Fazenda-roça goiana: matriz espacial do território e do sertanejo goiano

• Autor(a) principal: Borges, Júlio César Pereira
• Data de Publicação: 2016
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFG
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5853
• topic: Fazenda-roça goiana; Sertão goiano; Sertanejo goiano; Organização espacial de Goiás; Farm- farm goiana; Hinterland goiano; Country goiano; Spatial organization of Goias; CONSERVACAO DA NATUREZA::CONSERVACAO DE AREAS SILVESTRES

The decline of mining in Goias in the second half of the eighteenth century, directs you to a new spatial organization, which we call Farm-farm Goias. This led Goias for about two centuries, the late eighteenth century to the mid-twentieth century, when it was crossed by the modernization of the countryside. This organization represents the interaction of internal and external factors which, dialectically, particularized and integrated the Farm- farm Goias into the Brazilian and global spatial condition of the time. Condition that led us to consider that this is a singularity, because there was no other like it in Brazil, even within the totality under the capitalist command. In this sense, defined by the ratio of internal and external mediated elements, adapted and conflicted, the Farm-farm Goias characterized by an intrinsic reality to molds of rurality in which Goias was based and the hinterland existence. This reality is presented as-guiding of this research, which mediated by Geography, we imbued to interpret it as the founding basis of the backcountry world of Goias. Therefore, we did a research based in reading of integrating political, economic, social and cultural elements that constituted the territorial matrix of Goias and Goias backcountry. This approach is presupposed in mind that the geographic space synthesizes structural, qualitative, political and symbolic elements that reveal the spatial organization of the Farm-farm Goias. We understand as well, that this structure is the spatial organization that supported the territorial basis of Goias and conditioned the structuring of Goias hinterland society, evidenced in economic relations, power relations and cultural representations, which shaped the Goias reality of the hinterland. Faced with this situation, we understand that the backcountry is the result of spatial organization of the Farm-farm Goias. Therefore, from the moment that the organization loses its predominance ceases to exist as space hegemonic ordering of Goias, the mode of existence of the backcountry is considerably altered, leading him to rehabilitation in a new spatial organization. We affirm then that the modernization phenomenon of the field resulted in Goias at the end of forming the basis of Goias backcountry in its originality. However, he goes on about new existential conditions.