DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON IRRIGATED COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) RESPONSE TO NITROGEN TOPDRESSING
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/2868 |
Resumo: | In recent years emphasis has been placed upon the systemic approach of agricultural practices to increase food production. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) has demonstrated to be a suitable crop species as a component of several production systems as it has been shown on the irrigated areas of the Brazilian Central Region. However, general crop management techniques have to be adjusted as a function of the different crop systems available and nitrogen fertilization is one of those. To confirm this hypothesis, common bean response to nitrogen application was evaluated using cultivar Aporé under four different irrigated production systems using different crop rotations and soil management practices: A - bean-corn crop rotation, using moldboard plowing in the spring-summer (November/December) and harrowing in the autumn-winter (May-June) season; B – ricebean crop rotation and moldboard plowing only; C - rice/calopogonium-bean crop rotation and harrowing only; D – cornbean crop rotation using continuous no-tillage. Urea, used as the nitrogen source, was applied in topdressing using 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 125 kg.ha-1 of N. Field trials were conducted during the fallwinter season, in 1996 and 1997, in a distrofic Dark Red Latosol, at the experimental farm of Embrapa Rice & Beans. Treatment effects were detected on the number of pods per plant, 100 grain weight and grain yield. Higher yields were obtained for systems C and D in which there was less soil disturbance. In system C, the effect of different nitrogen doses fit in a quadratic model and 109 kg.ha-1, estimated by the regression equation, provided the highest grain yields. In system D the effect was linear indicating that the bean crop demanded more nitrogen under no-tillage. In systems A and B the effect of different nitrogen doses varied according to the year of cultivation. KEY-WORDS: Crop rotation; soil preparation; yield production; productivity; dry beans. |
id |
UFG-6_52a24012be960dc3bff8de77ab37a690 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/2868 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-6 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON IRRIGATED COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) RESPONSE TO NITROGEN TOPDRESSINGINFLUÊNCIA DE SISTEMAS AGRÍCOLAS NA RESPOSTA DO FEIJOEIRO (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) IRRIGADO À ADUBAÇÃO NITROGENADA EM COBERTURACrop rotationsoil preparationyield productionproductivitydry beansRotação de culturapreparo do solocomponentes da produçãoprodutividadefeijão In recent years emphasis has been placed upon the systemic approach of agricultural practices to increase food production. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) has demonstrated to be a suitable crop species as a component of several production systems as it has been shown on the irrigated areas of the Brazilian Central Region. However, general crop management techniques have to be adjusted as a function of the different crop systems available and nitrogen fertilization is one of those. To confirm this hypothesis, common bean response to nitrogen application was evaluated using cultivar Aporé under four different irrigated production systems using different crop rotations and soil management practices: A - bean-corn crop rotation, using moldboard plowing in the spring-summer (November/December) and harrowing in the autumn-winter (May-June) season; B – ricebean crop rotation and moldboard plowing only; C - rice/calopogonium-bean crop rotation and harrowing only; D – cornbean crop rotation using continuous no-tillage. Urea, used as the nitrogen source, was applied in topdressing using 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 125 kg.ha-1 of N. Field trials were conducted during the fallwinter season, in 1996 and 1997, in a distrofic Dark Red Latosol, at the experimental farm of Embrapa Rice & Beans. Treatment effects were detected on the number of pods per plant, 100 grain weight and grain yield. Higher yields were obtained for systems C and D in which there was less soil disturbance. In system C, the effect of different nitrogen doses fit in a quadratic model and 109 kg.ha-1, estimated by the regression equation, provided the highest grain yields. In system D the effect was linear indicating that the bean crop demanded more nitrogen under no-tillage. In systems A and B the effect of different nitrogen doses varied according to the year of cultivation. KEY-WORDS: Crop rotation; soil preparation; yield production; productivity; dry beans. O aumento na produção de alimentos por meio da agricultura, com enfoque em sistemas agrícolas, tem sido bastante praticado nos últimos anos. O feijoeiro (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) é uma espécie viável de integrar esses sistemas, o que tem sido demonstrado nas áreas irrigadas na região central do Brasil. Entretanto, são necessários ajustes nas técnicas de manejo, adequando-as aos diferentes sistemas. A adubação nitrogenada é uma delas e esta deve ser diferenciada, considerando a diversidade dos sistemas agrícolas em que o feijoeiro participa. Para testar esta hipótese, avaliou-se a influência de quatro sistemas agrícolas na resposta do feijoeiro irrigado, cultivar Aporé, à adubação nitrogenada. Os sistemas foram A - rotação milho-feijão, preparo do solo com arado de aiveca na primavera-verão (novembro-dezembro) e grade aradora no outono-inverno (maio-junho); B – rotação arroz-feijão, preparo do solo com arado de aiveca em todas as épocas; C - rotação arroz/calopogônio-feijão, preparo do solo com grade aradora em todas as épocas; e D - rotação milhofeijão, em plantio direto contínuo. O nitrogênio, tendo a uréia como fonte, foi aplicado em cobertura nas doses de 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 e 125 kg.ha-1 de N. Os experimentos foram conduzidos no período de outono-inverno (maio-junho) de 1996 e 1997, em latossolo vermelho-escuro distrófico, na Fazenda Capivara, pertencente à Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. Houve efeito dos tratamentos no número de vagens/planta, na massa de 100 grãos e no rendimento de grãos. Os maiores rendimentos de grãos foram obtidos nos sistemas C e D, em que houve menor movimentação de solo. No sistema C, o efeito das doses de N ajustou-se ao modelo quadrático, sendo de 109 kg.ha-1 de N a dose estimada pela equação de regressão para obtenção dos maiores rendimentos. No sistema D, o efeito foi linear, mostrando que o feijoeiro demandou mais nitrogênio no plantio direto. Nos sistemas A e B, o efeito das doses variou com o ano de cultivo. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Rotação de cultura; preparo do solo; componentes da produção; produtividade; feijão.Escola de Agronomia - Universidade Federal de Goiás2007-12-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/2868Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical [Agricultural Research in the Tropics]; v. 30, n. 1, Jan./Jun. 2000; 87-96Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Agricultural Research in the Tropics); v. 30, n. 1, jan./jun. 2000; 87-96Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical; v. 30, n. 1, jan./jun. 2000; 87-961983-4063reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/2868/2918Silva, Corival Cândido daSilveira, Pedro Marques dainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2009-06-24T19:41:34Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/2868Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/patPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/pat/oaiaseleguini.pat@gmail.com||mgoes@agro.ufg.br1983-40631517-6398opendoar:2024-05-21T19:55:23.430983Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON IRRIGATED COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) RESPONSE TO NITROGEN TOPDRESSING INFLUÊNCIA DE SISTEMAS AGRÍCOLAS NA RESPOSTA DO FEIJOEIRO (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) IRRIGADO À ADUBAÇÃO NITROGENADA EM COBERTURA |
title |
DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON IRRIGATED COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) RESPONSE TO NITROGEN TOPDRESSING |
spellingShingle |
DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON IRRIGATED COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) RESPONSE TO NITROGEN TOPDRESSING Silva, Corival Cândido da Crop rotation soil preparation yield production productivity dry beans Rotação de cultura preparo do solo componentes da produção produtividade feijão |
title_short |
DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON IRRIGATED COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) RESPONSE TO NITROGEN TOPDRESSING |
title_full |
DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON IRRIGATED COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) RESPONSE TO NITROGEN TOPDRESSING |
title_fullStr |
DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON IRRIGATED COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) RESPONSE TO NITROGEN TOPDRESSING |
title_full_unstemmed |
DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON IRRIGATED COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) RESPONSE TO NITROGEN TOPDRESSING |
title_sort |
DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON IRRIGATED COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) RESPONSE TO NITROGEN TOPDRESSING |
author |
Silva, Corival Cândido da |
author_facet |
Silva, Corival Cândido da Silveira, Pedro Marques da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silveira, Pedro Marques da |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Corival Cândido da Silveira, Pedro Marques da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Crop rotation soil preparation yield production productivity dry beans Rotação de cultura preparo do solo componentes da produção produtividade feijão |
topic |
Crop rotation soil preparation yield production productivity dry beans Rotação de cultura preparo do solo componentes da produção produtividade feijão |
description |
In recent years emphasis has been placed upon the systemic approach of agricultural practices to increase food production. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) has demonstrated to be a suitable crop species as a component of several production systems as it has been shown on the irrigated areas of the Brazilian Central Region. However, general crop management techniques have to be adjusted as a function of the different crop systems available and nitrogen fertilization is one of those. To confirm this hypothesis, common bean response to nitrogen application was evaluated using cultivar Aporé under four different irrigated production systems using different crop rotations and soil management practices: A - bean-corn crop rotation, using moldboard plowing in the spring-summer (November/December) and harrowing in the autumn-winter (May-June) season; B – ricebean crop rotation and moldboard plowing only; C - rice/calopogonium-bean crop rotation and harrowing only; D – cornbean crop rotation using continuous no-tillage. Urea, used as the nitrogen source, was applied in topdressing using 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 125 kg.ha-1 of N. Field trials were conducted during the fallwinter season, in 1996 and 1997, in a distrofic Dark Red Latosol, at the experimental farm of Embrapa Rice & Beans. Treatment effects were detected on the number of pods per plant, 100 grain weight and grain yield. Higher yields were obtained for systems C and D in which there was less soil disturbance. In system C, the effect of different nitrogen doses fit in a quadratic model and 109 kg.ha-1, estimated by the regression equation, provided the highest grain yields. In system D the effect was linear indicating that the bean crop demanded more nitrogen under no-tillage. In systems A and B the effect of different nitrogen doses varied according to the year of cultivation. KEY-WORDS: Crop rotation; soil preparation; yield production; productivity; dry beans. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-12-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/2868 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/2868 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/2868/2918 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Agronomia - Universidade Federal de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Agronomia - Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical [Agricultural Research in the Tropics]; v. 30, n. 1, Jan./Jun. 2000; 87-96 Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Agricultural Research in the Tropics); v. 30, n. 1, jan./jun. 2000; 87-96 Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical; v. 30, n. 1, jan./jun. 2000; 87-96 1983-4063 reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
aseleguini.pat@gmail.com||mgoes@agro.ufg.br |
_version_ |
1799874815515951104 |