Cidadania, participação e deliberação online: Um estudo de caso dos sites e-Democracia e Votenaweb
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2012 |
Format: | Master thesis |
Language: | por |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UFG |
Download full: | http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tde/1404 |
Summary: | The purpose of this research is to investigate the user participation in the websites e-Democracia and Votenaweb, from the theoretical standpoint of deliberation and online conversation. The online participation has its both its advanced by the possibilities of tools, but retains problems of access and quality of participation, lack of engagement and disinterest in political discussions. The research is developed through a descriptive evaluation of sites, a content analysis of citizen participation and a comparison between the particularities of each site. This dissertation shows that, in general, the sites carry, through their tools, the role of bringing citizen closer the legislative process, whether in an informal way, closer to conversational processes, as in the case of Votenaweb, or in more formal and argumentative ways, as in the case of e-Democracia. To a lesser extent, the sites play also a role in tightening the gap between citizens and their elected representatives. Regarding the content of the comments, different categories are identified as essential elements of deliberative democracy, in order to identify it´s different and possible levels, as well as the determination of actions mediated by the tools provided by the examined media devices, noting also to which extent that kind of participation contributes - or could contribute - to citizenship. About the comparison are shown the differences between the two sites, aspects that are inferred from primary difference between them: the fact that an experiment has been organized by the society, Votenaweb, and another organized by the State, in case the e-Democracia responsibility of the Chamber of Deputies. It analyzes the possibilities and limitations of the tools, in addition to meeting the targets proposed in its objectives. The research points to a finding of supply, in both sites, significant potential of participatory tools, but that, in fact, the uses of these tools and levels of interaction between the participants are still unsatisfactory. Finally, other elements are highlighted: the need for political and administrative structures more porous and the indication that institutional and non-institutional sites should act in a complementary way to participate in this offer, due to the different dynamic languages, public access and interference in the field political. |
id |
UFG-2_fd0ed9ce76e2d15a1f85fd6891c26bdf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tde/1404 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
SILVA, Magno Luiz Medeiros dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8829860934484429http://lattes.cnpq.br/3384021501523935SOUSA, Marcelo Igor de2014-07-29T15:22:32Z2012-12-262012-06-21SOUSA, Marcelo Igor de. Citizenship, participation and online deliberation: a case study of websites e-Democracia and Votenaweb. 2012. 224 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais Aplicadas) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2012.http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tde/1404The purpose of this research is to investigate the user participation in the websites e-Democracia and Votenaweb, from the theoretical standpoint of deliberation and online conversation. The online participation has its both its advanced by the possibilities of tools, but retains problems of access and quality of participation, lack of engagement and disinterest in political discussions. The research is developed through a descriptive evaluation of sites, a content analysis of citizen participation and a comparison between the particularities of each site. This dissertation shows that, in general, the sites carry, through their tools, the role of bringing citizen closer the legislative process, whether in an informal way, closer to conversational processes, as in the case of Votenaweb, or in more formal and argumentative ways, as in the case of e-Democracia. To a lesser extent, the sites play also a role in tightening the gap between citizens and their elected representatives. Regarding the content of the comments, different categories are identified as essential elements of deliberative democracy, in order to identify it´s different and possible levels, as well as the determination of actions mediated by the tools provided by the examined media devices, noting also to which extent that kind of participation contributes - or could contribute - to citizenship. About the comparison are shown the differences between the two sites, aspects that are inferred from primary difference between them: the fact that an experiment has been organized by the society, Votenaweb, and another organized by the State, in case the e-Democracia responsibility of the Chamber of Deputies. It analyzes the possibilities and limitations of the tools, in addition to meeting the targets proposed in its objectives. The research points to a finding of supply, in both sites, significant potential of participatory tools, but that, in fact, the uses of these tools and levels of interaction between the participants are still unsatisfactory. Finally, other elements are highlighted: the need for political and administrative structures more porous and the indication that institutional and non-institutional sites should act in a complementary way to participate in this offer, due to the different dynamic languages, public access and interference in the field political.O propósito desta pesquisa é realizar um estudo da participação pública realizada nos sites e-Democracia e Votenaweb, a partir dos referenciais teóricos de deliberação e conversação online. A participação online tem seus avanços pelas possibilidades de ferramentas, mas conserva problemas de acesso e de qualidade de participação, de falta de engajamento e desinteresse por discussões políticas. A pesquisa se desenvolve por meio de uma avaliação descritiva dos sites, uma análise do teor dos conteúdos das participações cidadãs e de uma comparação entre as particularidades de cada site. Esta dissertação mostra que, de forma geral, os sites cumprem, por meio de suas ferramentas, o papel de aproximar o cidadão do processo legislativo, seja de um modo informal e mais próximo do conversacional, no Votenaweb, ou mais formal e argumentativo, no e-Democracia. Em menor proporção, os sites cumprem um papel de aproximarem os cidadãos de seus representantes eleitos. Nos conteúdos dos comentários, são identificadas categorias a partir de elementos essenciais da democracia deliberativa, com o objetivo de identificar níveis, os quais sejam possíveis, de deliberação nas ações mediadas pelas ferramentas apresentadas pelos dispositivos midiáticos em questão, destacando também em que circunstância essa participação contribui ou pode contribuir para a cidadania. Sobre a comparação, são apresentadas as diferenças entre os dois sites, aspectos que se depreendem da diferença principal entre eles: o fato de uma experiência ter sido organizada pela sociedade, Votenaweb, e outra organizada pelo Estado, no caso, o e-Democracia, de responsabilidade da Câmara dos Deputados. São analisadas as possibilidades e limitações das ferramentas, além do cumprimento das metas propostas em seus objetivos. A pesquisa aponta para uma constatação de oferta, em ambos os sites, de ferramentas de significativo potencial participativo, mas que, de fato, os usos dessas ferramentas e os níveis de interação entre os participantes ainda são insatisfatórios. Por fim, outros elementos ressaltados são: a necessidade de estruturas político-administrativa mais porosas e a indicação de que sites institucionais e não institucionais devem atuar de forma complementar nessa oferta de participação, devido às diferentes dinâmicas de linguagens, acesso ao público e interferência no campo político.Made available in DSpace on 2014-07-29T15:22:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 VERSAO FINAL DISS MARCELO IGOR DE SOUSA.pdf: 2562198 bytes, checksum: 1cfa0fd60439cdd1449fc8705608b64a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-06-21application/pdfhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/TEDE/retrieve/4147/VERSAO%20FINAL%20DISS%20MARCELO%20IGOR%20DE%20SOUSA.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Federal de GoiásMestrado em ComunicaçãoUFGBRCiências Sociais AplicadasComunicaçãoParticipação PolíticaInternetCidadaniaDemocracia DeliberativaCommunicationPolitical ParticipationInternetCitizenshipDeliberative DemocracyCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAOCidadania, participação e deliberação online: Um estudo de caso dos sites e-Democracia e VotenawebCitizenship, participation and online deliberation: a case study of websites e-Democracia and Votenawebinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFGinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGORIGINALVERSAO FINAL DISS MARCELO IGOR DE SOUSA.pdfapplication/pdf2562198http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/d1bef4ef-bd06-42c6-8b72-cbc471c5fd35/download1cfa0fd60439cdd1449fc8705608b64aMD51THUMBNAILVERSAO FINAL DISS MARCELO IGOR DE SOUSA.pdf.jpgVERSAO FINAL DISS MARCELO IGOR DE SOUSA.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1943http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/730176df-639a-4f11-825b-428286659da5/downloadcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD52tde/14042014-07-30 03:11:46.569open.accessoai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tde/1404http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tedeRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/oai/requesttasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.bropendoar:2014-07-30T06:11:46Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Cidadania, participação e deliberação online: Um estudo de caso dos sites e-Democracia e Votenaweb |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Citizenship, participation and online deliberation: a case study of websites e-Democracia and Votenaweb |
title |
Cidadania, participação e deliberação online: Um estudo de caso dos sites e-Democracia e Votenaweb |
spellingShingle |
Cidadania, participação e deliberação online: Um estudo de caso dos sites e-Democracia e Votenaweb SOUSA, Marcelo Igor de Comunicação Participação Política Internet Cidadania Democracia Deliberativa Communication Political Participation Internet Citizenship Deliberative Democracy CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO |
title_short |
Cidadania, participação e deliberação online: Um estudo de caso dos sites e-Democracia e Votenaweb |
title_full |
Cidadania, participação e deliberação online: Um estudo de caso dos sites e-Democracia e Votenaweb |
title_fullStr |
Cidadania, participação e deliberação online: Um estudo de caso dos sites e-Democracia e Votenaweb |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cidadania, participação e deliberação online: Um estudo de caso dos sites e-Democracia e Votenaweb |
title_sort |
Cidadania, participação e deliberação online: Um estudo de caso dos sites e-Democracia e Votenaweb |
author |
SOUSA, Marcelo Igor de |
author_facet |
SOUSA, Marcelo Igor de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
SILVA, Magno Luiz Medeiros da |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8829860934484429 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3384021501523935 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
SOUSA, Marcelo Igor de |
contributor_str_mv |
SILVA, Magno Luiz Medeiros da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Comunicação Participação Política Internet Cidadania Democracia Deliberativa |
topic |
Comunicação Participação Política Internet Cidadania Democracia Deliberativa Communication Political Participation Internet Citizenship Deliberative Democracy CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Communication Political Participation Internet Citizenship Deliberative Democracy |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO |
description |
The purpose of this research is to investigate the user participation in the websites e-Democracia and Votenaweb, from the theoretical standpoint of deliberation and online conversation. The online participation has its both its advanced by the possibilities of tools, but retains problems of access and quality of participation, lack of engagement and disinterest in political discussions. The research is developed through a descriptive evaluation of sites, a content analysis of citizen participation and a comparison between the particularities of each site. This dissertation shows that, in general, the sites carry, through their tools, the role of bringing citizen closer the legislative process, whether in an informal way, closer to conversational processes, as in the case of Votenaweb, or in more formal and argumentative ways, as in the case of e-Democracia. To a lesser extent, the sites play also a role in tightening the gap between citizens and their elected representatives. Regarding the content of the comments, different categories are identified as essential elements of deliberative democracy, in order to identify it´s different and possible levels, as well as the determination of actions mediated by the tools provided by the examined media devices, noting also to which extent that kind of participation contributes - or could contribute - to citizenship. About the comparison are shown the differences between the two sites, aspects that are inferred from primary difference between them: the fact that an experiment has been organized by the society, Votenaweb, and another organized by the State, in case the e-Democracia responsibility of the Chamber of Deputies. It analyzes the possibilities and limitations of the tools, in addition to meeting the targets proposed in its objectives. The research points to a finding of supply, in both sites, significant potential of participatory tools, but that, in fact, the uses of these tools and levels of interaction between the participants are still unsatisfactory. Finally, other elements are highlighted: the need for political and administrative structures more porous and the indication that institutional and non-institutional sites should act in a complementary way to participate in this offer, due to the different dynamic languages, public access and interference in the field political. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2012-12-26 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2012-06-21 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2014-07-29T15:22:32Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
SOUSA, Marcelo Igor de. Citizenship, participation and online deliberation: a case study of websites e-Democracia and Votenaweb. 2012. 224 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais Aplicadas) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2012. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tde/1404 |
identifier_str_mv |
SOUSA, Marcelo Igor de. Citizenship, participation and online deliberation: a case study of websites e-Democracia and Votenaweb. 2012. 224 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais Aplicadas) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2012. |
url |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tde/1404 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Mestrado em Comunicação |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFG |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Ciências Sociais Aplicadas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFG instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/d1bef4ef-bd06-42c6-8b72-cbc471c5fd35/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/730176df-639a-4f11-825b-428286659da5/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
1cfa0fd60439cdd1449fc8705608b64a cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.br |
_version_ |
1798044407265492992 |