Emulsifier and enzymatic complex in diet for free range broiler chicken in the western amazon

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: do Nascimento, Antonia Mariana
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: ´Gomes, Fábio Augusto, de Freitas, Henrique Jorge, Ferreira da Costa Rodrigues, Suelen, Araújo Pires, Gilcineide, Guato, Cesar Andres, Miranda de Souza, Edcarlos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/70663
Resumo: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of adding levels of emulsifier based on soy lecithin and enzymatic complex (xylanase, β-glucanase, galactosidase, protease, amylase, and β-mannanase) on the basal diet during the raising of free-range broiler chickens. The experimental design was completely randomized, with five treatments and six replications. Treatments were: T1: control diet, without enzymatic complex and emulsifier; T2: 0.2 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex; T3: 0.5 kg t−1 of emulsifier; T4: 0.2 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex + 0.5 kg t−1 of emulsifier; and T5: 0.3 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex + 1 kg t−1 of emulsifier. Performance data were collected every 14 days, and the animals were euthanized at 70 days to obtain carcass, breast, drumstick, and thigh yield and intestine collection for pH analysis and morphometry. The periods from 1 to 56 and 1 to 70 days showed a difference (P<0.05) in the parameters of zootechnical performance, the feed intake was lower in T4 and T5, and weight gain was better in T1, T2, T3, and T4. Feed conversion was better in T1, T2, and T4. No difference (P>0.05) was observed for poultry livability, carcass yield, viscera, and pH of duodenum and cecum. A difference was found for intestinal morphometry (P<0.05), and T5 showed the best villus/crypt ratio. The level with 0.3 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex and 1 kg t−1 of emulsifier indicated a better relationship between villi and crypts. However, the level with 0.2 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex and 0.5 kg t−1 of emulsifier added to the commercial diet led to benefits such as decreased feed intake, without affecting weight gain, thus inducing a good feed conversion.Keywords: Additives; Performance; Intestinal morphometry; Carcass yield.
id UFG-7_89e0956ee8ce88a22f18eecc566140ef
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/70663
network_acronym_str UFG-7
network_name_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Emulsifier and enzymatic complex in diet for free range broiler chicken in the western amazonEmulsificante e complexo enzimático em dieta para frangos de corte de linhagem caipira na Amazônia ocidentalThis study aimed to evaluate the effects of adding levels of emulsifier based on soy lecithin and enzymatic complex (xylanase, β-glucanase, galactosidase, protease, amylase, and β-mannanase) on the basal diet during the raising of free-range broiler chickens. The experimental design was completely randomized, with five treatments and six replications. Treatments were: T1: control diet, without enzymatic complex and emulsifier; T2: 0.2 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex; T3: 0.5 kg t−1 of emulsifier; T4: 0.2 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex + 0.5 kg t−1 of emulsifier; and T5: 0.3 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex + 1 kg t−1 of emulsifier. Performance data were collected every 14 days, and the animals were euthanized at 70 days to obtain carcass, breast, drumstick, and thigh yield and intestine collection for pH analysis and morphometry. The periods from 1 to 56 and 1 to 70 days showed a difference (P<0.05) in the parameters of zootechnical performance, the feed intake was lower in T4 and T5, and weight gain was better in T1, T2, T3, and T4. Feed conversion was better in T1, T2, and T4. No difference (P>0.05) was observed for poultry livability, carcass yield, viscera, and pH of duodenum and cecum. A difference was found for intestinal morphometry (P<0.05), and T5 showed the best villus/crypt ratio. The level with 0.3 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex and 1 kg t−1 of emulsifier indicated a better relationship between villi and crypts. However, the level with 0.2 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex and 0.5 kg t−1 of emulsifier added to the commercial diet led to benefits such as decreased feed intake, without affecting weight gain, thus inducing a good feed conversion.Keywords: Additives; Performance; Intestinal morphometry; Carcass yield.Objetivou-se avaliar os efeitos da adição de níveis de emulsificante à base de lecitina de soja e complexo enzimático (Xilanase, β-Glucanase, Galactosidase, Protease, Amilase, β-Mananase) na ração basal durante a criação de frangos de corte de linhagem caipira. O delineamento experimental foi inteiramente casualizado com 5 tratamentos e 6 repetições. Os tratamentos foram: T1: ração controle, sem complexo enzimático e emulsificante; T2: 0,2 kg t-1 de complexo enzimático; T3: 0,5 kg t-1 de emulsificante; T4: 0,2 kg t-1 de complexo enzimático + 0,5 kg t-1 de emulsificante; T5: 0,3 kg t-1 de complexo enzimático + 1 kg t-1 de emulsificante. A cada 14 dias foram coletados os dados do desempenho zootécnico e após 70 dias as aves foram eutanasiadas para obtenção do rendimento de carcaça, peito, coxa, sobrecoxa e coleta do intestino para análise de pH e morfometria. Nos períodos de 1 a 56 e 1 a 70 dias houve diferença (P<0,05) nos parâmetros de desempenho zootécnico, o consumo de ração foi menor no T4 e T5, e o ganho de peso foi melhor no T1, T2, T3 e T4. A conversão foi melhor em T1, T2 e T4. Não houve diferença (P>0,05) na viabilidade das aves, no rendimento de carcaça, cortes de vísceras e no pH de duodeno e cecos. Houve diferença na morfometria intestinal (P<0,05), sendo o T5 o que obteve melhor relação vilo/cripta. O nível 0,3 kg t-1 complexo enzimático com 1 kg t-1 emulsificante indicou melhor efeito na relação vilosidade e criptas. O nível com 0,2 kg t-1 do complexo enzimático com 0,5 kg t-1 do emulsificante adicionado a dieta comercial trouxe benefícios como diminuição do consumo de ração, sem afetar o ganho de peso, tendo assim uma boa conversão alimentar. Palavras-chave: Aditivos; Desempenho Zootécnico; Morfometria Intestinal; Rendimento de Carcaça.Universidade Federal de Goiás2022-06-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/70663Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 23 (2022): Continuous publicationCiência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 23 (2022): Publicação contínua1809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporenghttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/70663/38438https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/70663/38574https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/70663/38439https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/70663/38575Copyright (c) 2022 Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Sciencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessdo Nascimento, Antonia Mariana´Gomes, Fábio Augusto de Freitas, Henrique JorgeFerreira da Costa Rodrigues, SuelenAraújo Pires, GilcineideGuato, Cesar AndresMiranda de Souza, Edcarlos2023-03-23T18:43:54Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/70663Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:56:29.145908Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Emulsifier and enzymatic complex in diet for free range broiler chicken in the western amazon
Emulsificante e complexo enzimático em dieta para frangos de corte de linhagem caipira na Amazônia ocidental
title Emulsifier and enzymatic complex in diet for free range broiler chicken in the western amazon
spellingShingle Emulsifier and enzymatic complex in diet for free range broiler chicken in the western amazon
do Nascimento, Antonia Mariana
title_short Emulsifier and enzymatic complex in diet for free range broiler chicken in the western amazon
title_full Emulsifier and enzymatic complex in diet for free range broiler chicken in the western amazon
title_fullStr Emulsifier and enzymatic complex in diet for free range broiler chicken in the western amazon
title_full_unstemmed Emulsifier and enzymatic complex in diet for free range broiler chicken in the western amazon
title_sort Emulsifier and enzymatic complex in diet for free range broiler chicken in the western amazon
author do Nascimento, Antonia Mariana
author_facet do Nascimento, Antonia Mariana
´Gomes, Fábio Augusto
de Freitas, Henrique Jorge
Ferreira da Costa Rodrigues, Suelen
Araújo Pires, Gilcineide
Guato, Cesar Andres
Miranda de Souza, Edcarlos
author_role author
author2 ´Gomes, Fábio Augusto
de Freitas, Henrique Jorge
Ferreira da Costa Rodrigues, Suelen
Araújo Pires, Gilcineide
Guato, Cesar Andres
Miranda de Souza, Edcarlos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv do Nascimento, Antonia Mariana
´Gomes, Fábio Augusto
de Freitas, Henrique Jorge
Ferreira da Costa Rodrigues, Suelen
Araújo Pires, Gilcineide
Guato, Cesar Andres
Miranda de Souza, Edcarlos
description This study aimed to evaluate the effects of adding levels of emulsifier based on soy lecithin and enzymatic complex (xylanase, β-glucanase, galactosidase, protease, amylase, and β-mannanase) on the basal diet during the raising of free-range broiler chickens. The experimental design was completely randomized, with five treatments and six replications. Treatments were: T1: control diet, without enzymatic complex and emulsifier; T2: 0.2 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex; T3: 0.5 kg t−1 of emulsifier; T4: 0.2 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex + 0.5 kg t−1 of emulsifier; and T5: 0.3 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex + 1 kg t−1 of emulsifier. Performance data were collected every 14 days, and the animals were euthanized at 70 days to obtain carcass, breast, drumstick, and thigh yield and intestine collection for pH analysis and morphometry. The periods from 1 to 56 and 1 to 70 days showed a difference (P<0.05) in the parameters of zootechnical performance, the feed intake was lower in T4 and T5, and weight gain was better in T1, T2, T3, and T4. Feed conversion was better in T1, T2, and T4. No difference (P>0.05) was observed for poultry livability, carcass yield, viscera, and pH of duodenum and cecum. A difference was found for intestinal morphometry (P<0.05), and T5 showed the best villus/crypt ratio. The level with 0.3 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex and 1 kg t−1 of emulsifier indicated a better relationship between villi and crypts. However, the level with 0.2 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex and 0.5 kg t−1 of emulsifier added to the commercial diet led to benefits such as decreased feed intake, without affecting weight gain, thus inducing a good feed conversion.Keywords: Additives; Performance; Intestinal morphometry; Carcass yield.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/70663
url https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/70663
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/70663/38438
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/70663/38574
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/70663/38439
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/70663/38575
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 23 (2022): Continuous publication
Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 23 (2022): Publicação contínua
1809-6891
1518-2797
reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
collection Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacab@gmail.com
_version_ 1799874790595493888