Ensino no curso técnico em enfermagem: metodologias problematizadora e tradicional

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Araújo, Reila Campos Guimarães de
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/4044
Resumo: This study aims to demonstrate the features and the importance of questioning the methodology and the traditional methodology in the training of the nursing technician of the National Commercial Training Service (Senac) Rio Verde, Goias. We used a qualitative-quantitative research approach in a convenience sample composed of two classes of students attending the course Cancer Treatment in twelve meetings (classes) for each class, under the analysis of two external observers. To evaluate the characteristics of the teaching methodologies, we used the method of formal assessment of learning; to analyze the perceptions of students regarding the teaching methodologies applied, we used three instruments: script dail y observation, analysis instrument of observers, containing range of values from zero to ten, analyzing five aspects (participation, the syllabus, satisfaction, critical thinking and learning disability), and an anonymous, self -administered at the end of the course to analyze the same aspects. The data were entered into Excel software for further analysis in SPSS 17.0 statistical software. Descriptive analysis (absolute and relative frequency) and comparison tests between groups was performed to detect po ssible differences between the methodologies used. For analysis Chi-square and T tests, the variables were dichotomized. For analyzing qualitative data content analysis was used. Study participants were 53 (98.15%) students. In formal evaluation, there were no differences between the methodologies of questioning and traditional; was no statistically significant difference (p <0.041) for the item "participation" in the questionnaire to students, and the participation was higher in questioning. Scales of values applied by the two observers, was no statistical difference between the two methods (p <0.001). In analyzing the reports of observers, there were differences between the methodologies in all observed items. It is concluded that in this study, with students from technical nursing program Senac- Rio Verde / Goiás that learning occurs similarly in both methodologies; perception of students both methodologies are similar with the exception of the item 'participation', which is larger in the methodology of questioning; the perception of observers to questionable methodology overlaps in several aspects to traditional methodology.
id UFG-2_e689a00217d902e0dc5f283ddbf90178
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/4044
network_acronym_str UFG-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFG
repository_id_str
spelling Nunes, Maria de FátimaNunes, Maria de FátimaMohn Neto, Carlos RodolfoMartins, Cleusa Alveshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8229155027357817Araújo, Reila Campos Guimarães de2015-01-30T14:36:00Z2014-09-18ARAÚJO, Reila Campos Guimarães de. Ensino no curso técnico em enfermagem: metodologias problematizadora e tradicional. 2014. 105 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ensino na Saúde) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2014.http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/4044ark:/38995/0013000003cpjThis study aims to demonstrate the features and the importance of questioning the methodology and the traditional methodology in the training of the nursing technician of the National Commercial Training Service (Senac) Rio Verde, Goias. We used a qualitative-quantitative research approach in a convenience sample composed of two classes of students attending the course Cancer Treatment in twelve meetings (classes) for each class, under the analysis of two external observers. To evaluate the characteristics of the teaching methodologies, we used the method of formal assessment of learning; to analyze the perceptions of students regarding the teaching methodologies applied, we used three instruments: script dail y observation, analysis instrument of observers, containing range of values from zero to ten, analyzing five aspects (participation, the syllabus, satisfaction, critical thinking and learning disability), and an anonymous, self -administered at the end of the course to analyze the same aspects. The data were entered into Excel software for further analysis in SPSS 17.0 statistical software. Descriptive analysis (absolute and relative frequency) and comparison tests between groups was performed to detect po ssible differences between the methodologies used. For analysis Chi-square and T tests, the variables were dichotomized. For analyzing qualitative data content analysis was used. Study participants were 53 (98.15%) students. In formal evaluation, there were no differences between the methodologies of questioning and traditional; was no statistically significant difference (p <0.041) for the item "participation" in the questionnaire to students, and the participation was higher in questioning. Scales of values applied by the two observers, was no statistical difference between the two methods (p <0.001). In analyzing the reports of observers, there were differences between the methodologies in all observed items. It is concluded that in this study, with students from technical nursing program Senac- Rio Verde / Goiás that learning occurs similarly in both methodologies; perception of students both methodologies are similar with the exception of the item 'participation', which is larger in the methodology of questioning; the perception of observers to questionable methodology overlaps in several aspects to traditional methodology.O presente estudo tem por objetivo demonstrar as características e a importância da metodologia da problematização e da metodologia tradicional na formação do técnico de enfermagem do Serviço Nacional de Aprendizagem Comercial (SENAC) de Rio Verde-Goiás. Utilizou-se de uma pesquisa de abordagem quali-quantitativa em uma amostra de conveniência composta por duas turmas de estudantes cursando a disciplina Tratamento Oncológico, em doze encontros (aulas) para cada turma, sob a análise de duas observadoras externas. Para avaliar as características das metodologias de ensino, utilizou-se o método da avaliação formal do aprendizado; para analisar a percepção dos estudantes, referente às metodologias de ensino aplicadas, utilizou-se três instrumentos: roteiro de observação diária, instrumento de análise das observadoras, contendo escala de valores de zero a dez, analisando cinco aspectos (participação, aproveitamento dos conteúdos, nível de satisfação, senso crítico e dificuldade de aprendizagem), e um questionário anônimo, autoaplicável ao final da disciplina para análise dos mesmos aspectos. Os dados foram digitados no Software Excel, para posterior anális e no software estatístico SPSS 17.0. Foi realizada análise descritiva (frequência absoluta e relativa) e testes de comparação entre grupos para detectar possíveis diferenças entre as metodologias utilizadas. Para análise do Qui-quadrado e Teste T, as variáveis foram dicotomizadas. Para a análise dados qualitativos foi utilizada análise de conteúdo. Participaram do estudo 53 (98,15%) estudantes. Na avaliação formal, não houve diferenças entre as metodologias da problematização e tradicional; houve diferença estatisticamente significantes (p<0,041) para o quesito “participação” no questionário aplicado aos estudantes, sendo que a participação foi maior na problematização. Nas escalas de valores aplicadas pelas duas observadoras, houve diferença estatística entre as duas metodologias (p<0,001). Na análise do relato das observadoras, houve diferenças entre as metodologias em todos os itens observados. Conclui-se que neste estudo, com alunos do curso técnico de enfermagem do Senac- Rio Verde/Goiás que o aprendizado ocorre semelhantemente em ambas as metodologias; na percepção dos estudantes as duas metodologias são semelhantes com exceção do quesito „participação‟, que é maior na metodologia da problematização; na percepção dos observadores a metodologia problematizadora se sobrepõe em diversos aspectos à metodologia tradicional.Submitted by Cássia Santos (cassia.bcufg@gmail.com) on 2015-01-30T11:10:24Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) Dissertação - Reila Campos Guimarães de Araújo - 2014.pdf: 1397254 bytes, checksum: 57234aeb1023198a2de456a42282b6fa (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2015-01-30T14:36:00Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) Dissertação - Reila Campos Guimarães de Araújo - 2014.pdf: 1397254 bytes, checksum: 57234aeb1023198a2de456a42282b6fa (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2015-01-30T14:36:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) Dissertação - Reila Campos Guimarães de Araújo - 2014.pdf: 1397254 bytes, checksum: 57234aeb1023198a2de456a42282b6fa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-09-18Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPqapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/retrieve/15904/Disserta%c3%a7%c3%a3o%20-%20Reila%20Campos%20Guimar%c3%a3es%20de%20Ara%c3%bajo%20-%202014.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Federal de GoiásPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ensino na Saúde (FM)UFGBrasilFaculdade de Medicina - FM (RG)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMetodologias de ensinoTécnico em enfermagemEnsino na saúdeEnfermagemTeaching methodsTechnical nursingEducation in healthCIENCIAS DA SAUDEEnsino no curso técnico em enfermagem: metodologias problematizadora e tradicionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis51342114431353001060060060060015457724759504863388765449414823306929-2555911436985713659reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFGinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGORIGINALDissertação - Reila Campos Guimarães de Araújo - 2014.pdfDissertação - Reila Campos Guimarães de Araújo - 2014.pdfDissertação - Reila Campos Guimarães de Araújo - 2014application/pdf1397254http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/52e4478c-e761-4f09-bb7e-3bec6425bcfe/download57234aeb1023198a2de456a42282b6faMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/b1719c49-f081-459d-b9c6-3084f62fd56f/downloadbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD53CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/e22e1318-09b1-476b-bfdb-69483749d146/download4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD54license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-822901http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/c4884a58-565e-4133-bce4-c7cec5f60c02/download29b9d5e95be03707f9d4a2e110421c11MD55license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-823148http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/e7f004f9-6e91-4431-8261-4fc317255ff1/download9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306MD56TEXTDissertação - Reila Campos Guimarães de Araújo - 2014.pdf.txtDissertação - Reila Campos Guimarães de Araújo - 2014.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain124110http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/76416381-c8ad-4905-9325-0d88df90bec7/downloadbb841cda94fa3ef646935275226f2702MD57THUMBNAILDissertação - Reila Campos Guimarães de Araújo - 2014.pdf.jpgDissertação - Reila Campos Guimarães de Araújo - 2014.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2611http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/b0a66e44-74ef-43cb-86bf-4fb87fb57ec9/downloadb10437a0a80c906169bca3395722a70cMD58tede/40442015-01-31 03:03:35.348http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acesso Abertoopen.accessoai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/4044http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tedeRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/oai/requesttasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.bropendoar:2015-01-31T05:03:35Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)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
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv Ensino no curso técnico em enfermagem: metodologias problematizadora e tradicional
title Ensino no curso técnico em enfermagem: metodologias problematizadora e tradicional
spellingShingle Ensino no curso técnico em enfermagem: metodologias problematizadora e tradicional
Araújo, Reila Campos Guimarães de
Metodologias de ensino
Técnico em enfermagem
Ensino na saúde
Enfermagem
Teaching methods
Technical nursing
Education in health
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
title_short Ensino no curso técnico em enfermagem: metodologias problematizadora e tradicional
title_full Ensino no curso técnico em enfermagem: metodologias problematizadora e tradicional
title_fullStr Ensino no curso técnico em enfermagem: metodologias problematizadora e tradicional
title_full_unstemmed Ensino no curso técnico em enfermagem: metodologias problematizadora e tradicional
title_sort Ensino no curso técnico em enfermagem: metodologias problematizadora e tradicional
author Araújo, Reila Campos Guimarães de
author_facet Araújo, Reila Campos Guimarães de
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Nunes, Maria de Fátima
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Nunes, Maria de Fátima
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Mohn Neto, Carlos Rodolfo
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Martins, Cleusa Alves
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8229155027357817
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araújo, Reila Campos Guimarães de
contributor_str_mv Nunes, Maria de Fátima
Nunes, Maria de Fátima
Mohn Neto, Carlos Rodolfo
Martins, Cleusa Alves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Metodologias de ensino
Técnico em enfermagem
Ensino na saúde
Enfermagem
topic Metodologias de ensino
Técnico em enfermagem
Ensino na saúde
Enfermagem
Teaching methods
Technical nursing
Education in health
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Teaching methods
Technical nursing
Education in health
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
description This study aims to demonstrate the features and the importance of questioning the methodology and the traditional methodology in the training of the nursing technician of the National Commercial Training Service (Senac) Rio Verde, Goias. We used a qualitative-quantitative research approach in a convenience sample composed of two classes of students attending the course Cancer Treatment in twelve meetings (classes) for each class, under the analysis of two external observers. To evaluate the characteristics of the teaching methodologies, we used the method of formal assessment of learning; to analyze the perceptions of students regarding the teaching methodologies applied, we used three instruments: script dail y observation, analysis instrument of observers, containing range of values from zero to ten, analyzing five aspects (participation, the syllabus, satisfaction, critical thinking and learning disability), and an anonymous, self -administered at the end of the course to analyze the same aspects. The data were entered into Excel software for further analysis in SPSS 17.0 statistical software. Descriptive analysis (absolute and relative frequency) and comparison tests between groups was performed to detect po ssible differences between the methodologies used. For analysis Chi-square and T tests, the variables were dichotomized. For analyzing qualitative data content analysis was used. Study participants were 53 (98.15%) students. In formal evaluation, there were no differences between the methodologies of questioning and traditional; was no statistically significant difference (p <0.041) for the item "participation" in the questionnaire to students, and the participation was higher in questioning. Scales of values applied by the two observers, was no statistical difference between the two methods (p <0.001). In analyzing the reports of observers, there were differences between the methodologies in all observed items. It is concluded that in this study, with students from technical nursing program Senac- Rio Verde / Goiás that learning occurs similarly in both methodologies; perception of students both methodologies are similar with the exception of the item 'participation', which is larger in the methodology of questioning; the perception of observers to questionable methodology overlaps in several aspects to traditional methodology.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2014-09-18
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2015-01-30T14:36:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv ARAÚJO, Reila Campos Guimarães de. Ensino no curso técnico em enfermagem: metodologias problematizadora e tradicional. 2014. 105 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ensino na Saúde) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2014.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/4044
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/38995/0013000003cpj
identifier_str_mv ARAÚJO, Reila Campos Guimarães de. Ensino no curso técnico em enfermagem: metodologias problematizadora e tradicional. 2014. 105 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ensino na Saúde) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2014.
ark:/38995/0013000003cpj
url http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/4044
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv 513421144313530010
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 1545772475950486338
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 8765449414823306929
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv -2555911436985713659
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-graduação em Ensino na Saúde (FM)
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFG
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Medicina - FM (RG)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFG
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/52e4478c-e761-4f09-bb7e-3bec6425bcfe/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/b1719c49-f081-459d-b9c6-3084f62fd56f/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/e22e1318-09b1-476b-bfdb-69483749d146/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/c4884a58-565e-4133-bce4-c7cec5f60c02/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/e7f004f9-6e91-4431-8261-4fc317255ff1/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/76416381-c8ad-4905-9325-0d88df90bec7/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/b0a66e44-74ef-43cb-86bf-4fb87fb57ec9/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 57234aeb1023198a2de456a42282b6fa
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f
29b9d5e95be03707f9d4a2e110421c11
9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306
bb841cda94fa3ef646935275226f2702
b10437a0a80c906169bca3395722a70c
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.br
_version_ 1811721367455793152