BALANCE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS VS. PROMOTION OF SOCIAL RIGHTS: A FALSE ANTAGONISM
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/72987 |
Resumo: | The social and economic collapse brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic required governments to make a huge financial effort in an attempt to at least mitigate the impact suffered by people. And this effort is already charging its bill: public debt has reached alarming levels. Consequently, the debate on how to deal with this reality of fiscal strangulation is once again back on the agenda, imposing to the countries making choices. Cut spending and, by extension, limit social rights or bet on public investments to balance debt? The first path, that of fiscal austerity, has been imposed in recent decades, but today once again became more relevant the developmental vision, that understands it is more appropriate to seek other strategies to balance revenues and expenditures. Brazil, however, by the choice of the last governments, is stuck with the first system, whose maximum expression is the Constitutional Amendment n.º 95/2016, which, by stipulating a ceiling for the expansion of social investments, ended up making it difficult to meet a wide universe of human needs, now particularly aggravated by the pandemic. |
id |
UFG-14_9376a7621fe9b7f64ff56fff037821b8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/72987 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-14 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
BALANCE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS VS. PROMOTION OF SOCIAL RIGHTS: A FALSE ANTAGONISMEQUILÍBRIO DAS CONTAS PÚBLICAS VS. PROMOÇÃO DE DIREITOS SOCIAIS: UM FALSO ANTAGONISMO: BALANCE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS VS. PROMOTION OF SOCIAL RIGHTS: A FALSE ANTAGONISM MarcusDireito e economiaEstado de bem-estar socialAusteridade fiscalEmenda constitucional n. 95/2016The social and economic collapse brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic required governments to make a huge financial effort in an attempt to at least mitigate the impact suffered by people. And this effort is already charging its bill: public debt has reached alarming levels. Consequently, the debate on how to deal with this reality of fiscal strangulation is once again back on the agenda, imposing to the countries making choices. Cut spending and, by extension, limit social rights or bet on public investments to balance debt? The first path, that of fiscal austerity, has been imposed in recent decades, but today once again became more relevant the developmental vision, that understands it is more appropriate to seek other strategies to balance revenues and expenditures. Brazil, however, by the choice of the last governments, is stuck with the first system, whose maximum expression is the Constitutional Amendment n.º 95/2016, which, by stipulating a ceiling for the expansion of social investments, ended up making it difficult to meet a wide universe of human needs, now particularly aggravated by the pandemic.O colapso social e econômico trazido pela pandemia do Covid-19 exigiu dos governos um enorme esforço financeiro na tentativa de, ao menos, amenizar o impacto sofrido pelas pessoas. E este esforço já está cobrando sua conta: o endividamento público alcançou níveis alarmantes. Consequentemente, o debate sobre como lidar com esta realidade de estrangulamento fiscal volta, mais uma vez, à pauta, exigindo que os países façam escolhas. Cortar gastos e, por extensão, limitar direitos sociais, ou apostar nos investimentos públicos para equilibrar a dívida? O primeiro caminho, da austeridade fiscal, se impôs nas últimas décadas, mas, atualmente, volta a ganhar corpo a visão desenvolvimentista, que entende ser mais adequado buscar outras estratégias para equilibrar receitas e despesas. O Brasil, contudo, por opção dos últimos governos, está preso ao primeiro sistema, cuja máxima expressão é a Emenda Constitucional n. 95/2016, a qual, ao estipular um teto para a expansão dos investimentos sociais, acabou por dificultar o atendimento de um amplo universo de necessidades humanas, agora particularmente agravadas pela pandemia.Universidade Federal de Goiás2023-01-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliação por "double-blind review"application/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/72987Revista Facultad de Derecho UFG; Vol. 46 Núm. 2 (2022): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFGMagazine de la faculté de droit UFG; Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFGRevista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG; v. 46 n. 2 (2022): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG0101-7187reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/72987/39447Santiago, Marcus Firminoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-15T21:24:48Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/72987Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/revfdPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/oaimcvidotte@gmail.com || rfdufg@gmail.com2317-67330101-7187opendoar:2023-09-15T21:24:48Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
BALANCE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS VS. PROMOTION OF SOCIAL RIGHTS: A FALSE ANTAGONISM EQUILÍBRIO DAS CONTAS PÚBLICAS VS. PROMOÇÃO DE DIREITOS SOCIAIS: UM FALSO ANTAGONISMO: BALANCE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS VS. PROMOTION OF SOCIAL RIGHTS: A FALSE ANTAGONISM Marcus |
title |
BALANCE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS VS. PROMOTION OF SOCIAL RIGHTS: A FALSE ANTAGONISM |
spellingShingle |
BALANCE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS VS. PROMOTION OF SOCIAL RIGHTS: A FALSE ANTAGONISM Santiago, Marcus Firmino Direito e economia Estado de bem-estar social Austeridade fiscal Emenda constitucional n. 95/2016 |
title_short |
BALANCE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS VS. PROMOTION OF SOCIAL RIGHTS: A FALSE ANTAGONISM |
title_full |
BALANCE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS VS. PROMOTION OF SOCIAL RIGHTS: A FALSE ANTAGONISM |
title_fullStr |
BALANCE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS VS. PROMOTION OF SOCIAL RIGHTS: A FALSE ANTAGONISM |
title_full_unstemmed |
BALANCE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS VS. PROMOTION OF SOCIAL RIGHTS: A FALSE ANTAGONISM |
title_sort |
BALANCE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS VS. PROMOTION OF SOCIAL RIGHTS: A FALSE ANTAGONISM |
author |
Santiago, Marcus Firmino |
author_facet |
Santiago, Marcus Firmino |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santiago, Marcus Firmino |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito e economia Estado de bem-estar social Austeridade fiscal Emenda constitucional n. 95/2016 |
topic |
Direito e economia Estado de bem-estar social Austeridade fiscal Emenda constitucional n. 95/2016 |
description |
The social and economic collapse brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic required governments to make a huge financial effort in an attempt to at least mitigate the impact suffered by people. And this effort is already charging its bill: public debt has reached alarming levels. Consequently, the debate on how to deal with this reality of fiscal strangulation is once again back on the agenda, imposing to the countries making choices. Cut spending and, by extension, limit social rights or bet on public investments to balance debt? The first path, that of fiscal austerity, has been imposed in recent decades, but today once again became more relevant the developmental vision, that understands it is more appropriate to seek other strategies to balance revenues and expenditures. Brazil, however, by the choice of the last governments, is stuck with the first system, whose maximum expression is the Constitutional Amendment n.º 95/2016, which, by stipulating a ceiling for the expansion of social investments, ended up making it difficult to meet a wide universe of human needs, now particularly aggravated by the pandemic. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-01-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliação por "double-blind review" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/72987 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/72987 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/72987/39447 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Facultad de Derecho UFG; Vol. 46 Núm. 2 (2022): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG Magazine de la faculté de droit UFG; Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG; v. 46 n. 2 (2022): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG 0101-7187 reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mcvidotte@gmail.com || rfdufg@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1796798165819588608 |