DO BIRD COMMUNITIES OF NEOTROPICAL MONODOMINANT FORESTS HAVE THEIR OWN IDENTITY? THE CASE OF EREMANTHUS ERYTHROPAPPUS FORESTS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza de Moura, Aloysio
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Fernandes Mariano, Ravi, Machado, Felipe, Rodrigo de Souza, Cleber, Jorge da Silveira Junior, Wanderley, Senna Correa, Bruno, Aurélio Leite Fontes, Marco
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cerne (Online)
Texto Completo: https://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/3015
Resumo: Background Monodominant Eremanthus erythropappus forests are dispersed in neotropical montane regions of southeastern and northeastern Brazil, forming ecotonal areas among other high altitude phytophysiognomies, with no information from their fauna communities and how these communities vary between phytophysiognomies adjacent. We examined the bird community of three preserved and three managed E. erythropappus forests, and compared them with two other coexisting phytophysiognomies (cloud forests and montane fields) in an ecotonal region between two biodiversity hotspot domains (Cerrado and Atlantic Forest), in southeastern Brazil (1300 to 1570m high). Results The bird community of the natural E. erythropappus forests was shared with other vegetation, while the managed E. erythropappus forests presented the lowest species richness. However, even though managed E. erythropappus forests has almost no exclusive elements, their community caused a balanced variation (a set of very similar species, only changing the representativeness), suggesting that the abundance of the registered species varies along these phytophysiognomies. Conclusion The species associated with the natural E. erythropappus forests represented 50% of the total species, in contrast to the remaining 50% associated with the areas of cloud forests and montane fields, and their sharing behaves as an ecotonal community, since its community coincides with elements which are also present in the avifauna of the other two sampled phytophysiognomies. The composition of the avifauna from managed E. erythropappus forests was more similar to the community registered in the montane fields.
id UFLA-3_92734ac1922cf7e010c0433114710fed
oai_identifier_str oai:cerne.ufla.br:article/3015
network_acronym_str UFLA-3
network_name_str Cerne (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling DO BIRD COMMUNITIES OF NEOTROPICAL MONODOMINANT FORESTS HAVE THEIR OWN IDENTITY? THE CASE OF EREMANTHUS ERYTHROPAPPUS FORESTSCandeiamontane ecosystemsconservationBackground Monodominant Eremanthus erythropappus forests are dispersed in neotropical montane regions of southeastern and northeastern Brazil, forming ecotonal areas among other high altitude phytophysiognomies, with no information from their fauna communities and how these communities vary between phytophysiognomies adjacent. We examined the bird community of three preserved and three managed E. erythropappus forests, and compared them with two other coexisting phytophysiognomies (cloud forests and montane fields) in an ecotonal region between two biodiversity hotspot domains (Cerrado and Atlantic Forest), in southeastern Brazil (1300 to 1570m high). Results The bird community of the natural E. erythropappus forests was shared with other vegetation, while the managed E. erythropappus forests presented the lowest species richness. However, even though managed E. erythropappus forests has almost no exclusive elements, their community caused a balanced variation (a set of very similar species, only changing the representativeness), suggesting that the abundance of the registered species varies along these phytophysiognomies. Conclusion The species associated with the natural E. erythropappus forests represented 50% of the total species, in contrast to the remaining 50% associated with the areas of cloud forests and montane fields, and their sharing behaves as an ecotonal community, since its community coincides with elements which are also present in the avifauna of the other two sampled phytophysiognomies. The composition of the avifauna from managed E. erythropappus forests was more similar to the community registered in the montane fields.CERNECERNE2022-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/3015CERNE; Vol 28 No 1 (2022); e-103015CERNE; Vol 28 No 1 (2022); e-1030152317-63420104-7760reponame:Cerne (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLAenghttps://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/3015/1314http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza de Moura, AloysioFernandes Mariano, RaviMachado, FelipeRodrigo de Souza, Cleber Jorge da Silveira Junior, Wanderley Senna Correa, Bruno Aurélio Leite Fontes, Marco 2022-08-25T19:42:58Zoai:cerne.ufla.br:article/3015Revistahttps://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNEPUBhttps://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/oaicerne@dcf.ufla.br||cerne@dcf.ufla.br2317-63420104-7760opendoar:2024-05-21T19:54:48.988821Cerne (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv DO BIRD COMMUNITIES OF NEOTROPICAL MONODOMINANT FORESTS HAVE THEIR OWN IDENTITY? THE CASE OF EREMANTHUS ERYTHROPAPPUS FORESTS
title DO BIRD COMMUNITIES OF NEOTROPICAL MONODOMINANT FORESTS HAVE THEIR OWN IDENTITY? THE CASE OF EREMANTHUS ERYTHROPAPPUS FORESTS
spellingShingle DO BIRD COMMUNITIES OF NEOTROPICAL MONODOMINANT FORESTS HAVE THEIR OWN IDENTITY? THE CASE OF EREMANTHUS ERYTHROPAPPUS FORESTS
Souza de Moura, Aloysio
Candeia
montane ecosystems
conservation
title_short DO BIRD COMMUNITIES OF NEOTROPICAL MONODOMINANT FORESTS HAVE THEIR OWN IDENTITY? THE CASE OF EREMANTHUS ERYTHROPAPPUS FORESTS
title_full DO BIRD COMMUNITIES OF NEOTROPICAL MONODOMINANT FORESTS HAVE THEIR OWN IDENTITY? THE CASE OF EREMANTHUS ERYTHROPAPPUS FORESTS
title_fullStr DO BIRD COMMUNITIES OF NEOTROPICAL MONODOMINANT FORESTS HAVE THEIR OWN IDENTITY? THE CASE OF EREMANTHUS ERYTHROPAPPUS FORESTS
title_full_unstemmed DO BIRD COMMUNITIES OF NEOTROPICAL MONODOMINANT FORESTS HAVE THEIR OWN IDENTITY? THE CASE OF EREMANTHUS ERYTHROPAPPUS FORESTS
title_sort DO BIRD COMMUNITIES OF NEOTROPICAL MONODOMINANT FORESTS HAVE THEIR OWN IDENTITY? THE CASE OF EREMANTHUS ERYTHROPAPPUS FORESTS
author Souza de Moura, Aloysio
author_facet Souza de Moura, Aloysio
Fernandes Mariano, Ravi
Machado, Felipe
Rodrigo de Souza, Cleber
Jorge da Silveira Junior, Wanderley
Senna Correa, Bruno
Aurélio Leite Fontes, Marco
author_role author
author2 Fernandes Mariano, Ravi
Machado, Felipe
Rodrigo de Souza, Cleber
Jorge da Silveira Junior, Wanderley
Senna Correa, Bruno
Aurélio Leite Fontes, Marco
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza de Moura, Aloysio
Fernandes Mariano, Ravi
Machado, Felipe
Rodrigo de Souza, Cleber
Jorge da Silveira Junior, Wanderley
Senna Correa, Bruno
Aurélio Leite Fontes, Marco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Candeia
montane ecosystems
conservation
topic Candeia
montane ecosystems
conservation
description Background Monodominant Eremanthus erythropappus forests are dispersed in neotropical montane regions of southeastern and northeastern Brazil, forming ecotonal areas among other high altitude phytophysiognomies, with no information from their fauna communities and how these communities vary between phytophysiognomies adjacent. We examined the bird community of three preserved and three managed E. erythropappus forests, and compared them with two other coexisting phytophysiognomies (cloud forests and montane fields) in an ecotonal region between two biodiversity hotspot domains (Cerrado and Atlantic Forest), in southeastern Brazil (1300 to 1570m high). Results The bird community of the natural E. erythropappus forests was shared with other vegetation, while the managed E. erythropappus forests presented the lowest species richness. However, even though managed E. erythropappus forests has almost no exclusive elements, their community caused a balanced variation (a set of very similar species, only changing the representativeness), suggesting that the abundance of the registered species varies along these phytophysiognomies. Conclusion The species associated with the natural E. erythropappus forests represented 50% of the total species, in contrast to the remaining 50% associated with the areas of cloud forests and montane fields, and their sharing behaves as an ecotonal community, since its community coincides with elements which are also present in the avifauna of the other two sampled phytophysiognomies. The composition of the avifauna from managed E. erythropappus forests was more similar to the community registered in the montane fields.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/3015
url https://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/3015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/3015/1314
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv CERNE
CERNE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv CERNE
CERNE
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv CERNE; Vol 28 No 1 (2022); e-103015
CERNE; Vol 28 No 1 (2022); e-103015
2317-6342
0104-7760
reponame:Cerne (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Cerne (Online)
collection Cerne (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cerne (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cerne@dcf.ufla.br||cerne@dcf.ufla.br
_version_ 1799874944312541184