Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Prado, Giuliani do
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Tinos, Adriano Catossi, Schiavon, Rafael de Almeida, Mahl, Denise
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/69665
Resumo: Yield response data of crops to soil and water management are vital for maximizing profits. This research aimed to evaluate the yield of the ‘IPR Andorinha’ bean cultivar under distinct irrigation depths (0, 25, 48, 100 and 130 % of the net irrigation depth) and tillage systems (no-tillage and conventional tillage), during the Brazilian fall season. The experimental design was in strips with subdivided plots and four replications, with the factor soil management in the plot and irrigation depths in the subplot. No-tillage had an average grain yield 26.5 % higher than that of the conventional tillage. Both the soil management treatments presented a quadratic response (R² > 90 %) to the irrigation depths applied, and the maximum yields were reached at 63.8 % (y = 2,452 kg ha-1) and 81.8 % (y = 1,789 kg ha-1) of the irrigation depth, respectively for the no-tillage and conventional tillage. However, the irrigation of bean cropped in the Brazilian fall season is not economically feasible for the no-tillage and conventional tillage when the price of the water millimeter is 43.19 and 33.27 times higher than the price of the bean kilogram, respectively, resulting in yields of 1,345.2 and 699.4 kg ha-1. KEYWORDS: Phaseolus vulgaris, no-tillage, conventional tillage.
id UFG-6_1534e6190700071417c651c8897656e7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/69665
network_acronym_str UFG-6
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systemsProdutividade de feijoeiro sob lâminas de irrigação e sistemas de cultivoYield response data of crops to soil and water management are vital for maximizing profits. This research aimed to evaluate the yield of the ‘IPR Andorinha’ bean cultivar under distinct irrigation depths (0, 25, 48, 100 and 130 % of the net irrigation depth) and tillage systems (no-tillage and conventional tillage), during the Brazilian fall season. The experimental design was in strips with subdivided plots and four replications, with the factor soil management in the plot and irrigation depths in the subplot. No-tillage had an average grain yield 26.5 % higher than that of the conventional tillage. Both the soil management treatments presented a quadratic response (R² > 90 %) to the irrigation depths applied, and the maximum yields were reached at 63.8 % (y = 2,452 kg ha-1) and 81.8 % (y = 1,789 kg ha-1) of the irrigation depth, respectively for the no-tillage and conventional tillage. However, the irrigation of bean cropped in the Brazilian fall season is not economically feasible for the no-tillage and conventional tillage when the price of the water millimeter is 43.19 and 33.27 times higher than the price of the bean kilogram, respectively, resulting in yields of 1,345.2 and 699.4 kg ha-1. KEYWORDS: Phaseolus vulgaris, no-tillage, conventional tillage.Dados de produtividade das culturas em função do manejo do solo e da água são essenciais para a maximização dos lucros. Objetivou-se avaliar a produtividade da cultivar de feijoeiro ‘IPR Andorinha’ sob diferentes lâminas de irrigação (0, 25, 48, 100 e 130 % da lâmina líquida de irrigação) e sistemas de cultivo (plantio direto e convencional), no outono. O delineamento experimental foi em faixas com parcelas subdivididas e quarto repetições, com o fator manejo do solo na parcela e lâminas de irrigação na subparcela. O plantio direto apresentou produtividade de grãos 26,5 % superior à do convencional. Ambos os tratamentos para manejo do solo apresentaram resposta quadrática (R² > 90 %) às lâminas de irrigação aplicadas, e as produtividades máximas foram alcançadas com 63,8 % (y = 2.452 kg ha-1) e 81,8 % (y = 1.789 kg ha-1) da lâmina líquida, respectivamente para o plantio direto e convencional. Entretanto, o cultivo irrigado do feijoeiro no outono não é economicamente viável no plantio direto e convencional quando o preço do milímetro de água for 43,19 e 33,27 vezes superior ao do quilograma de feijão, respectivamente, resultando em produtividades de 1.345,2 e 699,4 kg ha-1. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Phaseolus vulgaris, plantio direto, plantio convencional.Escola de Agronomia - Universidade Federal de Goiás2021-12-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/69665Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical [Agricultural Research in the Tropics]; Vol. 51 (2021); e69665Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Agricultural Research in the Tropics); Vol. 51 (2021); e69665Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical; v. 51 (2021); e696651983-4063reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGenghttps://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/69665/37704Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropicalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPrado, Giuliani doTinos, Adriano CatossiSchiavon, Rafael de Almeida Mahl, Denise2021-12-10T21:07:12Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/69665Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/patPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/pat/oaiaseleguini.pat@gmail.com||mgoes@agro.ufg.br1983-40631517-6398opendoar:2024-05-21T19:56:33.618741Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems
Produtividade de feijoeiro sob lâminas de irrigação e sistemas de cultivo
title Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems
spellingShingle Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems
Prado, Giuliani do
title_short Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems
title_full Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems
title_fullStr Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems
title_full_unstemmed Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems
title_sort Bean yield under irrigation depths and tillage systems
author Prado, Giuliani do
author_facet Prado, Giuliani do
Tinos, Adriano Catossi
Schiavon, Rafael de Almeida
Mahl, Denise
author_role author
author2 Tinos, Adriano Catossi
Schiavon, Rafael de Almeida
Mahl, Denise
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Prado, Giuliani do
Tinos, Adriano Catossi
Schiavon, Rafael de Almeida
Mahl, Denise
description Yield response data of crops to soil and water management are vital for maximizing profits. This research aimed to evaluate the yield of the ‘IPR Andorinha’ bean cultivar under distinct irrigation depths (0, 25, 48, 100 and 130 % of the net irrigation depth) and tillage systems (no-tillage and conventional tillage), during the Brazilian fall season. The experimental design was in strips with subdivided plots and four replications, with the factor soil management in the plot and irrigation depths in the subplot. No-tillage had an average grain yield 26.5 % higher than that of the conventional tillage. Both the soil management treatments presented a quadratic response (R² > 90 %) to the irrigation depths applied, and the maximum yields were reached at 63.8 % (y = 2,452 kg ha-1) and 81.8 % (y = 1,789 kg ha-1) of the irrigation depth, respectively for the no-tillage and conventional tillage. However, the irrigation of bean cropped in the Brazilian fall season is not economically feasible for the no-tillage and conventional tillage when the price of the water millimeter is 43.19 and 33.27 times higher than the price of the bean kilogram, respectively, resulting in yields of 1,345.2 and 699.4 kg ha-1. KEYWORDS: Phaseolus vulgaris, no-tillage, conventional tillage.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/69665
url https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/69665
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/69665/37704
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Agronomia - Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Agronomia - Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical [Agricultural Research in the Tropics]; Vol. 51 (2021); e69665
Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Agricultural Research in the Tropics); Vol. 51 (2021); e69665
Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical; v. 51 (2021); e69665
1983-4063
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv aseleguini.pat@gmail.com||mgoes@agro.ufg.br
_version_ 1799874821122686976