Procedural ethics, between small arrangements and transgression: comparison Brazil-France

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Colinet, Severine
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Passos, Izabel Friche
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5076
Resumo: The purpose of this article is to understand and compare the issues related to procedural ethics in France and Brazil, using a socio-historical approach and our experiences. The comparison shows the same disciplinary tension between social and biomedical sciences. In both countries we can see a deliberate policy to regulate the research ethically. In France, contrary to Brazil, the spread of procedural ethics is not completed yet. Procedural ethics characterized by a normative, formal dimension that standardizes the way of thinking, or rather the research. Faced with antagonistic logics, the researchers are strongly tempted to get round the procedures.
id UFF-7_b9c1c0f60cf0e449751f2ec7d24cd4a1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5076
network_acronym_str UFF-7
network_name_str Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
repository_id_str
spelling Procedural ethics, between small arrangements and transgression: comparison Brazil-FranceÉthique procédurale, entre petits arrangements et transgression : comparaison Brésil-FranceProcedural ethicssocial sciencesBrazilFranceethicssocial sciencesinternational comparisonThe purpose of this article is to understand and compare the issues related to procedural ethics in France and Brazil, using a socio-historical approach and our experiences. The comparison shows the same disciplinary tension between social and biomedical sciences. In both countries we can see a deliberate policy to regulate the research ethically. In France, contrary to Brazil, the spread of procedural ethics is not completed yet. Procedural ethics characterized by a normative, formal dimension that standardizes the way of thinking, or rather the research. Faced with antagonistic logics, the researchers are strongly tempted to get round the procedures. Dans une approche socio-historique et à partir de nos propres expériences, cet article se propose de comprendre les enjeux relatifs à l’éthique procédurale en France et au Brésil. Les résultats de cette comparaison montrent la même tension disciplinaire entre sciences sociales et biomédicales. On observe une politique volontariste de régulation de la recherche avec des humains dans les deux pays mais qui en France, contrairement au Brésil, n’est pas encore géneralisée. L’éthique procédurale, caractérisée comme normative, protocolaire et standardisée uniformise la manière de penser les recherches. Confrontés à des logiques antagonistes, les chercheurs sont fortement tentés de contourner les procédures. Mots-clés : Éthique procédurale ; sciences sociales ; Brésil ; FranceABEC2015-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliador por ParesTheoretical studyapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5076Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2015): Dossiê Políticas Sexuais e de Gênero no Contemporâneo; Temáticas diversas; 256-263Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 27 n. 3 (2015): Dossiê Políticas Sexuais e de Gênero no Contemporâneo; Temáticas diversas; 256-2631984-0292reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologiainstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5076/4927Copyright (c) 2018 Fractalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessColinet, SeverinePassos, Izabel Friche2018-06-05T12:07:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5076Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractalPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/oai||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com1984-02921984-0292opendoar:2018-06-05T12:07:39Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Procedural ethics, between small arrangements and transgression: comparison Brazil-France
Éthique procédurale, entre petits arrangements et transgression : comparaison Brésil-France
title Procedural ethics, between small arrangements and transgression: comparison Brazil-France
spellingShingle Procedural ethics, between small arrangements and transgression: comparison Brazil-France
Colinet, Severine
Procedural ethics
social sciences
Brazil
France
ethics
social sciences
international comparison
title_short Procedural ethics, between small arrangements and transgression: comparison Brazil-France
title_full Procedural ethics, between small arrangements and transgression: comparison Brazil-France
title_fullStr Procedural ethics, between small arrangements and transgression: comparison Brazil-France
title_full_unstemmed Procedural ethics, between small arrangements and transgression: comparison Brazil-France
title_sort Procedural ethics, between small arrangements and transgression: comparison Brazil-France
author Colinet, Severine
author_facet Colinet, Severine
Passos, Izabel Friche
author_role author
author2 Passos, Izabel Friche
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Colinet, Severine
Passos, Izabel Friche
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Procedural ethics
social sciences
Brazil
France
ethics
social sciences
international comparison
topic Procedural ethics
social sciences
Brazil
France
ethics
social sciences
international comparison
description The purpose of this article is to understand and compare the issues related to procedural ethics in France and Brazil, using a socio-historical approach and our experiences. The comparison shows the same disciplinary tension between social and biomedical sciences. In both countries we can see a deliberate policy to regulate the research ethically. In France, contrary to Brazil, the spread of procedural ethics is not completed yet. Procedural ethics characterized by a normative, formal dimension that standardizes the way of thinking, or rather the research. Faced with antagonistic logics, the researchers are strongly tempted to get round the procedures.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-11-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliador por Pares
Theoretical study
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5076
url https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5076
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5076/4927
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Fractal
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Fractal
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABEC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABEC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2015): Dossiê Políticas Sexuais e de Gênero no Contemporâneo; Temáticas diversas; 256-263
Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 27 n. 3 (2015): Dossiê Políticas Sexuais e de Gênero no Contemporâneo; Temáticas diversas; 256-263
1984-0292
reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
collection Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com
_version_ 1799695291313553408

Registros relacionados