On the validation of cartographic research: access to experience, consistency and effect
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Fractal : Revista de Psicologia |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4949 |
Resumo: | The paper discusses the issue of validation in research guided by the method of cartography. It defines a guideline for validation and distinguishes three indicators for validation. It proposes that validation is assessed on three levels of evaluation: researcher’s self-assessment, assessment by the research participants and peer review. This process will result in a distributed validation, as none of these three levels alone can account for the evaluation of the research process. Finally the paper argues that the validation of a cartographic research takes place throughout the process rather than just at the end of the investigation. |
id |
UFF-7_cef9329de48dae74448dda76438f5a7c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4949 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-7 |
network_name_str |
Fractal : Revista de Psicologia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
On the validation of cartographic research: access to experience, consistency and effectSobre a validação da pesquisa cartográfica: Acesso à experiência, consistência e produção de efeitosvalidationcartographyintervention researchparticipatory researchValidaçãocartografiapesquisa-intervençãopesquisa participativaThe paper discusses the issue of validation in research guided by the method of cartography. It defines a guideline for validation and distinguishes three indicators for validation. It proposes that validation is assessed on three levels of evaluation: researcher’s self-assessment, assessment by the research participants and peer review. This process will result in a distributed validation, as none of these three levels alone can account for the evaluation of the research process. Finally the paper argues that the validation of a cartographic research takes place throughout the process rather than just at the end of the investigation.O texto discute o tema da validação na pesquisa guiada pelo método da cartografia. Define uma diretriz de validação e distingue três indicadores de validação. Propõe que a validação seja realizada em três níveis de avaliação: a auto-avaliação realizada pelo próprio pesquisador, a avaliação pelos participantes da pesquisa e a avaliação por pares – o que vem a compor a idéia de uma validação distribuída, já que nenhum dos seus três níveis pode sozinho dar conta da avaliação do processo de investigação. Defende que a validação de uma pesquisa cartográfica se realize ao longo do processo e não apenas ao final da investigação.ABEC2013-08-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4949Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2013); 391-414Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 25 n. 2 (2013); 391-4141984-0292reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologiainstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4949/4791Copyright (c) 2018 Fractalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPassos, EduardoKastrup, Virginia2018-06-05T12:03:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4949Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractalPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/oai||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com1984-02921984-0292opendoar:2018-06-05T12:03:51Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
On the validation of cartographic research: access to experience, consistency and effect Sobre a validação da pesquisa cartográfica: Acesso à experiência, consistência e produção de efeitos |
title |
On the validation of cartographic research: access to experience, consistency and effect |
spellingShingle |
On the validation of cartographic research: access to experience, consistency and effect Passos, Eduardo validation cartography intervention research participatory research Validação cartografia pesquisa-intervenção pesquisa participativa |
title_short |
On the validation of cartographic research: access to experience, consistency and effect |
title_full |
On the validation of cartographic research: access to experience, consistency and effect |
title_fullStr |
On the validation of cartographic research: access to experience, consistency and effect |
title_full_unstemmed |
On the validation of cartographic research: access to experience, consistency and effect |
title_sort |
On the validation of cartographic research: access to experience, consistency and effect |
author |
Passos, Eduardo |
author_facet |
Passos, Eduardo Kastrup, Virginia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kastrup, Virginia |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Passos, Eduardo Kastrup, Virginia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
validation cartography intervention research participatory research Validação cartografia pesquisa-intervenção pesquisa participativa |
topic |
validation cartography intervention research participatory research Validação cartografia pesquisa-intervenção pesquisa participativa |
description |
The paper discusses the issue of validation in research guided by the method of cartography. It defines a guideline for validation and distinguishes three indicators for validation. It proposes that validation is assessed on three levels of evaluation: researcher’s self-assessment, assessment by the research participants and peer review. This process will result in a distributed validation, as none of these three levels alone can account for the evaluation of the research process. Finally the paper argues that the validation of a cartographic research takes place throughout the process rather than just at the end of the investigation. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-08-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4949 |
url |
https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4949 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4949/4791 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Fractal info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Fractal |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABEC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABEC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2013); 391-414 Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 25 n. 2 (2013); 391-414 1984-0292 reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologia instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Fractal : Revista de Psicologia |
collection |
Fractal : Revista de Psicologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799695290399195136 |