A importância de se levar em conta a lacuna linneana no planejamento de conservação dos anfíbios no Brasil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFG |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5733 |
Resumo: | We only have described a small fraction of the world’s biodiversity. The influence of how much we know biodiversity and how that hinders our strategies for conserving it is a genuine and weighty concern. Brazil has the greatest amphibian diversity in the world with 1026 amphibian species, and the number of described species is increasing at a high rate. It is likely that many of these Brazilian amphibians still undescribed are threatened. Although many new species are being described in Brazil some protected areas are being downsized or downgraded. In this study we aim to analyze how much the Linnean shortfall impairs our ability to prioritize areas for the conservation of a highly diverse and still poorly known group such as the Brazilian amphibians, and whether the main conservation strategy in Brazil is prepared to deal with this shortfall. We made four spatial prioritizations of the known Brazilian amphibians of four arbitrarily chosen scenarios (1980, 1990, 2000 and 2013), then we overlapped these prioritizations with the existing federal protected areas of each scenario, and compared the results, calculating the proportions of the high priority areas that changed place and the proportion of high priority areas federally protected at each scenario. In the first change of scenario 921 of the 4672 cells that comprises the seventeen per cent of highest priority cells in 1980 changed place to form the seventeen per cent most priority cells in 1990 (19,71% of the cells). On the 1990-2000 change 905 of the 4686 cells changed place (19,31%) and on the last change of scenario (2000-2013) 983 of the 4675 (21,01%) highest priority cells has changed place. The percentage of these highest priority areas that was federally protected at each scenario and in each of the biomes was severely low in all cases, but is maidenly rising with time. The new protected areas created between the scenarios (both the strict protection and sustainable use areas) do not follow the new priority areas. It is crucial that Brazilian taxonomy continues to grow. Since Brazil is so important for the future of the global diversity of amphibians is also crucial a systematic planning of new protected areas, using scientific models to account for the Linnean shortfall, in order to protect such an astonishing diversity. Keywords: Linnean shortfall, Biodiversity, Conservation, Brazilian Amphibians, Spatial Conservation Prioritization |
id |
UFG-2_87ada81bb8204ba542af5420bcd84dbc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/5733 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Silva, Daniel de Brito Cândido dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5139765780779893Silva, Daniel de Brito Candido dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1232924026540187Moreira, Mateus Atadeu2016-07-14T15:01:03Z2015-04-28ATADEU, M. A importância de se levar em conta a Lacuna Linneana no planejamento de conservação dos anfíbios no Brasil. 2015. 63 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ecologia e Evolução) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2015.http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5733ark:/38995/001300000cdgtWe only have described a small fraction of the world’s biodiversity. The influence of how much we know biodiversity and how that hinders our strategies for conserving it is a genuine and weighty concern. Brazil has the greatest amphibian diversity in the world with 1026 amphibian species, and the number of described species is increasing at a high rate. It is likely that many of these Brazilian amphibians still undescribed are threatened. Although many new species are being described in Brazil some protected areas are being downsized or downgraded. In this study we aim to analyze how much the Linnean shortfall impairs our ability to prioritize areas for the conservation of a highly diverse and still poorly known group such as the Brazilian amphibians, and whether the main conservation strategy in Brazil is prepared to deal with this shortfall. We made four spatial prioritizations of the known Brazilian amphibians of four arbitrarily chosen scenarios (1980, 1990, 2000 and 2013), then we overlapped these prioritizations with the existing federal protected areas of each scenario, and compared the results, calculating the proportions of the high priority areas that changed place and the proportion of high priority areas federally protected at each scenario. In the first change of scenario 921 of the 4672 cells that comprises the seventeen per cent of highest priority cells in 1980 changed place to form the seventeen per cent most priority cells in 1990 (19,71% of the cells). On the 1990-2000 change 905 of the 4686 cells changed place (19,31%) and on the last change of scenario (2000-2013) 983 of the 4675 (21,01%) highest priority cells has changed place. The percentage of these highest priority areas that was federally protected at each scenario and in each of the biomes was severely low in all cases, but is maidenly rising with time. The new protected areas created between the scenarios (both the strict protection and sustainable use areas) do not follow the new priority areas. It is crucial that Brazilian taxonomy continues to grow. Since Brazil is so important for the future of the global diversity of amphibians is also crucial a systematic planning of new protected areas, using scientific models to account for the Linnean shortfall, in order to protect such an astonishing diversity. Keywords: Linnean shortfall, Biodiversity, Conservation, Brazilian Amphibians, Spatial Conservation PrioritizationA ciência descreveu menos da metade do número total de espécies existentes. A influência do quanto conhecemos ou não a biodiversidade e o quanto isso pesa nas nossas estratégias de conservação é uma preocupação genuína e séria. O Brasil possui a maior diversidade de anfíbios do mundo com 1026 espécies, e esse número tem crescido em uma alta taxa. É provável que muitos dos anfíbios que ainda não foram descritos no Brasil estejam ameaçados. Enquanto muitas espécies têm sido descritas ultimamente o Brasil está diminuindo o tamanho e o grau de proteção de diversas áreas protegidas. Nesse estudo avaliamos o quanto a lacuna Linneana afeta a definição de áreas prioritárias para a conservação de um grupo altamente diverso e ainda pobremente conhecido como os anfíbios do Brasil, e se a principal estratégia de conservação brasileira está preparada pra lidar com essa lacuna. Nós fizemos quatro priorizações espaciais da fauna de anfíbios conhecida no Brasil em quatro cenários no tempo (1980, 1990, 2000 e 2013), em seguida sobrepusemos essas priorizações com as Unidades de Conservação Federais de cada um desses cenários e comparamos os resultados. Calculamos o quanto a configuração das áreas mais prioritárias mudou de um cenário para outro e o quanto das áreas mais prioritárias estava protegido em cada cenário. De 1980 para 1990, 921 das 4672 células mais prioritárias mudaram de lugar (19,71% das células). De 1990 para 2000, 905 das 4686 células mudaram (19,31%) e na última mudança de cenário (2000-2013) 983 das 4675 (21,01%) tiveram mudança espacial. A proporção dessas áreas mais importantes para conservação que estava protegida em cada cenário e em cada bioma foi muito pequena, mas está crescendo modestamente com o tempo. As novas Unidades de conservação criadas entre os cenários não acompanham as novas áreas mais prioritárias que surgem com o acréscimo das novas espécies. Sendo o Brasil tão importante para a proteção da tão ameaçada fauna global de anfíbios é crucial que exista um planejamento sistemático de novas áreas protegidas, e que esse planejamento use modelos científicos para levar em conta a lacuna Linneana.Submitted by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2016-07-14T14:59:37Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Mateus Atadeu Moreira - 2015.pdf: 3009996 bytes, checksum: 1a2c29fc3dae91ef371d08eaa0f6b9e2 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2016-07-14T15:01:03Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Mateus Atadeu Moreira - 2015.pdf: 3009996 bytes, checksum: 1a2c29fc3dae91ef371d08eaa0f6b9e2 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-14T15:01:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Mateus Atadeu Moreira - 2015.pdf: 3009996 bytes, checksum: 1a2c29fc3dae91ef371d08eaa0f6b9e2 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-04-28Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de GoiásPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Evolução (ICB)UFGBrasilInstituto de Ciências Biológicas - ICB (RG)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLacuna linneanaBiodiversidadeConservaçãoAnfíbios brasileirosPriorização espacialLinnean shortfallBiodiversityConservationBrazilian amphibiansSpatial conservation prioritizationCIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIAA importância de se levar em conta a lacuna linneana no planejamento de conservação dos anfíbios no BrasilThe importance of taking into account the linnean shortfall on amphibian conservation planninginfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-5361682850774351271600600600600-387277211782737340432634996052953650022075167498588264571reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFGinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/b67877ba-5927-43d8-8f61-4aa84ba4bc7f/downloadbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/05fab5f0-5d87-4a87-afe3-d152c6aa89d0/download4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-80http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/04a682dd-999b-43e9-a65f-98a64011967b/downloadd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD53license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-80http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/8740422c-a2dc-456b-a267-d79e0311233d/downloadd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54ORIGINALDissertação - Mateus Atadeu Moreira - 2015.pdfDissertação - Mateus Atadeu Moreira - 2015.pdfapplication/pdf3009996http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/d6860503-4b56-4455-9648-b197f605aa5e/download1a2c29fc3dae91ef371d08eaa0f6b9e2MD55tede/57332016-07-14 12:01:03.602http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acesso Abertoopen.accessoai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/5733http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tedeRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/oai/requesttasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.bropendoar:2016-07-14T15:01:03Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)falseTk9UQTogQ09MT1FVRSBBUVVJIEEgU1VBIFBSw5NQUklBIExJQ0VOw4dBCkVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EgZGUgZXhlbXBsbyDDqSBmb3JuZWNpZGEgYXBlbmFzIHBhcmEgZmlucyBpbmZvcm1hdGl2b3MuCgpMSUNFTsOHQSBERSBESVNUUklCVUnDh8ODTyBOw4NPLUVYQ0xVU0lWQQoKQ29tIGEgYXByZXNlbnRhw6fDo28gZGVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EsIHZvY8OqIChvIGF1dG9yIChlcykgb3UgbyB0aXR1bGFyIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBkZSBhdXRvcikgY29uY2VkZSDDoCBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgClhYWCAoU2lnbGEgZGEgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlKSBvIGRpcmVpdG8gbsOjby1leGNsdXNpdm8gZGUgcmVwcm9kdXppciwgIHRyYWR1emlyIChjb25mb3JtZSBkZWZpbmlkbyBhYmFpeG8pLCBlL291IApkaXN0cmlidWlyIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyAoaW5jbHVpbmRvIG8gcmVzdW1vKSBwb3IgdG9kbyBvIG11bmRvIG5vIGZvcm1hdG8gaW1wcmVzc28gZSBlbGV0csO0bmljbyBlIAplbSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvLCBpbmNsdWluZG8gb3MgZm9ybWF0b3Mgw6F1ZGlvIG91IHbDrWRlby4KClZvY8OqIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBhIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBwb2RlLCBzZW0gYWx0ZXJhciBvIGNvbnRlw7pkbywgdHJhbnNwb3IgYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIApwYXJhIHF1YWxxdWVyIG1laW8gb3UgZm9ybWF0byBwYXJhIGZpbnMgZGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gY29uY29yZGEgcXVlIGEgU2lnbGEgZGUgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlIHBvZGUgbWFudGVyIG1haXMgZGUgdW1hIGPDs3BpYSBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IApkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIHBhcmEgZmlucyBkZSBzZWd1cmFuw6dhLCBiYWNrLXVwIGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyDDqSBvcmlnaW5hbCBlIHF1ZSB2b2PDqiB0ZW0gbyBwb2RlciBkZSBjb25jZWRlciBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBjb250aWRvcyAKbmVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EuIFZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgbyBkZXDDs3NpdG8gZGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBuw6NvLCBxdWUgc2VqYSBkZSBzZXUgCmNvbmhlY2ltZW50bywgaW5mcmluZ2UgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGUgbmluZ3XDqW0uCgpDYXNvIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBjb250ZW5oYSBtYXRlcmlhbCBxdWUgdm9jw6ogbsOjbyBwb3NzdWkgYSB0aXR1bGFyaWRhZGUgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzLCB2b2PDqiAKZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgb2J0ZXZlIGEgcGVybWlzc8OjbyBpcnJlc3RyaXRhIGRvIGRldGVudG9yIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBwYXJhIGNvbmNlZGVyIMOgIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSAKb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXByZXNlbnRhZG9zIG5lc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCBlIHF1ZSBlc3NlIG1hdGVyaWFsIGRlIHByb3ByaWVkYWRlIGRlIHRlcmNlaXJvcyBlc3TDoSBjbGFyYW1lbnRlIAppZGVudGlmaWNhZG8gZSByZWNvbmhlY2lkbyBubyB0ZXh0byBvdSBubyBjb250ZcO6ZG8gZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIG9yYSBkZXBvc2l0YWRhLgoKQ0FTTyBBIFRFU0UgT1UgRElTU0VSVEHDh8ODTyBPUkEgREVQT1NJVEFEQSBURU5IQSBTSURPIFJFU1VMVEFETyBERSBVTSBQQVRST0PDjU5JTyBPVSAKQVBPSU8gREUgVU1BIEFHw4pOQ0lBIERFIEZPTUVOVE8gT1UgT1VUUk8gT1JHQU5JU01PIFFVRSBOw4NPIFNFSkEgQSBTSUdMQSBERSAKVU5JVkVSU0lEQURFLCBWT0PDiiBERUNMQVJBIFFVRSBSRVNQRUlUT1UgVE9ET1MgRSBRVUFJU1FVRVIgRElSRUlUT1MgREUgUkVWSVPDg08gQ09NTyAKVEFNQsOJTSBBUyBERU1BSVMgT0JSSUdBw4fDlUVTIEVYSUdJREFTIFBPUiBDT05UUkFUTyBPVSBBQ09SRE8uCgpBIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBzZSBjb21wcm9tZXRlIGEgaWRlbnRpZmljYXIgY2xhcmFtZW50ZSBvIHNldSBub21lIChzKSBvdSBvKHMpIG5vbWUocykgZG8ocykgCmRldGVudG9yKGVzKSBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvLCBlIG7Do28gZmFyw6EgcXVhbHF1ZXIgYWx0ZXJhw6fDo28sIGFsw6ltIGRhcXVlbGFzIApjb25jZWRpZGFzIHBvciBlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLgo= |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
A importância de se levar em conta a lacuna linneana no planejamento de conservação dos anfíbios no Brasil |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
The importance of taking into account the linnean shortfall on amphibian conservation planning |
title |
A importância de se levar em conta a lacuna linneana no planejamento de conservação dos anfíbios no Brasil |
spellingShingle |
A importância de se levar em conta a lacuna linneana no planejamento de conservação dos anfíbios no Brasil Moreira, Mateus Atadeu Lacuna linneana Biodiversidade Conservação Anfíbios brasileiros Priorização espacial Linnean shortfall Biodiversity Conservation Brazilian amphibians Spatial conservation prioritization CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA |
title_short |
A importância de se levar em conta a lacuna linneana no planejamento de conservação dos anfíbios no Brasil |
title_full |
A importância de se levar em conta a lacuna linneana no planejamento de conservação dos anfíbios no Brasil |
title_fullStr |
A importância de se levar em conta a lacuna linneana no planejamento de conservação dos anfíbios no Brasil |
title_full_unstemmed |
A importância de se levar em conta a lacuna linneana no planejamento de conservação dos anfíbios no Brasil |
title_sort |
A importância de se levar em conta a lacuna linneana no planejamento de conservação dos anfíbios no Brasil |
author |
Moreira, Mateus Atadeu |
author_facet |
Moreira, Mateus Atadeu |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Daniel de Brito Cândido da |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5139765780779893 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Daniel de Brito Candido da |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1232924026540187 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moreira, Mateus Atadeu |
contributor_str_mv |
Silva, Daniel de Brito Cândido da Silva, Daniel de Brito Candido da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Lacuna linneana Biodiversidade Conservação Anfíbios brasileiros Priorização espacial |
topic |
Lacuna linneana Biodiversidade Conservação Anfíbios brasileiros Priorização espacial Linnean shortfall Biodiversity Conservation Brazilian amphibians Spatial conservation prioritization CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Linnean shortfall Biodiversity Conservation Brazilian amphibians Spatial conservation prioritization |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA |
description |
We only have described a small fraction of the world’s biodiversity. The influence of how much we know biodiversity and how that hinders our strategies for conserving it is a genuine and weighty concern. Brazil has the greatest amphibian diversity in the world with 1026 amphibian species, and the number of described species is increasing at a high rate. It is likely that many of these Brazilian amphibians still undescribed are threatened. Although many new species are being described in Brazil some protected areas are being downsized or downgraded. In this study we aim to analyze how much the Linnean shortfall impairs our ability to prioritize areas for the conservation of a highly diverse and still poorly known group such as the Brazilian amphibians, and whether the main conservation strategy in Brazil is prepared to deal with this shortfall. We made four spatial prioritizations of the known Brazilian amphibians of four arbitrarily chosen scenarios (1980, 1990, 2000 and 2013), then we overlapped these prioritizations with the existing federal protected areas of each scenario, and compared the results, calculating the proportions of the high priority areas that changed place and the proportion of high priority areas federally protected at each scenario. In the first change of scenario 921 of the 4672 cells that comprises the seventeen per cent of highest priority cells in 1980 changed place to form the seventeen per cent most priority cells in 1990 (19,71% of the cells). On the 1990-2000 change 905 of the 4686 cells changed place (19,31%) and on the last change of scenario (2000-2013) 983 of the 4675 (21,01%) highest priority cells has changed place. The percentage of these highest priority areas that was federally protected at each scenario and in each of the biomes was severely low in all cases, but is maidenly rising with time. The new protected areas created between the scenarios (both the strict protection and sustainable use areas) do not follow the new priority areas. It is crucial that Brazilian taxonomy continues to grow. Since Brazil is so important for the future of the global diversity of amphibians is also crucial a systematic planning of new protected areas, using scientific models to account for the Linnean shortfall, in order to protect such an astonishing diversity. Keywords: Linnean shortfall, Biodiversity, Conservation, Brazilian Amphibians, Spatial Conservation Prioritization |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2015-04-28 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-07-14T15:01:03Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
ATADEU, M. A importância de se levar em conta a Lacuna Linneana no planejamento de conservação dos anfíbios no Brasil. 2015. 63 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ecologia e Evolução) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2015. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5733 |
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv |
ark:/38995/001300000cdgt |
identifier_str_mv |
ATADEU, M. A importância de se levar em conta a Lacuna Linneana no planejamento de conservação dos anfíbios no Brasil. 2015. 63 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ecologia e Evolução) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2015. ark:/38995/001300000cdgt |
url |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5733 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-5361682850774351271 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-3872772117827373404 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
3263499605295365002 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
2075167498588264571 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Evolução (ICB) |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFG |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Ciências Biológicas - ICB (RG) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFG instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/b67877ba-5927-43d8-8f61-4aa84ba4bc7f/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/05fab5f0-5d87-4a87-afe3-d152c6aa89d0/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/04a682dd-999b-43e9-a65f-98a64011967b/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/8740422c-a2dc-456b-a267-d79e0311233d/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/d6860503-4b56-4455-9648-b197f605aa5e/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e 1a2c29fc3dae91ef371d08eaa0f6b9e2 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.br |
_version_ |
1811721500534767616 |