The semantics of ditransitive construction in a diachronic perspective
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Gragoatá |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/40821 |
Resumo: | This paper focuses on the ditransitive construction of Brazilian Portuguese, aiming at examining its semantic evolution. To this end, it compares manifestations of this construction in the 18th and 20th centuries in order to investigate whether there has been a change in its morphosyntax and in the semantic class of the verbs that instantiate it. The theoretical approach combines assumptions and analytical categories of Usage-based Functional Linguistics (FURTADO DA CUNHA, M. A.; BISPO, E. B.; SILVA, 2013a) and Construction Grammar (GOLDBERG, 1995; TRAUGOTT; TROUSDALE, 2013). The results led to the conclusion that, in the 18th as well as in the 20th century, the ditransitive construction prototypically conceptualizes an event of physical transfer, in which an animate participant (Subject) transfers an object (Direct Object) to a human entity (Indirect Object). Furthermore, there was no change in the semantic class of verbs that can instantiate extensions from the central meaning of this construction. |
id |
UFF-6_848b3fd9b704f62d32b32f81f9fa0e09 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40821 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-6 |
network_name_str |
Gragoatá |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The semantics of ditransitive construction in a diachronic perspectiveA semântica da construção ditransitiva em perspectiva diacrônicaUsage-based Functional Linguistics. Construction Grammar. Ditransitive construction. Constructional semantics.Linguística Funcional Centrada no Uso. Gramática de Construções. Construção Ditransitiva. Semântica construcional.This paper focuses on the ditransitive construction of Brazilian Portuguese, aiming at examining its semantic evolution. To this end, it compares manifestations of this construction in the 18th and 20th centuries in order to investigate whether there has been a change in its morphosyntax and in the semantic class of the verbs that instantiate it. The theoretical approach combines assumptions and analytical categories of Usage-based Functional Linguistics (FURTADO DA CUNHA, M. A.; BISPO, E. B.; SILVA, 2013a) and Construction Grammar (GOLDBERG, 1995; TRAUGOTT; TROUSDALE, 2013). The results led to the conclusion that, in the 18th as well as in the 20th century, the ditransitive construction prototypically conceptualizes an event of physical transfer, in which an animate participant (Subject) transfers an object (Direct Object) to a human entity (Indirect Object). Furthermore, there was no change in the semantic class of verbs that can instantiate extensions from the central meaning of this construction.Este artigo tem como foco a construção ditransitiva do português do Brasil, com o objetivo de examinar sua evolução semântica. Para tanto, compara manifestações dessa construção nos séculos XVIII e XX a fim de investigar se houve mudança em sua morfossintaxe e na classe semântica dos verbos que a instanciam. A abordagem teórica conjuga pressupostos e categorias analíticas da Linguística Funcional Centrada no Uso (FURTADO DA CUNHA, M. A.; BISPO, E. B.; SILVA, 2013a) e da Gramática de Construções (GOLDBERG, 1995; TRAUGOTT; TROUSDALE, 2013; HILPERT, 2014). Os resultados obtidos indicam que, tanto no século XVIII como no século XX, em seu sentido prototípico, a construção ditransitiva conceitualiza um evento de transferência física, em que um participante animado (Sujeito) transfere um objeto (Objeto Direto) para uma entidade humana (Objeto Indireto). Além disso, não foi constatada mudança na classe semântica dos verbos que podem instanciar extensões do sentido central dessa construção.Universidade Federal Fluminense2020-09-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/4082110.22409/gragoata.v25i52.40821Gragoatá; Vol. 25 No. 52 (2020): Grammar of constructions and interfaces; 785-808Gragoatá; v. 25 n. 52 (2020): Gramática de Construções e interfaces; 785-8082358-41141413-907310.22409/gragoata.v25i52reponame:Gragoatáinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/40821/26457Copyright (c) 2020 Gragoatáinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFurtado da Cunha, Maria Angélica2020-09-21T09:06:32Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40821Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoataPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/oai||revistagragoata@gmail.com2358-41141413-9073opendoar:2020-09-21T09:06:32Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The semantics of ditransitive construction in a diachronic perspective A semântica da construção ditransitiva em perspectiva diacrônica |
title |
The semantics of ditransitive construction in a diachronic perspective |
spellingShingle |
The semantics of ditransitive construction in a diachronic perspective Furtado da Cunha, Maria Angélica Usage-based Functional Linguistics. Construction Grammar. Ditransitive construction. Constructional semantics. Linguística Funcional Centrada no Uso. Gramática de Construções. Construção Ditransitiva. Semântica construcional. |
title_short |
The semantics of ditransitive construction in a diachronic perspective |
title_full |
The semantics of ditransitive construction in a diachronic perspective |
title_fullStr |
The semantics of ditransitive construction in a diachronic perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
The semantics of ditransitive construction in a diachronic perspective |
title_sort |
The semantics of ditransitive construction in a diachronic perspective |
author |
Furtado da Cunha, Maria Angélica |
author_facet |
Furtado da Cunha, Maria Angélica |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Furtado da Cunha, Maria Angélica |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Usage-based Functional Linguistics. Construction Grammar. Ditransitive construction. Constructional semantics. Linguística Funcional Centrada no Uso. Gramática de Construções. Construção Ditransitiva. Semântica construcional. |
topic |
Usage-based Functional Linguistics. Construction Grammar. Ditransitive construction. Constructional semantics. Linguística Funcional Centrada no Uso. Gramática de Construções. Construção Ditransitiva. Semântica construcional. |
description |
This paper focuses on the ditransitive construction of Brazilian Portuguese, aiming at examining its semantic evolution. To this end, it compares manifestations of this construction in the 18th and 20th centuries in order to investigate whether there has been a change in its morphosyntax and in the semantic class of the verbs that instantiate it. The theoretical approach combines assumptions and analytical categories of Usage-based Functional Linguistics (FURTADO DA CUNHA, M. A.; BISPO, E. B.; SILVA, 2013a) and Construction Grammar (GOLDBERG, 1995; TRAUGOTT; TROUSDALE, 2013). The results led to the conclusion that, in the 18th as well as in the 20th century, the ditransitive construction prototypically conceptualizes an event of physical transfer, in which an animate participant (Subject) transfers an object (Direct Object) to a human entity (Indirect Object). Furthermore, there was no change in the semantic class of verbs that can instantiate extensions from the central meaning of this construction. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/40821 10.22409/gragoata.v25i52.40821 |
url |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/40821 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22409/gragoata.v25i52.40821 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/40821/26457 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Gragoatá info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Gragoatá |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Gragoatá; Vol. 25 No. 52 (2020): Grammar of constructions and interfaces; 785-808 Gragoatá; v. 25 n. 52 (2020): Gramática de Construções e interfaces; 785-808 2358-4114 1413-9073 10.22409/gragoata.v25i52 reponame:Gragoatá instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Gragoatá |
collection |
Gragoatá |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistagragoata@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799705502875123712 |