Controversy as discursive practices: a rhetorical approach
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Fractal : Revista de Psicologia |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4867 |
Resumo: | The aim of this paper is to present some key analytical concepts for the realization of a rhetorical interpretation of empirical discourse. In this way, we present first the Constructionism as an epistemological way of support for the study of language in the construction of social facts; then we make an approach to different streams of discourse analysis and then discuss the approach to Discursive Psychology from the perspective of Discursive Practices; the notion of controversy is discussed in Part Four, along with the notion of strategic resources and, finally, we present an example of rhetorical analysis to illustrate the methodological discussion presented. |
id |
UFF-7_8643ad4d2c61cce9dd8e263086fc2906 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4867 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-7 |
network_name_str |
Fractal : Revista de Psicologia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Controversy as discursive practices: a rhetorical approachControvérsias como práticas discursivas: uma abordagem retóricaSocial Psychologydiscursive practicescontroversiesrhetoricPsicologia Socialpráticas discursivascontrovérsiasretóricaPsicologia SocialThe aim of this paper is to present some key analytical concepts for the realization of a rhetorical interpretation of empirical discourse. In this way, we present first the Constructionism as an epistemological way of support for the study of language in the construction of social facts; then we make an approach to different streams of discourse analysis and then discuss the approach to Discursive Psychology from the perspective of Discursive Practices; the notion of controversy is discussed in Part Four, along with the notion of strategic resources and, finally, we present an example of rhetorical analysis to illustrate the methodological discussion presented.O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar alguns conceitos analíticos fundamentais para a realização de uma interpretação retórica em material empírico discursivo. Para este fim, apresentamos primeiramente o Construcionismo como vertente epistemológica de apoio para o estudo da linguagem na construção de fatos sociais; em seguida fazemos uma abordagem das diferentes correntes de análise de discurso para depois discutirmos o enfoque da Psicologia Discursiva sob a perspectiva das Práticas Discursivas; a noção de controvérsia é discutida na quarta parte, juntamente com a noção de recursos estratégicos e, por ultimo, apresentamos um exemplo de análise retórica para ilustrar a discussão metodológica apresentada.ABEC2011-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresEstudo Teóricoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4867Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 23 No. 3 (2011); 557-578Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 23 n. 3 (2011); 557-5781984-0292reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologiainstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4867/4708Copyright (c) 2018 Fractalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Flávia Regina Guedes2018-06-05T12:01:32Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4867Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractalPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/oai||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com1984-02921984-0292opendoar:2018-06-05T12:01:32Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Controversy as discursive practices: a rhetorical approach Controvérsias como práticas discursivas: uma abordagem retórica |
title |
Controversy as discursive practices: a rhetorical approach |
spellingShingle |
Controversy as discursive practices: a rhetorical approach Ribeiro, Flávia Regina Guedes Social Psychology discursive practices controversies rhetoric Psicologia Social práticas discursivas controvérsias retórica Psicologia Social |
title_short |
Controversy as discursive practices: a rhetorical approach |
title_full |
Controversy as discursive practices: a rhetorical approach |
title_fullStr |
Controversy as discursive practices: a rhetorical approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Controversy as discursive practices: a rhetorical approach |
title_sort |
Controversy as discursive practices: a rhetorical approach |
author |
Ribeiro, Flávia Regina Guedes |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, Flávia Regina Guedes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Flávia Regina Guedes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Social Psychology discursive practices controversies rhetoric Psicologia Social práticas discursivas controvérsias retórica Psicologia Social |
topic |
Social Psychology discursive practices controversies rhetoric Psicologia Social práticas discursivas controvérsias retórica Psicologia Social |
description |
The aim of this paper is to present some key analytical concepts for the realization of a rhetorical interpretation of empirical discourse. In this way, we present first the Constructionism as an epistemological way of support for the study of language in the construction of social facts; then we make an approach to different streams of discourse analysis and then discuss the approach to Discursive Psychology from the perspective of Discursive Practices; the notion of controversy is discussed in Part Four, along with the notion of strategic resources and, finally, we present an example of rhetorical analysis to illustrate the methodological discussion presented. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por pares Estudo Teórico |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4867 |
url |
https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4867 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4867/4708 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Fractal info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Fractal |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABEC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABEC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 23 No. 3 (2011); 557-578 Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 23 n. 3 (2011); 557-578 1984-0292 reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologia instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Fractal : Revista de Psicologia |
collection |
Fractal : Revista de Psicologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799695289924190208 |