Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH): interobserver reliability in the evaluation of venous ulcers

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rodrigues Alves, Gabriela
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Gomes Malaquias, Suelen, Bachion, Maria Márcia
Format: Article
Language: por
eng
Source: Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
Download full: https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49411
Summary: The aim of this study was to evaluate interobserver reliability of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) tool, in patients with venous ulcers. This methodological research was conducted in outpatient health care units, between June 2016 and August 2017. The participants were 10 nurses, who performed 46 observations of 35 wounds. Each observation was performed by a reference nurse, who provided the gold standard evaluation, and two clinical nurses participating in the research as subjects. To analyze the level of agreement, the Kappa index and intraclass correlation coefficient were used. Kappa values of the subscales ranged from 0.6 to 0.85 (p <0.001). There was almost perfect interobserver agreement for "area" and "exudate quantity" and substantial interobserver agreement for "tissue type" and "total score". The intraclass correlation coefficients were > 0.9, indicating excellent reliability. It is, thus, concluded that the PUSH presents satisfactory interobserver reliability for evaluating venous ulcers.
id UFG-13_13d1cb7d6b0c6ad8c81d624e60dadef3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/49411
network_acronym_str UFG-13
network_name_str Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
repository_id_str
spelling Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH): interobserver reliability in the evaluation of venous ulcersPressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH): confiabilidade interobservadores na avaliação de úlceras venosasWound HealingReproducibility of ResultsVaricose UlcerNursing AssessmentWound HealingReproducibility of ResultsVaricose UlcerNursing AssessmentCicatrizaçãoReprodutibilidade dos TestesÚlcera VaricosaAvaliação em EnfermagemCicatrizaçãoReprodutibilidade dos TestesÚlcera VaricosaAvaliação em EnfermagemThe aim of this study was to evaluate interobserver reliability of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) tool, in patients with venous ulcers. This methodological research was conducted in outpatient health care units, between June 2016 and August 2017. The participants were 10 nurses, who performed 46 observations of 35 wounds. Each observation was performed by a reference nurse, who provided the gold standard evaluation, and two clinical nurses participating in the research as subjects. To analyze the level of agreement, the Kappa index and intraclass correlation coefficient were used. Kappa values of the subscales ranged from 0.6 to 0.85 (p <0.001). There was almost perfect interobserver agreement for "area" and "exudate quantity" and substantial interobserver agreement for "tissue type" and "total score". The intraclass correlation coefficients were > 0.9, indicating excellent reliability. It is, thus, concluded that the PUSH presents satisfactory interobserver reliability for evaluating venous ulcers.Objetivou-se avaliar a confiabilidade interobservadores da Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing(PUSH), em pacientes com úlceras venosas. Trata-se de pesquisa metodológica, realizada em salas de curativos de unidades ambulatoriais de saúde, no período de junho de 2016 a agosto de 2017. Participaram 10 enfermeiras, que realizaram 46 observações em 35 lesões. Cada observação foi realizada por uma enfermeira de referência para a avaliação considerada padrão ouro e duas enfermeiras participantes da pesquisa como sujeito. Para análise de concordância, utilizou-se o índice Kappa e coeficiente de correlação intraclasse. Valores de Kappa das subescalas variaram de 0,6 a 0,85 (p<0,001). Houve concordância interobservador muito boa para “área” e “quantidade exsudato” e boa para “tipo de tecido” e “escore total”. Os coeficientes de correlação intraclasse foram > 0,9 o que indica excelente confiabilidade. Conclui-se que a PUSH apresenta confiabilidade interobservador satisfatória para avaliação de úlceras venosas.Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG2018-12-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/4941110.5216/ree.v20.49411Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; Vol. 20 (2018); v20a33Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; v. 20 (2018); v20a331518-1944reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Enfermageminstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporenghttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49411/26903https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49411/26904Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagemhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues Alves, GabrielaGomes Malaquias, SuelenBachion, Maria Márcia2022-05-23T22:06:11Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/49411Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/fenPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/oairee.fen@ufg.br1518-19441518-1944opendoar:2022-05-23T22:06:11Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH): interobserver reliability in the evaluation of venous ulcers
Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH): confiabilidade interobservadores na avaliação de úlceras venosas
title Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH): interobserver reliability in the evaluation of venous ulcers
spellingShingle Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH): interobserver reliability in the evaluation of venous ulcers
Rodrigues Alves, Gabriela
Wound Healing
Reproducibility of Results
Varicose Ulcer
Nursing Assessment
Wound Healing
Reproducibility of Results
Varicose Ulcer
Nursing Assessment
Cicatrização
Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
Úlcera Varicosa
Avaliação em Enfermagem
Cicatrização
Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
Úlcera Varicosa
Avaliação em Enfermagem
title_short Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH): interobserver reliability in the evaluation of venous ulcers
title_full Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH): interobserver reliability in the evaluation of venous ulcers
title_fullStr Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH): interobserver reliability in the evaluation of venous ulcers
title_full_unstemmed Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH): interobserver reliability in the evaluation of venous ulcers
title_sort Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH): interobserver reliability in the evaluation of venous ulcers
author Rodrigues Alves, Gabriela
author_facet Rodrigues Alves, Gabriela
Gomes Malaquias, Suelen
Bachion, Maria Márcia
author_role author
author2 Gomes Malaquias, Suelen
Bachion, Maria Márcia
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues Alves, Gabriela
Gomes Malaquias, Suelen
Bachion, Maria Márcia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Wound Healing
Reproducibility of Results
Varicose Ulcer
Nursing Assessment
Wound Healing
Reproducibility of Results
Varicose Ulcer
Nursing Assessment
Cicatrização
Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
Úlcera Varicosa
Avaliação em Enfermagem
Cicatrização
Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
Úlcera Varicosa
Avaliação em Enfermagem
topic Wound Healing
Reproducibility of Results
Varicose Ulcer
Nursing Assessment
Wound Healing
Reproducibility of Results
Varicose Ulcer
Nursing Assessment
Cicatrização
Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
Úlcera Varicosa
Avaliação em Enfermagem
Cicatrização
Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
Úlcera Varicosa
Avaliação em Enfermagem
description The aim of this study was to evaluate interobserver reliability of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) tool, in patients with venous ulcers. This methodological research was conducted in outpatient health care units, between June 2016 and August 2017. The participants were 10 nurses, who performed 46 observations of 35 wounds. Each observation was performed by a reference nurse, who provided the gold standard evaluation, and two clinical nurses participating in the research as subjects. To analyze the level of agreement, the Kappa index and intraclass correlation coefficient were used. Kappa values of the subscales ranged from 0.6 to 0.85 (p <0.001). There was almost perfect interobserver agreement for "area" and "exudate quantity" and substantial interobserver agreement for "tissue type" and "total score". The intraclass correlation coefficients were > 0.9, indicating excellent reliability. It is, thus, concluded that the PUSH presents satisfactory interobserver reliability for evaluating venous ulcers.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49411
10.5216/ree.v20.49411
url https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49411
identifier_str_mv 10.5216/ree.v20.49411
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49411/26903
https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49411/26904
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; Vol. 20 (2018); v20a33
Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; v. 20 (2018); v20a33
1518-1944
reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
collection Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ree.fen@ufg.br
_version_ 1797049171621969920