Cidade vigiada: segurança e controle em tempos de biopoder

• Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Ludmilla Alves de
• Data de Publicação: 2013
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
• dARK ID: ark:/38995/0013000003htc
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/3127
• topic: Subjetividade; Vigilância; Câmeras; Insegurança; Insegurança; Subjectivity; Surveillance; Cameras; Insecurity; Urban space; COMUNICACAO::TEORIA DA COMUNICACAO

The contemporary world lives the reality of the culture of fear, culminating in a society under constant surveillance. And the surveillance cameras are part of the urban scenario being necessary to exercise of controlling and security. This paper aims to identify how the individual is incurred as a subject before surveillance. Insecurity, fear and social conflicts guided by contemporary capitalism. This is a qualitative exploratory study that pursued to know the current surveillance control universe established in the contemporary world. The following study of the surveillance cameras usage in Goiânia uses as a theoretical and methodological referential the discourse analysis (DA) based on the method of Eni P. Orlandi (2005). All the evoked notions and theories such as power, knowledge, subjectivity and discourse, in view of authors as Foucault (2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 1999a: 1999b: 1987), Guattari and Rolnik (2011: 1992), Deleuze (2005: 2001: 1992) and Agamben (2009), are worked in the theoretical chapters and resumed during the analysis process. Were interviewed passers-by and traders present in the monitored areas as well as representatives of the monitoring central station. Throughout the analysis and interviews the attention was turned to the process of subjectivity of the subject. Their subjection process (acceptance and resistance/biopower) and still the ways of knowing and the power present in the relation between the subject and the surveillance cameras. From these categories of analysis and interviews it was observed the presence of a hegemonic discourse where the subject is incurred by the relation of forces, modes coercion and control that they are involved in, developing a behavior characteristic of biopower. However this same subject is constituted according to the environment they live it is also the subject that was not characterized by a unique behavior in their own way to make themselves the subject, becoming, therefore, mass of a hegemonic discourse, absolutely controllable by a security system, sold only as something to benefit society. Keywords: Subjectivity. Surveillance. Cameras. Insecurity. Urban space.