O STJ e a jurisprudência ambiental: entre avanços e retrocessos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Navarro, Gabriela Cristina Braga
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFLA
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/37224
Resumo: The purpose of this article is to demonstrate inconsistencies in decisions about environmental law, based on the paradigmatic case of environmental moral damage in the Superior Court of Justice (STJ). Through the chronological analysis of various decisions, it was observed that there is a disparity between the decisions of the two sections of STJ responsible for judging environmental controversies. While a section accept the moral damages based on the application of the principle in dubio pro natura, another section believes that the feeling of pain is individual and therefore incompatible with the environmental damage. There was also the use of procedural and formal arguments to rule out even considering the merits of the matter. The article concludes with the need for a fundamental change in the interpretive paradigm concerning jus-ecological conflicts, from an individualist, patrimonial and anthropocentric bias to a transindividualist and extrapatrimonial bias
id UFLA_72a704e743a745e02b2be0643cb836ec
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:1/37224
network_acronym_str UFLA
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFLA
repository_id_str
spelling O STJ e a jurisprudência ambiental: entre avanços e retrocessosThe STJ and the environmental decisions: in betwen developments and regressionsJurisprudência ambientalDireito ambientalDano extrapatrimonialParadigma hermenêuticoSuperior Tribunal de JustiçaEnvironmental court decisionsEnvironmental lawMoral damageHermeneutic paradigmThe purpose of this article is to demonstrate inconsistencies in decisions about environmental law, based on the paradigmatic case of environmental moral damage in the Superior Court of Justice (STJ). Through the chronological analysis of various decisions, it was observed that there is a disparity between the decisions of the two sections of STJ responsible for judging environmental controversies. While a section accept the moral damages based on the application of the principle in dubio pro natura, another section believes that the feeling of pain is individual and therefore incompatible with the environmental damage. There was also the use of procedural and formal arguments to rule out even considering the merits of the matter. The article concludes with the need for a fundamental change in the interpretive paradigm concerning jus-ecological conflicts, from an individualist, patrimonial and anthropocentric bias to a transindividualist and extrapatrimonial biasO objetivo do trabalho é demonstrar eventuais incoerências nas decisões acerca do direito ambiental, tendo por base o caso paradigmático do dano extrapatrimonial ambiental no Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ). Através da análise cronológica de diversas decisões, verificou-se que existe uma disparidade entre as decisões das duas turmas do STJ responsáveis pelo julgamento de lides ambientais. Enquanto uma turma entende possível o dano moral, com base na aplicação do princípio in dubio pro natura, outra turma entende que o sentimento de dor é individual e, portanto, incompatível com o dano ambiental. Verificou-se também a utilização de argumentos procedimentais e formais para afastar inclusive a análise do mérito da questão. Conclui-se pela necessidade de uma modificação profunda no paradigma interpretativo relativo a conflitos jus-ecológicos, passando de um viés individualista, patrimonialista e antropocêntrico para um viés transindividual e extrapatrimonial.Universidade Estadual Paulista2019-10-14T19:20:42Z2019-10-14T19:20:42Z2014info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfNAVARRO, G. C. B. O STJ e a jurisprudência ambiental: entre avanços e retrocessos. Revista de Estudos Jurídicos UNESP, [S.l.], v. 18, n. 27, 2014.http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/37224Revista de Estudos Jurídicos UNESPreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFLAinstname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLAAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNavarro, Gabriela Cristina Bragapor2023-03-20T11:16:22Zoai:localhost:1/37224Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ufla.br/oai/requestnivaldo@ufla.br || repositorio.biblioteca@ufla.bropendoar:2023-03-20T11:16:22Repositório Institucional da UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv O STJ e a jurisprudência ambiental: entre avanços e retrocessos
The STJ and the environmental decisions: in betwen developments and regressions
title O STJ e a jurisprudência ambiental: entre avanços e retrocessos
spellingShingle O STJ e a jurisprudência ambiental: entre avanços e retrocessos
Navarro, Gabriela Cristina Braga
Jurisprudência ambiental
Direito ambiental
Dano extrapatrimonial
Paradigma hermenêutico
Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Environmental court decisions
Environmental law
Moral damage
Hermeneutic paradigm
title_short O STJ e a jurisprudência ambiental: entre avanços e retrocessos
title_full O STJ e a jurisprudência ambiental: entre avanços e retrocessos
title_fullStr O STJ e a jurisprudência ambiental: entre avanços e retrocessos
title_full_unstemmed O STJ e a jurisprudência ambiental: entre avanços e retrocessos
title_sort O STJ e a jurisprudência ambiental: entre avanços e retrocessos
author Navarro, Gabriela Cristina Braga
author_facet Navarro, Gabriela Cristina Braga
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Navarro, Gabriela Cristina Braga
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Jurisprudência ambiental
Direito ambiental
Dano extrapatrimonial
Paradigma hermenêutico
Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Environmental court decisions
Environmental law
Moral damage
Hermeneutic paradigm
topic Jurisprudência ambiental
Direito ambiental
Dano extrapatrimonial
Paradigma hermenêutico
Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Environmental court decisions
Environmental law
Moral damage
Hermeneutic paradigm
description The purpose of this article is to demonstrate inconsistencies in decisions about environmental law, based on the paradigmatic case of environmental moral damage in the Superior Court of Justice (STJ). Through the chronological analysis of various decisions, it was observed that there is a disparity between the decisions of the two sections of STJ responsible for judging environmental controversies. While a section accept the moral damages based on the application of the principle in dubio pro natura, another section believes that the feeling of pain is individual and therefore incompatible with the environmental damage. There was also the use of procedural and formal arguments to rule out even considering the merits of the matter. The article concludes with the need for a fundamental change in the interpretive paradigm concerning jus-ecological conflicts, from an individualist, patrimonial and anthropocentric bias to a transindividualist and extrapatrimonial bias
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014
2019-10-14T19:20:42Z
2019-10-14T19:20:42Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv NAVARRO, G. C. B. O STJ e a jurisprudência ambiental: entre avanços e retrocessos. Revista de Estudos Jurídicos UNESP, [S.l.], v. 18, n. 27, 2014.
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/37224
identifier_str_mv NAVARRO, G. C. B. O STJ e a jurisprudência ambiental: entre avanços e retrocessos. Revista de Estudos Jurídicos UNESP, [S.l.], v. 18, n. 27, 2014.
url http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/37224
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Estudos Jurídicos UNESP
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFLA
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFLA
collection Repositório Institucional da UFLA
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv nivaldo@ufla.br || repositorio.biblioteca@ufla.br
_version_ 1784550123745837056

Registros relacionados