Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Gragoatá |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/47745 |
Resumo: | Opposing some of the characteristics of solid modernity to those of liquid modernity (BAUMAN, 2001), I examine a body of fictional works, aiming to discuss different dystopian scenarios as representations of the expansion of capitalist mechanisms and their penetration of the social fabric. (JAMESON, 1984) Borrowing from Bauman’s (2012) idea of the interregnum, I argue that, given the deleterious effects brought about by the fragmentation and erosion of the “solid” institutions, coupled with the dissociation between political power – which is being increasingly manipulated by ecologically and socially irresponsible forces – and the pressing issues of humanity and the environment (BROWN, 2015), it has become progressively difficult for “liquid” dystopias to offer a counternarrative to this picture. As a result, contemporary dystopianism tends to represent/re-present the interregnum (BAUMAN, 2012), i.e., the span of time between a social setting that has run its course and another, yet to be defined. Within the scope of fictional dystopias, few authors have taken the risk of outlining a post-capitalist society. Inspired by Negri’s (2005a; 2005b) autonomist vision of the common and the “four futures” imagined b Frase (2016), I propose to discuss Canadian writer Cory Doctorow’s Walkaway (2017), in which the counternarrative or resistance to the hegemonic order is a new form of the organization of work and communication based on equal sharing and the production of common wealth. |
id |
UFF-6_f4ce25db1a2e3ab5e5973f05495c7645 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47745 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-6 |
network_name_str |
Gragoatá |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the InterregnumDistopia no Antropoceno, ou re(a)presentando o interregnoOpposing some of the characteristics of solid modernity to those of liquid modernity (BAUMAN, 2001), I examine a body of fictional works, aiming to discuss different dystopian scenarios as representations of the expansion of capitalist mechanisms and their penetration of the social fabric. (JAMESON, 1984) Borrowing from Bauman’s (2012) idea of the interregnum, I argue that, given the deleterious effects brought about by the fragmentation and erosion of the “solid” institutions, coupled with the dissociation between political power – which is being increasingly manipulated by ecologically and socially irresponsible forces – and the pressing issues of humanity and the environment (BROWN, 2015), it has become progressively difficult for “liquid” dystopias to offer a counternarrative to this picture. As a result, contemporary dystopianism tends to represent/re-present the interregnum (BAUMAN, 2012), i.e., the span of time between a social setting that has run its course and another, yet to be defined. Within the scope of fictional dystopias, few authors have taken the risk of outlining a post-capitalist society. Inspired by Negri’s (2005a; 2005b) autonomist vision of the common and the “four futures” imagined b Frase (2016), I propose to discuss Canadian writer Cory Doctorow’s Walkaway (2017), in which the counternarrative or resistance to the hegemonic order is a new form of the organization of work and communication based on equal sharing and the production of common wealth.Contrapondo algumas características da modernidade sólida às da modernidade líquida (BAUMAN, 2001), examino um corpo ficcional em língua inglesa, visando a discutir diferentes cenários distópicos e suas representações da expansão dos mecanismos do capitalismo e sua penetração no próprio tecido social. (JAMESON, 1984) Tomando emprestado o conceito do interregno de Bauman (2012) como chave de leitura, argumento que, diante do quadro complexo de fragmentação e erosão das instituições “sólidas”, e dissociação entre o poder político, crescentemente manejado por forças ecológica e socialmente irresponsáveis e questões prementes da humanidade e do meio-ambiente (BROWN, 2015), torna-se progressivamente difícil para a distopia “líquida” oferecer uma contranarrativa de resistência, restando aos autores re(a)presentar, repetidamente, o interregno – i.e., o momento de ruptura com o passado, sem que tenha surgido, ainda, o novo. No âmbito da distopia, são poucos os autores que se arriscam a esboçar uma sociedade pós-capitalista. Sendo assim, inspiro-me na visão autonomista do comum (Negri, 2005a; 2005b), e nos “quatro futuros” imaginados por Frase (2016), para propor uma discussão da obra Walkaway, do autor canadense Cory Doctorow (2017), onde a contranarrativa ou resistência à ordem hegemônica parte de uma nova forma de organização do trabalho e da comunicação, baseada na partilha e na produção de uma riqueza comum.Universidade Federal Fluminense2021-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/4774510.22409/gragoata.v26i55.47745Gragoatá; Vol. 26 No. 55 (2021): Distopia na arte contemporânea: uma estética de resistência ou de submissão?; 558-587Gragoatá; v. 26 n. 55 (2021): Distopia na arte contemporânea: uma estética de resistência ou de submissão?; 558-5872358-41141413-907310.22409/gragoata.v26i55reponame:Gragoatáinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/47745/29114Copyright (c) 2021 Gragoatáinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTorres, Sonia2021-10-08T04:10:41Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47745Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoataPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/oai||revistagragoata@gmail.com2358-41141413-9073opendoar:2021-10-08T04:10:41Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum Distopia no Antropoceno, ou re(a)presentando o interregno |
title |
Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum |
spellingShingle |
Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum Torres, Sonia |
title_short |
Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum |
title_full |
Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum |
title_fullStr |
Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum |
title_sort |
Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum |
author |
Torres, Sonia |
author_facet |
Torres, Sonia |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Torres, Sonia |
description |
Opposing some of the characteristics of solid modernity to those of liquid modernity (BAUMAN, 2001), I examine a body of fictional works, aiming to discuss different dystopian scenarios as representations of the expansion of capitalist mechanisms and their penetration of the social fabric. (JAMESON, 1984) Borrowing from Bauman’s (2012) idea of the interregnum, I argue that, given the deleterious effects brought about by the fragmentation and erosion of the “solid” institutions, coupled with the dissociation between political power – which is being increasingly manipulated by ecologically and socially irresponsible forces – and the pressing issues of humanity and the environment (BROWN, 2015), it has become progressively difficult for “liquid” dystopias to offer a counternarrative to this picture. As a result, contemporary dystopianism tends to represent/re-present the interregnum (BAUMAN, 2012), i.e., the span of time between a social setting that has run its course and another, yet to be defined. Within the scope of fictional dystopias, few authors have taken the risk of outlining a post-capitalist society. Inspired by Negri’s (2005a; 2005b) autonomist vision of the common and the “four futures” imagined b Frase (2016), I propose to discuss Canadian writer Cory Doctorow’s Walkaway (2017), in which the counternarrative or resistance to the hegemonic order is a new form of the organization of work and communication based on equal sharing and the production of common wealth. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/47745 10.22409/gragoata.v26i55.47745 |
url |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/47745 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22409/gragoata.v26i55.47745 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/47745/29114 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Gragoatá info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Gragoatá |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Gragoatá; Vol. 26 No. 55 (2021): Distopia na arte contemporânea: uma estética de resistência ou de submissão?; 558-587 Gragoatá; v. 26 n. 55 (2021): Distopia na arte contemporânea: uma estética de resistência ou de submissão?; 558-587 2358-4114 1413-9073 10.22409/gragoata.v26i55 reponame:Gragoatá instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Gragoatá |
collection |
Gragoatá |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistagragoata@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799705503241076736 |