A microconstrução “pois não” no Português Brasileiro: construcionalização e expansão

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lôbo, Célia Márcia Gonçalves Nunes
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
dARK ID: ark:/38995/00130000097gs
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/7394
Resumo: This thesis aims to analyze, through a panchronic study, the uses of “pois não” in the perspective of the Grammar of Constructions in order to allocate it in a hierarchical constructional network and verify the source context of this microconstruction so recurrent in the Brazilian speech. A theoretical reference is made by Tomasello (2003), Croft and Cruse (2004), Langacker (2013), among others, with regard to cognitive language issues; Croft (2001), Goldberg (2006, 2013), Traugott (2008a), Bybee (2010), Traugott (2012) and Traugott and Trousdale (2013) for understanding general principles on constructional approaches; and Traugott and Trousdale (2013) and Diewald (2006a) to define the parameters of analysis. It is observed how occurred the process of change that resulted in the different uses of “pois não”, based on the analysis of Brazilian Portuguese spoken and written in the period of implementation of Brazilian Portuguese, which extends from the nineteenth to the twenty-first century (cf. MATTOS e SILVA, 2008). The oral and written contemporary language data are part of the Corpus of Portuguese (DAVIES and FERREIRA, 2006). It is relevant, in writing data, “pois não” used in dialogical sequences. The assumption is that the text with a more interactive character, due to its functional, structural and informational aspects, has a strong likelihood of being compared to the face-to-face conversation and, therefore, it is an excellent example of the language in use (PRETI, 2004). The initial parameters of analysis are based on the symbolic structure model of a Radical Construction Grammar proposed by Croft (2001); in the characteristics of construction dimensions (size, phonological specificity, concept), schematicity, productivity and compositionality factors, as proposed and understood by Traugott and Trousdale (2013); and in the mechanisms of (inter)subjectivity worked out by Traugott (2010). The postulates of the Functional Discursive Grammar, proposed by Hengeveld and Mackenzie (2008), especially those related to the interpersonal level, serve as an auxiliary theoretical contribution. The research shows that the microconstruction “pois não” manifests in the interpersonal level of the language the function of discursive marker. The results of the analyzes demonstrated the occurrence of more abstract constructs (less compositional) as from the 19th century. The process of implementation of these uses is related to the intersubjective mechanism, since the speaker when using “pois não” is attentive to the pragmatic attitudes and needs of the interlocutor. Through these findings, there was a need to resort to a theory that recognizes the interpersonal level as a level of grammar, so the Functional Discursive Grammar is used as complementary theory. Based on the description by Hengevald and Mackenzie (2008) on the interpersonal level, the semantic-pragmatic functions of “pois não” are distinguished in more intersubjectives contexts. Through the analysis of the contexts of change, as proposed by Diewald (2006a), it was verified that the microconstruction under study is the result of a grammatical constructionalization. Syntactic-semantic changes run along a path that starts from an atypical context in which the construction “pois” evidences loss of categorial property and ceases to act as a conjunction. Soon after, the change passes through the critical context in which “pois” loses its conclusive function and assumes discursive-pragmatic function. Finally, it reaches the isolated context, a phase marked by the loss of the semantic function of the negation of the construction “não” and the process of a chunking between the constructions “pois” and “não”, resulting in microconstruction “pois não” with innovative use which integrates a new node in the network of discursive markers, revealing a process of expansion.
id UFG-2_a6784a58e6e887292e2110cb176c2f36
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/7394
network_acronym_str UFG-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFG
repository_id_str
spelling Galvão, Vânia Cristina Cassebhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4483153034836149Galvão, Vânia Cristina CassebBarros, Déborah Magalhães deAssis, Eleone Ferraz deVieira, Marília SilvaBorges, Mônica Velosohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2604409717028606Lôbo, Célia Márcia Gonçalves Nunes2017-06-01T10:59:28Z2017-05-29LÔBO, C. M. G. N. A microconstrução “pois não” no Português Brasileiro: construcionalização e expansão. 2017. 129 f. Tese (Doutorado em Letras e Linguística) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2017.http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/7394ark:/38995/00130000097gsThis thesis aims to analyze, through a panchronic study, the uses of “pois não” in the perspective of the Grammar of Constructions in order to allocate it in a hierarchical constructional network and verify the source context of this microconstruction so recurrent in the Brazilian speech. A theoretical reference is made by Tomasello (2003), Croft and Cruse (2004), Langacker (2013), among others, with regard to cognitive language issues; Croft (2001), Goldberg (2006, 2013), Traugott (2008a), Bybee (2010), Traugott (2012) and Traugott and Trousdale (2013) for understanding general principles on constructional approaches; and Traugott and Trousdale (2013) and Diewald (2006a) to define the parameters of analysis. It is observed how occurred the process of change that resulted in the different uses of “pois não”, based on the analysis of Brazilian Portuguese spoken and written in the period of implementation of Brazilian Portuguese, which extends from the nineteenth to the twenty-first century (cf. MATTOS e SILVA, 2008). The oral and written contemporary language data are part of the Corpus of Portuguese (DAVIES and FERREIRA, 2006). It is relevant, in writing data, “pois não” used in dialogical sequences. The assumption is that the text with a more interactive character, due to its functional, structural and informational aspects, has a strong likelihood of being compared to the face-to-face conversation and, therefore, it is an excellent example of the language in use (PRETI, 2004). The initial parameters of analysis are based on the symbolic structure model of a Radical Construction Grammar proposed by Croft (2001); in the characteristics of construction dimensions (size, phonological specificity, concept), schematicity, productivity and compositionality factors, as proposed and understood by Traugott and Trousdale (2013); and in the mechanisms of (inter)subjectivity worked out by Traugott (2010). The postulates of the Functional Discursive Grammar, proposed by Hengeveld and Mackenzie (2008), especially those related to the interpersonal level, serve as an auxiliary theoretical contribution. The research shows that the microconstruction “pois não” manifests in the interpersonal level of the language the function of discursive marker. The results of the analyzes demonstrated the occurrence of more abstract constructs (less compositional) as from the 19th century. The process of implementation of these uses is related to the intersubjective mechanism, since the speaker when using “pois não” is attentive to the pragmatic attitudes and needs of the interlocutor. Through these findings, there was a need to resort to a theory that recognizes the interpersonal level as a level of grammar, so the Functional Discursive Grammar is used as complementary theory. Based on the description by Hengevald and Mackenzie (2008) on the interpersonal level, the semantic-pragmatic functions of “pois não” are distinguished in more intersubjectives contexts. Through the analysis of the contexts of change, as proposed by Diewald (2006a), it was verified that the microconstruction under study is the result of a grammatical constructionalization. Syntactic-semantic changes run along a path that starts from an atypical context in which the construction “pois” evidences loss of categorial property and ceases to act as a conjunction. Soon after, the change passes through the critical context in which “pois” loses its conclusive function and assumes discursive-pragmatic function. Finally, it reaches the isolated context, a phase marked by the loss of the semantic function of the negation of the construction “não” and the process of a chunking between the constructions “pois” and “não”, resulting in microconstruction “pois não” with innovative use which integrates a new node in the network of discursive markers, revealing a process of expansion.Esta Tese visa analisar, mediante um estudo pancrônico, os usos de “pois não” na perspectiva da Gramática de Construções a fim de alocá-los em uma rede construcional hierárquica e verificar qual o contexto típico (fonte) dessa microconstrução tão recorrente na fala brasileira. Toma-se como referencial teórico Tomasello (2003), Croft e Cruse (2004), Langacker (2013), entre outros, no que se refere às questões cognitivas da linguagem; Croft (2001), Goldberg (2006, 2013), Traugott (2008a), Bybee (2010), Traugott (2012) e Traugott e Trousdale (2013) para o entendimento de princípios gerais sobre abordagens construcionais; e Traugott e Trousdale (2013) e Diewald (2006a) para definir os parâmetros de análise. Observa-se como ocorreu o processo de mudança que resultou nos diferentes usos de “pois não”, a partir da análise de dados do português brasileiro falado e escrito no período de implementação do Português Brasileiro, que se estende do século XIX ao século XXI (cf. MATTOS e SILVA, 2008). Os dados de língua oral e escrita contemporânea integram o Corpus do Português (DAVIES e FERREIRA, 2006). São relevantes, em dados da escrita, usos de “pois não” em sequências dialogais. O pressuposto é o de que o texto com caráter mais interativo, por seus aspectos funcionais, estruturais e informacionais, apresenta uma forte carga de verossimilhança em relação à conversação face a face e, por isso, é um excelente exemplar da língua em uso (PRETI, 2004). Os parâmetros iniciais de análise estão baseados: no modelo de estrutura simbólica de uma Gramática de Construção Radical, proposto por Croft (2001); nas características de dimensões da construção (tamanho, especificidade fonológica, conceito), nos fatores de esquematicidade, produtividade e composicionalidade, tais como propostos e entendidos por Traugott e Trousdale (2013); e nos mecanismos de (inter)subjetividade trabalhados por Traugott (2010). Os postulados da Gramática Discursivo Funcional, propostos por Hengeveld e Mackenzie (2008), especialmente aqueles relacionados ao nível interpessoal, servem de aporte teórico auxiliar. A pesquisa mostra que a microconstrução “pois não” manifesta no nível interpessoal da língua a função de marcador discursivo. Os resultados das análises demonstraram a ocorrência de construtos mais abstratizados (menos composicionais) a partir do século XIX. O processo de implementação desses usos está relacionado ao mecanismo de intersubjetificação, pois o locutor ao usar “pois não” atenta-se às atitudes e necessidades pragmáticas do interlocutor. Mediante tais constatações, houve uma necessidade de recorrer a uma teoria que reconhece o nível interpessoal como um nível de gramática, por isso utiliza-se a Gramática Discursivo funcional como teoria complementar. Com base na descrição feita por Hengevald e Mackenzie (2008) sobre o nível interpessoal, distingue-se detalhadamente as funções semântico-pragmáticas de “pois não” em contextos mais intersubjetivos. Mediante a análise dos contextos de mudança, conforme proposto por Diewald (2006a), constatou-se que a microconstrução em estudo é resultado de uma construcionalização gramatical. As alterações sintático-semânticas percorrem um trajeto que parte de um contexto atípico em que a construção “pois” evidencia perda de propriedade categorial e deixa de atuar como conjunção. Logo após, a mudança passa pelo contexto crítico no qual “pois” perde sua função conclusiva e assume função discursivo-pragmática. Por fim, atinge o contexto isolado, fase marcada pela perda da função semântica de negação da construção “não” e do processo de chunking entre as construções “pois” e “não”, resultando na microconstrução “pois não” com uso inovador a qual integra um novo nó na rede dos marcadores discursivos, revelando um processo de expansão.Submitted by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2017-06-01T10:58:44Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Célia Márcia Gonçalves Nunes Lôbo - 2017.pdf: 1974208 bytes, checksum: 08af02b446c385cf21a470b174911757 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2017-06-01T10:59:28Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Célia Márcia Gonçalves Nunes Lôbo - 2017.pdf: 1974208 bytes, checksum: 08af02b446c385cf21a470b174911757 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-01T10:59:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Célia Márcia Gonçalves Nunes Lôbo - 2017.pdf: 1974208 bytes, checksum: 08af02b446c385cf21a470b174911757 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-05-29Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de GoiásPrograma de Pós-graduação em Letras e Linguística (FL)UFGBrasilFaculdade de Letras - FL (RG)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLinguística funcional centrada no usoGramática de construçõesMarcador discursivoUsage-based perspective on languageGrammar of constructionsDiscourse markerLINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICAA microconstrução “pois não” no Português Brasileiro: construcionalização e expansãoThe microconstruction “pois não” in Brazilian Portuguese: constructionalization and expansioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis-1403758209736362229600600600600-541785070467807298879552599547855107832075167498588264571reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFGinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/515ebd92-ea1e-4710-8e63-e2cb40141aaf/downloadbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/b0a56b20-e6c0-4e25-a9be-4068962f06da/download4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-80http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/9dbbb425-3ede-4fb3-afff-e9b880b1122d/downloadd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD53license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-80http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/24c68cfc-6700-4d4d-b794-91e3be9f0790/downloadd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54ORIGINALTese - Célia Márcia Gonçalves Nunes Lôbo - 2017.pdfTese - Célia Márcia Gonçalves Nunes Lôbo - 2017.pdfapplication/pdf1974208http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/ee545420-1867-4717-ae0b-d5c5b607b2f3/download08af02b446c385cf21a470b174911757MD55tede/73942017-06-01 07:59:28.829http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acesso Abertoopen.accessoai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/7394http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tedeRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/oai/requesttasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.bropendoar:2017-06-01T10:59:28Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)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
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv A microconstrução “pois não” no Português Brasileiro: construcionalização e expansão
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv The microconstruction “pois não” in Brazilian Portuguese: constructionalization and expansion
title A microconstrução “pois não” no Português Brasileiro: construcionalização e expansão
spellingShingle A microconstrução “pois não” no Português Brasileiro: construcionalização e expansão
Lôbo, Célia Márcia Gonçalves Nunes
Linguística funcional centrada no uso
Gramática de construções
Marcador discursivo
Usage-based perspective on language
Grammar of constructions
Discourse marker
LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA
title_short A microconstrução “pois não” no Português Brasileiro: construcionalização e expansão
title_full A microconstrução “pois não” no Português Brasileiro: construcionalização e expansão
title_fullStr A microconstrução “pois não” no Português Brasileiro: construcionalização e expansão
title_full_unstemmed A microconstrução “pois não” no Português Brasileiro: construcionalização e expansão
title_sort A microconstrução “pois não” no Português Brasileiro: construcionalização e expansão
author Lôbo, Célia Márcia Gonçalves Nunes
author_facet Lôbo, Célia Márcia Gonçalves Nunes
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Galvão, Vânia Cristina Casseb
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4483153034836149
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Galvão, Vânia Cristina Casseb
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Barros, Déborah Magalhães de
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Assis, Eleone Ferraz de
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv Vieira, Marília Silva
dc.contributor.referee5.fl_str_mv Borges, Mônica Veloso
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2604409717028606
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lôbo, Célia Márcia Gonçalves Nunes
contributor_str_mv Galvão, Vânia Cristina Casseb
Galvão, Vânia Cristina Casseb
Barros, Déborah Magalhães de
Assis, Eleone Ferraz de
Vieira, Marília Silva
Borges, Mônica Veloso
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Linguística funcional centrada no uso
Gramática de construções
Marcador discursivo
topic Linguística funcional centrada no uso
Gramática de construções
Marcador discursivo
Usage-based perspective on language
Grammar of constructions
Discourse marker
LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Usage-based perspective on language
Grammar of constructions
Discourse marker
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA
description This thesis aims to analyze, through a panchronic study, the uses of “pois não” in the perspective of the Grammar of Constructions in order to allocate it in a hierarchical constructional network and verify the source context of this microconstruction so recurrent in the Brazilian speech. A theoretical reference is made by Tomasello (2003), Croft and Cruse (2004), Langacker (2013), among others, with regard to cognitive language issues; Croft (2001), Goldberg (2006, 2013), Traugott (2008a), Bybee (2010), Traugott (2012) and Traugott and Trousdale (2013) for understanding general principles on constructional approaches; and Traugott and Trousdale (2013) and Diewald (2006a) to define the parameters of analysis. It is observed how occurred the process of change that resulted in the different uses of “pois não”, based on the analysis of Brazilian Portuguese spoken and written in the period of implementation of Brazilian Portuguese, which extends from the nineteenth to the twenty-first century (cf. MATTOS e SILVA, 2008). The oral and written contemporary language data are part of the Corpus of Portuguese (DAVIES and FERREIRA, 2006). It is relevant, in writing data, “pois não” used in dialogical sequences. The assumption is that the text with a more interactive character, due to its functional, structural and informational aspects, has a strong likelihood of being compared to the face-to-face conversation and, therefore, it is an excellent example of the language in use (PRETI, 2004). The initial parameters of analysis are based on the symbolic structure model of a Radical Construction Grammar proposed by Croft (2001); in the characteristics of construction dimensions (size, phonological specificity, concept), schematicity, productivity and compositionality factors, as proposed and understood by Traugott and Trousdale (2013); and in the mechanisms of (inter)subjectivity worked out by Traugott (2010). The postulates of the Functional Discursive Grammar, proposed by Hengeveld and Mackenzie (2008), especially those related to the interpersonal level, serve as an auxiliary theoretical contribution. The research shows that the microconstruction “pois não” manifests in the interpersonal level of the language the function of discursive marker. The results of the analyzes demonstrated the occurrence of more abstract constructs (less compositional) as from the 19th century. The process of implementation of these uses is related to the intersubjective mechanism, since the speaker when using “pois não” is attentive to the pragmatic attitudes and needs of the interlocutor. Through these findings, there was a need to resort to a theory that recognizes the interpersonal level as a level of grammar, so the Functional Discursive Grammar is used as complementary theory. Based on the description by Hengevald and Mackenzie (2008) on the interpersonal level, the semantic-pragmatic functions of “pois não” are distinguished in more intersubjectives contexts. Through the analysis of the contexts of change, as proposed by Diewald (2006a), it was verified that the microconstruction under study is the result of a grammatical constructionalization. Syntactic-semantic changes run along a path that starts from an atypical context in which the construction “pois” evidences loss of categorial property and ceases to act as a conjunction. Soon after, the change passes through the critical context in which “pois” loses its conclusive function and assumes discursive-pragmatic function. Finally, it reaches the isolated context, a phase marked by the loss of the semantic function of the negation of the construction “não” and the process of a chunking between the constructions “pois” and “não”, resulting in microconstruction “pois não” with innovative use which integrates a new node in the network of discursive markers, revealing a process of expansion.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-06-01T10:59:28Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017-05-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv LÔBO, C. M. G. N. A microconstrução “pois não” no Português Brasileiro: construcionalização e expansão. 2017. 129 f. Tese (Doutorado em Letras e Linguística) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2017.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/7394
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/38995/00130000097gs
identifier_str_mv LÔBO, C. M. G. N. A microconstrução “pois não” no Português Brasileiro: construcionalização e expansão. 2017. 129 f. Tese (Doutorado em Letras e Linguística) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2017.
ark:/38995/00130000097gs
url http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/7394
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -1403758209736362229
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv -5417850704678072988
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 7955259954785510783
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv 2075167498588264571
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-graduação em Letras e Linguística (FL)
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFG
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Letras - FL (RG)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFG
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/515ebd92-ea1e-4710-8e63-e2cb40141aaf/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/b0a56b20-e6c0-4e25-a9be-4068962f06da/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/9dbbb425-3ede-4fb3-afff-e9b880b1122d/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/24c68cfc-6700-4d4d-b794-91e3be9f0790/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/ee545420-1867-4717-ae0b-d5c5b607b2f3/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
08af02b446c385cf21a470b174911757
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.br
_version_ 1815172609265893376