Hegemonia em transição: um estudo histórico-político sobre o campo da esquerda no Brasil contemporâneo (2003-2018)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFG |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/9210 |
Resumo: | This dissertation aimed to investigate if a new hegemony is emerging in the field of the Brazilian political left. By following the demonstrations of June 2013 and its immediate developments we saw a growing friction between the leftist collective actors, one part aligned with the Workers’ Party (PT) government – such as the Workers’ Unitary Union (CUT) and the Movement of Landless Rural Workers’ (MST) – and others who have organized themselves in recent years to oppose the moderate political project of the PT – such as the United Socialist Workers’ Party (PSTU), the Homeless Workers’ Movement (MTST), and the Socialism and Liberty Party (PSOL). On the one hand, the discrediting of the hegemonic left, centered on the PT, both in the ideological field and in society as a whole became more evident – given the limitations of the governments of Lula and Dilma in promoting a more prosperous, less unequal, violent and corrupt society. On the other hand, the left opposition, which was strengthened in the PT era by the engagement of a new generation of militants, played an important role in popular mobilization until the peak of the June protests. Having made this diagnosis, we asked whether there was a change in the balance of forces in the field, the possibility of a new hegemony, and the future of the left from those events. This qualitative research was based on the historiographic method and documentary analysis. Its theoretical foundations are found mostly in the work of Antonio Gramsci, from which we extract the categories for the study of political matters in a historical perspective. After a bibliographical survey on the beginnings of the New Republic, the constitution of PT’s hegemony and their presidential governments between 2003 and 2016, we dedicated ourselves to investigate the documents and resolutions issued by the collective actors until 2018 in order to characterize them and to understand their connections, affinities and rejections. Twenty-two organizations were selected according to the criterion of hegemonic potential, in a few words, those that participated in the current crisis of the left and are involved in the struggle for the direction of the field – in line with our gramscian referential. From this effort it was possible to conclude that the PT’s hegemony still holds despite all the setbacks in the post-2013 period and the growing activity of the left opposition. The latter, with the role of PSOL and MTST, became more influential and offered a great contribution to renew, pluralize the militancy and insert the newly politicized generations. In short, hegemony in the leftist field is still in dispute, without any indication of the ascendancy of an alternative direction. Its future will depend on those collectives who, jointly, are able to overcome fragmentation, indicate a new strategic horizon and guide the dispute in the society midst of a democracy in recession. |
id |
UFG-2_b1ad9047998e969b9396c7726cebc3e3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/9210 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Tavares, Francisco Mata Machadohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2283526225862308Tavares, Francisco Mata MachadoBianchi, AlvaroMaciel, Davidhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3178521740116529Benedito, Sérgio Mendonça2019-01-08T11:49:11Z2018-11-27BENEDITO, S. M. Hegemonia em transição: um estudo histórico-político sobre o campo da esquerda no Brasil contemporâneo (2003-2018). 2018. 340 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência Politica) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2018.http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/9210This dissertation aimed to investigate if a new hegemony is emerging in the field of the Brazilian political left. By following the demonstrations of June 2013 and its immediate developments we saw a growing friction between the leftist collective actors, one part aligned with the Workers’ Party (PT) government – such as the Workers’ Unitary Union (CUT) and the Movement of Landless Rural Workers’ (MST) – and others who have organized themselves in recent years to oppose the moderate political project of the PT – such as the United Socialist Workers’ Party (PSTU), the Homeless Workers’ Movement (MTST), and the Socialism and Liberty Party (PSOL). On the one hand, the discrediting of the hegemonic left, centered on the PT, both in the ideological field and in society as a whole became more evident – given the limitations of the governments of Lula and Dilma in promoting a more prosperous, less unequal, violent and corrupt society. On the other hand, the left opposition, which was strengthened in the PT era by the engagement of a new generation of militants, played an important role in popular mobilization until the peak of the June protests. Having made this diagnosis, we asked whether there was a change in the balance of forces in the field, the possibility of a new hegemony, and the future of the left from those events. This qualitative research was based on the historiographic method and documentary analysis. Its theoretical foundations are found mostly in the work of Antonio Gramsci, from which we extract the categories for the study of political matters in a historical perspective. After a bibliographical survey on the beginnings of the New Republic, the constitution of PT’s hegemony and their presidential governments between 2003 and 2016, we dedicated ourselves to investigate the documents and resolutions issued by the collective actors until 2018 in order to characterize them and to understand their connections, affinities and rejections. Twenty-two organizations were selected according to the criterion of hegemonic potential, in a few words, those that participated in the current crisis of the left and are involved in the struggle for the direction of the field – in line with our gramscian referential. From this effort it was possible to conclude that the PT’s hegemony still holds despite all the setbacks in the post-2013 period and the growing activity of the left opposition. The latter, with the role of PSOL and MTST, became more influential and offered a great contribution to renew, pluralize the militancy and insert the newly politicized generations. In short, hegemony in the leftist field is still in dispute, without any indication of the ascendancy of an alternative direction. Its future will depend on those collectives who, jointly, are able to overcome fragmentation, indicate a new strategic horizon and guide the dispute in the society midst of a democracy in recession.Este trabalho se orientou a investigar se está em curso a conformação de uma nova hegemonia no campo da esquerda brasileira. Ao acompanhar as manifestações de junho de 2013 e seus desdobramentos imediatos observamos um crescente atrito entre os atores coletivos de esquerda, uns alinhados com o governo do Partido dos Trabalhadores (PT) – como a Central Única dos Trabalhadores (CUT) e o Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais sem Terra (MST) – e outros que se organizaram nos anos recentes para opor o projeto político moderado daquele partido – como o Partido Socialista dos Trabalhadores Unificado (PSTU), Movimento dos Trabalhadores Sem-Teto (MTST) e o Partido Socialismo e Liberdade (PSOL). Por um lado ficou mais evidente naquela ocasião o descrédito da esquerda hegemônica, centrada no PT, tanto no campo ideológico como no conjunto da sociedade – dados os limites dos governos Lula e Dilma na promoção de uma sociedade mais próspera, menos desigual e corrupta. Por outro lado a oposição de esquerda, que se fortaleceu na era petista pelo engajamento de uma nova geração de militantes, teve um papel importante na mobilização popular até o auge dos protestos de junho. Feito esse diagnóstico nos indagamos se estava a ocorrer uma mudança no equilíbrio de forças no campo, sobre a possibilidade de uma nova hegemonia, e o futuro da esquerda a partir daqueles eventos. Trata-se de uma pesquisa de cunho qualitativo com base no método historiográfico e na análise documental. Seus fundamentos teóricos se encontram majoritariamente na obra de Antonio Gramsci, da qual extraímos as categorias para o estudo de temas políticos em uma perspectiva histórica. Após um levantamento bibliográfico sobre os primórdios da Nova República, a constituição da hegemonia petista e os governos presidenciais do PT entre 2003 e 2016, dedicamo-nos a investigar os documentos e resoluções emitidos pelos atores coletivos até 2018 de modo a caracterizá-los e compreender suas conexões, afinidades e rejeições. Foram selecionadas vinte e duas organizações segundo o critério de potencial hegemônico, em poucas palavras, aquelas que tiveram parte na atual crise da esquerda e que estão envolvidas na luta pela direção do campo – em linha com nosso referencial gramsciano. Desse esforço foi possível extrair que a hegemonia petista ainda se mantém apesar de todos os revéses no período pós-2013 e da crescente atividade da oposição de esquerda. Esta última, com o protagonismo do PSOL e MTST, tornou-se mais influente e ofereceu grande contribuição para renovar, pluralizar a militância e inserir as novas gerações recentemente politizadas. Em síntese, a hegemonia no campo da esquerda ainda se encontra em disputa – sem indício da ascendência de uma direção alternativa – e seu futuro dependerá daquele conjunto de coletivos que sejam capazes de superar a fragmentação, indicar um novo horizonte estratégico e pautar a disputa na sociedade em meio a uma democracia em recessão.Submitted by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2019-01-08T11:33:40Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Sérgio Mendonça Benedito - 2018.pdf: 2816622 bytes, checksum: 2e7477061e06c55bccf36c5a599860ab (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2019-01-08T11:49:11Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Sérgio Mendonça Benedito - 2018.pdf: 2816622 bytes, checksum: 2e7477061e06c55bccf36c5a599860ab (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2019-01-08T11:49:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Sérgio Mendonça Benedito - 2018.pdf: 2816622 bytes, checksum: 2e7477061e06c55bccf36c5a599860ab (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-11-27Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de GoiásPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciência Politica (FCS)UFGBrasilFaculdade de Ciências Sociais - FCS (RG)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsquerda políticaPartidos políticosSindicatosMovimentos sociaisAtivismoPolitical leftPolitical partiesLabor unionsSocial movementsActivismCIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIAHegemonia em transição: um estudo histórico-político sobre o campo da esquerda no Brasil contemporâneo (2003-2018)Hegemony in transition: a political-historical study of the political left in contemporary Brazil (2003-2018)info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis5093518695538803131600600600600-6965107611713429420-52092499617927752432075167498588264571reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFGinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/58c6585a-3277-4572-b761-a77dca9cb11f/downloadbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/5ac6ea25-08d3-47f6-8e60-3c678ae19d35/download4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-80http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/5f8f652b-1cb8-4e40-9522-7f3272cc04ca/downloadd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD53license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-80http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/39ce2586-fce5-4d27-98fe-b8a6830b0922/downloadd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54ORIGINALDissertação - Sérgio Mendonça Benedito - 2018.pdfDissertação - Sérgio Mendonça Benedito - 2018.pdfapplication/pdf2816622http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/866fbe0a-3e48-4c82-8211-de4a076b4169/download2e7477061e06c55bccf36c5a599860abMD55tede/92102019-01-08 09:49:11.992http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acesso Abertoopen.accessoai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/9210http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tedeRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/oai/requesttasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.bropendoar:2019-01-08T11:49:11Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)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 |
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
Hegemonia em transição: um estudo histórico-político sobre o campo da esquerda no Brasil contemporâneo (2003-2018) |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Hegemony in transition: a political-historical study of the political left in contemporary Brazil (2003-2018) |
title |
Hegemonia em transição: um estudo histórico-político sobre o campo da esquerda no Brasil contemporâneo (2003-2018) |
spellingShingle |
Hegemonia em transição: um estudo histórico-político sobre o campo da esquerda no Brasil contemporâneo (2003-2018) Benedito, Sérgio Mendonça Esquerda política Partidos políticos Sindicatos Movimentos sociais Ativismo Political left Political parties Labor unions Social movements Activism CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA |
title_short |
Hegemonia em transição: um estudo histórico-político sobre o campo da esquerda no Brasil contemporâneo (2003-2018) |
title_full |
Hegemonia em transição: um estudo histórico-político sobre o campo da esquerda no Brasil contemporâneo (2003-2018) |
title_fullStr |
Hegemonia em transição: um estudo histórico-político sobre o campo da esquerda no Brasil contemporâneo (2003-2018) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hegemonia em transição: um estudo histórico-político sobre o campo da esquerda no Brasil contemporâneo (2003-2018) |
title_sort |
Hegemonia em transição: um estudo histórico-político sobre o campo da esquerda no Brasil contemporâneo (2003-2018) |
author |
Benedito, Sérgio Mendonça |
author_facet |
Benedito, Sérgio Mendonça |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Tavares, Francisco Mata Machado |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2283526225862308 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Tavares, Francisco Mata Machado |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Bianchi, Alvaro |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
Maciel, David |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3178521740116529 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Benedito, Sérgio Mendonça |
contributor_str_mv |
Tavares, Francisco Mata Machado Tavares, Francisco Mata Machado Bianchi, Alvaro Maciel, David |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Esquerda política Partidos políticos Sindicatos Movimentos sociais Ativismo |
topic |
Esquerda política Partidos políticos Sindicatos Movimentos sociais Ativismo Political left Political parties Labor unions Social movements Activism CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Political left Political parties Labor unions Social movements Activism |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA |
description |
This dissertation aimed to investigate if a new hegemony is emerging in the field of the Brazilian political left. By following the demonstrations of June 2013 and its immediate developments we saw a growing friction between the leftist collective actors, one part aligned with the Workers’ Party (PT) government – such as the Workers’ Unitary Union (CUT) and the Movement of Landless Rural Workers’ (MST) – and others who have organized themselves in recent years to oppose the moderate political project of the PT – such as the United Socialist Workers’ Party (PSTU), the Homeless Workers’ Movement (MTST), and the Socialism and Liberty Party (PSOL). On the one hand, the discrediting of the hegemonic left, centered on the PT, both in the ideological field and in society as a whole became more evident – given the limitations of the governments of Lula and Dilma in promoting a more prosperous, less unequal, violent and corrupt society. On the other hand, the left opposition, which was strengthened in the PT era by the engagement of a new generation of militants, played an important role in popular mobilization until the peak of the June protests. Having made this diagnosis, we asked whether there was a change in the balance of forces in the field, the possibility of a new hegemony, and the future of the left from those events. This qualitative research was based on the historiographic method and documentary analysis. Its theoretical foundations are found mostly in the work of Antonio Gramsci, from which we extract the categories for the study of political matters in a historical perspective. After a bibliographical survey on the beginnings of the New Republic, the constitution of PT’s hegemony and their presidential governments between 2003 and 2016, we dedicated ourselves to investigate the documents and resolutions issued by the collective actors until 2018 in order to characterize them and to understand their connections, affinities and rejections. Twenty-two organizations were selected according to the criterion of hegemonic potential, in a few words, those that participated in the current crisis of the left and are involved in the struggle for the direction of the field – in line with our gramscian referential. From this effort it was possible to conclude that the PT’s hegemony still holds despite all the setbacks in the post-2013 period and the growing activity of the left opposition. The latter, with the role of PSOL and MTST, became more influential and offered a great contribution to renew, pluralize the militancy and insert the newly politicized generations. In short, hegemony in the leftist field is still in dispute, without any indication of the ascendancy of an alternative direction. Its future will depend on those collectives who, jointly, are able to overcome fragmentation, indicate a new strategic horizon and guide the dispute in the society midst of a democracy in recession. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-27 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-08T11:49:11Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
BENEDITO, S. M. Hegemonia em transição: um estudo histórico-político sobre o campo da esquerda no Brasil contemporâneo (2003-2018). 2018. 340 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência Politica) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2018. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/9210 |
identifier_str_mv |
BENEDITO, S. M. Hegemonia em transição: um estudo histórico-político sobre o campo da esquerda no Brasil contemporâneo (2003-2018). 2018. 340 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência Politica) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2018. |
url |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/9210 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
5093518695538803131 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-6965107611713429420 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-5209249961792775243 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
2075167498588264571 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência Politica (FCS) |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFG |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Ciências Sociais - FCS (RG) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFG instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/58c6585a-3277-4572-b761-a77dca9cb11f/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/5ac6ea25-08d3-47f6-8e60-3c678ae19d35/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/5f8f652b-1cb8-4e40-9522-7f3272cc04ca/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/39ce2586-fce5-4d27-98fe-b8a6830b0922/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/866fbe0a-3e48-4c82-8211-de4a076b4169/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e 2e7477061e06c55bccf36c5a599860ab |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.br |
_version_ |
1798044353444184064 |