Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cazedey, Henrique Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Torres Filho, Robledo de Almeida, Fontes, Paulo Rogério, Ramos, Alcinéia de Lemos Souza, Ramos, Eduardo Mendes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFLA
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/30294
Resumo: Pork may be classified into quality categories according to its color, texture and exudation, though no international consensus criterion has been reached yet. Thus, the aim of the present paper was to examine the relation between important meat quality traits, evaluating pork quality classification of a same data by different criteria proposed in the literature. In 60 pork loins (Longissimus thoracis muscle), initial pH (pH45min) and R-value were evaluated after 45min post mortem between the 9th and 10th ribs, and ultimate pH (pH24h), objective color and water-holding capacity were evaluated 24h post mortem in two 2.54cm thick steaks cut between the 9th and 11th ribs to be classified into PSE (pale, soft and exudative), RSE (reddish-pink, soft and exudative), RFN (reddish-pink, firm and non-exudative) or DFD (dark, firm and dry) quality. Frequency distributions of quality categories differed (P<0.001) among criteria, which resulted in large variations: 3 to 68% PSE; 0 to 73% RSE; 5 to 68% RFN; 0 to 22% DFD; and 0 to 33% unclassified samples. A same sample may be classified into different quality categories according to the criterion utilized, which results in large variations in frequency distributions and also in quality attributes. Therefore, the classification of pork quality depends on the adopted criterion, which indicated the need for international standardization, so that pork quality can be determined efficiently and effectively.
id UFLA_7211234b258cc77ab9a8c900070ca3fd
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:1/30294
network_acronym_str UFLA
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFLA
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of porkComparação de diferentes critérios utilizados para classificar a qualidade tecnológica da carne suínaPork - ColorPork - ExudationCarne suína - CorCarne suína - ExsudaçãoPork may be classified into quality categories according to its color, texture and exudation, though no international consensus criterion has been reached yet. Thus, the aim of the present paper was to examine the relation between important meat quality traits, evaluating pork quality classification of a same data by different criteria proposed in the literature. In 60 pork loins (Longissimus thoracis muscle), initial pH (pH45min) and R-value were evaluated after 45min post mortem between the 9th and 10th ribs, and ultimate pH (pH24h), objective color and water-holding capacity were evaluated 24h post mortem in two 2.54cm thick steaks cut between the 9th and 11th ribs to be classified into PSE (pale, soft and exudative), RSE (reddish-pink, soft and exudative), RFN (reddish-pink, firm and non-exudative) or DFD (dark, firm and dry) quality. Frequency distributions of quality categories differed (P<0.001) among criteria, which resulted in large variations: 3 to 68% PSE; 0 to 73% RSE; 5 to 68% RFN; 0 to 22% DFD; and 0 to 33% unclassified samples. A same sample may be classified into different quality categories according to the criterion utilized, which results in large variations in frequency distributions and also in quality attributes. Therefore, the classification of pork quality depends on the adopted criterion, which indicated the need for international standardization, so that pork quality can be determined efficiently and effectively.A carne suína pode ser classificada em categorias de qualidade de acordo com sua cor, textura e exsudação, embora ainda não exista um critério internacional consensual. Desse modo, o objetivo do presente artigo foi verificar a relação entre importantes características de qualidade de carne, avaliando a classificação da qualidade da carne suína de um mesmo banco de dados por diferentes critérios propostos na literatura. Em 60 lombos (músculo Longissimus thoracis), pH inicial (pH45min) e Valor R, foram avaliados 45 minutos post mortem entre a 9a e a 10a costelas, e pH final (pH24h), cor objetiva e capacidade de retenção de água foram avaliados 24 horas post mortem, em dois bifes, com 2,54cm de espessura, cortados, entre a 9a e a 11a costelas, para serem classificados como PSE (pálida, flácida e exsudativa), RSE (vermelho-rosada, flácida e exsudativa), RFN (vermelho-rosada, firme e não-exsudativa) ou DFD (escura, firme e seca). As distribuições de frequência das categorias de qualidade diferiram (P<0,001) entre os critérios, resultando em grandes variações: 3 a 68% PSE; 0 a 73% RSE; 5 a 68% RFN; 0 a 22% DFD; e 0 a 33% de amostras não classificadas. Uma mesma amostra pode ser classificada em diferentes categorias de qualidade, de acordo com o critério utilizado, o que resulta em grandes variações nas distribuições de frequência e também nos atributos de qualidade. Portanto, a classificação da qualidade da carne suína é dependente do critério adotado, evidenciando a necessidade de uma padronização internacional para a identificação eficiente e eficaz da qualidade da carne suína.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2018-08-30T17:49:21Z2018-08-30T17:49:21Z2016-12info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfCAZEDEY, H. P. et al. Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v. 46, n. 12, p. 2241-2248, dez. 2016.http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/30294Ciência Ruralreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFLAinstname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLAAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCazedey, Henrique PereiraTorres Filho, Robledo de AlmeidaFontes, Paulo RogérioRamos, Alcinéia de Lemos SouzaRamos, Eduardo Mendespor2018-08-30T17:49:22Zoai:localhost:1/30294Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ufla.br/oai/requestnivaldo@ufla.br || repositorio.biblioteca@ufla.bropendoar:2018-08-30T17:49:22Repositório Institucional da UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
Comparação de diferentes critérios utilizados para classificar a qualidade tecnológica da carne suína
title Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
spellingShingle Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
Cazedey, Henrique Pereira
Pork - Color
Pork - Exudation
Carne suína - Cor
Carne suína - Exsudação
title_short Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
title_full Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
title_fullStr Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
title_sort Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
author Cazedey, Henrique Pereira
author_facet Cazedey, Henrique Pereira
Torres Filho, Robledo de Almeida
Fontes, Paulo Rogério
Ramos, Alcinéia de Lemos Souza
Ramos, Eduardo Mendes
author_role author
author2 Torres Filho, Robledo de Almeida
Fontes, Paulo Rogério
Ramos, Alcinéia de Lemos Souza
Ramos, Eduardo Mendes
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cazedey, Henrique Pereira
Torres Filho, Robledo de Almeida
Fontes, Paulo Rogério
Ramos, Alcinéia de Lemos Souza
Ramos, Eduardo Mendes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pork - Color
Pork - Exudation
Carne suína - Cor
Carne suína - Exsudação
topic Pork - Color
Pork - Exudation
Carne suína - Cor
Carne suína - Exsudação
description Pork may be classified into quality categories according to its color, texture and exudation, though no international consensus criterion has been reached yet. Thus, the aim of the present paper was to examine the relation between important meat quality traits, evaluating pork quality classification of a same data by different criteria proposed in the literature. In 60 pork loins (Longissimus thoracis muscle), initial pH (pH45min) and R-value were evaluated after 45min post mortem between the 9th and 10th ribs, and ultimate pH (pH24h), objective color and water-holding capacity were evaluated 24h post mortem in two 2.54cm thick steaks cut between the 9th and 11th ribs to be classified into PSE (pale, soft and exudative), RSE (reddish-pink, soft and exudative), RFN (reddish-pink, firm and non-exudative) or DFD (dark, firm and dry) quality. Frequency distributions of quality categories differed (P<0.001) among criteria, which resulted in large variations: 3 to 68% PSE; 0 to 73% RSE; 5 to 68% RFN; 0 to 22% DFD; and 0 to 33% unclassified samples. A same sample may be classified into different quality categories according to the criterion utilized, which results in large variations in frequency distributions and also in quality attributes. Therefore, the classification of pork quality depends on the adopted criterion, which indicated the need for international standardization, so that pork quality can be determined efficiently and effectively.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12
2018-08-30T17:49:21Z
2018-08-30T17:49:21Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv CAZEDEY, H. P. et al. Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v. 46, n. 12, p. 2241-2248, dez. 2016.
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/30294
identifier_str_mv CAZEDEY, H. P. et al. Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v. 46, n. 12, p. 2241-2248, dez. 2016.
url http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/30294
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Rural
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFLA
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFLA
collection Repositório Institucional da UFLA
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv nivaldo@ufla.br || repositorio.biblioteca@ufla.br
_version_ 1807835197898489856