Comparison of the amount of aqueous flare between laser photometry and subjective evaluation techniques in dogs undergoing phacoemulsification

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andrade, Alexandre Lima de
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: da Conceição, Luciano Fernandes, Morales, Adriana, Piso, Dunia Yesela Trujillo, Tuboni, Laís Tieme, Laus, José Luiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/76758
Resumo: This study aimed to compare the quantification of aqueous flares using laser photometry and subjective clinical determination after phacoemulsification through the V-prechop nucleodissection technique in dogs. Forty-three dogs of different breeds, males and females, aged 3–10 years, with mature (G2, n = 22) and immature (G1, n = 21) cataracts, were included. After surgery, the patients were evaluated weekly for aqueous flares (using laser flare photometry) and clinically evaluated using slit-lamp biomicroscopy over different periods. Intraocular inflammation was more evident in patients with stage G2 disease than in those with stage G1 disease. Over time, it regressed in most animals, persisting to a mild degree in three animals by the end of the observation period. Statistical analyses revealed key differences between the groups in the immediate postoperative period and after 30 days of observation. “Aqueous flare” (ph/ms), quantified using laser flare photometry, was higher in the operated eyes of both groups (G1 and G2). However, a significant difference was observed in the immediate postoperative period and at 45 and 30 days in groups G1 and G2, respectively. Furthermore, when comparing the operated eyes of each group, a significant difference was observed in the preoperative period and 60 days postoperatively; the mean values were always higher in the G2 patients (G1-preop = 25.5 ± 11.4 ph/ms and G2-preop = 45.7 ± 17.7 ph/ms; G1-60d = 23.4 ± 8.9 ph/ms and G2-60d = 39.8 ± 13.4 ph/ms). In conclusion, laser cell and flare photometry showed higher accuracy in evaluating aqueous flares than clinical evaluation based on scores during the postoperative period in phacoemulsification by V-prechop nucleodissection. The quantitative values of flares obtained using this non-invasive method may also be used to evaluate other nucleodissection techniques in phacoemulsification.
id UFG-7_bc727dce0f5d52dc2e7363fb7d9fc8ef
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/76758
network_acronym_str UFG-7
network_name_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of the amount of aqueous flare between laser photometry and subjective evaluation techniques in dogs undergoing phacoemulsificationComparação do quantitativo de flare do aquoso entre as técnicas de fotometria à laser e avaliação subjetiva em cães submetidos à facoemulsificaçãoThis study aimed to compare the quantification of aqueous flares using laser photometry and subjective clinical determination after phacoemulsification through the V-prechop nucleodissection technique in dogs. Forty-three dogs of different breeds, males and females, aged 3–10 years, with mature (G2, n = 22) and immature (G1, n = 21) cataracts, were included. After surgery, the patients were evaluated weekly for aqueous flares (using laser flare photometry) and clinically evaluated using slit-lamp biomicroscopy over different periods. Intraocular inflammation was more evident in patients with stage G2 disease than in those with stage G1 disease. Over time, it regressed in most animals, persisting to a mild degree in three animals by the end of the observation period. Statistical analyses revealed key differences between the groups in the immediate postoperative period and after 30 days of observation. “Aqueous flare” (ph/ms), quantified using laser flare photometry, was higher in the operated eyes of both groups (G1 and G2). However, a significant difference was observed in the immediate postoperative period and at 45 and 30 days in groups G1 and G2, respectively. Furthermore, when comparing the operated eyes of each group, a significant difference was observed in the preoperative period and 60 days postoperatively; the mean values were always higher in the G2 patients (G1-preop = 25.5 ± 11.4 ph/ms and G2-preop = 45.7 ± 17.7 ph/ms; G1-60d = 23.4 ± 8.9 ph/ms and G2-60d = 39.8 ± 13.4 ph/ms). In conclusion, laser cell and flare photometry showed higher accuracy in evaluating aqueous flares than clinical evaluation based on scores during the postoperative period in phacoemulsification by V-prechop nucleodissection. The quantitative values of flares obtained using this non-invasive method may also be used to evaluate other nucleodissection techniques in phacoemulsification.Objetivou-se com este estudo comparar a quantificação do “flare” do aquoso por fotometria à laser e a quantificação clínica subjetiva do “flare” do aquoso após facoemulsificação pela técnica V-Prechop de nucleodissecção, em cães. Foram utilizados 43 cães de diferentes raças, machos e fêmeas, com idades entre 3 e 10 anos, portadores de catarata madura (n=22) e imatura (n=21). Após a cirurgia, os pacientes foram avaliados semanalmente para quantificação do flare por fotometria laser em diferentes períodos, e para observação clínica do flare por biomicroscopia de lâmpada de fenda, nos mesmos períodos. A exacerbação clínica da inflamação intraocular foi mais evidente nos pacientes do G2 quando comparados com os do G1. Com o tempo regrediu na maioria deles, persistindo em grau leve em três animais ao final do período de observação. A análise estatística demonstrou diferenças entre os grupos estudados no pós-operatório imediato e após 30 dias de observação. A avaliação quantitativa do "flare" do aquoso (em ph/ms) na fotometria à laser mostrou-se maior nos olhos operados de ambos os grupos (G1 e G2). No entanto, houve diferença significativa no pós-operatório imediato e aos 45 e 30 dias no G1 e G2, respectivamente. Ao comparar os olhos operados de cada grupo, observou-se diferença significativa no pré-operatório e 60 dias de pós-operatório; os valores médios foram sempre maiores nos pacientes do G2 (G1-pré-operatório = 25,5 ± 11,4 ph/ms e G2-pré-operatório = 45,7 ± 17,7 ph/ms; G1-60d = 23,4 ± 8,9 ph/ms e G2- 60d = 39,8 ± 13,4 ph/ms). Em conclusão, pode-se supor que a fotometria de célula a laser e flare apresentou maior acurácia em comparação à avaliação clínica do flare usando escores no pós-operatório na facoemulsificação por nucleodissecção V-Prechop. É possível que os valores quantitativos de flare encontrados sejam semelhantes utilizando outras técnicas de nucleodissecção em facoemulsificação, utilizando este método não invasivo de avaliação do flare.Universidade Federal de Goiás2023-12-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/76758Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 25 (2024): Publicação continuaCiência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 25 (2024): Publicação continua1809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporenghttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/76758/40553https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/76758/40554https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/76758/40820https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/76758/40821Copyright (c) 2023 Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Sciencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade, Alexandre Lima deda Conceição, Luciano FernandesMorales, AdrianaPiso, Dunia Yesela TrujilloTuboni, Laís TiemeLaus, José Luiz2024-03-09T21:22:31Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/76758Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:56:38.063512Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of the amount of aqueous flare between laser photometry and subjective evaluation techniques in dogs undergoing phacoemulsification
Comparação do quantitativo de flare do aquoso entre as técnicas de fotometria à laser e avaliação subjetiva em cães submetidos à facoemulsificação
title Comparison of the amount of aqueous flare between laser photometry and subjective evaluation techniques in dogs undergoing phacoemulsification
spellingShingle Comparison of the amount of aqueous flare between laser photometry and subjective evaluation techniques in dogs undergoing phacoemulsification
Andrade, Alexandre Lima de
title_short Comparison of the amount of aqueous flare between laser photometry and subjective evaluation techniques in dogs undergoing phacoemulsification
title_full Comparison of the amount of aqueous flare between laser photometry and subjective evaluation techniques in dogs undergoing phacoemulsification
title_fullStr Comparison of the amount of aqueous flare between laser photometry and subjective evaluation techniques in dogs undergoing phacoemulsification
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the amount of aqueous flare between laser photometry and subjective evaluation techniques in dogs undergoing phacoemulsification
title_sort Comparison of the amount of aqueous flare between laser photometry and subjective evaluation techniques in dogs undergoing phacoemulsification
author Andrade, Alexandre Lima de
author_facet Andrade, Alexandre Lima de
da Conceição, Luciano Fernandes
Morales, Adriana
Piso, Dunia Yesela Trujillo
Tuboni, Laís Tieme
Laus, José Luiz
author_role author
author2 da Conceição, Luciano Fernandes
Morales, Adriana
Piso, Dunia Yesela Trujillo
Tuboni, Laís Tieme
Laus, José Luiz
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andrade, Alexandre Lima de
da Conceição, Luciano Fernandes
Morales, Adriana
Piso, Dunia Yesela Trujillo
Tuboni, Laís Tieme
Laus, José Luiz
description This study aimed to compare the quantification of aqueous flares using laser photometry and subjective clinical determination after phacoemulsification through the V-prechop nucleodissection technique in dogs. Forty-three dogs of different breeds, males and females, aged 3–10 years, with mature (G2, n = 22) and immature (G1, n = 21) cataracts, were included. After surgery, the patients were evaluated weekly for aqueous flares (using laser flare photometry) and clinically evaluated using slit-lamp biomicroscopy over different periods. Intraocular inflammation was more evident in patients with stage G2 disease than in those with stage G1 disease. Over time, it regressed in most animals, persisting to a mild degree in three animals by the end of the observation period. Statistical analyses revealed key differences between the groups in the immediate postoperative period and after 30 days of observation. “Aqueous flare” (ph/ms), quantified using laser flare photometry, was higher in the operated eyes of both groups (G1 and G2). However, a significant difference was observed in the immediate postoperative period and at 45 and 30 days in groups G1 and G2, respectively. Furthermore, when comparing the operated eyes of each group, a significant difference was observed in the preoperative period and 60 days postoperatively; the mean values were always higher in the G2 patients (G1-preop = 25.5 ± 11.4 ph/ms and G2-preop = 45.7 ± 17.7 ph/ms; G1-60d = 23.4 ± 8.9 ph/ms and G2-60d = 39.8 ± 13.4 ph/ms). In conclusion, laser cell and flare photometry showed higher accuracy in evaluating aqueous flares than clinical evaluation based on scores during the postoperative period in phacoemulsification by V-prechop nucleodissection. The quantitative values of flares obtained using this non-invasive method may also be used to evaluate other nucleodissection techniques in phacoemulsification.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/76758
url https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/76758
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/76758/40553
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/76758/40554
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/76758/40820
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/76758/40821
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 25 (2024): Publicação continua
Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 25 (2024): Publicação continua
1809-6891
1518-2797
reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
collection Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacab@gmail.com
_version_ 1799874791322157056