Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pelissari, Luana Carolina Back
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Zilly, Adriana, Ferreira, Helder, Spohr, Fabiana Aparecida, Casacio, Gabriela Dominicci de Melo, Silva, Rosane Meire Munhak da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66517
Resumo: Objective: to analyze the incidence of episiotomy and maternal and neonatal related factors. Method: cross-sectional, retrospective study in which 11,809 medical records of women who underwent vaginal delivery were analyzed. The chi-square test was performed to identify related factors (p<0.05). Results: the incidence of episiotomy was 59.4%. Among women who did not undergo episiotomy, 27.0% had intact perineum and 13.5% had spontaneous laceration. Maternal related factors were age less than 19 years, appropriate antenatal care, primiparity, presence of uterine dynamics, cervical dilation between 1 and 3 cm, ruptured amniotic sac, and prolonged labor. Neonatal factors were full-term babies, birth weight ≥2,500g, Apgar ≥7, cephalic presentation, complications with the baby and referral to rooming-in. Conclusion: the practice of episiotomy was high and should be discouraged. Respect for the physiology of birth and the individuality of women is necessary to strengthen maternal care.
id UFG-13_7192e6e070e35a7e552afba4c0ccd161
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/66517
network_acronym_str UFG-13
network_name_str Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
repository_id_str
spelling Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factorsPrática da episiotomia: fatores maternos e neonatais relacionadosEpisiotomyEpidemiologic FactorsLabor, ObstetricObstetric NursingEpisiotomiaFatores EpidemiológicosTrabalho de PartoEnfermagem ObstétricaObjective: to analyze the incidence of episiotomy and maternal and neonatal related factors. Method: cross-sectional, retrospective study in which 11,809 medical records of women who underwent vaginal delivery were analyzed. The chi-square test was performed to identify related factors (p<0.05). Results: the incidence of episiotomy was 59.4%. Among women who did not undergo episiotomy, 27.0% had intact perineum and 13.5% had spontaneous laceration. Maternal related factors were age less than 19 years, appropriate antenatal care, primiparity, presence of uterine dynamics, cervical dilation between 1 and 3 cm, ruptured amniotic sac, and prolonged labor. Neonatal factors were full-term babies, birth weight ≥2,500g, Apgar ≥7, cephalic presentation, complications with the baby and referral to rooming-in. Conclusion: the practice of episiotomy was high and should be discouraged. Respect for the physiology of birth and the individuality of women is necessary to strengthen maternal care.Objetivo: analisar a incidência da episiotomia e os fatores maternos e neonatais relacionados. Método: estudo transversal, retrospectivo, que analisou 11.809 prontuários de mulheres que evoluíram ao parto vaginal. Realizou-se o teste qui-quadrado para identificar os fatores relacionados (p<0,05). Resultados: a incidência da episiotomia foi 59,4%. Entre as mulheres que não sofreram episiotomia, 27,0% permaneceram com períneo íntegro e 13,5% tiveram laceração espontânea. Fatores maternos relacionados foram idade inferior a 19 anos, acompanhamento pré-natal adequado, primiparidade, dinâmica uterina presente, dilatação cervical entre 1 e 3cm, bolsa amniótica rota e trabalho de parto prolongado. Os fatores neonatais foram bebês a termo, peso ao nascer ≥2500g, Apgar ≥ 7, apresentação cefálica, intercorrências com o bebê e encaminhamento ao alojamento conjunto. Conclusão: a prática da episiotomia foi elevada, a qual deve ser desencorajada, com respeito a fisiologia do nascimento e a individualidade das mulheres, para o fortalecimento dos cuidados maternos.Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG2022-01-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/6651710.5216/ree.v24.66517Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; Vol. 24 (2022); 66517Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; v. 24 (2022); 665171518-1944reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Enfermageminstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporenghttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66517/37875https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66517/37876Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagemhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPelissari, Luana Carolina Back Zilly, AdrianaFerreira, HelderSpohr, Fabiana AparecidaCasacio, Gabriela Dominicci de MeloSilva, Rosane Meire Munhak da2023-06-23T17:12:49Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/66517Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/fenPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/oairee.fen@ufg.br1518-19441518-1944opendoar:2023-06-23T17:12:49Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors
Prática da episiotomia: fatores maternos e neonatais relacionados
title Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors
spellingShingle Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors
Pelissari, Luana Carolina Back
Episiotomy
Epidemiologic Factors
Labor, Obstetric
Obstetric Nursing
Episiotomia
Fatores Epidemiológicos
Trabalho de Parto
Enfermagem Obstétrica
title_short Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors
title_full Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors
title_fullStr Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors
title_full_unstemmed Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors
title_sort Practice of episiotomy: maternal and neonatal related factors
author Pelissari, Luana Carolina Back
author_facet Pelissari, Luana Carolina Back
Zilly, Adriana
Ferreira, Helder
Spohr, Fabiana Aparecida
Casacio, Gabriela Dominicci de Melo
Silva, Rosane Meire Munhak da
author_role author
author2 Zilly, Adriana
Ferreira, Helder
Spohr, Fabiana Aparecida
Casacio, Gabriela Dominicci de Melo
Silva, Rosane Meire Munhak da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pelissari, Luana Carolina Back
Zilly, Adriana
Ferreira, Helder
Spohr, Fabiana Aparecida
Casacio, Gabriela Dominicci de Melo
Silva, Rosane Meire Munhak da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Episiotomy
Epidemiologic Factors
Labor, Obstetric
Obstetric Nursing
Episiotomia
Fatores Epidemiológicos
Trabalho de Parto
Enfermagem Obstétrica
topic Episiotomy
Epidemiologic Factors
Labor, Obstetric
Obstetric Nursing
Episiotomia
Fatores Epidemiológicos
Trabalho de Parto
Enfermagem Obstétrica
description Objective: to analyze the incidence of episiotomy and maternal and neonatal related factors. Method: cross-sectional, retrospective study in which 11,809 medical records of women who underwent vaginal delivery were analyzed. The chi-square test was performed to identify related factors (p<0.05). Results: the incidence of episiotomy was 59.4%. Among women who did not undergo episiotomy, 27.0% had intact perineum and 13.5% had spontaneous laceration. Maternal related factors were age less than 19 years, appropriate antenatal care, primiparity, presence of uterine dynamics, cervical dilation between 1 and 3 cm, ruptured amniotic sac, and prolonged labor. Neonatal factors were full-term babies, birth weight ≥2,500g, Apgar ≥7, cephalic presentation, complications with the baby and referral to rooming-in. Conclusion: the practice of episiotomy was high and should be discouraged. Respect for the physiology of birth and the individuality of women is necessary to strengthen maternal care.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66517
10.5216/ree.v24.66517
url https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66517
identifier_str_mv 10.5216/ree.v24.66517
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66517/37875
https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66517/37876
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; Vol. 24 (2022); 66517
Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; v. 24 (2022); 66517
1518-1944
reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
collection Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ree.fen@ufg.br
_version_ 1797049164249432064