Response process validity in the Cloze test

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha, Neide de Brito
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Santos, Acácia Aparecida Angeli dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4768
Resumo: Based in the response process validity evidence, this study explored quality of children's mistakes on the Cloze test. The sample was composed by 266 children, boys and girls, aging from 8 to 13 years old, attending at the third and fourth grades of the elementary education of public and private schools of São Paulo, Brazil. Two protocols groups were formed: of the children with high and low means to construct a errors scale, for the least to most serious: blank, phonological, lexical, syntactic and semantic. The results showed that children with high means test presented lexical mistakes, while children with low means made semantic mistakes. Although the response process validity evidence was finding, by the homogeneously evaluation on the errors distribution types, it's necessary to extend the knowledge of psychometric characteristics of the Cloze test.
id UFF-7_450270f76df73249e48e02ce803051c3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4768
network_acronym_str UFF-7
network_name_str Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
repository_id_str
spelling Response process validity in the Cloze testValidade por processo de resposta no teste de Clozepsychological assessmentCloze testreading comprehensionpsychometricsresponse processBased in the response process validity evidence, this study explored quality of children's mistakes on the Cloze test. The sample was composed by 266 children, boys and girls, aging from 8 to 13 years old, attending at the third and fourth grades of the elementary education of public and private schools of São Paulo, Brazil. Two protocols groups were formed: of the children with high and low means to construct a errors scale, for the least to most serious: blank, phonological, lexical, syntactic and semantic. The results showed that children with high means test presented lexical mistakes, while children with low means made semantic mistakes. Although the response process validity evidence was finding, by the homogeneously evaluation on the errors distribution types, it's necessary to extend the knowledge of psychometric characteristics of the Cloze test.Tendo por base considerações sobre as evidências de validade por processo de resposta, foram analisados neste estudo os erros cometidos num teste de Cloze. Participaram 266 crianças, de ambos os sexos, entre 8 e 13 anos, de terceiras e quartas séries do Ensino Fundamental de escolas públicas e particulares de São Paulo. Foram formados dois grupos de protocolos: das crianças que tiveram as melhores e as piores pontuações, para a construção de uma escala dos tipos de erros cometidos, a saber: branco, fonológico, lexical, sintático e semântico. Os resultados mostraram que as crianças com médias mais altas cometeram mais erros lexicais e as com médias mais baixas, erros semânticos. Embora tenha sido encontrada a evidência de validade por processo de resposta, por meio da avaliação da homogeneidade na distribuição dos tipos de erros, é preciso ampliar o conhecimento sobre as características psicométricas do teste de Cloze.ABEC2009-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4768Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 21 No. 3 (2009); 549-562Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 21 n. 3 (2009); 549-5621984-0292reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologiainstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4768/4591Copyright (c) 2018 Fractalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCunha, Neide de BritoSantos, Acácia Aparecida Angeli dos2018-06-05T11:58:56Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4768Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractalPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/oai||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com1984-02921984-0292opendoar:2018-06-05T11:58:56Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Response process validity in the Cloze test
Validade por processo de resposta no teste de Cloze
title Response process validity in the Cloze test
spellingShingle Response process validity in the Cloze test
Cunha, Neide de Brito
psychological assessment
Cloze test
reading comprehension
psychometrics
response process
title_short Response process validity in the Cloze test
title_full Response process validity in the Cloze test
title_fullStr Response process validity in the Cloze test
title_full_unstemmed Response process validity in the Cloze test
title_sort Response process validity in the Cloze test
author Cunha, Neide de Brito
author_facet Cunha, Neide de Brito
Santos, Acácia Aparecida Angeli dos
author_role author
author2 Santos, Acácia Aparecida Angeli dos
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha, Neide de Brito
Santos, Acácia Aparecida Angeli dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv psychological assessment
Cloze test
reading comprehension
psychometrics
response process
topic psychological assessment
Cloze test
reading comprehension
psychometrics
response process
description Based in the response process validity evidence, this study explored quality of children's mistakes on the Cloze test. The sample was composed by 266 children, boys and girls, aging from 8 to 13 years old, attending at the third and fourth grades of the elementary education of public and private schools of São Paulo, Brazil. Two protocols groups were formed: of the children with high and low means to construct a errors scale, for the least to most serious: blank, phonological, lexical, syntactic and semantic. The results showed that children with high means test presented lexical mistakes, while children with low means made semantic mistakes. Although the response process validity evidence was finding, by the homogeneously evaluation on the errors distribution types, it's necessary to extend the knowledge of psychometric characteristics of the Cloze test.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-12-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4768
url https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4768
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4768/4591
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Fractal
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Fractal
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABEC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABEC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 21 No. 3 (2009); 549-562
Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 21 n. 3 (2009); 549-562
1984-0292
reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
collection Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com
_version_ 1799695289772146688