Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Torres, Sonia
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Gragoatá
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/47745
Resumo: Opposing some of the characteristics of solid modernity to those of liquid modernity (BAUMAN, 2001), I examine a body of fictional works, aiming to discuss different dystopian scenarios as representations of the expansion of capitalist mechanisms and their penetration of the social fabric. (JAMESON, 1984) Borrowing from Bauman’s (2012) idea of the interregnum, I argue that, given the deleterious effects brought about by the fragmentation and erosion of the “solid” institutions, coupled with the dissociation between political power – which is being increasingly manipulated by ecologically and socially irresponsible forces – and the pressing issues of humanity and the environment (BROWN, 2015), it has become progressively difficult for “liquid” dystopias to offer a counternarrative to this picture. As a result, contemporary dystopianism tends to represent/re-present the interregnum (BAUMAN, 2012), i.e., the span of time between a social setting that has run its course and another, yet to be defined. Within the scope of fictional dystopias, few authors have taken the risk of outlining a post-capitalist society. Inspired by Negri’s (2005a; 2005b) autonomist vision of the common and the “four futures” imagined b Frase (2016), I propose to discuss Canadian writer Cory Doctorow’s Walkaway (2017), in which the counternarrative or resistance to the hegemonic order is a new form of the organization of work and communication based on equal sharing and the production of common wealth.
id UFF-6_f4ce25db1a2e3ab5e5973f05495c7645
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47745
network_acronym_str UFF-6
network_name_str Gragoatá
repository_id_str
spelling Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the InterregnumDistopia no Antropoceno, ou re(a)presentando o interregnoOpposing some of the characteristics of solid modernity to those of liquid modernity (BAUMAN, 2001), I examine a body of fictional works, aiming to discuss different dystopian scenarios as representations of the expansion of capitalist mechanisms and their penetration of the social fabric. (JAMESON, 1984) Borrowing from Bauman’s (2012) idea of the interregnum, I argue that, given the deleterious effects brought about by the fragmentation and erosion of the “solid” institutions, coupled with the dissociation between political power – which is being increasingly manipulated by ecologically and socially irresponsible forces – and the pressing issues of humanity and the environment (BROWN, 2015), it has become progressively difficult for “liquid” dystopias to offer a counternarrative to this picture. As a result, contemporary dystopianism tends to represent/re-present the interregnum (BAUMAN, 2012), i.e., the span of time between a social setting that has run its course and another, yet to be defined. Within the scope of fictional dystopias, few authors have taken the risk of outlining a post-capitalist society. Inspired by Negri’s (2005a; 2005b) autonomist vision of the common and the “four futures” imagined b Frase (2016), I propose to discuss Canadian writer Cory Doctorow’s Walkaway (2017), in which the counternarrative or resistance to the hegemonic order is a new form of the organization of work and communication based on equal sharing and the production of common wealth.Contrapondo algumas características da modernidade sólida às da modernidade líquida (BAUMAN, 2001), examino um corpo ficcional em língua inglesa, visando a discutir diferentes cenários distópicos e suas representações da expansão dos mecanismos do capitalismo e sua penetração no próprio tecido social. (JAMESON, 1984) Tomando emprestado o conceito do interregno de Bauman (2012) como chave de leitura, argumento que, diante do quadro complexo de fragmentação e erosão das instituições “sólidas”, e dissociação entre o poder político, crescentemente manejado por forças ecológica e socialmente irresponsáveis e questões prementes da humanidade e do meio-ambiente (BROWN, 2015), torna-se progressivamente difícil para a distopia “líquida” oferecer uma contranarrativa de resistência, restando aos autores re(a)presentar, repetidamente, o interregno – i.e., o momento de ruptura com o passado, sem que tenha surgido, ainda, o novo. No âmbito da distopia, são poucos os autores que se arriscam a esboçar uma sociedade pós-capitalista. Sendo assim, inspiro-me na visão autonomista do comum (Negri, 2005a; 2005b), e nos “quatro futuros” imaginados por Frase (2016), para propor uma discussão da obra Walkaway, do autor canadense Cory Doctorow (2017), onde a contranarrativa ou resistência à ordem hegemônica parte de uma nova forma de organização do trabalho e da comunicação, baseada na partilha e na produção de uma riqueza comum.Universidade Federal Fluminense2021-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/4774510.22409/gragoata.v26i55.47745Gragoatá; Vol. 26 No. 55 (2021): Distopia na arte contemporânea: uma estética de resistência ou de submissão?; 558-587Gragoatá; v. 26 n. 55 (2021): Distopia na arte contemporânea: uma estética de resistência ou de submissão?; 558-5872358-41141413-907310.22409/gragoata.v26i55reponame:Gragoatáinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/47745/29114Copyright (c) 2021 Gragoatáinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTorres, Sonia2021-10-08T04:10:41Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47745Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoataPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/oai||revistagragoata@gmail.com2358-41141413-9073opendoar:2021-10-08T04:10:41Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum
Distopia no Antropoceno, ou re(a)presentando o interregno
title Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum
spellingShingle Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum
Torres, Sonia
title_short Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum
title_full Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum
title_fullStr Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum
title_full_unstemmed Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum
title_sort Dystopia in the Anthropocene, or Representing/Re-presenting the Interregnum
author Torres, Sonia
author_facet Torres, Sonia
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Torres, Sonia
description Opposing some of the characteristics of solid modernity to those of liquid modernity (BAUMAN, 2001), I examine a body of fictional works, aiming to discuss different dystopian scenarios as representations of the expansion of capitalist mechanisms and their penetration of the social fabric. (JAMESON, 1984) Borrowing from Bauman’s (2012) idea of the interregnum, I argue that, given the deleterious effects brought about by the fragmentation and erosion of the “solid” institutions, coupled with the dissociation between political power – which is being increasingly manipulated by ecologically and socially irresponsible forces – and the pressing issues of humanity and the environment (BROWN, 2015), it has become progressively difficult for “liquid” dystopias to offer a counternarrative to this picture. As a result, contemporary dystopianism tends to represent/re-present the interregnum (BAUMAN, 2012), i.e., the span of time between a social setting that has run its course and another, yet to be defined. Within the scope of fictional dystopias, few authors have taken the risk of outlining a post-capitalist society. Inspired by Negri’s (2005a; 2005b) autonomist vision of the common and the “four futures” imagined b Frase (2016), I propose to discuss Canadian writer Cory Doctorow’s Walkaway (2017), in which the counternarrative or resistance to the hegemonic order is a new form of the organization of work and communication based on equal sharing and the production of common wealth.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/47745
10.22409/gragoata.v26i55.47745
url https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/47745
identifier_str_mv 10.22409/gragoata.v26i55.47745
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/47745/29114
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Gragoatá
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Gragoatá
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Fluminense
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Fluminense
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Gragoatá; Vol. 26 No. 55 (2021): Distopia na arte contemporânea: uma estética de resistência ou de submissão?; 558-587
Gragoatá; v. 26 n. 55 (2021): Distopia na arte contemporânea: uma estética de resistência ou de submissão?; 558-587
2358-4114
1413-9073
10.22409/gragoata.v26i55
reponame:Gragoatá
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Gragoatá
collection Gragoatá
repository.name.fl_str_mv Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistagragoata@gmail.com
_version_ 1799705503241076736