Análise das receitas e despesas em ambientes metropolitanos: o caso da região metropolitana de Goiânia (2012 a 2014)

• Autor(a) principal: Dionizio, Daiane Cristina Pereira
• Data de Publicação: 2017
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/7912
• topic: Ambientes metropolitanos; Metropolização; Politícas públicas; Receitas e despesas; Região metropolitana de Goiânia; Public policies; Revenue and spending; Metropolitan region of Goiânia; Metropolitan environments; Metropolization; CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::GEOCIENCIAS

The fiscal diversity and the lack of cooperative public policies increases the complexity of metropolitan environments spatially integrated, however, political administratively fragmented. This complexity is enlarged when the excessive concentration of urban equipment of consumption and services is observed in a city that exert the function of a metropolis. This research sought to analyze how the fiscal diversity of the municipalities of Metropolitan Region of Goiânia, added to the lack of cooperative public policies, have impacted the spatial organization of the region. To achieve this goal the following methodological steps were adopted: literature review with focus on the analyze of the fiscal federative issue of Brazilian municipalities (the distribution of tributary competencies in the Federation, the fiscal and administrative decentralization after the 80s and the consequences of the 1988 constitution for the current municipal fiscal framework) and the metropolitan regions (institutional and metropolitan management issues, and specifically, about the Metropolitan Region of Goiânia); primary and secondary data collection; documentary analysis and mapping of public spending of the Metropolitan Region of Goiânia. The hypothesis of the research is that “The fiscal diversity found in the municipalities of the Metropolitan Region of Goiânia (RMG), added to the lack of cooperative public policies of metropolitan management, reinforce the polarization and the centrality of the metropolis, and consequently, it does not promote the lateral integration between the municipalities of the RMG”.