Physician perception of clinical protocols

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chehuen Neto, José Antonio
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Rocha, Flávio Roberto Silva, fernandes, aline halfeld, França, Luiza Meireles, Vale, Victor César de Souza, Magalhães, Gabriel Galvão Rafael
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: HU Revista (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/425
Resumo: AbstractClinical protocols are evidence-based sets of procedures and approaches aiming to improve medical practice and inform clinical decision-taking.  With a body of information about better and more appropriate approaches to specific clinical situations, clinical protocols allow for quicker and more efficient responses to disease to be made, while providing patients with better quality of life.  Guidelines seek to increase diagnostic accuracy, medical care quality, health services quality and cost control.  This study investigated physician use of protocols, their impact on medical practice and health system and the stance of physicians regarding the boundaries between patient individuality and predetermined therapy standardization. A nine-question questionnaire was answered individually and voluntarily by 80 physicians.  98.75% were aware of protocol use;  95% agreed with the use of protocols, of whom 83.75% did it partially; those interviewed recognized the limitations of protocol applicability; 38.75% considered clinical judgment to be paramount; 72.5% believed the protocols to be beneficial; 77.5% recognized cost reduction with their use.  In spite of limitations to their applicability, knowledge about and use of clinical protocols by physicians are already significant.  Clinical protocols are thus helpful tools that may be changed and that must be widely taught, permanently updated and adapted to each patient’s reality.
id UFJF-8_b9a187049b3ac3fa6a73c95ec284ce11
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/425
network_acronym_str UFJF-8
network_name_str HU Revista (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Physician perception of clinical protocolsPercepção médica quanto aos protocolos clínicosProtocolos. Protocolos Clínicos. Árvores de Decisões.AbstractClinical protocols are evidence-based sets of procedures and approaches aiming to improve medical practice and inform clinical decision-taking.  With a body of information about better and more appropriate approaches to specific clinical situations, clinical protocols allow for quicker and more efficient responses to disease to be made, while providing patients with better quality of life.  Guidelines seek to increase diagnostic accuracy, medical care quality, health services quality and cost control.  This study investigated physician use of protocols, their impact on medical practice and health system and the stance of physicians regarding the boundaries between patient individuality and predetermined therapy standardization. A nine-question questionnaire was answered individually and voluntarily by 80 physicians.  98.75% were aware of protocol use;  95% agreed with the use of protocols, of whom 83.75% did it partially; those interviewed recognized the limitations of protocol applicability; 38.75% considered clinical judgment to be paramount; 72.5% believed the protocols to be beneficial; 77.5% recognized cost reduction with their use.  In spite of limitations to their applicability, knowledge about and use of clinical protocols by physicians are already significant.  Clinical protocols are thus helpful tools that may be changed and that must be widely taught, permanently updated and adapted to each patient’s reality.Os protocolos clínicos são condutas e procedimentos desenvolvidos com suporte em evidências atualizadas e consistentes, que objetivam promover uma melhor prática da medicina. Esses protocolos vem auxiliar o médico em decisões sobre a melhor e mais apropriada conduta em situações clínicas específicas, permitindo resolução mais rápida e eficiente das enfermidades, gerando melhor qualidade de vida aos pacientes. Neste sentido, os guidelines buscam aumento da precisão diagnóstica, qualidade da assistência médica, dos serviços de saúde e controle de custos. Em estudo verificou-se a percepção médica em relação ao uso de protocolos, no tocante às vantagens e limitações da prática, principais beneficiados, influência nos custos e possível diferença entre os protocolos adotados nos sistemas de saúde. Aplicou-se questionário contendo nove perguntas, respondidas individualmente e voluntariamente por 80 médicos. Constatou-se que 98,75% dos médicos tem conhecimento do uso de protocolos; 95% concordam com seu uso, sendo que 83,75% dos médicos o fazem parcialmente. Os entrevistados reconheceram as limitações de sua aplicabilidade. 38,75% consideram que o julgamento clínico é mais importante, e 72,5% avaliam que os protocolos trazem benefícios, sendo que 77,5% reconhecem a diminuição nos custos. Concluiu-se que, apesar de haver limitações na aplicabilidade deste recurso, o conhecimento e uso dos protocolos por parte dos médicos já são significativos, sendo, portanto, instrumentos de auxílio em um contexto, no qual a experiência clínica deve ser integrada à informação científica, de forma crítica e racional, objetivando melhorar a qualidade da assistência médica. Desta forma, os protocolos devem ser amplamente divulgados, constantemente atualizados e adequados à realidade de cada paciente.Editora UFJF2010-02-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtOrPesquisa exploratóriaapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/mswordhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/425HU Revista; v. 35 n. 3 (2009)1982-80470103-3123reponame:HU Revista (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)instacron:UFJFporhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/425/248https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/425/14991https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/425/14992Chehuen Neto, José AntonioRocha, Flávio Roberto Silvafernandes, aline halfeldFrança, Luiza MeirelesVale, Victor César de SouzaMagalhães, Gabriel Galvão Rafaelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-05-04T03:53:17Zoai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/425Revistahttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevistaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/oairevista.hurevista@ufjf.edu.br1982-80470103-3123opendoar:2023-05-04T03:53:17HU Revista (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Physician perception of clinical protocols
Percepção médica quanto aos protocolos clínicos
title Physician perception of clinical protocols
spellingShingle Physician perception of clinical protocols
Chehuen Neto, José Antonio
Protocolos. Protocolos Clínicos. Árvores de Decisões.
title_short Physician perception of clinical protocols
title_full Physician perception of clinical protocols
title_fullStr Physician perception of clinical protocols
title_full_unstemmed Physician perception of clinical protocols
title_sort Physician perception of clinical protocols
author Chehuen Neto, José Antonio
author_facet Chehuen Neto, José Antonio
Rocha, Flávio Roberto Silva
fernandes, aline halfeld
França, Luiza Meireles
Vale, Victor César de Souza
Magalhães, Gabriel Galvão Rafael
author_role author
author2 Rocha, Flávio Roberto Silva
fernandes, aline halfeld
França, Luiza Meireles
Vale, Victor César de Souza
Magalhães, Gabriel Galvão Rafael
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chehuen Neto, José Antonio
Rocha, Flávio Roberto Silva
fernandes, aline halfeld
França, Luiza Meireles
Vale, Victor César de Souza
Magalhães, Gabriel Galvão Rafael
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Protocolos. Protocolos Clínicos. Árvores de Decisões.
topic Protocolos. Protocolos Clínicos. Árvores de Decisões.
description AbstractClinical protocols are evidence-based sets of procedures and approaches aiming to improve medical practice and inform clinical decision-taking.  With a body of information about better and more appropriate approaches to specific clinical situations, clinical protocols allow for quicker and more efficient responses to disease to be made, while providing patients with better quality of life.  Guidelines seek to increase diagnostic accuracy, medical care quality, health services quality and cost control.  This study investigated physician use of protocols, their impact on medical practice and health system and the stance of physicians regarding the boundaries between patient individuality and predetermined therapy standardization. A nine-question questionnaire was answered individually and voluntarily by 80 physicians.  98.75% were aware of protocol use;  95% agreed with the use of protocols, of whom 83.75% did it partially; those interviewed recognized the limitations of protocol applicability; 38.75% considered clinical judgment to be paramount; 72.5% believed the protocols to be beneficial; 77.5% recognized cost reduction with their use.  In spite of limitations to their applicability, knowledge about and use of clinical protocols by physicians are already significant.  Clinical protocols are thus helpful tools that may be changed and that must be widely taught, permanently updated and adapted to each patient’s reality.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-02-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
ArtOr
Pesquisa exploratória
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/425
url https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/425
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/425/248
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/425/14991
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/425/14992
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/msword
application/msword
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora UFJF
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora UFJF
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv HU Revista; v. 35 n. 3 (2009)
1982-8047
0103-3123
reponame:HU Revista (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
instacron:UFJF
instname_str Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
instacron_str UFJF
institution UFJF
reponame_str HU Revista (Online)
collection HU Revista (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv HU Revista (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.hurevista@ufjf.edu.br
_version_ 1796798240056672256