Repressão estatal e capital comunicacional: o bloco dominante e a criminalização do movimento piqueteiro na Argentina

• Autor(a) principal: Braga, Lisandro Rodrigues de Almeida
• Data de Publicação: 2016
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/8108
• topic: Argentina contemporânea; Neoliberalismo subordinado; Luta de classes; Lumpemproletariado; Bloco dominante; Argentina contemporánea; Neoliberalismo subordinado; Lucha de clases; Bloque dominante; CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA

The purpose of this paper was to analyze the journalistic discourses of the main newspapers of the country about the state repression of the piqueteros movement in Argentina (1996-2002), its relation with the interests of the dominant block and, consequently, of the social classes that constituted it. In order to do this, we attempt to make a theoretical discussion about the Marxist theory of social classes in Chapter 1, emphasizing the three constituent elements of a social class (way of life, interests and alliance / class opposition), since this theoretical support became Fundamental to understand the new dynamics of the class struggle in Argentina and especially the class struggle between the organized lumpemproletariado (piqueteiro movement) and the social classes that composed the dominant block (communicational bourgeoisie, bureaucracy and its fractions, intellectuality, etc.) . Subsequently, we discussed the escalation of state repression in the regime of integral accumulation (US and Europe) and its tendencies, as well as the role played by the communicational capital in the regularization of social relations necessary for the reproduction of capitalist accumulation. In chapter 02, we present the peculiarities of the process of lumpproletarianization (marginalization of the social division of labor) in Argentina, to conclude, in chapter 03, with a discussion about the new dynamics of the class struggle in Argentina, Its dynamics, its social subjects, its potentialities, and especially the state repression and the role of communicational capital, through the journalistic discourses that it conveys in its presentation / legitimation / justification.