Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/69665 |
Resumo: | Yield response data of crops to soil and water management are vital for maximizing profits. This research aimed to evaluate the yield of the ‘IPR Andorinha’ bean cultivar under distinct irrigation depths (0, 25, 48, 100 and 130 % of the net irrigation depth) and tillage systems (no-tillage and conventional tillage), during the Brazilian fall season. The experimental design was in strips with subdivided plots and four replications, with the factor soil management in the plot and irrigation depths in the subplot. No-tillage had an average grain yield 26.5 % higher than that of the conventional tillage. Both the soil management treatments presented a quadratic response (R² > 90 %) to the irrigation depths applied, and the maximum yields were reached at 63.8 % (y = 2,452 kg ha-1) and 81.8 % (y = 1,789 kg ha-1) of the irrigation depth, respectively for the no-tillage and conventional tillage. However, the irrigation of bean cropped in the Brazilian fall season is not economically feasible for the no-tillage and conventional tillage when the price of the water millimeter is 43.19 and 33.27 times higher than the price of the bean kilogram, respectively, resulting in yields of 1,345.2 and 699.4 kg ha-1. KEYWORDS: Phaseolus vulgaris, no-tillage, conventional tillage. |
id |
UFG-6_1534e6190700071417c651c8897656e7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/69665 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-6 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systemsProdutividade de feijoeiro sob lâminas de irrigação e sistemas de cultivoYield response data of crops to soil and water management are vital for maximizing profits. This research aimed to evaluate the yield of the ‘IPR Andorinha’ bean cultivar under distinct irrigation depths (0, 25, 48, 100 and 130 % of the net irrigation depth) and tillage systems (no-tillage and conventional tillage), during the Brazilian fall season. The experimental design was in strips with subdivided plots and four replications, with the factor soil management in the plot and irrigation depths in the subplot. No-tillage had an average grain yield 26.5 % higher than that of the conventional tillage. Both the soil management treatments presented a quadratic response (R² > 90 %) to the irrigation depths applied, and the maximum yields were reached at 63.8 % (y = 2,452 kg ha-1) and 81.8 % (y = 1,789 kg ha-1) of the irrigation depth, respectively for the no-tillage and conventional tillage. However, the irrigation of bean cropped in the Brazilian fall season is not economically feasible for the no-tillage and conventional tillage when the price of the water millimeter is 43.19 and 33.27 times higher than the price of the bean kilogram, respectively, resulting in yields of 1,345.2 and 699.4 kg ha-1. KEYWORDS: Phaseolus vulgaris, no-tillage, conventional tillage.Dados de produtividade das culturas em função do manejo do solo e da água são essenciais para a maximização dos lucros. Objetivou-se avaliar a produtividade da cultivar de feijoeiro ‘IPR Andorinha’ sob diferentes lâminas de irrigação (0, 25, 48, 100 e 130 % da lâmina líquida de irrigação) e sistemas de cultivo (plantio direto e convencional), no outono. O delineamento experimental foi em faixas com parcelas subdivididas e quarto repetições, com o fator manejo do solo na parcela e lâminas de irrigação na subparcela. O plantio direto apresentou produtividade de grãos 26,5 % superior à do convencional. Ambos os tratamentos para manejo do solo apresentaram resposta quadrática (R² > 90 %) às lâminas de irrigação aplicadas, e as produtividades máximas foram alcançadas com 63,8 % (y = 2.452 kg ha-1) e 81,8 % (y = 1.789 kg ha-1) da lâmina líquida, respectivamente para o plantio direto e convencional. Entretanto, o cultivo irrigado do feijoeiro no outono não é economicamente viável no plantio direto e convencional quando o preço do milímetro de água for 43,19 e 33,27 vezes superior ao do quilograma de feijão, respectivamente, resultando em produtividades de 1.345,2 e 699,4 kg ha-1. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Phaseolus vulgaris, plantio direto, plantio convencional.Escola de Agronomia - Universidade Federal de Goiás2021-12-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/69665Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical [Agricultural Research in the Tropics]; Vol. 51 (2021); e69665Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Agricultural Research in the Tropics); Vol. 51 (2021); e69665Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical; v. 51 (2021); e696651983-4063reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGenghttps://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/69665/37704Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropicalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPrado, Giuliani doTinos, Adriano CatossiSchiavon, Rafael de Almeida Mahl, Denise2021-12-10T21:07:12Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/69665Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/patPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/pat/oaiaseleguini.pat@gmail.com||mgoes@agro.ufg.br1983-40631517-6398opendoar:2024-05-21T19:56:33.618741Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems Produtividade de feijoeiro sob lâminas de irrigação e sistemas de cultivo |
title |
Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems |
spellingShingle |
Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems Prado, Giuliani do |
title_short |
Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems |
title_full |
Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems |
title_fullStr |
Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems |
title_sort |
Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems |
author |
Prado, Giuliani do |
author_facet |
Prado, Giuliani do Tinos, Adriano Catossi Schiavon, Rafael de Almeida Mahl, Denise |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tinos, Adriano Catossi Schiavon, Rafael de Almeida Mahl, Denise |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Prado, Giuliani do Tinos, Adriano Catossi Schiavon, Rafael de Almeida Mahl, Denise |
description |
Yield response data of crops to soil and water management are vital for maximizing profits. This research aimed to evaluate the yield of the ‘IPR Andorinha’ bean cultivar under distinct irrigation depths (0, 25, 48, 100 and 130 % of the net irrigation depth) and tillage systems (no-tillage and conventional tillage), during the Brazilian fall season. The experimental design was in strips with subdivided plots and four replications, with the factor soil management in the plot and irrigation depths in the subplot. No-tillage had an average grain yield 26.5 % higher than that of the conventional tillage. Both the soil management treatments presented a quadratic response (R² > 90 %) to the irrigation depths applied, and the maximum yields were reached at 63.8 % (y = 2,452 kg ha-1) and 81.8 % (y = 1,789 kg ha-1) of the irrigation depth, respectively for the no-tillage and conventional tillage. However, the irrigation of bean cropped in the Brazilian fall season is not economically feasible for the no-tillage and conventional tillage when the price of the water millimeter is 43.19 and 33.27 times higher than the price of the bean kilogram, respectively, resulting in yields of 1,345.2 and 699.4 kg ha-1. KEYWORDS: Phaseolus vulgaris, no-tillage, conventional tillage. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/69665 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/69665 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/69665/37704 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Agronomia - Universidade Federal de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Agronomia - Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical [Agricultural Research in the Tropics]; Vol. 51 (2021); e69665 Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Agricultural Research in the Tropics); Vol. 51 (2021); e69665 Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical; v. 51 (2021); e69665 1983-4063 reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
aseleguini.pat@gmail.com||mgoes@agro.ufg.br |
_version_ |
1799874821122686976 |