Bairro nortista (Jussara-GO): a migração e a (re)construção de um lugar

• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Hilda Freitas
• Data de Publicação: 2019
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
• dARK ID: ark:/38995/0013000009b5z
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/10161
• topic: Migração; Etnográfico; Bairro nortista; Migration; Ethnographic; Northern neighborhood; OUTROS::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS

This work contemplates the migration and (re) construction of place, within the process that oscillates between rural and urban. The place is the Northern District, located in Jussara, interior of the state of Goiás. The research was done with a group of 50 adults. These people are chosen because they have a memory and experiences of time spent in the Northern District and / or the northeastern states. The interest of this research arises from the perception of the marginality of official recognition of participation of these neighborhood residents in the formation of the city, as well as the constant attribution of other residents of other neighborhoods that the Northern District is a dangerous and therefore bad place. of living. In this sense, this research builds and ethnographic analysis of the aforementioned neighborhood to know the daily lives of the people who live there. It can be observed preliminarily that it is formed by families that are neighbors and friends of some decades, in which they themselves demonstrate and say that there is a good place to live, undoing or refuting the official narrative in force in the city. For this context, I use anthropological theory as a support for research, and I already use Yi-Fu-Tuan (1983, p.182) when he says that "specific importance changes over time, while general importance remains." Given this, it is understood that this work is of general importance, as it fits in a context of migration, without intervention and direct incentive from the government; and specific, as the people involved have singularities that built and rebuilt a place, a movement that sometimes explodes official history. Thus, the study embraces both time in the diachronic perspective, as well as synchronic. This is justified because history is not ignored throughout the ages, nor is it ignoring the present perspective of living. Thus, the process of constructing the senses of places and valuing experiences are used to understand the uses and customs of residents, as well as to approach the understanding of the anthropological constitution of their memories and identities.