Progress of cercopora leaf spot in coffee under different irrigation management systems and planting densities

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paiva, Bernardo Reis Teixeira Lacerda
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: De Souza, Paulo Estevão, Scalco, Myriane Stella, Monteiro, Fernando Pereira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Coffee Science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/391
Resumo: Irrigation and density are practices that change the microclimate of the crop and affect the incidence of light, temperature and relative humidity and, thus, the intensity of diseases in coffee. Therefore, quantifying the influence of these practices on disease progress is useful in making decisions regarding their appropriate management. This study evaluated the effect of different planting densities and irrigation management practices on the incidence and severity of Cercospora leaf spot on adult coffee plants, and irrigation and planting density practices were related to progress of the disease and plant leaf development. A randomized block experimental design was used with four replications in a split-plot arrangement. The treatments consisted of four planting densities located in the plots (conventional and dense): 2500 (4.0 x 1.0 m), 3333 (3.0 x1.0 m), 5000 (2.0 x 1.0 m) and 10,000 (2.0 x 0.5 m) plants.ha-1, and four irrigation management practices (split-plots), which were: irrigation when soil water tension reached values near 20kPa; irrigation when soil water tension reached values near 60 kPa; irrigation management using the climatic water balance (calculated by the software Irriplus); and a control without irrigation. Each row in the split-plot consisted of 10 plants, with the six center plants being considered as useful. It was foundthat irrigation management influences the incidence of Cercospora leaf spot and leaf formation; in non-irrigated plants the incidence of Cercospora leaf spot was 30% greater than in the irrigated managements. The foliage had values close to 1000 as the area under the disease progress curve. In regression analysis of the area under the severity and incidence progress curve, the quadratic model gave the best fit, with the following equations: y=0.000004x2-0.0137x+192.05 (R2=0.6901) and y=0.000014x2-0.4048x+5943.7 (R2=0.6086), respectively. The minimum value of the area under the severity progress curve was obtained when using a density of approximately 7500 plants per hectare. The maximum value was obtained when using the density of 1712.5 plants per hectare. For the area under the incidence progress curve, similar results were obtained. High planting density systems of 10,000 plants/ha and 5,000 plants/ha reduced the incidence of Cercospora leaf spot by 35% and 31.5%, respectively. Planting density did not affect leaf development.
id UFLA-4_c2add07cf0a0484e1869f184d40fc275
oai_identifier_str oai:coffeescience.ufla.br:article/391
network_acronym_str UFLA-4
network_name_str Coffee Science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Progress of cercopora leaf spot in coffee under different irrigation management systems and planting densitiesProgresso da cercosporiose do cafeeiro sob diferentes manejos de irrigação e densidades de plantioCercospora coffeicolaEpidemiologyPlant PathologyCoffea arabicaCercospora coffeicolaÁrea abaixo da curva de progressoDoençaCaféIrrigation and density are practices that change the microclimate of the crop and affect the incidence of light, temperature and relative humidity and, thus, the intensity of diseases in coffee. Therefore, quantifying the influence of these practices on disease progress is useful in making decisions regarding their appropriate management. This study evaluated the effect of different planting densities and irrigation management practices on the incidence and severity of Cercospora leaf spot on adult coffee plants, and irrigation and planting density practices were related to progress of the disease and plant leaf development. A randomized block experimental design was used with four replications in a split-plot arrangement. The treatments consisted of four planting densities located in the plots (conventional and dense): 2500 (4.0 x 1.0 m), 3333 (3.0 x1.0 m), 5000 (2.0 x 1.0 m) and 10,000 (2.0 x 0.5 m) plants.ha-1, and four irrigation management practices (split-plots), which were: irrigation when soil water tension reached values near 20kPa; irrigation when soil water tension reached values near 60 kPa; irrigation management using the climatic water balance (calculated by the software Irriplus); and a control without irrigation. Each row in the split-plot consisted of 10 plants, with the six center plants being considered as useful. It was foundthat irrigation management influences the incidence of Cercospora leaf spot and leaf formation; in non-irrigated plants the incidence of Cercospora leaf spot was 30% greater than in the irrigated managements. The foliage had values close to 1000 as the area under the disease progress curve. In regression analysis of the area under the severity and incidence progress curve, the quadratic model gave the best fit, with the following equations: y=0.000004x2-0.0137x+192.05 (R2=0.6901) and y=0.000014x2-0.4048x+5943.7 (R2=0.6086), respectively. The minimum value of the area under the severity progress curve was obtained when using a density of approximately 7500 plants per hectare. The maximum value was obtained when using the density of 1712.5 plants per hectare. For the area under the incidence progress curve, similar results were obtained. High planting density systems of 10,000 plants/ha and 5,000 plants/ha reduced the incidence of Cercospora leaf spot by 35% and 31.5%, respectively. Planting density did not affect leaf development.A irrigação assim como o adensamento são práticas que alteram o microclima da cultura, as quais interferem na luminosidade, na temperatura e na umidade relativa do ar e, por consequência, na intensidade de doenças no cafeeiro. Por isso, quantificar a influência dessas práticas no progresso das doenças torna-se útil na tomada de decisão sobre o seu manejo adequado. Avaliou-se, no presente trabalho, o efeito de diferentes densidades de plantio e manejos de irrigação na incidência e na severidade da cercosporiose em cafeeiros adultos e relacionaram-se manejos de irrigação e densidades de plantio ao progresso da doença e enfolhamento da planta. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetições, em esquema de parcelas subdivididas. Os tratamentos foram constituídos por quatro densidades de plantio localizadas nas parcelas: 2.500 (4,0 x 1,0m), 3.333 (3,0 x 1,0m), 5.000 (2,0 x 1,0m) e 10.000 (2,0 x 0,5m) plantas.ha-1 e quatro manejos de irrigação (subparcelas), sendo:irrigação quando a tensão da água no solo atingiu valores próximos a 20kPa; irrigação quando a tensão da água no solo atingiu valores próximos a 60kPa; irrigação com a utilização de manejo do balanço hídrico climatológico (calculado por meio do software Irriplus) e uma testemunha não irrigada. Cada linha da subparcela foi constituída por 10 plantas, sendo consideradas como plantas úteis as seis centrais. Verificou-se que os manejos de irrigação influenciaram a incidência da cercosporiose e o enfolhamento, sendo que, em plantas não irrigadas a incidência da cercosporiose foi 30% maior, que os manejos irrigados. Quanto ao enfolhamento verificou-se que os tratamentos 20kPA e 60 kPA foram 9% e 5% maior comparado ao tratamento não irrigado. O aumento mais expressivo no enfolhamento foi obtido quando empregado o manejo do balanço hídrico com um valor 13% maior que a testemunha. Na análise de regressão da área abaixo da curva do progresso da severidade e incidência, o modelo quadrático obteveo melhor ajuste, tendo as equações y=0,000004x2-0,0137x+192,05 (R2=0,6901) e y=0,000014x2-0,4048x+5943,7 (R2=0,6086), respectivamente. O valor de mínima para área abaixo da curva do progresso da severidade foi obtido quando utilizada umadensidade de 7500 plantas por hectare aproximadamente. O valor de máxima foi obtido quando empregada a densidade de 1712,5 plantas por hectare. Para a área abaixo da curva do progresso da incidência foram obtidos resultados semelhantes. Os sistemas de plantios adensados, 10.000 plantas/ha e 5.000 plantas/ha, reduziram a incidência da cercosporiose em 35% e 31,5%, respectivamente. As densidades de plantio não interferiram no enfolhamento.Editora UFLA2013-12-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/391Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2013); 166-175Coffee Science; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2013); 166-175Coffee Science; v. 8 n. 2 (2013); 166-1751984-3909reponame:Coffee Science (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLAengporhttps://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/391/pdf_144https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/391/pdf_26Copyright (c) 2013 Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909https://creativecommons.org/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaiva, Bernardo Reis Teixeira LacerdaDe Souza, Paulo EstevãoScalco, Myriane StellaMonteiro, Fernando Pereira2014-10-22T17:23:36Zoai:coffeescience.ufla.br:article/391Revistahttps://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/CoffeesciencePUBhttps://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/oaicoffeescience@dag.ufla.br||coffeescience@dag.ufla.br|| alvaro-cozadi@hotmail.com1984-39091809-6875opendoar:2024-05-21T19:53:40.436276Coffee Science (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Progress of cercopora leaf spot in coffee under different irrigation management systems and planting densities
Progresso da cercosporiose do cafeeiro sob diferentes manejos de irrigação e densidades de plantio
title Progress of cercopora leaf spot in coffee under different irrigation management systems and planting densities
spellingShingle Progress of cercopora leaf spot in coffee under different irrigation management systems and planting densities
Paiva, Bernardo Reis Teixeira Lacerda
Cercospora coffeicola
Epidemiology
Plant Pathology
Coffea arabica
Cercospora coffeicola
Área abaixo da curva de progresso
Doença
Café
title_short Progress of cercopora leaf spot in coffee under different irrigation management systems and planting densities
title_full Progress of cercopora leaf spot in coffee under different irrigation management systems and planting densities
title_fullStr Progress of cercopora leaf spot in coffee under different irrigation management systems and planting densities
title_full_unstemmed Progress of cercopora leaf spot in coffee under different irrigation management systems and planting densities
title_sort Progress of cercopora leaf spot in coffee under different irrigation management systems and planting densities
author Paiva, Bernardo Reis Teixeira Lacerda
author_facet Paiva, Bernardo Reis Teixeira Lacerda
De Souza, Paulo Estevão
Scalco, Myriane Stella
Monteiro, Fernando Pereira
author_role author
author2 De Souza, Paulo Estevão
Scalco, Myriane Stella
Monteiro, Fernando Pereira
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paiva, Bernardo Reis Teixeira Lacerda
De Souza, Paulo Estevão
Scalco, Myriane Stella
Monteiro, Fernando Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cercospora coffeicola
Epidemiology
Plant Pathology
Coffea arabica
Cercospora coffeicola
Área abaixo da curva de progresso
Doença
Café
topic Cercospora coffeicola
Epidemiology
Plant Pathology
Coffea arabica
Cercospora coffeicola
Área abaixo da curva de progresso
Doença
Café
description Irrigation and density are practices that change the microclimate of the crop and affect the incidence of light, temperature and relative humidity and, thus, the intensity of diseases in coffee. Therefore, quantifying the influence of these practices on disease progress is useful in making decisions regarding their appropriate management. This study evaluated the effect of different planting densities and irrigation management practices on the incidence and severity of Cercospora leaf spot on adult coffee plants, and irrigation and planting density practices were related to progress of the disease and plant leaf development. A randomized block experimental design was used with four replications in a split-plot arrangement. The treatments consisted of four planting densities located in the plots (conventional and dense): 2500 (4.0 x 1.0 m), 3333 (3.0 x1.0 m), 5000 (2.0 x 1.0 m) and 10,000 (2.0 x 0.5 m) plants.ha-1, and four irrigation management practices (split-plots), which were: irrigation when soil water tension reached values near 20kPa; irrigation when soil water tension reached values near 60 kPa; irrigation management using the climatic water balance (calculated by the software Irriplus); and a control without irrigation. Each row in the split-plot consisted of 10 plants, with the six center plants being considered as useful. It was foundthat irrigation management influences the incidence of Cercospora leaf spot and leaf formation; in non-irrigated plants the incidence of Cercospora leaf spot was 30% greater than in the irrigated managements. The foliage had values close to 1000 as the area under the disease progress curve. In regression analysis of the area under the severity and incidence progress curve, the quadratic model gave the best fit, with the following equations: y=0.000004x2-0.0137x+192.05 (R2=0.6901) and y=0.000014x2-0.4048x+5943.7 (R2=0.6086), respectively. The minimum value of the area under the severity progress curve was obtained when using a density of approximately 7500 plants per hectare. The maximum value was obtained when using the density of 1712.5 plants per hectare. For the area under the incidence progress curve, similar results were obtained. High planting density systems of 10,000 plants/ha and 5,000 plants/ha reduced the incidence of Cercospora leaf spot by 35% and 31.5%, respectively. Planting density did not affect leaf development.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/391
url https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/391
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/391/pdf_144
https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/391/pdf_26
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909
https://creativecommons.org/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909
https://creativecommons.org/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora UFLA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora UFLA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2013); 166-175
Coffee Science; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2013); 166-175
Coffee Science; v. 8 n. 2 (2013); 166-175
1984-3909
reponame:Coffee Science (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Coffee Science (Online)
collection Coffee Science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coffee Science (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coffeescience@dag.ufla.br||coffeescience@dag.ufla.br|| alvaro-cozadi@hotmail.com
_version_ 1799874919091142656