Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Neto, José Antônio Chehuen
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Sirimarco, Mauro Toledo, Rocha, Flávio Roberto Silva, Souza, Camila Freitas de, Pereira, Francisca Simões
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: HU Revista (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/62
Resumo: Medical practice is continually updated with the introduction of new methods of examination, diagnosis, and treatment. As new technologies are introduced, hunry-taking and physical examinations are little valued in medical practice. The objective of this study was to identify the relationship between confidence in the performance of medical diagnosis and the need of additional tests. For data collecting we sent a questionnaire to 200 users of PAM MARECHAL, SUS / Juiz de Fora - MG. Statistical analysis was performed on a quantitative, qualitative, and descriptive form. The results, on the credibility of information given by the doctor in a query, pointed out that 52.5% of respondents rely on the doctor entirely. The reasons that raised more confidence in the patient is were careful listening (67.5%), and the ordering of additional tests (60.5%). These percentages are higher than those related to the reasons as confident questioning (33.0%) and / or office physical examination (33.5%), 55.0% of the individuals interviewed, do not believe the diagnosis without a work up being ordered. As for the possibility of returning when no additional tests, were ordered 76.5% of the people questioned say that would not return, and 91.5% believe that tests are necessary. We conclude that, despite the high degree of confidence in the professional performance, the population perceives the need for additional examinations as a means of confirming medical opinion.
id UFJF-8_4e72e87aa4a504c32badbb0fa8dc5988
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/62
network_acronym_str UFJF-8
network_name_str HU Revista (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary examConfiabilidade no médico relacionada ao pedido de exame complementarExames MédicosServiços de DiagnósticoConfiançaMedical practice is continually updated with the introduction of new methods of examination, diagnosis, and treatment. As new technologies are introduced, hunry-taking and physical examinations are little valued in medical practice. The objective of this study was to identify the relationship between confidence in the performance of medical diagnosis and the need of additional tests. For data collecting we sent a questionnaire to 200 users of PAM MARECHAL, SUS / Juiz de Fora - MG. Statistical analysis was performed on a quantitative, qualitative, and descriptive form. The results, on the credibility of information given by the doctor in a query, pointed out that 52.5% of respondents rely on the doctor entirely. The reasons that raised more confidence in the patient is were careful listening (67.5%), and the ordering of additional tests (60.5%). These percentages are higher than those related to the reasons as confident questioning (33.0%) and / or office physical examination (33.5%), 55.0% of the individuals interviewed, do not believe the diagnosis without a work up being ordered. As for the possibility of returning when no additional tests, were ordered 76.5% of the people questioned say that would not return, and 91.5% believe that tests are necessary. We conclude that, despite the high degree of confidence in the professional performance, the population perceives the need for additional examinations as a means of confirming medical opinion.A prática medica é continuamente atualizada com a introdução de novos exames e métodos de diagnostico e tratamento. À medida que novas tecnologias são introduzidas, a anamnese e o exame físico são desvalorizados e eventualmente, observa-se inversão de valores na prática do profissional médico. O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar a relação entre a confiança no exercício médico e a necessidade de confirmação do diagnóstico por exames complementares (ECs). Para a coleta de dados foi utilizado um questionário aplicado a 200 usuários do Posto de Atendimento – PAM MARECHAL, SUS / Juiz de Fora – MG. A análise estatística foi feita de forma quanti-qualitativa e descritiva. Os resultados, quanto à confiança depositada nas informações dadas pelo médico em uma consulta, apontaram que 52,5% dos entrevistados confiam plenamente. Os motivos que mais suscitam confiança no paciente são o médico ouvi-lo com atenção (67,5%) e solicitar-lhe ECs (60,5%). Esses percentuais são maiores do que aqueles relacionados às razões como perguntar seguramente (33,0%) e/ou ao examinar no consultório (33,5%). A postura mediante um diagnóstico médico baseado apenas na consulta, para 55,0% dos indivíduos entrevistados, é não acreditar no diagnóstico sem a realização de exames médicos subsidiários. Quanto à possibilidade de retorno após consulta sem solicitação de ECs, 76,5% das pessoas questionadas afirmam que não retornariam, sendo que 91,5% dos entrevistados acreditam que o pedido dos mesmos seja necessário. Concluímos que, apesar do alto grau de confiança na atuação do profissional, a população percebe a necessidade de exames complementares como meio confirmação da opinião médica.Editora UFJF2008-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtOrapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/62HU Revista; v. 33 n. 3 (2007); 77-821982-80470103-3123reponame:HU Revista (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)instacron:UFJFporhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/62/47Neto, José Antônio ChehuenSirimarco, Mauro ToledoRocha, Flávio Roberto SilvaSouza, Camila Freitas dePereira, Francisca Simõesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-05-04T03:53:15Zoai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/62Revistahttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevistaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/oairevista.hurevista@ufjf.edu.br1982-80470103-3123opendoar:2023-05-04T03:53:15HU Revista (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam
Confiabilidade no médico relacionada ao pedido de exame complementar
title Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam
spellingShingle Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam
Neto, José Antônio Chehuen
Exames Médicos
Serviços de Diagnóstico
Confiança
title_short Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam
title_full Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam
title_fullStr Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam
title_full_unstemmed Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam
title_sort Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam
author Neto, José Antônio Chehuen
author_facet Neto, José Antônio Chehuen
Sirimarco, Mauro Toledo
Rocha, Flávio Roberto Silva
Souza, Camila Freitas de
Pereira, Francisca Simões
author_role author
author2 Sirimarco, Mauro Toledo
Rocha, Flávio Roberto Silva
Souza, Camila Freitas de
Pereira, Francisca Simões
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Neto, José Antônio Chehuen
Sirimarco, Mauro Toledo
Rocha, Flávio Roberto Silva
Souza, Camila Freitas de
Pereira, Francisca Simões
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Exames Médicos
Serviços de Diagnóstico
Confiança
topic Exames Médicos
Serviços de Diagnóstico
Confiança
description Medical practice is continually updated with the introduction of new methods of examination, diagnosis, and treatment. As new technologies are introduced, hunry-taking and physical examinations are little valued in medical practice. The objective of this study was to identify the relationship between confidence in the performance of medical diagnosis and the need of additional tests. For data collecting we sent a questionnaire to 200 users of PAM MARECHAL, SUS / Juiz de Fora - MG. Statistical analysis was performed on a quantitative, qualitative, and descriptive form. The results, on the credibility of information given by the doctor in a query, pointed out that 52.5% of respondents rely on the doctor entirely. The reasons that raised more confidence in the patient is were careful listening (67.5%), and the ordering of additional tests (60.5%). These percentages are higher than those related to the reasons as confident questioning (33.0%) and / or office physical examination (33.5%), 55.0% of the individuals interviewed, do not believe the diagnosis without a work up being ordered. As for the possibility of returning when no additional tests, were ordered 76.5% of the people questioned say that would not return, and 91.5% believe that tests are necessary. We conclude that, despite the high degree of confidence in the professional performance, the population perceives the need for additional examinations as a means of confirming medical opinion.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
ArtOr
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/62
url https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/62
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/62/47
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora UFJF
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora UFJF
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv HU Revista; v. 33 n. 3 (2007); 77-82
1982-8047
0103-3123
reponame:HU Revista (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
instacron:UFJF
instname_str Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
instacron_str UFJF
institution UFJF
reponame_str HU Revista (Online)
collection HU Revista (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv HU Revista (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.hurevista@ufjf.edu.br
_version_ 1796798239342592000