Paranoia and History, pathology and truth
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Teoria da História |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/65416 |
Resumo: | This study aims to propose an opening of history towards psychoanalysis, specifically through the notion of paranoia. This traditional concept is in construction since the Freudian circle, with the famous case of President Schreber. In the twentieth century, the discussion appears in the works of Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Gilles Deleuze until the millennial Slavoj Zizek. Reconstructing this concept for these philosophers, psychoanalysts and sociologists, we can rework the accumulation generated its uses in historiography. Richard Hofstadter, who had coined the term paranoid style, started this trend on the side of history and brought political gains. It is up to this article do develop it, but not as a projection – notion very close to paranoia – to interpret other historical or social formations. But to rethink other critical models for historiography in the tension between pathology and truth, the very antinomy of paranoia. |
id |
UFG-10_f82fd78f38a45cb55d20752262705706 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/65416 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-10 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Teoria da História |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Paranoia and History, pathology and truthParanoia e História, patologia e verdadeParanoiaHistoryTruthPathologySchreberParanoiaHistóriaVerdadePatologiaSchreberThis study aims to propose an opening of history towards psychoanalysis, specifically through the notion of paranoia. This traditional concept is in construction since the Freudian circle, with the famous case of President Schreber. In the twentieth century, the discussion appears in the works of Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Gilles Deleuze until the millennial Slavoj Zizek. Reconstructing this concept for these philosophers, psychoanalysts and sociologists, we can rework the accumulation generated its uses in historiography. Richard Hofstadter, who had coined the term paranoid style, started this trend on the side of history and brought political gains. It is up to this article do develop it, but not as a projection – notion very close to paranoia – to interpret other historical or social formations. But to rethink other critical models for historiography in the tension between pathology and truth, the very antinomy of paranoia.Este estudo objetiva propor uma abertura da psicanálise à história por meio da noção de paranoia. Uma categoria tradicional da clínica, sua construção remonta ao círculo freudiano e o célebre caso do presidente Schreber para se espraiar no século XX-XXI nas obras de Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Gilles Deleuze e Slavoj Zizek. Percorrendo os usos da noção para estes filósofos, psicanalistas e sociólogos, podemos retrabalhar o acúmulo gerado pelos usos da noção para na historiografia. Richard Hofstadter, cunhador do estilo paranoico durante os anos 1960, começou este trabalho do lado da História e trouxe ganhos políticos, evidentes aos olhos de hoje. Cabe a este artigo, desenvolvê-lo, mas não para projetá-lo – expediente próximo a paranoia – em outras formações históricas, mas para repensar outros modelos críticos para a historiografia na tensão entre patologia e verdade, antinomia da noção de paranoia.Universidade Federal de Goiás2021-05-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/6541610.5216/rth.v23i2.65416Revista de Teoria da História; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2020): History and Psychoanalysis; 246 - 272Revista de Teoria da História; v. 23 n. 2 (2020): História e Psicanálise; 246 - 2722175-5892reponame:Revista de Teoria da Históriainstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/65416/36672Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Teoria da História | rthhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Ávila, Danilo2021-06-12T22:31:22Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/65416Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/PUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/oai||revistateoriadahistoria@hotmail.com2175-58922175-5892opendoar:2021-06-12T22:31:22Revista de Teoria da História - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Paranoia and History, pathology and truth Paranoia e História, patologia e verdade |
title |
Paranoia and History, pathology and truth |
spellingShingle |
Paranoia and History, pathology and truth de Ávila, Danilo Paranoia History Truth Pathology Schreber Paranoia História Verdade Patologia Schreber |
title_short |
Paranoia and History, pathology and truth |
title_full |
Paranoia and History, pathology and truth |
title_fullStr |
Paranoia and History, pathology and truth |
title_full_unstemmed |
Paranoia and History, pathology and truth |
title_sort |
Paranoia and History, pathology and truth |
author |
de Ávila, Danilo |
author_facet |
de Ávila, Danilo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Ávila, Danilo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Paranoia History Truth Pathology Schreber Paranoia História Verdade Patologia Schreber |
topic |
Paranoia History Truth Pathology Schreber Paranoia História Verdade Patologia Schreber |
description |
This study aims to propose an opening of history towards psychoanalysis, specifically through the notion of paranoia. This traditional concept is in construction since the Freudian circle, with the famous case of President Schreber. In the twentieth century, the discussion appears in the works of Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Gilles Deleuze until the millennial Slavoj Zizek. Reconstructing this concept for these philosophers, psychoanalysts and sociologists, we can rework the accumulation generated its uses in historiography. Richard Hofstadter, who had coined the term paranoid style, started this trend on the side of history and brought political gains. It is up to this article do develop it, but not as a projection – notion very close to paranoia – to interpret other historical or social formations. But to rethink other critical models for historiography in the tension between pathology and truth, the very antinomy of paranoia. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/65416 10.5216/rth.v23i2.65416 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/65416 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5216/rth.v23i2.65416 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/65416/36672 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Teoria da História | rth https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Teoria da História | rth https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Teoria da História; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2020): History and Psychoanalysis; 246 - 272 Revista de Teoria da História; v. 23 n. 2 (2020): História e Psicanálise; 246 - 272 2175-5892 reponame:Revista de Teoria da História instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Revista de Teoria da História |
collection |
Revista de Teoria da História |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Teoria da História - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistateoriadahistoria@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1825947903981518848 |