Managing glyphosate-resistant weeds with cover crop associated with herbicide rotation and mixture

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marochi,Aroldo
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Ferreira,Antonio, Takano,Hudson Kagueyama, Oliveira Junior,Rubem Silvério, Ovejero,Ramiro Fernando Lopez
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542018000400381
Resumo: ABSTRACT Herbicide resistance has become a major concern for agricultural systems, and integrating weed management practices seem to be the most promise way for its mitigation. The effects of cropping systems including ruzigrass (Urochloa ruziziensis) associated with herbicide rotation programs were evaluated for the management of glyphosate resistant conyza (Conyza sumatrensis) and sourgrass (Digitaria insularis) in soybean and corn production systems. A 3x3 factorial was evaluated in four consecutive soybean (spring-summer) and corn (fall-winter) double cropping seasons. Factor A consisted of three combinations of cropping systems in the fall-winter: corn, corn plus ruzigrass, and ruzigrass alone. Factor B was based on increasing levels of diversity in herbicide mode of action over the four-year period (5, 8, and 11 MoAs). The results indicate that using ruzigrass significantly increased soil coverage by cover crop residues. In general, the cover crop was more efficient for conyza than for sourgrass control, whereas herbicide programs provided greater control on sourgrass than on conyza. Besides the weed suppression effect, the accumulation of ruzigrass biomass on the soil surface during the fall-winter also improved yield of soybean in the spring-summer. The integration of ruzigrass as a cover crop and the use of herbicide programs with multiple modes of action can provide efficient control of glyphosate-resistant conyza and sourgrass. The use of only one of these strategies was not effective in most cases, especially for the long term.
id UFLA-2_0a87bf9ba3c5332a54596baeff8bc2c4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-70542018000400381
network_acronym_str UFLA-2
network_name_str Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Managing glyphosate-resistant weeds with cover crop associated with herbicide rotation and mixtureDigitaria insularisConyza sumatrensisintegrated weed managementUrochloa ruziziensisherbicide resistance.ABSTRACT Herbicide resistance has become a major concern for agricultural systems, and integrating weed management practices seem to be the most promise way for its mitigation. The effects of cropping systems including ruzigrass (Urochloa ruziziensis) associated with herbicide rotation programs were evaluated for the management of glyphosate resistant conyza (Conyza sumatrensis) and sourgrass (Digitaria insularis) in soybean and corn production systems. A 3x3 factorial was evaluated in four consecutive soybean (spring-summer) and corn (fall-winter) double cropping seasons. Factor A consisted of three combinations of cropping systems in the fall-winter: corn, corn plus ruzigrass, and ruzigrass alone. Factor B was based on increasing levels of diversity in herbicide mode of action over the four-year period (5, 8, and 11 MoAs). The results indicate that using ruzigrass significantly increased soil coverage by cover crop residues. In general, the cover crop was more efficient for conyza than for sourgrass control, whereas herbicide programs provided greater control on sourgrass than on conyza. Besides the weed suppression effect, the accumulation of ruzigrass biomass on the soil surface during the fall-winter also improved yield of soybean in the spring-summer. The integration of ruzigrass as a cover crop and the use of herbicide programs with multiple modes of action can provide efficient control of glyphosate-resistant conyza and sourgrass. The use of only one of these strategies was not effective in most cases, especially for the long term.Editora da UFLA2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542018000400381Ciência e Agrotecnologia v.42 n.4 2018reponame:Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLA10.1590/1413-70542018424017918info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarochi,AroldoFerreira,AntonioTakano,Hudson KagueyamaOliveira Junior,Rubem SilvérioOvejero,Ramiro Fernando Lopezeng2018-10-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-70542018000400381Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/cagroPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||renpaiva@dbi.ufla.br|| editora@editora.ufla.br1981-18291413-7054opendoar:2022-11-22T16:31:35.651383Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Managing glyphosate-resistant weeds with cover crop associated with herbicide rotation and mixture
title Managing glyphosate-resistant weeds with cover crop associated with herbicide rotation and mixture
spellingShingle Managing glyphosate-resistant weeds with cover crop associated with herbicide rotation and mixture
Marochi,Aroldo
Digitaria insularis
Conyza sumatrensis
integrated weed management
Urochloa ruziziensis
herbicide resistance.
title_short Managing glyphosate-resistant weeds with cover crop associated with herbicide rotation and mixture
title_full Managing glyphosate-resistant weeds with cover crop associated with herbicide rotation and mixture
title_fullStr Managing glyphosate-resistant weeds with cover crop associated with herbicide rotation and mixture
title_full_unstemmed Managing glyphosate-resistant weeds with cover crop associated with herbicide rotation and mixture
title_sort Managing glyphosate-resistant weeds with cover crop associated with herbicide rotation and mixture
author Marochi,Aroldo
author_facet Marochi,Aroldo
Ferreira,Antonio
Takano,Hudson Kagueyama
Oliveira Junior,Rubem Silvério
Ovejero,Ramiro Fernando Lopez
author_role author
author2 Ferreira,Antonio
Takano,Hudson Kagueyama
Oliveira Junior,Rubem Silvério
Ovejero,Ramiro Fernando Lopez
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marochi,Aroldo
Ferreira,Antonio
Takano,Hudson Kagueyama
Oliveira Junior,Rubem Silvério
Ovejero,Ramiro Fernando Lopez
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Digitaria insularis
Conyza sumatrensis
integrated weed management
Urochloa ruziziensis
herbicide resistance.
topic Digitaria insularis
Conyza sumatrensis
integrated weed management
Urochloa ruziziensis
herbicide resistance.
description ABSTRACT Herbicide resistance has become a major concern for agricultural systems, and integrating weed management practices seem to be the most promise way for its mitigation. The effects of cropping systems including ruzigrass (Urochloa ruziziensis) associated with herbicide rotation programs were evaluated for the management of glyphosate resistant conyza (Conyza sumatrensis) and sourgrass (Digitaria insularis) in soybean and corn production systems. A 3x3 factorial was evaluated in four consecutive soybean (spring-summer) and corn (fall-winter) double cropping seasons. Factor A consisted of three combinations of cropping systems in the fall-winter: corn, corn plus ruzigrass, and ruzigrass alone. Factor B was based on increasing levels of diversity in herbicide mode of action over the four-year period (5, 8, and 11 MoAs). The results indicate that using ruzigrass significantly increased soil coverage by cover crop residues. In general, the cover crop was more efficient for conyza than for sourgrass control, whereas herbicide programs provided greater control on sourgrass than on conyza. Besides the weed suppression effect, the accumulation of ruzigrass biomass on the soil surface during the fall-winter also improved yield of soybean in the spring-summer. The integration of ruzigrass as a cover crop and the use of herbicide programs with multiple modes of action can provide efficient control of glyphosate-resistant conyza and sourgrass. The use of only one of these strategies was not effective in most cases, especially for the long term.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542018000400381
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542018000400381
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1413-70542018424017918
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da UFLA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da UFLA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência e Agrotecnologia v.42 n.4 2018
reponame:Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
collection Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||renpaiva@dbi.ufla.br|| editora@editora.ufla.br
_version_ 1799874970756579328