Território camponês do sudeste do Pará: a construção da educação do campo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gomes, Maria Suely Ferreira
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/11643
Resumo: Rural education in the Southeast region of Pará has advanced significantly. In this process, the Agriculture integrated with High School vocational course, through pedagogical alternation, has been a great challenge. This study examined the advances in the training of young rural workers after the implementation of the Federal Institute of Pará – Rural Campus in Marabá (IFPA-CRMB). The study aimed to understand the process of education for these young people and its implications for the construction and “development” of rural territory in the Southeast of the state of Pará. The qualitative research was based on historical materialism, evidencing tensions and contradictions, considering the historical time. It was developed through interviews, using a survey and semi-structured scripts. The research participants were graduates of the technical Agriculture Integrated with High School vocational course (classes of 2009, 2014 and 2015), teachers, managers and leaders of social movements in the countryside. It was also based on the analysis of documents such as the Political-Pedagogical Project of the Rural Campus of Marabá and the Political-Pedagogical Project of the vocational course, as well as photographic records. Some categories that permeate the genesis of rural education and the process of construction of education from the perspective of social transformation were revisited, such as: peasantry, social movements, rural youth. The research revealed some advances and challenges: a) the initial formation of the IFPA-CRMB, based on the Rural Family School proposal, underwent several changes, mainly due to the institutional bureaucracy that caused the removal of social movements from practical activities and its insertion in the political-pedagogical coordination of the course, in addition to the limits and challenges of the dynamics of the Board of Directors; b) some obstacles hindered and are hindering the advancement of the pedagogical proposal, such as the lack of leveling with respect to concepts such as the principles of agroecology, work and research, in addition to pedagogical alternation, especially with regard to Community Time; c) not separating teaching-research-extension has been a challenge for the “development” of actions within land reform settlements and rural communities; d) in general, many positive experiences have been and continue to be carried out by IFPA-CRMB, either by the Teaching, Research and Extension Unit (UNIEPEs), or by the communities; e) the training managed to meet the expectations of the graduates; f) the integration of the areas of knowledge was paramount for achieving the results of each cycle, and the connection of the subjects with the land and the work was necessary to carry out research and experiments; g) the training course encouraged conversations with families in the territories and monitoring through unions, associations and/or cooperatives; h) Finally, the participants stated that the initiative still needs to bring the institution closer to rural territories and their populations, promoting teaching, research and extension in land reform encampments and settlements. Considering all the changes to the original proposal based on the Rural Family School, the participants’ statements are in line with the importance of the Campus for the Southeast region of Pará, and the training, without disregarding limits and challenges, contributed to the connection of graduates with the land and to the “development” of rural territories.
id UFG-2_f5c050c7009651f5eb8d79f4bed80fd0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/11643
network_acronym_str UFG-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFG
repository_id_str
spelling Pietrafesa, José Paulohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5325872034942622Pietrafesa, José PauloQueiroz, João Batista Pereira deSousa, Romier da PaixãoResende, Anita Cristina AzevedoAlves, Amone Ináciahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1662093255716179Gomes, Maria Suely Ferreira2021-09-22T12:58:00Z2021-09-22T12:58:00Z2021-06-30GOMES, M. S. F. Território camponês do sudeste do Pará: a construção da educação do campo. 2021. 435 f. Tese (Doutorado) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2021.http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/11643Rural education in the Southeast region of Pará has advanced significantly. In this process, the Agriculture integrated with High School vocational course, through pedagogical alternation, has been a great challenge. This study examined the advances in the training of young rural workers after the implementation of the Federal Institute of Pará – Rural Campus in Marabá (IFPA-CRMB). The study aimed to understand the process of education for these young people and its implications for the construction and “development” of rural territory in the Southeast of the state of Pará. The qualitative research was based on historical materialism, evidencing tensions and contradictions, considering the historical time. It was developed through interviews, using a survey and semi-structured scripts. The research participants were graduates of the technical Agriculture Integrated with High School vocational course (classes of 2009, 2014 and 2015), teachers, managers and leaders of social movements in the countryside. It was also based on the analysis of documents such as the Political-Pedagogical Project of the Rural Campus of Marabá and the Political-Pedagogical Project of the vocational course, as well as photographic records. Some categories that permeate the genesis of rural education and the process of construction of education from the perspective of social transformation were revisited, such as: peasantry, social movements, rural youth. The research revealed some advances and challenges: a) the initial formation of the IFPA-CRMB, based on the Rural Family School proposal, underwent several changes, mainly due to the institutional bureaucracy that caused the removal of social movements from practical activities and its insertion in the political-pedagogical coordination of the course, in addition to the limits and challenges of the dynamics of the Board of Directors; b) some obstacles hindered and are hindering the advancement of the pedagogical proposal, such as the lack of leveling with respect to concepts such as the principles of agroecology, work and research, in addition to pedagogical alternation, especially with regard to Community Time; c) not separating teaching-research-extension has been a challenge for the “development” of actions within land reform settlements and rural communities; d) in general, many positive experiences have been and continue to be carried out by IFPA-CRMB, either by the Teaching, Research and Extension Unit (UNIEPEs), or by the communities; e) the training managed to meet the expectations of the graduates; f) the integration of the areas of knowledge was paramount for achieving the results of each cycle, and the connection of the subjects with the land and the work was necessary to carry out research and experiments; g) the training course encouraged conversations with families in the territories and monitoring through unions, associations and/or cooperatives; h) Finally, the participants stated that the initiative still needs to bring the institution closer to rural territories and their populations, promoting teaching, research and extension in land reform encampments and settlements. Considering all the changes to the original proposal based on the Rural Family School, the participants’ statements are in line with the importance of the Campus for the Southeast region of Pará, and the training, without disregarding limits and challenges, contributed to the connection of graduates with the land and to the “development” of rural territories.L'enseignement en milieu rural dans la région sud-est de l’État du Pará a considérablement progressé. Au cours de ce processus, le cursus technique en Agriculture et Élevage intégré au Lycée, au moyen de l'alternance pédagogique, est devenu un enjeu majeur. Cette étude porte sur les avancées de la formation des jeunes paysans depuis l’implantation de l'Institut Fédéral de l’État du Pará – Campus Rural de Marabá (IFPA-CRMB). Le but est de comprendre le processus de formation de ces jeunes et ses effets sur la construction et le "développement" du territoire paysan dans le sud-est de l’État du Pará. L’étude de nature qualitative s’est basée sur le matérialisme historique et a mis en évidence des tensions et des contradictions, compte tenu du temps historique. Elle a été menée à travers des entretiens utilisant des questionnaires et des scripts semi-structurés. Les participants à la recherche étaient les diplômés du cursus technique en Agriculture et Élevage intégré au Lycée, des enseignants, des responsables et des leaders de mouvements sociaux ruraux. Cette étude s'est également basée sur l'analyse de documents tels que le Projet Politique Pédagogique du Cours du Campus Rural de Marabá, le Projet Politique Pédagogique du cursus technique et des documents photographiques. Les Certaines catégories, qui imprègnent la genèse de l'éducation rurale et le processus de construction de la formation dans une perspective de transformation sociale, ont été revisitées, comme par exemple : la paysannerie, les mouvements sociaux, la jeunesse paysanne. La recherche a révélé quelques avancées et défis : a) la formation initiale de l'IFPA-CRMB, à partir de la proposition de l'Ecole Famille Agricole, a subi plusieurs changements, principalement en raison de la bureaucratie institutionnelle qui a provoqué le retrait des mouvements sociaux ruraux des activités pratiques et de son insertion dans la coordination politico-pédagogique du cours, au-delà des limites et des enjeux de la dynamique de fonctionnement du Conseil d'Administration ; b) certains obstacles ont freiné et freinent encore les avancées de la proposition pédagogique, tels que le manque de nivellement des conceptions sur les principes de l'agroécologie, du travail et de la recherche, ainsi que de l'alternance pédagogique, notamment en ce qui concerne le Temps Communauté ; c) l’indissociabilité enseignement-recherche-extension s'est avérée être un défi pour l'avancement du "développement" des actions auprès des installations de la réforme agraire et des communautés rurales ; d) de manière générale, de nombreuses expériences positives ont été et continuent d’être menées par l'IFPA-CRMB, soit par les Unités d'Enseignement, de Recherche et d’Extension (UNIEPEs), soit par les communautés ; e) la formation a réussi à répondre aux attentes des diplômés ; f) l'intégration des domaines de connaissance a été fondamentale pour le résultat des produits de chaque cycle, de même que la connexion des sujets avec la terre et le travail pour la réalisation des recherches et des expérimentations ; g) le parcours de formation a privilégié le dialogue avec les familles des territoires et le suivi via des syndicats, associations et/ou coopératives ; h) Enfin, les personnes interrogées ont déclaré que l’institution manquait encore de plus de rapprochement avec les territoires des populations rurales afin de favoriser l'enseignement, la recherche et l’extension dans les camps et les installations de la réforme agraire. Compte tenu de tous les changements dans la proposition originale basée sur l'Ecole Famille Agricole, les récits des personnes interrogées sont conformes à l'importance du campus pour la région sud-est de l’État du Pará. De plus, le parcours de formation, sans négliger ses limites et ses défis, a contribué à la connexion des diplômés à la terre et au "développement" des territoires paysans.A educação do campo na região Sudeste do Pará avançou significativamente. Nesse processo o curso técnico em Agropecuária Integrado ao Ensino Médio, por meio de alternância pedagógica, tem se configurado como um grande desafio. Este estudo versou sobre os avanços da formação dos jovens camponeses a partir da implantação do Instituto Federal do Pará – Campus Rural de Marabá (IFPA-CRMB). Objetivou compreender o processo de formação desses jovens e suas implicações na construção e no “desenvolvimento” do território camponês no Sudeste do estado do Pará. A pesquisa de cunho qualitativa fundamentou-se no materialismo histórico, evidenciando tensões e contradições, considerando o tempo histórico. Desenvolvida através de entrevistas, com utilização de questionário e roteiros semiestruturados. Os participantes da pesquisa foram os egressos do curso técnico em Agropecuária Integrado ao Ensino Médio (turmas 2009; 2014; 2015), docentes, gestores e dirigentes dos movimentos sociais do campo. Baseou-se ainda na análise de documentos como o Projeto Político Pedagógico do Curso do Campus Rural de Marabá e o Projeto Político Pedagógico do curso técnico, bem como registros fotográficos. Foram revisitadas algumas categorias que permeiam a gênese da educação do campo e ao processo de construção da formação na perspectiva da transformação social, tais como: campesinato, movimentos sociais, juventude camponesa. A pesquisa revelou alguns avanços e desafios: a) a formação inicial do IFPA-CRMB, a partir da proposta da Escola Família Agrícola, sofreu diversas mudanças, principalmente devido à burocracia institucional que provocou o afastamento dos movimentos sociais do campo das atividades práticas e de sua inserção na coordenação político-pedagógica do curso, além dos limites e desafios da dinâmica de funcionamento do Conselho Diretor; b) alguns entraves dificultaram e estão dificultando o avanço da proposta pedagógica como a falta de nivelamento das concepções sobre os princípios da agroecologia, trabalho e pesquisa, além da alternância pedagógica, sobretudo no que tange ao Tempo Comunidade; c) a indissociabilidade entre ensino-pesquisa-extensão têm se mostrado desafio para o avanço do “desenvolvimento” das ações junto aos assentamentos de reforma agrária e comunidades rurais; d) de modo geral, muitas experiências positivas foram e continuam sendo realizadas pelo IFPA-CRMB, quer pelas Unidades de Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensão (UNIEPEs), quer pelas comunidades; e) a formação conseguiu atingir a expectativa dos egressos; f) a integração das áreas do conhecimento foi fundamental para o resultado dos produtos de cada ciclo, bem como a vinculação dos sujeitos com a terra e o trabalho para a realização de pesquisas e experimentos; g) o percurso formativo instigou o diálogo com as famílias nos territórios e acompanhamento por meio de sindicatos, associações e/ou cooperativas; h) Por fim, os entrevistados afirmaram que ainda carece de maior aproximação da instituição junto aos territórios das populações do campo, fomentando o ensino, a pesquisa e a extensão nos acampamentos e assentamentos de reforma agrária. Diante de todas as mudanças da proposta original baseada na Escola Família Agrícola, as falas dos entrevistados vão ao encontro da importância do Campus para a região Sudeste do Pará, e o percurso formativo, sem desconsiderar limites e desafios, contribuiu para a vinculação dos egressos à terra e para o “desenvolvimento” dos territórios camponeses.Submitted by Franciele Moreira (francielemoreyra@gmail.com) on 2021-09-21T13:07:52Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Maria Suely Ferreira Gomes - 2021.pdf: 22715569 bytes, checksum: 9615ba1434fa053f9018fbcc3337c67a (MD5) license_rdf: 805 bytes, checksum: 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2021-09-22T12:57:59Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Maria Suely Ferreira Gomes - 2021.pdf: 22715569 bytes, checksum: 9615ba1434fa053f9018fbcc3337c67a (MD5) license_rdf: 805 bytes, checksum: 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2021-09-22T12:58:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Maria Suely Ferreira Gomes - 2021.pdf: 22715569 bytes, checksum: 9615ba1434fa053f9018fbcc3337c67a (MD5) license_rdf: 805 bytes, checksum: 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-06-30porUniversidade Federal de GoiásPrograma de Pós-graduação em Educação (FE)UFGBrasilFaculdade de Educação - FE (RG)Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFormação técnica profissionalEgressosCampesinatoReforma agráriaRural educationVocational trainingLand reformEnseignement en milieu ruralFormation technique professionnellePaysannerieRéforme agraireCIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAOTerritório camponês do sudeste do Pará: a construção da educação do campoRural territory in the southeast of Pará: building education in rural areasTerritoire paysan du sud-est de l’État du Pará: la construction de l'enseignement en milieu ruralinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis3750050050012195reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFGinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/a3e54ed8-3cd6-471f-acf2-71303dda0c86/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/fdf0127a-6203-408c-9a0c-9fdabcb69102/download4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52ORIGINALTese - Maria Suely Ferreira Gomes - 2021.pdfTese - Maria Suely Ferreira Gomes - 2021.pdfapplication/pdf22715569http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/530712bd-21db-4059-ab50-ea79b1118dd3/download9615ba1434fa053f9018fbcc3337c67aMD53tede/116432021-09-22 09:58:00.464http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalopen.accessoai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/11643http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tedeRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/oai/requesttasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.bropendoar:2021-09-22T12:58Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)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
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Território camponês do sudeste do Pará: a construção da educação do campo
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Rural territory in the southeast of Pará: building education in rural areas
dc.title.alternative.fra.fl_str_mv Territoire paysan du sud-est de l’État du Pará: la construction de l'enseignement en milieu rural
title Território camponês do sudeste do Pará: a construção da educação do campo
spellingShingle Território camponês do sudeste do Pará: a construção da educação do campo
Gomes, Maria Suely Ferreira
Formação técnica profissional
Egressos
Campesinato
Reforma agrária
Rural education
Vocational training
Land reform
Enseignement en milieu rural
Formation technique professionnelle
Paysannerie
Réforme agraire
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
title_short Território camponês do sudeste do Pará: a construção da educação do campo
title_full Território camponês do sudeste do Pará: a construção da educação do campo
title_fullStr Território camponês do sudeste do Pará: a construção da educação do campo
title_full_unstemmed Território camponês do sudeste do Pará: a construção da educação do campo
title_sort Território camponês do sudeste do Pará: a construção da educação do campo
author Gomes, Maria Suely Ferreira
author_facet Gomes, Maria Suely Ferreira
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Pietrafesa, José Paulo
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5325872034942622
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Pietrafesa, José Paulo
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Queiroz, João Batista Pereira de
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Sousa, Romier da Paixão
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv Resende, Anita Cristina Azevedo
dc.contributor.referee5.fl_str_mv Alves, Amone Inácia
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1662093255716179
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gomes, Maria Suely Ferreira
contributor_str_mv Pietrafesa, José Paulo
Pietrafesa, José Paulo
Queiroz, João Batista Pereira de
Sousa, Romier da Paixão
Resende, Anita Cristina Azevedo
Alves, Amone Inácia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Formação técnica profissional
Egressos
Campesinato
Reforma agrária
topic Formação técnica profissional
Egressos
Campesinato
Reforma agrária
Rural education
Vocational training
Land reform
Enseignement en milieu rural
Formation technique professionnelle
Paysannerie
Réforme agraire
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Rural education
Vocational training
Land reform
dc.subject.fra.fl_str_mv Enseignement en milieu rural
Formation technique professionnelle
Paysannerie
Réforme agraire
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
description Rural education in the Southeast region of Pará has advanced significantly. In this process, the Agriculture integrated with High School vocational course, through pedagogical alternation, has been a great challenge. This study examined the advances in the training of young rural workers after the implementation of the Federal Institute of Pará – Rural Campus in Marabá (IFPA-CRMB). The study aimed to understand the process of education for these young people and its implications for the construction and “development” of rural territory in the Southeast of the state of Pará. The qualitative research was based on historical materialism, evidencing tensions and contradictions, considering the historical time. It was developed through interviews, using a survey and semi-structured scripts. The research participants were graduates of the technical Agriculture Integrated with High School vocational course (classes of 2009, 2014 and 2015), teachers, managers and leaders of social movements in the countryside. It was also based on the analysis of documents such as the Political-Pedagogical Project of the Rural Campus of Marabá and the Political-Pedagogical Project of the vocational course, as well as photographic records. Some categories that permeate the genesis of rural education and the process of construction of education from the perspective of social transformation were revisited, such as: peasantry, social movements, rural youth. The research revealed some advances and challenges: a) the initial formation of the IFPA-CRMB, based on the Rural Family School proposal, underwent several changes, mainly due to the institutional bureaucracy that caused the removal of social movements from practical activities and its insertion in the political-pedagogical coordination of the course, in addition to the limits and challenges of the dynamics of the Board of Directors; b) some obstacles hindered and are hindering the advancement of the pedagogical proposal, such as the lack of leveling with respect to concepts such as the principles of agroecology, work and research, in addition to pedagogical alternation, especially with regard to Community Time; c) not separating teaching-research-extension has been a challenge for the “development” of actions within land reform settlements and rural communities; d) in general, many positive experiences have been and continue to be carried out by IFPA-CRMB, either by the Teaching, Research and Extension Unit (UNIEPEs), or by the communities; e) the training managed to meet the expectations of the graduates; f) the integration of the areas of knowledge was paramount for achieving the results of each cycle, and the connection of the subjects with the land and the work was necessary to carry out research and experiments; g) the training course encouraged conversations with families in the territories and monitoring through unions, associations and/or cooperatives; h) Finally, the participants stated that the initiative still needs to bring the institution closer to rural territories and their populations, promoting teaching, research and extension in land reform encampments and settlements. Considering all the changes to the original proposal based on the Rural Family School, the participants’ statements are in line with the importance of the Campus for the Southeast region of Pará, and the training, without disregarding limits and challenges, contributed to the connection of graduates with the land and to the “development” of rural territories.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-09-22T12:58:00Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2021-09-22T12:58:00Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021-06-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv GOMES, M. S. F. Território camponês do sudeste do Pará: a construção da educação do campo. 2021. 435 f. Tese (Doutorado) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2021.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/11643
identifier_str_mv GOMES, M. S. F. Território camponês do sudeste do Pará: a construção da educação do campo. 2021. 435 f. Tese (Doutorado) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2021.
url http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/11643
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv 37
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 500
500
500
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 12
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 195
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-graduação em Educação (FE)
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFG
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Educação - FE (RG)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFG
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/a3e54ed8-3cd6-471f-acf2-71303dda0c86/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/fdf0127a-6203-408c-9a0c-9fdabcb69102/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/530712bd-21db-4059-ab50-ea79b1118dd3/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
9615ba1434fa053f9018fbcc3337c67a
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.br
_version_ 1798044358352568320