THE USE OF GENETIC DISTANCE AND GROUPING METHODS TO PREDICT Eucalyptus pellita F. MUELL GENITORS FOR HYBRIDIZATION

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tambarussi, Evandro Vagner
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Andrade, Mateus Chagas, Fernandes, Aline Cristina Miranda, Siqueira, Leandro de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cerne (Online)
Texto Completo: https://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/2546
Resumo: The objective of this study was to use quantitative traits to estimate the genetic distance among E. pellita provenances and progenies, to inform possible hybridization strategies in a species improvement program. A provenance and progeny test with 118 progenies from seven provenances was evaluated. The following quantitative traits were measured at seven years of age: diameter at breast height (DBH); height; and individual volume. The data were submitted to REML/BLUP analysis to obtain the predicted genetic value (BLUP). From this, the Mahalanobis (D²) genetic distance was estimated for provenances and progenies, which were then grouped by Tocher’s method, the unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA), and principal component analysis (PCA). In total, 29 divergent groups were obtained among progenies based on Tocher’s method, which showed greater reliability according to the cophenetic correlation coefficient than UPGMA. The opposite was found between provenances, where the results for UPGMA demonstrated greater clustering reliability. Based on principal component analysis (PCA), the M. Ray and Tully provenances were the most similar, while Connl. A and Orchard were the most divergent. Height was the most important trait in estimating genetic distance. The results obtained offer important insights for breeding programs; with this information, crosses can be designed between contrasting individuals among and within provenances to obtain E. pellita hybrids, validating the possible heterotic groups identified through the genetic distance and grouping methods.
id UFLA-3_ea3dd50717685ed364ac20d017e3acfa
oai_identifier_str oai:cerne.ufla.br:article/2546
network_acronym_str UFLA-3
network_name_str Cerne (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling THE USE OF GENETIC DISTANCE AND GROUPING METHODS TO PREDICT Eucalyptus pellita F. MUELL GENITORS FOR HYBRIDIZATIONTHE USE OF GENETIC DISTANCE AND GROUPING METHODS TO PREDICT Eucalyptus pellita F. MUELL GENITORS FOR HYBRIDIZATIONhybridsheterotic groupstree improvement,GeneticsThe objective of this study was to use quantitative traits to estimate the genetic distance among E. pellita provenances and progenies, to inform possible hybridization strategies in a species improvement program. A provenance and progeny test with 118 progenies from seven provenances was evaluated. The following quantitative traits were measured at seven years of age: diameter at breast height (DBH); height; and individual volume. The data were submitted to REML/BLUP analysis to obtain the predicted genetic value (BLUP). From this, the Mahalanobis (D²) genetic distance was estimated for provenances and progenies, which were then grouped by Tocher’s method, the unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA), and principal component analysis (PCA). In total, 29 divergent groups were obtained among progenies based on Tocher’s method, which showed greater reliability according to the cophenetic correlation coefficient than UPGMA. The opposite was found between provenances, where the results for UPGMA demonstrated greater clustering reliability. Based on principal component analysis (PCA), the M. Ray and Tully provenances were the most similar, while Connl. A and Orchard were the most divergent. Height was the most important trait in estimating genetic distance. The results obtained offer important insights for breeding programs; with this information, crosses can be designed between contrasting individuals among and within provenances to obtain E. pellita hybrids, validating the possible heterotic groups identified through the genetic distance and grouping methods.The objective of this study was to use quantitative traits to estimate the genetic distance among E. pellita provenances and progenies, to inform possible hybridization strategies in a species improvement program. A provenance and progeny test with 118 progenies from seven provenances was evaluated. The following quantitative traits were measured at seven years of age: diameter at breast height (DBH); height; and individual volume. The data were submitted to REML/BLUP analysis to obtain the predicted genetic value (BLUP). From this, the Mahalanobis (D²) genetic distance was estimated for provenances and progenies, which were then grouped by Tocher’s method, the unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA), and principal component analysis (PCA). In total, 29 divergent groups were obtained among progenies based on Tocher’s method, which showed greater reliability according to the cophenetic correlation coefficient than UPGMA. The opposite was found between provenances, where the results for UPGMA demonstrated greater clustering reliability. Based on principal component analysis (PCA), the M. Ray and Tully provenances were the most similar, while Connl. A and Orchard were the most divergent. Height was the most important trait in estimating genetic distance. The results obtained offer important insights for breeding programs; with this information, crosses can be designed between contrasting individuals among and within provenances to obtain E. pellita hybrids, validating the possible heterotic groups identified through the genetic distance and grouping methods.CERNECERNE2020-11-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/2546CERNE; Vol 26 No 4 (2020); 414-426CERNE; Vol 26 No 4 (2020); 414-4262317-63420104-7760reponame:Cerne (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLAenghttps://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/2546/1211Copyright (c) 2020 CERNEinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTambarussi, Evandro VagnerAndrade, Mateus ChagasFernandes, Aline Cristina MirandaSiqueira, Leandro de2021-01-12T01:23:05Zoai:cerne.ufla.br:article/2546Revistahttps://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNEPUBhttps://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/oaicerne@dcf.ufla.br||cerne@dcf.ufla.br2317-63420104-7760opendoar:2024-05-21T19:54:45.786305Cerne (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE USE OF GENETIC DISTANCE AND GROUPING METHODS TO PREDICT Eucalyptus pellita F. MUELL GENITORS FOR HYBRIDIZATION
THE USE OF GENETIC DISTANCE AND GROUPING METHODS TO PREDICT Eucalyptus pellita F. MUELL GENITORS FOR HYBRIDIZATION
title THE USE OF GENETIC DISTANCE AND GROUPING METHODS TO PREDICT Eucalyptus pellita F. MUELL GENITORS FOR HYBRIDIZATION
spellingShingle THE USE OF GENETIC DISTANCE AND GROUPING METHODS TO PREDICT Eucalyptus pellita F. MUELL GENITORS FOR HYBRIDIZATION
Tambarussi, Evandro Vagner
hybrids
heterotic groups
tree improvement,
Genetics
title_short THE USE OF GENETIC DISTANCE AND GROUPING METHODS TO PREDICT Eucalyptus pellita F. MUELL GENITORS FOR HYBRIDIZATION
title_full THE USE OF GENETIC DISTANCE AND GROUPING METHODS TO PREDICT Eucalyptus pellita F. MUELL GENITORS FOR HYBRIDIZATION
title_fullStr THE USE OF GENETIC DISTANCE AND GROUPING METHODS TO PREDICT Eucalyptus pellita F. MUELL GENITORS FOR HYBRIDIZATION
title_full_unstemmed THE USE OF GENETIC DISTANCE AND GROUPING METHODS TO PREDICT Eucalyptus pellita F. MUELL GENITORS FOR HYBRIDIZATION
title_sort THE USE OF GENETIC DISTANCE AND GROUPING METHODS TO PREDICT Eucalyptus pellita F. MUELL GENITORS FOR HYBRIDIZATION
author Tambarussi, Evandro Vagner
author_facet Tambarussi, Evandro Vagner
Andrade, Mateus Chagas
Fernandes, Aline Cristina Miranda
Siqueira, Leandro de
author_role author
author2 Andrade, Mateus Chagas
Fernandes, Aline Cristina Miranda
Siqueira, Leandro de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tambarussi, Evandro Vagner
Andrade, Mateus Chagas
Fernandes, Aline Cristina Miranda
Siqueira, Leandro de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv hybrids
heterotic groups
tree improvement,
Genetics
topic hybrids
heterotic groups
tree improvement,
Genetics
description The objective of this study was to use quantitative traits to estimate the genetic distance among E. pellita provenances and progenies, to inform possible hybridization strategies in a species improvement program. A provenance and progeny test with 118 progenies from seven provenances was evaluated. The following quantitative traits were measured at seven years of age: diameter at breast height (DBH); height; and individual volume. The data were submitted to REML/BLUP analysis to obtain the predicted genetic value (BLUP). From this, the Mahalanobis (D²) genetic distance was estimated for provenances and progenies, which were then grouped by Tocher’s method, the unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA), and principal component analysis (PCA). In total, 29 divergent groups were obtained among progenies based on Tocher’s method, which showed greater reliability according to the cophenetic correlation coefficient than UPGMA. The opposite was found between provenances, where the results for UPGMA demonstrated greater clustering reliability. Based on principal component analysis (PCA), the M. Ray and Tully provenances were the most similar, while Connl. A and Orchard were the most divergent. Height was the most important trait in estimating genetic distance. The results obtained offer important insights for breeding programs; with this information, crosses can be designed between contrasting individuals among and within provenances to obtain E. pellita hybrids, validating the possible heterotic groups identified through the genetic distance and grouping methods.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/2546
url https://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/2546
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/2546/1211
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 CERNE
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 CERNE
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv CERNE
CERNE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv CERNE
CERNE
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv CERNE; Vol 26 No 4 (2020); 414-426
CERNE; Vol 26 No 4 (2020); 414-426
2317-6342
0104-7760
reponame:Cerne (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Cerne (Online)
collection Cerne (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cerne (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cerne@dcf.ufla.br||cerne@dcf.ufla.br
_version_ 1799874944191954944