Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | HU Revista (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/62 |
Resumo: | Medical practice is continually updated with the introduction of new methods of examination, diagnosis, and treatment. As new technologies are introduced, hunry-taking and physical examinations are little valued in medical practice. The objective of this study was to identify the relationship between confidence in the performance of medical diagnosis and the need of additional tests. For data collecting we sent a questionnaire to 200 users of PAM MARECHAL, SUS / Juiz de Fora - MG. Statistical analysis was performed on a quantitative, qualitative, and descriptive form. The results, on the credibility of information given by the doctor in a query, pointed out that 52.5% of respondents rely on the doctor entirely. The reasons that raised more confidence in the patient is were careful listening (67.5%), and the ordering of additional tests (60.5%). These percentages are higher than those related to the reasons as confident questioning (33.0%) and / or office physical examination (33.5%), 55.0% of the individuals interviewed, do not believe the diagnosis without a work up being ordered. As for the possibility of returning when no additional tests, were ordered 76.5% of the people questioned say that would not return, and 91.5% believe that tests are necessary. We conclude that, despite the high degree of confidence in the professional performance, the population perceives the need for additional examinations as a means of confirming medical opinion. |
id |
UFJF-8_4e72e87aa4a504c32badbb0fa8dc5988 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/62 |
network_acronym_str |
UFJF-8 |
network_name_str |
HU Revista (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary examConfiabilidade no médico relacionada ao pedido de exame complementarExames MédicosServiços de DiagnósticoConfiançaMedical practice is continually updated with the introduction of new methods of examination, diagnosis, and treatment. As new technologies are introduced, hunry-taking and physical examinations are little valued in medical practice. The objective of this study was to identify the relationship between confidence in the performance of medical diagnosis and the need of additional tests. For data collecting we sent a questionnaire to 200 users of PAM MARECHAL, SUS / Juiz de Fora - MG. Statistical analysis was performed on a quantitative, qualitative, and descriptive form. The results, on the credibility of information given by the doctor in a query, pointed out that 52.5% of respondents rely on the doctor entirely. The reasons that raised more confidence in the patient is were careful listening (67.5%), and the ordering of additional tests (60.5%). These percentages are higher than those related to the reasons as confident questioning (33.0%) and / or office physical examination (33.5%), 55.0% of the individuals interviewed, do not believe the diagnosis without a work up being ordered. As for the possibility of returning when no additional tests, were ordered 76.5% of the people questioned say that would not return, and 91.5% believe that tests are necessary. We conclude that, despite the high degree of confidence in the professional performance, the population perceives the need for additional examinations as a means of confirming medical opinion.A prática medica é continuamente atualizada com a introdução de novos exames e métodos de diagnostico e tratamento. À medida que novas tecnologias são introduzidas, a anamnese e o exame físico são desvalorizados e eventualmente, observa-se inversão de valores na prática do profissional médico. O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar a relação entre a confiança no exercício médico e a necessidade de confirmação do diagnóstico por exames complementares (ECs). Para a coleta de dados foi utilizado um questionário aplicado a 200 usuários do Posto de Atendimento – PAM MARECHAL, SUS / Juiz de Fora – MG. A análise estatística foi feita de forma quanti-qualitativa e descritiva. Os resultados, quanto à confiança depositada nas informações dadas pelo médico em uma consulta, apontaram que 52,5% dos entrevistados confiam plenamente. Os motivos que mais suscitam confiança no paciente são o médico ouvi-lo com atenção (67,5%) e solicitar-lhe ECs (60,5%). Esses percentuais são maiores do que aqueles relacionados às razões como perguntar seguramente (33,0%) e/ou ao examinar no consultório (33,5%). A postura mediante um diagnóstico médico baseado apenas na consulta, para 55,0% dos indivíduos entrevistados, é não acreditar no diagnóstico sem a realização de exames médicos subsidiários. Quanto à possibilidade de retorno após consulta sem solicitação de ECs, 76,5% das pessoas questionadas afirmam que não retornariam, sendo que 91,5% dos entrevistados acreditam que o pedido dos mesmos seja necessário. Concluímos que, apesar do alto grau de confiança na atuação do profissional, a população percebe a necessidade de exames complementares como meio confirmação da opinião médica.Editora UFJF2008-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtOrapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/62HU Revista; v. 33 n. 3 (2007); 77-821982-80470103-3123reponame:HU Revista (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)instacron:UFJFporhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/62/47Neto, José Antônio ChehuenSirimarco, Mauro ToledoRocha, Flávio Roberto SilvaSouza, Camila Freitas dePereira, Francisca Simõesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-05-04T03:53:15Zoai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/62Revistahttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevistaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/oairevista.hurevista@ufjf.edu.br1982-80470103-3123opendoar:2023-05-04T03:53:15HU Revista (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam Confiabilidade no médico relacionada ao pedido de exame complementar |
title |
Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam |
spellingShingle |
Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam Neto, José Antônio Chehuen Exames Médicos Serviços de Diagnóstico Confiança |
title_short |
Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam |
title_full |
Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam |
title_fullStr |
Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam |
title_sort |
Reliability in the doctor related to the request of supplementary exam |
author |
Neto, José Antônio Chehuen |
author_facet |
Neto, José Antônio Chehuen Sirimarco, Mauro Toledo Rocha, Flávio Roberto Silva Souza, Camila Freitas de Pereira, Francisca Simões |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sirimarco, Mauro Toledo Rocha, Flávio Roberto Silva Souza, Camila Freitas de Pereira, Francisca Simões |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Neto, José Antônio Chehuen Sirimarco, Mauro Toledo Rocha, Flávio Roberto Silva Souza, Camila Freitas de Pereira, Francisca Simões |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Exames Médicos Serviços de Diagnóstico Confiança |
topic |
Exames Médicos Serviços de Diagnóstico Confiança |
description |
Medical practice is continually updated with the introduction of new methods of examination, diagnosis, and treatment. As new technologies are introduced, hunry-taking and physical examinations are little valued in medical practice. The objective of this study was to identify the relationship between confidence in the performance of medical diagnosis and the need of additional tests. For data collecting we sent a questionnaire to 200 users of PAM MARECHAL, SUS / Juiz de Fora - MG. Statistical analysis was performed on a quantitative, qualitative, and descriptive form. The results, on the credibility of information given by the doctor in a query, pointed out that 52.5% of respondents rely on the doctor entirely. The reasons that raised more confidence in the patient is were careful listening (67.5%), and the ordering of additional tests (60.5%). These percentages are higher than those related to the reasons as confident questioning (33.0%) and / or office physical examination (33.5%), 55.0% of the individuals interviewed, do not believe the diagnosis without a work up being ordered. As for the possibility of returning when no additional tests, were ordered 76.5% of the people questioned say that would not return, and 91.5% believe that tests are necessary. We conclude that, despite the high degree of confidence in the professional performance, the population perceives the need for additional examinations as a means of confirming medical opinion. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion ArtOr |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/62 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/62 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/62/47 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora UFJF |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora UFJF |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
HU Revista; v. 33 n. 3 (2007); 77-82 1982-8047 0103-3123 reponame:HU Revista (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) instacron:UFJF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) |
instacron_str |
UFJF |
institution |
UFJF |
reponame_str |
HU Revista (Online) |
collection |
HU Revista (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
HU Revista (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.hurevista@ufjf.edu.br |
_version_ |
1796798239342592000 |