Blended paper: physical, optical, structural, and interfiber bonding analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cerne (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/2944 |
Resumo: | Background: Blended paper can present suitable mechanical properties due to sirnergetic effect.However, regarded to physical properties, few studies are conducted. This study aimed to evaluate optical, structural, interfiber bonding, and other physical properties from blended paper and try to understand how these properties can affect applications. The eucalyptus, sisal, and pine pulp were used for handsheet forming. Pulps were disintegrated, refined, and blended two by two in 5/95%, 25/75%, and 45/55% ratios. Also, virgin pulps (100% of each pulp) were used for handsheet forming. Handsheets were formed and evaluated by bond strength, cobb test, air permeance, roughness, optical, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Results: Treatments differed statistically in bond strength, cobb test, optical, air permeance, and roughness. Generally, treatments with eucalyptus presented higher bond strength, brightness, and air permeance. Treatments with sisal presented the highest opacity and roughness. Spectra of virgin handsheets presented differences in 2170-2000 and 2360 cm-¹ bands, probably related to residual lignin content. SEM images revealed structural differences between blended and virgin pulps.Conclusion: Treatment T15 (45S 55P) presented the best results, suggesting better physical-mechanical properties. Blended handsheets presented better properties than virgin handsheets on most properties, evidencing a synergetic effect. |
id |
UFLA-3_408c3c59b39b8ec382fb3e5e7ddeacc1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:cerne.ufla.br:article/2944 |
network_acronym_str |
UFLA-3 |
network_name_str |
Cerne (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Blended paper: physical, optical, structural, and interfiber bonding analysisBlended paper: physical, optical, structural, and interfiber bonding analysisCelluloseHandsheetNatural fibersMixturePapermakingcellulosenanocellulosestrengthfiberspaperpulpwoodwood scienceBackground: Blended paper can present suitable mechanical properties due to sirnergetic effect.However, regarded to physical properties, few studies are conducted. This study aimed to evaluate optical, structural, interfiber bonding, and other physical properties from blended paper and try to understand how these properties can affect applications. The eucalyptus, sisal, and pine pulp were used for handsheet forming. Pulps were disintegrated, refined, and blended two by two in 5/95%, 25/75%, and 45/55% ratios. Also, virgin pulps (100% of each pulp) were used for handsheet forming. Handsheets were formed and evaluated by bond strength, cobb test, air permeance, roughness, optical, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Results: Treatments differed statistically in bond strength, cobb test, optical, air permeance, and roughness. Generally, treatments with eucalyptus presented higher bond strength, brightness, and air permeance. Treatments with sisal presented the highest opacity and roughness. Spectra of virgin handsheets presented differences in 2170-2000 and 2360 cm-¹ bands, probably related to residual lignin content. SEM images revealed structural differences between blended and virgin pulps.Conclusion: Treatment T15 (45S 55P) presented the best results, suggesting better physical-mechanical properties. Blended handsheets presented better properties than virgin handsheets on most properties, evidencing a synergetic effect.Background: Blended paper can present suitable mechanical properties due to sirnergetic effect.However, regarded to physical properties, few studies are conducted. This study aimed to evaluate optical, structural, interfiber bonding, and other physical properties from blended paper and try to understand how these properties can affect applications. The eucalyptus, sisal, and pine pulp were used for handsheet forming. Pulps were disintegrated, refined, and blended two by two in 5/95%, 25/75%, and 45/55% ratios. Also, virgin pulps (100% of each pulp) were used for handsheet forming. Handsheets were formed and evaluated by bond strength, cobb test, air permeance, roughness, optical, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Results: Treatments differed statistically in bond strength, cobb test, optical, air permeance, and roughness. Generally, treatments with eucalyptus presented higher bond strength, brightness, and air permeance. Treatments with sisal presented the highest opacity and roughness. Spectra of virgin handsheets presented differences in 2170-2000 and 2360 cm-¹ bands, probably related to residual lignin content. SEM images revealed structural differences between blended and virgin pulps.Conclusion: Treatment T15 (45S 55P) presented the best results, suggesting better physical-mechanical properties. Blended handsheets presented better properties than virgin handsheets on most properties, evidencing a synergetic effect.CERNECERNE2021-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/2944CERNE; Vol 27 No 1 (2021); e-102944CERNE; Vol 27 No 1 (2021); e-1029442317-63420104-7760reponame:Cerne (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLAenghttps://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/2944/1270http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPego, Matheus Felipe FreireBianchi, Maria Lúcia2022-01-28T19:13:54Zoai:cerne.ufla.br:article/2944Revistahttps://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNEPUBhttps://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/oaicerne@dcf.ufla.br||cerne@dcf.ufla.br2317-63420104-7760opendoar:2024-05-21T19:54:47.833376Cerne (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Blended paper: physical, optical, structural, and interfiber bonding analysis Blended paper: physical, optical, structural, and interfiber bonding analysis |
title |
Blended paper: physical, optical, structural, and interfiber bonding analysis |
spellingShingle |
Blended paper: physical, optical, structural, and interfiber bonding analysis Pego, Matheus Felipe Freire Cellulose Handsheet Natural fibers Mixture Papermaking cellulose nanocellulose strength fibers paper pulp wood wood science |
title_short |
Blended paper: physical, optical, structural, and interfiber bonding analysis |
title_full |
Blended paper: physical, optical, structural, and interfiber bonding analysis |
title_fullStr |
Blended paper: physical, optical, structural, and interfiber bonding analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Blended paper: physical, optical, structural, and interfiber bonding analysis |
title_sort |
Blended paper: physical, optical, structural, and interfiber bonding analysis |
author |
Pego, Matheus Felipe Freire |
author_facet |
Pego, Matheus Felipe Freire Bianchi, Maria Lúcia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bianchi, Maria Lúcia |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pego, Matheus Felipe Freire Bianchi, Maria Lúcia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cellulose Handsheet Natural fibers Mixture Papermaking cellulose nanocellulose strength fibers paper pulp wood wood science |
topic |
Cellulose Handsheet Natural fibers Mixture Papermaking cellulose nanocellulose strength fibers paper pulp wood wood science |
description |
Background: Blended paper can present suitable mechanical properties due to sirnergetic effect.However, regarded to physical properties, few studies are conducted. This study aimed to evaluate optical, structural, interfiber bonding, and other physical properties from blended paper and try to understand how these properties can affect applications. The eucalyptus, sisal, and pine pulp were used for handsheet forming. Pulps were disintegrated, refined, and blended two by two in 5/95%, 25/75%, and 45/55% ratios. Also, virgin pulps (100% of each pulp) were used for handsheet forming. Handsheets were formed and evaluated by bond strength, cobb test, air permeance, roughness, optical, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Results: Treatments differed statistically in bond strength, cobb test, optical, air permeance, and roughness. Generally, treatments with eucalyptus presented higher bond strength, brightness, and air permeance. Treatments with sisal presented the highest opacity and roughness. Spectra of virgin handsheets presented differences in 2170-2000 and 2360 cm-¹ bands, probably related to residual lignin content. SEM images revealed structural differences between blended and virgin pulps.Conclusion: Treatment T15 (45S 55P) presented the best results, suggesting better physical-mechanical properties. Blended handsheets presented better properties than virgin handsheets on most properties, evidencing a synergetic effect. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/2944 |
url |
https://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/2944 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/2944/1270 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
CERNE CERNE |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
CERNE CERNE |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
CERNE; Vol 27 No 1 (2021); e-102944 CERNE; Vol 27 No 1 (2021); e-102944 2317-6342 0104-7760 reponame:Cerne (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA) instacron:UFLA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA) |
instacron_str |
UFLA |
institution |
UFLA |
reponame_str |
Cerne (Online) |
collection |
Cerne (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cerne (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cerne@dcf.ufla.br||cerne@dcf.ufla.br |
_version_ |
1799874944255918080 |