revolutions in philosophical and scientific thought that informed several elements present in the novel: the social theories of William Godwin and Mary Wollstonecraft, Erasmus Darwin’s hypotheses about the origin of life, Luigi Galvani’s experiments with electricity, among others. On the other hand, in a contemporary perspective, Frankenstein is a work that inaugurates many aspects that would be read through the prism of the posthuman. When describing the possible (and terrible) consequences of the connection between the human sphere and those of the animal and of the technological, the novel problematizes the privileged position of man in nature. Considering the physical and biological features of the monster, Frankenstein’s wish in overcoming the limits of nature, and the complex relation between both characters regarding the binomial desire/freedom, the novel can be read as one of the greatest representatives of the concept of posthumanity in literature. ---DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.2018n47a1173Este trabalho tem por objetivo investigar de que maneira as descobertas e o pensamento científico do final do século XVIII e início do século XIX (período conhecido como Segunda Revolução Científica) influenciaram a escrita do romance Frankenstein (1818), de Mary Shelley, assim como analisar como essa obra apresenta aspectos que contribuem para o estudo do pós-humano. Frankenstein foi escrito em meio a um contexto de profundas revoluções no pensamento filosófico-científico que informaram diversos elementos presentes no romance: as teorias sociais de William Godwin e Mary Wollstonecraft, as hipóteses sobre o princípio da vida de Erasmus Darwin, os experimentos com eletricidade de Luigi Galvani, entre outros. Por outro lado, em uma perspectiva contemporânea, Frankenstein é uma obra que inaugura vários aspectos que viriam a ser lidos pelo prisma do pós-humano. Ao descrever as possíveis (e terríveis) consequências da junção da esfera do humano com as do animal e do tecnológico, o romance problematiza a posição privilegiada do homem na natureza. Considerando as características físicas e biológicas do monstro, o desejo de Frankenstein em ultrapassar os limites da natureza, e a complexa relação de ambos os personagens no que se refere ao binômio desejo/liberdade, o romance pode ser lido como um dos grandes representantes do conceito de pós-humanidade na literatura. ---DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.2018n47a1173Universidade Federal Fluminense2018-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/3360610.22409/gragoata.v23i47.33606Gragoatá; Vol. 23 No. 47 (2018): Monstrous Organization; 848-872Gragoatá; v. 23 n. 47 (2018): Monstruosa organização; 848-8722358-41141413-907310.22409/gragoata.v23i47reponame:Gragoatáinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33606/19593Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatáinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGomes, Anderson Soares2019-08-23T11:13:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33606Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoataPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/oai||revistagragoata@gmail.com2358-41141413-9073opendoar:2019-08-23T11:13:59Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The monstrous science in 'Frankenstein': aspects of the posthuman A ciência monstruosa em 'Frankenstein': aspectos do pós-humano |
title |
The monstrous science in 'Frankenstein': aspects of the posthuman |
spellingShingle |
The monstrous science in 'Frankenstein': aspects of the posthuman Gomes, Anderson Soares Frankenstein science posthuman. Frankenstein ciência pós-humano. |
title_short |
The monstrous science in 'Frankenstein': aspects of the posthuman |
title_full |
The monstrous science in 'Frankenstein': aspects of the posthuman |
title_fullStr |
The monstrous science in 'Frankenstein': aspects of the posthuman |
title_full_unstemmed |
The monstrous science in 'Frankenstein': aspects of the posthuman |
title_sort |
The monstrous science in 'Frankenstein': aspects of the posthuman |
author |
Gomes, Anderson Soares |
author_facet |
Gomes, Anderson Soares |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gomes, Anderson Soares |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Frankenstein science posthuman. Frankenstein ciência pós-humano. |
topic |
Frankenstein science posthuman. Frankenstein ciência pós-humano. |
description |
The objective of this work is to investigate the ways in which the discoveries and the scientific thought in the end of the 18th century and beginning of the 19th century (the period known as the Second Scientific Revolution) influenced the writing of Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein (1818), as well as to analyze how this work presents aspects which contribute to the study of the posthuman. Frankenstein was written during a period of profound revolutions in philosophical and scientific thought that informed several elements present in the novel: the social theories of William Godwin and Mary Wollstonecraft, Erasmus Darwin’s hypotheses about the origin of life, Luigi Galvani’s experiments with electricity, among others. On the other hand, in a contemporary perspective, Frankenstein is a work that inaugurates many aspects that would be read through the prism of the posthuman. When describing the possible (and terrible) consequences of the connection between the human sphere and those of the animal and of the technological, the novel problematizes the privileged position of man in nature. Considering the physical and biological features of the monster, Frankenstein’s wish in overcoming the limits of nature, and the complex relation between both characters regarding the binomial desire/freedom, the novel can be read as one of the greatest representatives of the concept of posthumanity in literature. ---DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.2018n47a1173 |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33606 10.22409/gragoata.v23i47.33606 |
url |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33606 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22409/gragoata.v23i47.33606 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33606/19593 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatá info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatá |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Gragoatá; Vol. 23 No. 47 (2018): Monstrous Organization; 848-872 Gragoatá; v. 23 n. 47 (2018): Monstruosa organização; 848-872 2358-4114 1413-9073 10.22409/gragoata.v23i47 reponame:Gragoatá instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Gragoatá |
collection |
Gragoatá |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistagragoata@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799705502437867520 |