Biodiversity assessments: origin matters

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pauchard, Aníbal
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Meyerson, Laura A., Bacher, Sven, Blackburn, Tim M., Brundu, Giuseppe, Cadotte, Marc W., Courchamp, Franck, Essl, Franz, Genovesi, Piero, Haider, Sylvia, Holmes, Nick D., Hulme, Philip E., Jeschke, Jonathan M., Lockwood, Julie L., Novoa, Ana, A. Nuñez, Martin, Peltzer, Duane A., Pyšek, Petr, Richardson, David M., Simberloff, Daniel, Smith, Kevin, van Wilgen, Brian W., Vilà, Montserrat, Wilson, John R. U., Winter, Marten, Zenni, Rafael D.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFLA
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/33989
Resumo: Recent global efforts in biodiversity accounting, such as those undertaken through the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), are vital if we are to track conservation progress, ensure that we can address the challenges of global change, and develop powerful and scientifically sound indicators. Schlaepfer [1] proposes that we should work toward inventories of biodiversity that account for native and non-native species regardless of species origin and ecological context. We strongly disagree with the approach of combining counts of native and non-native species because this will reduce our capacity to detect the effects of non-native species on native biodiversity with potentially devastating consequences. Compelling and abundant evidence demonstrates that some non-native species can become invasive and produce major ecosystem disruptions and even native species extinction. Unfortunately, we still cannot be certain which non-native species will be the most detrimental (e.g., [2]). Combining native and non-native species together into a single biodiversity index would not only inflate biodiversity estimates and risk promoting the spread of invasive non-native species but would also ignore the fundamental ecological differences between the two groups. The critical differences that should be considered when assessing biodiversity include the following.
id UFLA_00967d85c3bfb7fbcc212b5e593a0516
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:1/33989
network_acronym_str UFLA
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFLA
repository_id_str
spelling Biodiversity assessments: origin mattersConservationGlobal changeBiodiversity inventoriesRecent global efforts in biodiversity accounting, such as those undertaken through the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), are vital if we are to track conservation progress, ensure that we can address the challenges of global change, and develop powerful and scientifically sound indicators. Schlaepfer [1] proposes that we should work toward inventories of biodiversity that account for native and non-native species regardless of species origin and ecological context. We strongly disagree with the approach of combining counts of native and non-native species because this will reduce our capacity to detect the effects of non-native species on native biodiversity with potentially devastating consequences. Compelling and abundant evidence demonstrates that some non-native species can become invasive and produce major ecosystem disruptions and even native species extinction. Unfortunately, we still cannot be certain which non-native species will be the most detrimental (e.g., [2]). Combining native and non-native species together into a single biodiversity index would not only inflate biodiversity estimates and risk promoting the spread of invasive non-native species but would also ignore the fundamental ecological differences between the two groups. The critical differences that should be considered when assessing biodiversity include the following.PLOS2019-05-03T19:54:43Z2019-05-03T19:54:43Z2018-11-13info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfPAUCHARD, A. et al. Biodiversity assessments: origin matters. PLoS Biology, [S.l.], v. 16, n. 11, p. 1-4, Nov. 2018. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006686.http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/33989PLoS Biologyreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFLAinstname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLAAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPauchard, AníbalMeyerson, Laura A.Bacher, SvenBlackburn, Tim M.Brundu, GiuseppeCadotte, Marc W.Courchamp, FranckEssl, FranzGenovesi, PieroHaider, SylviaHolmes, Nick D.Hulme, Philip E.Jeschke, Jonathan M.Lockwood, Julie L.Novoa, AnaA. Nuñez, MartinPeltzer, Duane A.Pyšek, PetrRichardson, David M.Simberloff, DanielSmith, Kevinvan Wilgen, Brian W.Vilà, MontserratWilson, John R. U.Winter, MartenZenni, Rafael D.eng2019-05-03T19:55:31Zoai:localhost:1/33989Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ufla.br/oai/requestnivaldo@ufla.br || repositorio.biblioteca@ufla.bropendoar:2019-05-03T19:55:31Repositório Institucional da UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biodiversity assessments: origin matters
title Biodiversity assessments: origin matters
spellingShingle Biodiversity assessments: origin matters
Pauchard, Aníbal
Conservation
Global change
Biodiversity inventories
title_short Biodiversity assessments: origin matters
title_full Biodiversity assessments: origin matters
title_fullStr Biodiversity assessments: origin matters
title_full_unstemmed Biodiversity assessments: origin matters
title_sort Biodiversity assessments: origin matters
author Pauchard, Aníbal
author_facet Pauchard, Aníbal
Meyerson, Laura A.
Bacher, Sven
Blackburn, Tim M.
Brundu, Giuseppe
Cadotte, Marc W.
Courchamp, Franck
Essl, Franz
Genovesi, Piero
Haider, Sylvia
Holmes, Nick D.
Hulme, Philip E.
Jeschke, Jonathan M.
Lockwood, Julie L.
Novoa, Ana
A. Nuñez, Martin
Peltzer, Duane A.
Pyšek, Petr
Richardson, David M.
Simberloff, Daniel
Smith, Kevin
van Wilgen, Brian W.
Vilà, Montserrat
Wilson, John R. U.
Winter, Marten
Zenni, Rafael D.
author_role author
author2 Meyerson, Laura A.
Bacher, Sven
Blackburn, Tim M.
Brundu, Giuseppe
Cadotte, Marc W.
Courchamp, Franck
Essl, Franz
Genovesi, Piero
Haider, Sylvia
Holmes, Nick D.
Hulme, Philip E.
Jeschke, Jonathan M.
Lockwood, Julie L.
Novoa, Ana
A. Nuñez, Martin
Peltzer, Duane A.
Pyšek, Petr
Richardson, David M.
Simberloff, Daniel
Smith, Kevin
van Wilgen, Brian W.
Vilà, Montserrat
Wilson, John R. U.
Winter, Marten
Zenni, Rafael D.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pauchard, Aníbal
Meyerson, Laura A.
Bacher, Sven
Blackburn, Tim M.
Brundu, Giuseppe
Cadotte, Marc W.
Courchamp, Franck
Essl, Franz
Genovesi, Piero
Haider, Sylvia
Holmes, Nick D.
Hulme, Philip E.
Jeschke, Jonathan M.
Lockwood, Julie L.
Novoa, Ana
A. Nuñez, Martin
Peltzer, Duane A.
Pyšek, Petr
Richardson, David M.
Simberloff, Daniel
Smith, Kevin
van Wilgen, Brian W.
Vilà, Montserrat
Wilson, John R. U.
Winter, Marten
Zenni, Rafael D.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Conservation
Global change
Biodiversity inventories
topic Conservation
Global change
Biodiversity inventories
description Recent global efforts in biodiversity accounting, such as those undertaken through the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), are vital if we are to track conservation progress, ensure that we can address the challenges of global change, and develop powerful and scientifically sound indicators. Schlaepfer [1] proposes that we should work toward inventories of biodiversity that account for native and non-native species regardless of species origin and ecological context. We strongly disagree with the approach of combining counts of native and non-native species because this will reduce our capacity to detect the effects of non-native species on native biodiversity with potentially devastating consequences. Compelling and abundant evidence demonstrates that some non-native species can become invasive and produce major ecosystem disruptions and even native species extinction. Unfortunately, we still cannot be certain which non-native species will be the most detrimental (e.g., [2]). Combining native and non-native species together into a single biodiversity index would not only inflate biodiversity estimates and risk promoting the spread of invasive non-native species but would also ignore the fundamental ecological differences between the two groups. The critical differences that should be considered when assessing biodiversity include the following.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-13
2019-05-03T19:54:43Z
2019-05-03T19:54:43Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv PAUCHARD, A. et al. Biodiversity assessments: origin matters. PLoS Biology, [S.l.], v. 16, n. 11, p. 1-4, Nov. 2018. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006686.
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/33989
identifier_str_mv PAUCHARD, A. et al. Biodiversity assessments: origin matters. PLoS Biology, [S.l.], v. 16, n. 11, p. 1-4, Nov. 2018. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006686.
url http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/33989
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PLOS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PLOS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv PLoS Biology
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFLA
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFLA
collection Repositório Institucional da UFLA
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv nivaldo@ufla.br || repositorio.biblioteca@ufla.br
_version_ 1815439319082467328