The experience of the image in the history and philosophy of science: Kuhn's Legacy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marinho, Ariadne
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Costa, Thiago
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Teoria da História
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/72834
Resumo: One of the best known names in the history of the philosophy of science is undoubtedly the American physicist Thomas Kuhn. In 1962, Kuhn published The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, a work that resonated widely, particularly among researchers in the humanities and social sciences. In his work, the author's purpose was to reformulate the identity of the natural sciences and, to this end, he resorted to history, sociology, psychology, and, also to the history of art. With a language that privileged visual experience, he claimed - among other things - that art and science were not so far apart, although they remained distinct enterprises. However, perhaps as a strategy to demarcate the fields, the philosopher of science manifested a conventional understanding about the artistic phenomenon. Yet, both in his major work and in the article "Comments [about art and Science]" (1969), he ignored the revolutionary achievements of contemporary art - with works that actually strained the traditional understanding of the activity - and, likewise, was unable to perceive the image beyond aesthetic determination. By extension, in the process of formulating scientific knowledge, it tied the visual inscription to an instrumental and subordinate function. In this sense, we follow the reflections on visual representations in the history of science, as well as in the philosophy of science, with special emphasis on Kuhn's understanding. Finally, we present some contemporary perspectives on the image and visuality in a scientific context.
id UFG-10_eca603570172a25404614e98d09a4d7f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/72834
network_acronym_str UFG-10
network_name_str Revista de Teoria da História
repository_id_str
spelling The experience of the image in the history and philosophy of science: Kuhn's LegacyA experiência da imagem na história e na filosofia da ciência: O legado de KuhnThomas KuhnImageHistory and Philosophy of ScienceThomas Kuhn ImagemHistória e Filosofia da CiênciaOne of the best known names in the history of the philosophy of science is undoubtedly the American physicist Thomas Kuhn. In 1962, Kuhn published The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, a work that resonated widely, particularly among researchers in the humanities and social sciences. In his work, the author's purpose was to reformulate the identity of the natural sciences and, to this end, he resorted to history, sociology, psychology, and, also to the history of art. With a language that privileged visual experience, he claimed - among other things - that art and science were not so far apart, although they remained distinct enterprises. However, perhaps as a strategy to demarcate the fields, the philosopher of science manifested a conventional understanding about the artistic phenomenon. Yet, both in his major work and in the article "Comments [about art and Science]" (1969), he ignored the revolutionary achievements of contemporary art - with works that actually strained the traditional understanding of the activity - and, likewise, was unable to perceive the image beyond aesthetic determination. By extension, in the process of formulating scientific knowledge, it tied the visual inscription to an instrumental and subordinate function. In this sense, we follow the reflections on visual representations in the history of science, as well as in the philosophy of science, with special emphasis on Kuhn's understanding. Finally, we present some contemporary perspectives on the image and visuality in a scientific context.Um dos mais conhecidos nomes na história da filosofia da ciência, sem dúvida, foi o do físico estadunidense Thomas Kuhn. Em 1962, Kuhn publicou The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, um trabalho que repercutiu amplamente, em particular, entre os pesquisadores das ciências humanas e sociais. Em sua obra, o propósito do autor era o de reformular a identidade das ciências naturais e, para isso, recorria à história, sociologia, psicologia e, de certo modo, também à história da arte. Com uma linguagem que privilegiava a experiência visual, afirmava – entre outras coisas – que a arte e a ciência não eram assim tão distantes, embora permanecessem empreendimentos distintos. No entanto, talvez como uma estratégia para demarcar os campos, o filósofo da ciência manifestou uma compreensão convencional acerca do fenômeno artístico. Ora, tanto em sua principal obra quanto no artigo “Comments [about art and Science]” (1969), ignorou as realizações revolucionárias da arte contemporânea – com trabalhos que de fato tensionavam o entendimento tradicional da atividade – e, de igual modo, foi incapaz de perceber a imagem para além da determinação estética. Por extensão, no processo de formulação do conhecimento científico, vinculou a inscrição visual à uma função instrumental e subalterna. Nesse sentido, acompanhamos as reflexões sobre as representações visuais na história da ciência, bem como na filosofia da ciência, com especial destaque para a compreensão de Kuhn. Por fim, apresentamos algumas das perspectivas contemporâneas acerca da imagem e da visualidade em contexto científico. Nota-se que independentemente de seus juízos, as devastadoras implicações do pensamento de Kuhn configuram um dos aspectos que permitiram a reavaliação de práticas e instrumentos ao redor do ofício científico, vale dizer, de expedientes então desconsiderados pelos especialistas. Logo, também da imagem.Universidade Federal de Goiás2022-07-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/7283410.5216/rth.v25i1.72834Revista de Teoria da História; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2022): History and historiography of sciences; 35 - 55Revista de Teoria da História; v. 25 n. 1 (2022): História e historiografia das ciências; 35 - 552175-5892reponame:Revista de Teoria da Históriainstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/72834/38528Copyright (c) 2022 rth |https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarinho, AriadneCosta, Thiago2022-07-30T00:09:08Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/72834Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/PUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/oai||revistateoriadahistoria@hotmail.com2175-58922175-5892opendoar:2022-07-30T00:09:08Revista de Teoria da História - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The experience of the image in the history and philosophy of science: Kuhn's Legacy
A experiência da imagem na história e na filosofia da ciência: O legado de Kuhn
title The experience of the image in the history and philosophy of science: Kuhn's Legacy
spellingShingle The experience of the image in the history and philosophy of science: Kuhn's Legacy
Marinho, Ariadne
Thomas Kuhn
Image
History and Philosophy of Science
Thomas Kuhn
Imagem
História e Filosofia da Ciência
title_short The experience of the image in the history and philosophy of science: Kuhn's Legacy
title_full The experience of the image in the history and philosophy of science: Kuhn's Legacy
title_fullStr The experience of the image in the history and philosophy of science: Kuhn's Legacy
title_full_unstemmed The experience of the image in the history and philosophy of science: Kuhn's Legacy
title_sort The experience of the image in the history and philosophy of science: Kuhn's Legacy
author Marinho, Ariadne
author_facet Marinho, Ariadne
Costa, Thiago
author_role author
author2 Costa, Thiago
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marinho, Ariadne
Costa, Thiago
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Thomas Kuhn
Image
History and Philosophy of Science
Thomas Kuhn
Imagem
História e Filosofia da Ciência
topic Thomas Kuhn
Image
History and Philosophy of Science
Thomas Kuhn
Imagem
História e Filosofia da Ciência
description One of the best known names in the history of the philosophy of science is undoubtedly the American physicist Thomas Kuhn. In 1962, Kuhn published The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, a work that resonated widely, particularly among researchers in the humanities and social sciences. In his work, the author's purpose was to reformulate the identity of the natural sciences and, to this end, he resorted to history, sociology, psychology, and, also to the history of art. With a language that privileged visual experience, he claimed - among other things - that art and science were not so far apart, although they remained distinct enterprises. However, perhaps as a strategy to demarcate the fields, the philosopher of science manifested a conventional understanding about the artistic phenomenon. Yet, both in his major work and in the article "Comments [about art and Science]" (1969), he ignored the revolutionary achievements of contemporary art - with works that actually strained the traditional understanding of the activity - and, likewise, was unable to perceive the image beyond aesthetic determination. By extension, in the process of formulating scientific knowledge, it tied the visual inscription to an instrumental and subordinate function. In this sense, we follow the reflections on visual representations in the history of science, as well as in the philosophy of science, with special emphasis on Kuhn's understanding. Finally, we present some contemporary perspectives on the image and visuality in a scientific context.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/72834
10.5216/rth.v25i1.72834
url https://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/72834
identifier_str_mv 10.5216/rth.v25i1.72834
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/72834/38528
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 rth |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 rth |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Teoria da História; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2022): History and historiography of sciences; 35 - 55
Revista de Teoria da História; v. 25 n. 1 (2022): História e historiografia das ciências; 35 - 55
2175-5892
reponame:Revista de Teoria da História
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Revista de Teoria da História
collection Revista de Teoria da História
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Teoria da História - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistateoriadahistoria@hotmail.com
_version_ 1809730282472865792