Cartografia das relações entre psicologia, filosofia e teatro: norma ou singularidade?

• Autor(a) principal: Souza, Nayane Ataides de
• Data de Publicação: 2020
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
• dARK ID: ark:/38995/0013000004zsx
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/11221
• topic: Cartografia; Psicologia; Filosofia; Teatro; Norma; Singularidade; Cartography; Psychology; Philosophy; Theater; Rule; Singularity; CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA

The objective of this research is: cartography of relations between teathre, psycology, philosophy searching for a conceptual critic and looking behind the theory of philosophy of difference to propose the strengthening of the theories of cultural psycology at Brasil. The object of research does not was stratified because the metodoloy that we use are not embased in construction cientific but through delimitation of object to be observed. That’s what cartography proposes: one relation betwen subjects and objects that it is constant being able to give voice at the many people and the several subjects that we analize consider that it is one search at the camp (garimpo) of human sciences. The principal objective of this dissertation it is to problematize the relation between the knowledges and the practice that normalize some types of psychology and the possibilities of creation in life from the theory of philosophy aldo theatre and the history of psychology. So we have as specific objectives: 1) Show the critic about some of principal philosophical concepts that are cornerstones of psycology and some historical cut of psychology. 2) Demonstrate the knowlegde of philosophy of difference uniting with the cultural psychology that opposes to the psychology cientific. 3) Brief of historic of theory of development theories and of school and the apresentation of some concepts that are veiculated by theater, philosophy and psychology. We pretend to show the agonistic between the resistence and the constitution of the ways of normative subjectivation by the narrative of the researcher behind the field of diary that was operated by many voices. We used the perspective of genealogy and cartography to think about the psychology, philosophy and the theater as available at the production of normal subjectivations where life is delineated and produced by one representation/ideal of unity that puts itself in front to another knowledges as being the only way to say about what it is to be a human. We problematize the disciplinary function and the control of psychology at schools and your insetion at theater principaly in to the process of knowledge and creation that the theories of theater works as one idea of development of psychology and normalize the production of characters as representations or identities.