Uma nova (des) ordem nas cidades: o movimento dos sujeitos não desejados na ocupação dos espaços urbanos das capitais do cerrado - Goiânia, Brasília e Palmas

• Autor(a) principal: Pelá, Márcia Cristina Hizim
• Data de Publicação: 2014
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/4051
• topic: Goiânia; Brasília; Palmas; Cidades-capitais planejadas; Sujeitos não desejados; Práticas socioculturais; Práxis; (Des)ordem; (Dis)order; Goiânia; Brasília; Palmas; Planned capital-cities; Not welcomed subjects; Socio-cultural practices; Praxis; CIENCIAS HUMANAS::GEOGRAFIA

The main objective of this thesis is to analyze the spatialization process of not welcomed subjects in the planned capitals of Brazilian Cerrado. Goiânia, Brasília and Palmas. The proposition is that the dialectical relationship between the norm and the life, through work and social-cultural practices, promotes landslidings of meaning both in form and content of the urban spaces, thus, provoking a new (Dis)order in these cities. The term “not welcomed subjects” was coined by the author of this paper on her master’s degree dis sertation as a way of referring to the capital Goiânia builders, once that, despite these workers represented a bigger contingent on the city building process, there wasn’t even a reserved space for them on the original planning. This fact allowed the relationship assessment of what was once imputed to the workers, the time elapsed on the city building wasn’t counted as well as the right to live over the edifications they crafted. This phenomenon, that has also happened in the city building of Brasília and Palmas, goes on until today, revealing that the not welcomed subjects on cities planned spaces are not only the builders. Another huge contingent of workers is added to the “not welcomed” group forced out of their homes for numerous reasons like, expelling from the countryside, lack of work, housing and better life perspective, etc., these individuals migrated to Goiânia, Palmas and Brasília hoping to find better living conditions. Another important assessment is that these cities were built and managed wit hin the bounds of capitalist development. They are cities initially planned, as claimed by some authors and researchers, by and for the capital. However, despite agreeing with the socio -spatial analysis that come from these precepts and also understanding the hegemonic financier and market driven logic through the capital-cities urban spaces configuration, we believe that they are insufficient to comprehend the development of these cities urban areas, once that, the final product of the capital-work relationship is privileged, while the not welcomed subjects’ struggles for surviving and fixing themselves in the new city is ignored. Therefore, we add to the relationships studied here the symbolic, political and social meanings. There is a spatial living that cannot be ignored; it’s within it that the not welcomed subjects’ movement against the logic of hegemonic capital is acknowledged. It’s over this space that the dialectical contradictions are revealed: the dialectic between the conceived and perceived spac e and the lived one; between the historical time and the social one; between alienation and creation; between frustration and possibility; between domination and insurgency; demonstrating that human beings cannot be totally alienated, through struggles, creations, changes, they resist and (re) exist. When doing it, they break the established order and portray a new ( Dis)order, which, in one way or another, will be materialized in the urban areas and alter its form and contend. And it’s exactly within this movement that a transforming praxis can be glimpsed.