Beyond Oedipus: between Deleuze-Guattari and Laplanche
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Fractal : Revista de Psicologia |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5762 |
Resumo: | This article aims to analyze the ways in which the Oedipus complex has been reworked in the formulations of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, as well as of Jean Laplanche. We tried to show that Laplanchean psychoanalysis allows us to respond to some of the critics made by the authors of The Anti-Oedipus. For Laplanche, as well as for Deleuze and Guattari, what is at stake is in what consists the originality of the Freudian discovery for each one: the priority of the sexual, to the psychoanalyst, and the priority of the non-human sex, to the schizoanalysts. After presenting the fundaments of each current, we promote a reflection on relations between Oedipus and gender based on the works of these authors. Also recurring to the contributions of Judith Butler to this debate, we hypothesize that gender norms, while instituting binary sex, serve as a support for the repression (meaning both “Unterdruckung” and “Verdrangung”) of the sexual and of non-human sex, who despise the normative binary of man-woman. Thus, we believe it was possible to point, along with Laplanche and the contributions of schizoanalysis, to a post-Oedipal or even a non-Oedipal psychoanalysis. |
id |
UFF-7_ca1c9c3feea623f3604aec01ce805a54 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5762 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-7 |
network_name_str |
Fractal : Revista de Psicologia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Beyond Oedipus: between Deleuze-Guattari and LaplanchePara além do Édipo: entre Deleuze-Guattari e LaplanchedesireOedipusunconsciouspsychoanalysissexualitydesejoÉdipoinconscientepsicanálisesexualidadePsicanálise e complexo de ÉdipoThis article aims to analyze the ways in which the Oedipus complex has been reworked in the formulations of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, as well as of Jean Laplanche. We tried to show that Laplanchean psychoanalysis allows us to respond to some of the critics made by the authors of The Anti-Oedipus. For Laplanche, as well as for Deleuze and Guattari, what is at stake is in what consists the originality of the Freudian discovery for each one: the priority of the sexual, to the psychoanalyst, and the priority of the non-human sex, to the schizoanalysts. After presenting the fundaments of each current, we promote a reflection on relations between Oedipus and gender based on the works of these authors. Also recurring to the contributions of Judith Butler to this debate, we hypothesize that gender norms, while instituting binary sex, serve as a support for the repression (meaning both “Unterdruckung” and “Verdrangung”) of the sexual and of non-human sex, who despise the normative binary of man-woman. Thus, we believe it was possible to point, along with Laplanche and the contributions of schizoanalysis, to a post-Oedipal or even a non-Oedipal psychoanalysis.O objetivo deste artigo é analisar as maneiras pelas quais o complexo de Édipo foi reelaborado nas formulações de Gilles Deleuze e Félix Guattari, bem como de Jean Laplanche. Tentamos mostrar que as formulações laplancheanas permitem responder a algumas das críticas levantadas pelos autores de O anti-Édipo. Tanto para Laplanche quanto para Deleuze e Guattari, o que está em questão é retomar o que cada um considera como a originalidade da descoberta freudiana: a prioridade do Sexual, no caso do psicanalista, e a prioridade do sexo não humano, no caso dos esquizoanalistas. Após apresentar os principais fundamentos de cada corrente, promovemos uma reflexão sobre as ligações entre o Édipo e as questões de gênero a partir das obras desses autores. Recorrendo também às contribuições de Judith Butler para esse debate, levantamos a hipótese de que as normas de gênero, ao instituírem um sexo binário, servem como suporte para a repressão e o recalque do Sexual e do sexo não humano, que desprezam o binário normativo homem-mulher ou papai-mamãe. Como resultado, acreditamos apontar, com Laplanche e as contribuições da esquizoanálise, para a possibilidade de uma psicanálise pós-edipiana ou, até mesmo, não edipiana.ABEC2020-06-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresEstudo bibliográficoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/576210.22409/1984-0292/v32i2/5762Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2020); 162-170Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 32 n. 2 (2020); 162-1701984-029210.22409/1984-0292/v32i2reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologiainstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5762/24525Copyright (c) 2020 Copyright © 2020 Lima, V. M., & Bedê, H. M.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Vinícius MoreiraBedê, Heloísa Moura2020-06-16T21:22:37Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5762Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractalPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/oai||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com1984-02921984-0292opendoar:2020-06-16T21:22:37Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Beyond Oedipus: between Deleuze-Guattari and Laplanche Para além do Édipo: entre Deleuze-Guattari e Laplanche |
title |
Beyond Oedipus: between Deleuze-Guattari and Laplanche |
spellingShingle |
Beyond Oedipus: between Deleuze-Guattari and Laplanche Lima, Vinícius Moreira desire Oedipus unconscious psychoanalysis sexuality desejo Édipo inconsciente psicanálise sexualidade Psicanálise e complexo de Édipo |
title_short |
Beyond Oedipus: between Deleuze-Guattari and Laplanche |
title_full |
Beyond Oedipus: between Deleuze-Guattari and Laplanche |
title_fullStr |
Beyond Oedipus: between Deleuze-Guattari and Laplanche |
title_full_unstemmed |
Beyond Oedipus: between Deleuze-Guattari and Laplanche |
title_sort |
Beyond Oedipus: between Deleuze-Guattari and Laplanche |
author |
Lima, Vinícius Moreira |
author_facet |
Lima, Vinícius Moreira Bedê, Heloísa Moura |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bedê, Heloísa Moura |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Vinícius Moreira Bedê, Heloísa Moura |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
desire Oedipus unconscious psychoanalysis sexuality desejo Édipo inconsciente psicanálise sexualidade Psicanálise e complexo de Édipo |
topic |
desire Oedipus unconscious psychoanalysis sexuality desejo Édipo inconsciente psicanálise sexualidade Psicanálise e complexo de Édipo |
description |
This article aims to analyze the ways in which the Oedipus complex has been reworked in the formulations of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, as well as of Jean Laplanche. We tried to show that Laplanchean psychoanalysis allows us to respond to some of the critics made by the authors of The Anti-Oedipus. For Laplanche, as well as for Deleuze and Guattari, what is at stake is in what consists the originality of the Freudian discovery for each one: the priority of the sexual, to the psychoanalyst, and the priority of the non-human sex, to the schizoanalysts. After presenting the fundaments of each current, we promote a reflection on relations between Oedipus and gender based on the works of these authors. Also recurring to the contributions of Judith Butler to this debate, we hypothesize that gender norms, while instituting binary sex, serve as a support for the repression (meaning both “Unterdruckung” and “Verdrangung”) of the sexual and of non-human sex, who despise the normative binary of man-woman. Thus, we believe it was possible to point, along with Laplanche and the contributions of schizoanalysis, to a post-Oedipal or even a non-Oedipal psychoanalysis. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por pares Estudo bibliográfico |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5762 10.22409/1984-0292/v32i2/5762 |
url |
https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5762 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22409/1984-0292/v32i2/5762 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5762/24525 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Copyright © 2020 Lima, V. M., & Bedê, H. M. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Copyright © 2020 Lima, V. M., & Bedê, H. M. |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABEC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABEC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2020); 162-170 Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 32 n. 2 (2020); 162-170 1984-0292 10.22409/1984-0292/v32i2 reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologia instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Fractal : Revista de Psicologia |
collection |
Fractal : Revista de Psicologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799695292060139520 |