Quality of hydroponic forage corn cultivated on different by-product substrates

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cordeiro Fonseca, Geane
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Paula de Araújo, Graziela, Lima Abreu, Natan, Vagner de Lima Pantoja, Raimundo, Lucélia da Silva Nascimento, Angélica, de Abreu Faria, Letícia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/69834
Resumo: Hydroponic corn cultivation is an efficient, fast, and feasible alternative for periods of food scarcity; however, there is still little information on the qualitative and quantitative parameters of the produced biomass, especially with regard to substrates. This study aimed to evaluate the productive and qualitative aspects of hydroponic feed corn grown on different substrates with a cultivation period of 15 days. Four substrates were evaluated: 1) fermented whole açaí seeds, 2) crushed açaí seeds, 3) sugarcane bagasse, and 4) ground Tifton hay, with five replications under a randomized block design. Substrate temperature was monitored during the production period. After harvesting on day 15, roots length (RL), shoot length (SL), biomass dry matter content (BDM), dry biomass yield, forage dry mass productivity, crude protein (CP), and ash content were assessed. There was no correlation of growth period and substrate temperature. RL was not affected by substrates, BDM was lower in treatment 3, CP was not influenced, and ash content was higher in treatment 1. In general, the best development was observed in treatment 1 because of the absence of distinction regarding qualitative parameters (CP and ash) and higher granulometry of whole açaí seeds which affects mass density and substrate aeration, thus allowing higher dry biomass yield. Keywords: açaí seed; agroindustry by-products; animal nutrition; forage production.
id UFG-7_88199232ad8779ab7c32f3e405596804
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/69834
network_acronym_str UFG-7
network_name_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Quality of hydroponic forage corn cultivated on different by-product substratesQualidade de forragem de milho hidropônico cultivado em diferentes substratos de subprodutoHydroponic corn cultivation is an efficient, fast, and feasible alternative for periods of food scarcity; however, there is still little information on the qualitative and quantitative parameters of the produced biomass, especially with regard to substrates. This study aimed to evaluate the productive and qualitative aspects of hydroponic feed corn grown on different substrates with a cultivation period of 15 days. Four substrates were evaluated: 1) fermented whole açaí seeds, 2) crushed açaí seeds, 3) sugarcane bagasse, and 4) ground Tifton hay, with five replications under a randomized block design. Substrate temperature was monitored during the production period. After harvesting on day 15, roots length (RL), shoot length (SL), biomass dry matter content (BDM), dry biomass yield, forage dry mass productivity, crude protein (CP), and ash content were assessed. There was no correlation of growth period and substrate temperature. RL was not affected by substrates, BDM was lower in treatment 3, CP was not influenced, and ash content was higher in treatment 1. In general, the best development was observed in treatment 1 because of the absence of distinction regarding qualitative parameters (CP and ash) and higher granulometry of whole açaí seeds which affects mass density and substrate aeration, thus allowing higher dry biomass yield. Keywords: açaí seed; agroindustry by-products; animal nutrition; forage production.O cultivo hidropônico de milho é uma alternativa eficiente, rápida e viável para períodos de escassez de alimentos; entretanto, ainda são poucas as informações sobre os parâmetros qualitativos e quantitativos da biomassa produzida, principalmente no que diz respeito aos substratos. Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar os aspectos produtivos e qualitativos do milho hidropônico para ração cultivado em diferentes substratos com um período de cultivo de 15 dias. Quatro substratos foram avaliados: 1) sementes de açaí inteiras fermentadas, 2) sementes de açaí trituradas, 3) bagaço de cana-de-açúcar e 4) feno de Tifton moído, com cinco repetições em delineamento de blocos ao acaso. A temperatura do substrato foi monitorada durante o período de produção. Após a colheita, no dia 15, foram avaliados o comprimento das raízes (RL), o comprimento da parte aérea, o teor de matéria seca da biomassa (BDM), o rendimento da biomassa seca, a produtividade da massa seca da forragem, a proteína bruta (PB) e o teor de cinzas. Não houve correlação entre período de crescimento e temperatura do substrato. O RL não foi afetado pelos substratos, o BDM foi menor no tratamento 3, o PB não foi influenciado e o teor de cinzas foi maior no tratamento 1. Em geral, o melhor desenvolvimento foi observado no tratamento 1 devido à ausência de distinção quanto aos parâmetros qualitativos (PB e cinzas) e maior granulometria das sementes inteiras de açaí que afetam a densidade de massa e aeração do substrato, permitindo maior rendimento de biomassa seca.Palavras-chave: caroço de açaí; coproduto da agroindústria; nutrição animal; produção de forragem.Universidade Federal de Goiás2021-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/69834Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 22 (2021): Continuous publicationCiência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 22 (2021): Publicação contínua1809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporenghttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/69834/37684https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/69834/37939https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/69834/37685https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/69834/37940Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência Animal Brasileirahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCordeiro Fonseca, Geane Paula de Araújo, GrazielaLima Abreu, NatanVagner de Lima Pantoja, RaimundoLucélia da Silva Nascimento, Angélicade Abreu Faria, Letícia2023-03-23T18:53:00Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/69834Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:56:28.439595Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality of hydroponic forage corn cultivated on different by-product substrates
Qualidade de forragem de milho hidropônico cultivado em diferentes substratos de subproduto
title Quality of hydroponic forage corn cultivated on different by-product substrates
spellingShingle Quality of hydroponic forage corn cultivated on different by-product substrates
Cordeiro Fonseca, Geane
title_short Quality of hydroponic forage corn cultivated on different by-product substrates
title_full Quality of hydroponic forage corn cultivated on different by-product substrates
title_fullStr Quality of hydroponic forage corn cultivated on different by-product substrates
title_full_unstemmed Quality of hydroponic forage corn cultivated on different by-product substrates
title_sort Quality of hydroponic forage corn cultivated on different by-product substrates
author Cordeiro Fonseca, Geane
author_facet Cordeiro Fonseca, Geane
Paula de Araújo, Graziela
Lima Abreu, Natan
Vagner de Lima Pantoja, Raimundo
Lucélia da Silva Nascimento, Angélica
de Abreu Faria, Letícia
author_role author
author2 Paula de Araújo, Graziela
Lima Abreu, Natan
Vagner de Lima Pantoja, Raimundo
Lucélia da Silva Nascimento, Angélica
de Abreu Faria, Letícia
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cordeiro Fonseca, Geane
Paula de Araújo, Graziela
Lima Abreu, Natan
Vagner de Lima Pantoja, Raimundo
Lucélia da Silva Nascimento, Angélica
de Abreu Faria, Letícia
description Hydroponic corn cultivation is an efficient, fast, and feasible alternative for periods of food scarcity; however, there is still little information on the qualitative and quantitative parameters of the produced biomass, especially with regard to substrates. This study aimed to evaluate the productive and qualitative aspects of hydroponic feed corn grown on different substrates with a cultivation period of 15 days. Four substrates were evaluated: 1) fermented whole açaí seeds, 2) crushed açaí seeds, 3) sugarcane bagasse, and 4) ground Tifton hay, with five replications under a randomized block design. Substrate temperature was monitored during the production period. After harvesting on day 15, roots length (RL), shoot length (SL), biomass dry matter content (BDM), dry biomass yield, forage dry mass productivity, crude protein (CP), and ash content were assessed. There was no correlation of growth period and substrate temperature. RL was not affected by substrates, BDM was lower in treatment 3, CP was not influenced, and ash content was higher in treatment 1. In general, the best development was observed in treatment 1 because of the absence of distinction regarding qualitative parameters (CP and ash) and higher granulometry of whole açaí seeds which affects mass density and substrate aeration, thus allowing higher dry biomass yield. Keywords: açaí seed; agroindustry by-products; animal nutrition; forage production.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/69834
url https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/69834
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/69834/37684
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/69834/37939
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/69834/37685
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/69834/37940
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência Animal Brasileira
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência Animal Brasileira
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 22 (2021): Continuous publication
Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 22 (2021): Publicação contínua
1809-6891
1518-2797
reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
collection Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacab@gmail.com
_version_ 1799874790559842304