Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66517 |
Resumo: | Objective: to analyze the incidence of episiotomy and maternal and neonatal related factors. Method: cross-sectional, retrospective study in which 11,809 medical records of women who underwent vaginal delivery were analyzed. The chi-square test was performed to identify related factors (p<0.05). Results: the incidence of episiotomy was 59.4%. Among women who did not undergo episiotomy, 27.0% had intact perineum and 13.5% had spontaneous laceration. Maternal related factors were age less than 19 years, appropriate antenatal care, primiparity, presence of uterine dynamics, cervical dilation between 1 and 3 cm, ruptured amniotic sac, and prolonged labor. Neonatal factors were full-term babies, birth weight ≥2,500g, Apgar ≥7, cephalic presentation, complications with the baby and referral to rooming-in. Conclusion: the practice of episiotomy was high and should be discouraged. Respect for the physiology of birth and the individuality of women is necessary to strengthen maternal care. |
id |
UFG-13_7192e6e070e35a7e552afba4c0ccd161 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/66517 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-13 |
network_name_str |
Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factorsPrática da episiotomia: fatores maternos e neonatais relacionadosEpisiotomyEpidemiologic FactorsLabor, ObstetricObstetric NursingEpisiotomiaFatores EpidemiológicosTrabalho de PartoEnfermagem ObstétricaObjective: to analyze the incidence of episiotomy and maternal and neonatal related factors. Method: cross-sectional, retrospective study in which 11,809 medical records of women who underwent vaginal delivery were analyzed. The chi-square test was performed to identify related factors (p<0.05). Results: the incidence of episiotomy was 59.4%. Among women who did not undergo episiotomy, 27.0% had intact perineum and 13.5% had spontaneous laceration. Maternal related factors were age less than 19 years, appropriate antenatal care, primiparity, presence of uterine dynamics, cervical dilation between 1 and 3 cm, ruptured amniotic sac, and prolonged labor. Neonatal factors were full-term babies, birth weight ≥2,500g, Apgar ≥7, cephalic presentation, complications with the baby and referral to rooming-in. Conclusion: the practice of episiotomy was high and should be discouraged. Respect for the physiology of birth and the individuality of women is necessary to strengthen maternal care.Objetivo: analisar a incidência da episiotomia e os fatores maternos e neonatais relacionados. Método: estudo transversal, retrospectivo, que analisou 11.809 prontuários de mulheres que evoluíram ao parto vaginal. Realizou-se o teste qui-quadrado para identificar os fatores relacionados (p<0,05). Resultados: a incidência da episiotomia foi 59,4%. Entre as mulheres que não sofreram episiotomia, 27,0% permaneceram com períneo íntegro e 13,5% tiveram laceração espontânea. Fatores maternos relacionados foram idade inferior a 19 anos, acompanhamento pré-natal adequado, primiparidade, dinâmica uterina presente, dilatação cervical entre 1 e 3cm, bolsa amniótica rota e trabalho de parto prolongado. Os fatores neonatais foram bebês a termo, peso ao nascer ≥2500g, Apgar ≥ 7, apresentação cefálica, intercorrências com o bebê e encaminhamento ao alojamento conjunto. Conclusão: a prática da episiotomia foi elevada, a qual deve ser desencorajada, com respeito a fisiologia do nascimento e a individualidade das mulheres, para o fortalecimento dos cuidados maternos.Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG2022-01-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/6651710.5216/ree.v24.66517Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; Vol. 24 (2022); 66517Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; v. 24 (2022); 665171518-1944reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Enfermageminstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporenghttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66517/37875https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66517/37876Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagemhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPelissari, Luana Carolina Back Zilly, AdrianaFerreira, HelderSpohr, Fabiana AparecidaCasacio, Gabriela Dominicci de MeloSilva, Rosane Meire Munhak da2023-06-23T17:12:49Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/66517Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/fenPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/oairee.fen@ufg.br1518-19441518-1944opendoar:2023-06-23T17:12:49Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors Prática da episiotomia: fatores maternos e neonatais relacionados |
title |
Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors |
spellingShingle |
Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors Pelissari, Luana Carolina Back Episiotomy Epidemiologic Factors Labor, Obstetric Obstetric Nursing Episiotomia Fatores Epidemiológicos Trabalho de Parto Enfermagem Obstétrica |
title_short |
Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors |
title_full |
Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors |
title_fullStr |
Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors |
title_full_unstemmed |
Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors |
title_sort |
Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors |
author |
Pelissari, Luana Carolina Back |
author_facet |
Pelissari, Luana Carolina Back Zilly, Adriana Ferreira, Helder Spohr, Fabiana Aparecida Casacio, Gabriela Dominicci de Melo Silva, Rosane Meire Munhak da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zilly, Adriana Ferreira, Helder Spohr, Fabiana Aparecida Casacio, Gabriela Dominicci de Melo Silva, Rosane Meire Munhak da |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pelissari, Luana Carolina Back Zilly, Adriana Ferreira, Helder Spohr, Fabiana Aparecida Casacio, Gabriela Dominicci de Melo Silva, Rosane Meire Munhak da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Episiotomy Epidemiologic Factors Labor, Obstetric Obstetric Nursing Episiotomia Fatores Epidemiológicos Trabalho de Parto Enfermagem Obstétrica |
topic |
Episiotomy Epidemiologic Factors Labor, Obstetric Obstetric Nursing Episiotomia Fatores Epidemiológicos Trabalho de Parto Enfermagem Obstétrica |
description |
Objective: to analyze the incidence of episiotomy and maternal and neonatal related factors. Method: cross-sectional, retrospective study in which 11,809 medical records of women who underwent vaginal delivery were analyzed. The chi-square test was performed to identify related factors (p<0.05). Results: the incidence of episiotomy was 59.4%. Among women who did not undergo episiotomy, 27.0% had intact perineum and 13.5% had spontaneous laceration. Maternal related factors were age less than 19 years, appropriate antenatal care, primiparity, presence of uterine dynamics, cervical dilation between 1 and 3 cm, ruptured amniotic sac, and prolonged labor. Neonatal factors were full-term babies, birth weight ≥2,500g, Apgar ≥7, cephalic presentation, complications with the baby and referral to rooming-in. Conclusion: the practice of episiotomy was high and should be discouraged. Respect for the physiology of birth and the individuality of women is necessary to strengthen maternal care. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66517 10.5216/ree.v24.66517 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66517 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5216/ree.v24.66517 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66517/37875 https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66517/37876 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; Vol. 24 (2022); 66517 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; v. 24 (2022); 66517 1518-1944 reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem |
collection |
Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ree.fen@ufg.br |
_version_ |
1797049164249432064 |