A abordagem não paramétrica para avaliação da percepção de sustentabilidade do sistema de produção de arroz de terras altas

• Autor(a) principal: Inga de La Cruz, Elvis Edgard
• Data de Publicação: 2015
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5713
• topic: Sustentabilidade agrícola; MPSATA-NP; Método não paramétrico; Teste de Wilcoxon; Agricultural sustainability; MPSATA-NP; Nonparametric method; Wilcoxon test; OUTROS::ADMINISTRACAO RURAL

This study aimed, expand the method of Production Systems Sustainability Perception Rice High -MPSAT Lands. The choice of this method is justified by the fact that it has a good theoretical framework and be easily understood by the actors; however, it lacks nonparametric statistical approach. They were interviewed actors in the production chain of upland rice in Mato Grosso on two occasions, in 2006/07, when the MPSATA and 2014 was developed as part of this research. The methodology transformed the qualitative elements that make up the MPSATA (questions, attributes, indicators, key variables, secondary counselors, primary guiding and sustainability dimensions) for ordinal type and identified the sense of the order of the categories of these elements. Then it verified the significance of matched elements, considering the 2007 and 2014 surveys, with the IBM-SPSS 21. Later the element values were calculated. These elements have as a data source practices and managements carried out along the production chain. The end result of the research was the development of Parametric Method Not for Perception Sustainability Highlands Rice Production System - MPSATA-NP. The results obtained by MPSATA-NP allowed to accept or reject in statistical terms, if there were significant differences between the values of the features found in different eras who were surveyed, revealing that the 221 questions elements, eleven have statistical difference between their medians (three environmental dimension, two of the socioeconomic scale, four in the economic dimension and two territorial dimension). The other sustainability factors have changes compared to paired terms, however, it can´t be said that these elements are in fact different and represent more or less sustainable production conditions. So it follows that not hear significant change in the perception of the actors with respect to the sustainability of the land rice production system in the region.